:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:政黨雙歧不確定的糾結:成因、決策過程、媒體接收與行為意向
書刊名:中華傳播學刊
作者:張卿卿 引用關係
作者(外文):Chang, Chingching
出版日期:2017
卷期:32
頁次:頁167-202
主題關鍵詞:2016總統大選投票決策投票意向應對策略選舉新聞雙歧選民2016 presidential electionDecision strategiesVoting intentionElection news receivingAmbivalent voters
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:103
  • 點閱點閱:24
以傳播調查資料庫於2016 年總統大選期間所進行的面訪調查資料作為基礎,本文探索政黨雙歧態度的成因、雙歧選民在選舉中的決策過程、競選新聞接收,及其投票行為意向。從不確定觀點出發,點出三個面向的不確定觸發政黨雙歧態度。其次,探索雙歧者的投票決策過程,包括決策困難度、政策投票與選人不選黨策略。此外,探索雙歧者的競選新聞接收行為。最後,從「雙歧不安應對策略模式」出發,探討雙歧者面對投票決策所採取的行為應對策略。
Using data from Taiwan Communication Survey conducted in 2015, this study explored the antecedents, decision strategies, media uses, and coping strategies of those who felt ambivalent toward the competing parties in Taiwan's 2016 presidential election. Party alignment, political interests, and value conflicts were observed to be negatively associated with party ambivalence. Those with greater party ambivalence had more difficulty making decisions and tended to engage in issue voting. Their decision strategy was oriented toward selecting the right candidate, rather than the right party. Moreover, ambivalent voters read more newspapers and were more likely to avoid news channels with clear party biases during the campaign period. Finally, ambivalent voters intended to avoid voting and expressed a greater intention to engage in split-ticket voting and to vote for the projected winner.
期刊論文
1.Gilovich, T.、Medvec, V. H.(1994)。The temporal pattern to the experience of regret。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,67,357-365。  new window
2.Gilovich, T.、Medvec, V. H.(1995)。The experience of regret: What, when, and why。Psychological Review,102(2),379-395。  new window
3.Alvarez, R. Michael、Brehm, John(1995)。American Ambivalence Towards Abortion Policy: Development of a Heteroskedastic Probit Model of Competing Values。American Journal of Political Science,39(4),1055-1082。  new window
4.Bell, D. W.、Esses, V. M.(2002)。Ambivalence and response amplification: A motivational perspective。Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,28,1143-1152。  new window
5.Chang, C.(2012)。Ambivalent attitudes in a communication process: An integrated model。Human Communication Research,38(3),332-359。  new window
6.Iyengar, Shanto、Hahn, Kyu S.(2009)。Red media, blue media: Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use。Journal of Communication,59(1),19-39。  new window
7.Yoo, S. J.(2010)。Two Types of Neutrality: Ambivalence versus Indifference and Political Participation。The Journal of Politics,72(1),163-177。  new window
8.Sparks, P.、Hedderley, D.、Shepherd, R.(1992)。An Investigation into the Relationship between Perceived Control, Attitude Variability and the Consumption of Two Common Foods。European Journal of Social Psychology,22,55-71。  new window
9.Basinger, S. J.、Lavine, H.(2005)。Ambivalence, information, and electoral choice。The American Political Science Review,99,169-184。  new window
10.Cacioppo, J. T.、Gardner, W. L.、Berntson, G. G.(1997)。Beyond bipolar conceptualizations and measures: The case of attitudes and evaluative space。Personality and Social Psychology Review,1(1),3-25。  new window
11.Bargh, J. A.、Chaiken, S.、Govender, R.、Pratto, F.(1992)。The generality of the automatic attitude activation effect。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,62,893-912。  new window
12.Armitage, C. J.、Conner, M.(2000)。Attitudinal Ambivalence: A Test of Three Key Hypotheses。Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin,26(11),1421-1432。  new window
13.Drolet, A. L.、Morrison, D. G.(2001)。Do we really need multiple-item measures in service research?。Journal of service research,3(3),196-204。  new window
14.Kaplan, K. J.(1972)。On the ambivalence-indifference problem in attitude theory and measurement: A suggested modification of the semantic differential technique。Psychological Bulletin,77(5),361-372。  new window
15.Rossiter, J. R.(2002)。The C-OAR-SE procedure for scale development in marketing。International Journal of Research in Marketing,19(4),305-335。  new window
16.黃紀(20011200)。一致與分裂投票:方法論之探討。人文及社會科學集刊,13(3),541-574。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.Keele, Luke、Wolak, Jennifer(2006)。Value Conflict and Volatility in Party Identification。British Journal of Political Science,36(4),671-690。  new window
18.Landman, J.(1987)。Regret and Elation Following Action and Inaction: Affective Responses to Positive Versus Negative Outcomes。Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,13(4),524-536。  new window
19.Greenwald, A. G.、Banaji, M. R.(1995)。Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes。Psychological Review,102(1),4-27。  new window
20.Dilliplane, Susanna(2011)。All the News You Want to Hear: The Impact of Partisan News Exposure on Political Participation。Public Opinion Quarterly,75(2),287-316。  new window
21.Bergkvist, L.、Rossiter, J. R.(2007)。The predictive validity of multipleitem versus single-item measures of the same constructs。Journal of Marketing Research,44(2),175-184。  new window
22.Newby-Clark, I. R.、McGregor, I.、Zanna, M. P.(2002)。Thinking and caring about cognitive inconsistency: When and for whom does attitudinal ambivalence feel uncomfortable?。Journal of personality and social psychology,82(2),157-166。  new window
23.Davis, N. T.(2015)。The role of indifference in split-ticket voting。Political Behavior,37,67-86。  new window
24.Chang, C.、Wei, R.、Lo, V.-H.(2014)。Ambivalent versus univalent voters: Perceived media influences and third-person perceptions。Media Psychology,17,420-450。  new window
25.Feldman, Stanley、Zaller, John(1992)。The political culture of ambivalence: Ideological responses to the welfare state。American Journal of Political Science,36(1),268-307。  new window
26.Greene, S.(2005)。The structure of partisan attitudes: Reexamining partisan dimensionality and ambivalence。Political Psychology,26,809-822。  new window
27.Has, R. G.、Katz, I.、Rizzo, N.、Bailey, J.、Moore, L.(1992)。When racial ambivalence evokes negative affect, using a disguised measure of mood。Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,18,786-797。  new window
28.Johnson, A. A.(2014)。Ambivalence, political engagement and context。Political Studies,62,502-521。  new window
29.Keele, L.、Wolak, J.(2008)。Contextual sources of ambivalence。Political Psychology,29,653-673。  new window
30.Lavine, H.(2001)。The electoral consequences of ambivalence toward presidential candidates。American Journal of Political Science,45,915-929。  new window
31.McGraw, K. M.、Hasecke, E.、Conger, K.(2003)。Ambivalence, uncertainty, and processes of candidate evaluation。Political Psychology,24,421-448。  new window
32.Mulligan, K.(2011)。Partisan ambivalence, split‐ticket voting, and divided government。Political Psychology,32(3),505-530。  new window
33.Nir, L.(2005)。Ambivalent social networks and their consequences for participation。International Journal of Public Opinion Research,17,422-442。  new window
34.Nir, L.、Druckman, J. N.(2008)。Campaign mixed-message flows and timing of vote decision。International Journal of Public Opinion Research,20,326-346。  new window
35.Priester, J. P.、Petty, R. E.(1996)。The gradual threshold model of ambivalence: Relating the positive and negative bases of attitudes to subjective ambivalence。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,71(3),431-449。  new window
36.Rudolph, T. J.(2011)。The dynamics of ambivalence。American Journal of Political Science,55(6),561-573。  new window
37.Rudolph, Thomas J.、Popp, Elizabeth(2007)。An information processing theory of ambivalence。Political Psychology,28(5),563-585。  new window
38.Thornton, J. R.(2014)。Getting lost on the way to the party: Ambivalence, indifference, and defection with evidence from two presidential elections。Social Science Quarterly,95(1),184-201。  new window
39.Tourangeau, R.、Rasinski, K. A.、Bradburn, N.、D'Andrade, R.(1989)。Belief accessibility and context effects in attitude measurement。Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,25,401-421。  new window
40.Van Harreveld, F.、Rutjens, B. T.、Rotteveel, M.、Nordgren, L. F.、Van der Pligt, J.(2009)。Ambivalence and decisional conflict as a cause of psychological discomfort: Feeling tense before jumping off the fence。Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,45,167-173。  new window
41.Van Harreveld, F.、Van der Pligt, J.、De Liver, Y. N.(2009)。The agony of ambivalence and ways to resolve it: Introducing the MAID model。Personality and Social Psychology Review,13,45-61。  new window
42.Zemborain, Martin R.、Johar, Gita V.(2007)。Attitudinal ambivalence and openness to persuasion: A framework for interpersonal influence。Journal of Consumer Research,33(4),506-514。  new window
43.吳重禮、許文賓(20030600)。誰是政黨認同者與獨立選民?--以二〇〇一年臺灣地區選民政黨認同的決定因素為例。政治科學論叢,18,101-140。new window  延伸查詢new window
44.Lodge, Milton、McGraw, Kathleen M.、Stroh, Patrick(1989)。An Impression-Driven Model of Candidate Evaluation。American Political Science Review,83(2),399-419。  new window
45.Churchill, Gilbert A. Jr.(1979)。A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs。Journal of Marketing Research,16(1),64-73。  new window
研究報告
1.黃秀端(2004)。2002年至2004年「選舉與民主化調查」三年期研究規劃(III):民國九十三年總統大選民調案 (計畫編號:NSC 92-2420-H-031-004)。臺北:行政院國家科學委員會。  延伸查詢new window
2.張卿卿、陶振超、杜素豪(2015)。臺灣傳播調查資料庫:第一期第四次調查計畫執行報告 (計畫編號:MOST 103-2420-H-004-033-SS2)。台北市:國立政治大學傳播學院廣告學系。  延伸查詢new window
3.章英華、傅仰止(2003)。台灣地區社會變遷基本調查計畫:第四期第四次調查計畫執行報告 (計畫編號:NSC 92-2420-H-001-002-B1)。臺北:中央研究院社會學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.李崑斌(2013)。選民的政治矛盾態度與分裂投票:2012年總統暨立法委員選舉的實證研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Keith, Bruce E.、Magleby, David B.、Nelson, Candice J.、Orr, Elizabeth A.、Westlye, Mark C.、Wolfinger, Raymond E.(1992)。The Myth of the Independent Voter。Berkeley, CA:University of California Press。  new window
2.Eagly, A. H.、Chaiken, S.(1993)。The Psychology of Attitudes。Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers。  new window
3.Lavine, H. G.、Johnston, C. D.、Steenbergen, M. R.(2012)。The ambivalent partisan: How critical loyalty promotes democracy。Oxford:Oxford University Press。  new window
單篇論文
1.Chang, C.(2017)。Model of behavioral strategies for coping with party ambivalence: The 2016 presidential election in Taiwan。  new window
圖書論文
1.Meffert, M. F.、Guge, M.、Lodge, M.(2004)。Good, bad, and ambivalent: The consequences of multidimensional political attitudes。Studies in public opinion: Attitudes, non-attitudes, measurement error, and change。Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press。  new window
2.Thompson, M. M.、Zanna, M. P.、Griffin, D. W.(1995)。Let's not be indifferent about (attitudinal) ambivalence。Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences。Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum。  new window
3.Steenbergen, M. R.、Brewer, P. R.(2004)。The not-so-ambivalent public: Policy attitudes in the political culture of ambivalence。Studies in public opinion: Attitudes, non-attitudes, measurement error, and change。Princeton, NJ:University of Princeton Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE