:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:並立式混合選制下兩票之連動效果:日本眾議員選舉政黨重複提名策略與成效
作者:郭銘峰 引用關係
作者(外文):Ming-Feng Kuo
校院名稱:國立臺灣大學
系所名稱:政治學研究所
指導教授:黃紀
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2011
主題關鍵詞:日本眾議員選舉小選舉區比例代表並立制重複提名制度獨立效果感染效果效應模型雙變數機率單元模型Japanese House ElectionMixed-Member Majoritarian Electoral Systems (MMM)Dual CandidacyIndependent EffectsContamination EffectsTreatment-effects modelBivariate Probit Model
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(2) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:112
混合式選制融合了多數決與比例代表兩種選制的精神,不過關於此種選制兩票架構對投票的影響,有兩種截然不同的主張:一是認為兩票各自獨立運作,其影響可以獨立估算;另一派則主張兩票抉擇會相互影響,亦即具有所謂連動效果或感染效果的存在,因此必須綜合考量兩票架構的互動關係。而日本自1996年眾議員選舉開始施行的「小選舉區比例代表並立制」,又因允許候選人在兩種選票間重複提名,使得其兩票間的連動關係益形複雜。
本文主軸鎖定於日本改採新制後的候選人重複提名規定,對於日本政壇主要政黨(包括自民黨、民主黨、社民黨)提名參選策略與其實質成效的影響。有別既有文獻分析兩票連動效果經常未顧及變項間內因性與非隨機選組機制因素,導致參數值估算偏誤的因果推論問題,本文首先爰引James J. Heckman建構之效應模型進行校估。實證結果顯示:日本各主要政黨在歷屆眾議員選舉對單一選區候選人採重複提名參選的策略,其對政黨比例代表得票率的效應會因黨、因年而異;當中包括自民黨在2009年選舉、民主黨在2003年選舉,社民黨在2000年、2005年、2009年選舉,均以重複提名策略有效提升該黨的政黨比例代表得票率。
為更準確驗證選區層次資料分析結果的效度,本文進一步根據日本選舉研究(JES)的民調資料,以日本自民黨為背景,採William H. Greene建構之雙變數機率單元模型深入解析新制下歷屆眾議員選舉中個體選民的兩票效應。研究結果不僅發現自民黨採重複提名策略確實對於選民兩票架構的決策互動造成影響,原本重複提名對於自民黨在PR得票上的負向作用,更有逐年轉為正向提升自民黨PR選票的趨勢,此一結果與選區資料的分析發現相當一致;此外,傳統日本選舉文獻所強調的政黨認同、保革意識型態與都市化程度等因素,仍在新制下的幾屆眾議員選舉中對選民投票行為產生影響。總括本文的分析,不僅佐證既有日本選舉投票與日本政黨重複提名參選成效等相關文獻的預期,也吻合混合選制學理兩票連動效果的論點。
The Mixed electoral system combines the spirits of Plurality and Proportional Representation. The way two-ballot structure influencing the electoral behavior however is not settled. Of the two distinctive schools, one believed two ballots work separately and therefore, their influences should be estimated independently. The other group of people advocated the existing of interaction effects (or the so-called “contamination effects”), and believed it is necessary to consider the interaction between two ballots. As for the Mixed-Member Majoritarian (MMM) Electoral System which was realized in Japanese House Election since 1996, it is actually more complicated because of the addition of dual candidacy.
The purpose of this study is trying to evaluate the impact of this new electoral system in Japan. Specifically, this study is especially interested in the interaction effects of two-vote structure that caused by parties’ dual candidacy strategies. To avoid the causal biased estimation and capture the contamination effect more precisely based on district-level data, this study applies Heckman’s treatment-effects model to remove the endogeneity and self-selection problem. The result not only shows the dual candidacy strategy influences the interaction between two ballots, it also indicates the impact is dissimilar from different parties and different periods of time. More specifically, the dual candidacy strategy improves the PR votes obviously for the LDP (Liberal Democratic Party) in 2009, the DPJ (Democratic Party of Japan) in 2003, and the SDP (Social Democratic Party) in 2000, 2005, and 2009.
In order to make sure the validity of the findings of district-level data and get further information, this study takes advantage of the survey collected by Japanese Election Studies (JES) since 1996. Specifically, this study uses the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) as an example, and applies Greene’s bivariate probit model to analyze the interaction between the voters’ two ballots. The result shows that the dual candidacy in the new electoral system did influence the interaction between the two ballots; the LDP’s dual candidacy strategies indeed helped to attract more PR votes gradually. The result is consistent with the findings of district-level data. In addition, the bivariate probit result also shows that the party identification, political ideology, and the urbanization of districts still influence the voters’ voting behavior. In conclusion, this study supports existing literatures and theories, such as the Japanese voting behavior, the impact of parties’ dual candidacy strategies, and the contamination theory of mixed-member electoral systems.
ㄧ、中文部分
王業立、彭怡菲,2004,〈分裂投票:一個制度面的分析〉,《台灣政治學刊》,8 (1): 3-45。new window
王業立,2005,〈台灣憲政運作之回顧:政治制度的影響〉,「憲政回顧與憲法修改」圓桌討論會(3月12日),台北:中研院政治所籌備處主辦。
王業立,2008,《比較選舉制度》,台北:五南。new window
王鼎銘,2003,〈策略投票及其影響之檢測:二OO一年縣市長及立委選舉結果的探討〉,《東吳政治學報》,16: 95-123。new window
王鼎銘、郭銘峰、黃紀,2008,〈選制轉變過程下杜佛傑心理效應之檢視:從日本眾議院選制變革的經驗來觀察〉,《問題與研究》,47 (3): 1-28。new window
王鼎銘、郭銘峰,2009,〈混合式選制下的投票思維:台灣與日本國會選舉變革經驗的比較〉,《選舉研究》,16 (2): 101-130。new window
王鼎銘、蘇俊斌、黃紀、郭銘峰,2004,〈日本自民黨之選票穩定度研究:1993、1996及2000年眾議院選舉之定群追蹤分析〉,《選舉研究》,11 (2): 81-109。new window
吳玉山,2001,〈制度、結構與政治穩定〉,《政治學報》,32: 1-30。new window
吳明上,2003,〈日本眾議院議員選舉制度改革之探討:小選舉區比例代表並立制〉,《問題與研究》,42 (2): 79-94。new window
吳明上,2008,〈日本聯合政權組成中公明黨關鍵少數之研究〉,《東吳政治學報》, 26 (1): 51-86。new window
吳東野,1996,〈「單一選區兩票制」選舉方法之探討:德國、日本、俄羅斯選舉之實例比較〉,《選舉研究》,3 (1): 69-102。new window
吳重禮、王宏忠,2003,〈我國選民「分立政府」心理認知與投票穩定度:以2000 年總統選舉與2001 年立法委員選舉為例〉,《選舉研究》,10 (1): 81-114。
吳博群,1998,《後冷戰時期日本選舉制度改革與政黨政治之研究》,台北:台灣大學政治學系碩士學位論文。
李世暉、郭國興,2011,〈日本政黨輪替思維之探析:兼論民主黨之角色與定位〉,《問題與研究》,50 (1): 1-33。new window
何思因,1992,〈日本自民黨的候選人選拔制度及政黨凝聚力〉,《問題與研究》,31 (6): 42-52。new window
林長志、黃紀,2007,〈不同層級選舉中之一致與分裂投票:2005年台北縣之分析〉,《問題與研究》,46 (1): 1-32。new window
林繼文,1997,〈制度選擇如何可能:論日本之選舉制度改革〉,《台灣政治學 刊》,2: 63-106。new window
林繼文,1999,〈單一選區兩票制與選舉制度改革〉,《新世紀智庫論壇》,6 : 69-79。
林繼文,2008,〈以輸為贏:小黨在日本單一選區兩票制下的參選策略〉,《選舉研究》,15 (2): 37-66。new window
洪永泰,1995,〈分裂投票:八十三年臺北市選舉的實證分析〉,《選舉研究》,2 (1):119-145。new window
徐火炎,2001,〈一九九八年臺北市選民投票行為之分析:選民的黨派抉擇與分裂投票〉,《東吳政治學報》,13: 77-127。new window
許介鱗,1991,《日本現代史》,台北:三民書局。
許介鱗,1997,〈日本新選舉制度對民主政治的影響〉,《研考雙月刊》,21 (1): 42-48。new window
許介鱗、楊鈞池,2006,《日本政治制度》,台北:三民書局。new window
張世賢,1995,〈日本眾議院議員選舉區制改革之研究〉,《中國行政評論》,4 (3): 1-42。new window
張世賢、黃澤銘、黃積聖,1996,〈1996年日本眾議院議員選舉之研究〉,《中國行政評論》,6 (1): 93-156。new window
張進逸,2009,《日本「分立國會」下的參議院之研究》,台北:政治大學政治學系碩士學位論文。
盛杏湲、周應龍,2008,〈選樣偏誤模型在調查研究中項目無反應問題的應用〉, 《台灣政治學刊》,12 (1): 147-183。new window
盛治仁,2006,〈單一選區兩票制對未來台灣政黨政治發展之可能影響探討〉,《台灣民主季刊》,3 (2): 63-86。new window
郭承天,2000,〈新制度論與政治經濟學〉,何思因、吳玉山(編),《政治學報特輯--邁入二十一世紀的政治學》,台北:中國政治學會,31: 171-201。new window
郭銘峰、黃紀、王鼎銘,2010,〈並立式混合選制下之兩票連動:日本眾議員選舉政黨重複提名策略之效應分析〉,2010年台灣政治學會年會暨「重新思考國家:五都之後,百年前夕!」學術研討會(12 月4 日),台北:東吳大學政治系。new window
郭銘峰、黃紀、王鼎銘,2010,〈候選人重複提名對自民黨選票的影響:日本眾院議員選舉之分析(1996-2005年)〉,2010年中國政治學會年會暨「能知的公民?民主的理想與實際」學術研討會(11 月7 日),高雄:中山大學政治所。
陳陸輝、周應龍,2008,〈如何評估單一選區兩票制下候選人票與政黨票之間的連動關係〉,黃紀、游清鑫(編),《如何評估選制變遷:方法論的探討》,台北:五南,頁151-172。
陳華昇、葉彥宗,2006,〈「我國立委選舉應否採行『重複候選人』制度」之分析與建議〉,下載自財團法人國家政策研究基金會網頁資料(http://old.npf.org.tw/PUBLICATION/IA/095/IA-B-095-002.htm,瀏覽日期:
2011/4/20)。
陳儔美,1997,〈從第四十一屆眾議院選舉看日本的新選舉制度〉,《問題與研究》,36 (4) : 63-75。new window
曹瑞泰,2007,〈日本選舉制度改革與影響:現行小選區比例代表並立制施行之研究〉,台日綜合研究所網頁(http://www.japansearch.org.tw/scholar-94.aspm), 瀏覽日期:2007/4/2。
黃紀,2000,〈實用方法論芻議〉,何思因、吳玉山(編),《政治學報特輯--邁入廿一世紀的政治學》,台北:中國政治學會,31: 107-139。new window
黃紀,2001,〈一致與分裂投票:方法論之探討〉,《人文與社會科學集刊》,13 (5): 541-574。new window
黃紀、張益超,2001,〈一致與分裂投票:嘉義市一九九七年市長與立委選舉之分析〉,徐永明、黃紀(編),《政治分析的層次》,台北:韋伯文化,頁183-218。
黃紀、王鼎銘、郭銘峰,2005,〈日本眾議院1993 及1996 年選舉:自民黨之選票流動分析〉,《人文及社會科學集刊》,17 (4): 853-883。new window
黃紀,2008a,〈緒論:選舉制度的脈絡與效應〉,黃紀、游清鑫(編),《如何評估選制變遷:方法論的探討》,台北:五南,頁1-18。
黃紀,2008b,〈單一選區兩票並立制下選民之投票抉擇:分析方法之探討〉,黃紀、游清鑫(編),《如何評估選制變遷:方法論的探討》,台北:五南,頁129-150。
黃紀,2008c,〈因果推論與觀察研究:「反事實模型」之思考〉,《社會科學論叢》,2 (1): 1-21。new window
黃紀、王鼎銘、郭銘峰,2008,〈「混合選制」下選民之一致與分裂投票:1996年日本眾議員選舉自民黨選票之分析〉,《選舉研究》,15 (2): 1-36。new window
黃紀,2010,〈因果推論與效應評估:區段識別法及其於「選制效應」之應用〉,《選舉研究》,17 (2): 103-134。new window
黃紀,2011,〈受限依變量(II):選樣校正模型與因果效應模型〉,黃紀、王德育(編),《類別與受限依變量之分析》,未出版草稿。
游清鑫,2004,〈分裂投票解釋觀點與台灣選舉之應用:以2002年高雄市長與市議員選舉為例〉,《台灣政治學刊》,8 (1): 47-98。new window
游清鑫,2008,〈如何評估選區重劃的政治效果〉,黃紀、游清鑫(編),《如何評估選制變遷:方法論的探討》,台北:五南,頁21-48。
楊永明,2003,〈日本眾議院選舉的兩大議題〉,《中國時報》,2003/11/10。
楊鈞池,2001,《後冷戰時期日本聯合政府之研究》,台北:台灣大學政治學系博士學位論文。new window
楊鈞池,2002,〈後冷戰時期日本聯合政府與政治改革〉,《政治科學論叢》,16: 63-88。new window
楊鈞池,2005,〈一九九0年代日本選舉制度改革及其影響的分析〉,《高大法學論叢》,創刊號: 167-216。new window
楊鈞池,2007,〈『小泉政治』是否改變日本政治秩序:日本制度變遷與秩序重建之分析,以小泉政治為例〉,2007年中國政治學會年會暨「制度、治理與秩序」學術研討會(9月30日),高雄:義守大學公共政策與管理學系。new window
蔡增家、楊鈞池,2003,〈比較台灣和日本在90年之後的政經體制的轉變〉,台灣與日本評比國際研討會(1月17-18日),台南:成功大學社科院與工學院舉辦。
蔡增家,2004,《日本轉型: 九〇年之後政治經濟體制的轉變》,台北:五南。new window
謝相慶,2000,〈日本眾議院議員新選舉制度及其政治效應-以1996年選舉為例〉,《選舉研究》,6 (2): 45-87。new window
謝復生,1992,《政黨比例代表制》,台北:理論與政策雜誌社。new window
蘇子喬、王業立,2010,〈為何廢棄混合式選舉制度?義大利、俄羅斯、與泰國選制改革之研究〉,《東吳政治學報》,28 (3): 1-81。new window

二、英文部分
Akuto, Hiroshi. 1971. “Political Process and Public Opinion: Voting Behavior and Mass Communication.” In International Studies of Broadcasting, eds. Hirosuki Eguchi and H. Ichinohe. Tokyo: NHK Radio and Television Culture Research Institute.
Arase, David. 2010. “Japan in 2009: A Historical Election Year.” Asian Survey 50 (1): 40-55.
Barnow, Burt S., Glen G. Gain, and Arthur S. Goldberger. 1981. “Issues in the Analysis of Selectivity Bias.” In Evaluation Studies Review Annual, Vol. 5, eds. Ernst Stromsdorfer and George Farkas. Beverly Hills: Sage, 42-59.
Bawn, Kathleen. 1993. “The Logic of Institutional Preferences: German Electoral Law as a Social Choice Outcome.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (4): 965-989.
Bawn, Kathleen, and Michael F. Thies. 2003. “A Comparative Theory of Electoral Incentives: Representing the Unorganized under PR, Plurality and Mixed Member Systems.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 15 (1): 5-32.
Beck, Paul Allen, Lawrence Baum, Aage Clausen, and Charles E. Smith, Jr. 1992. “Patterns and Sources of Ticket Splitting in Subpresidential Voting.” American Political Science Review 86 (4): 916-928.
Blundell, Richard. 1988. “Consumer Behavior: Theory and Empirical Evidence– A Survey.” The Economic Journal 98 (389): 16-65.
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., Henry E. Brady, and David Collier. 2008. “Political Science Methodology.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology, eds. Janet M. Box-Steffensmeier, Henry E. Brady, and David Collier. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 3-31.
Brady, Henry E. 2008. “Causation and Explanation in Social Science.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology, eds. Janet M. Box-Steffensmeier, Henry E. Brady, and David Collier. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 217-270.
Browne, Eric C., and Dennis Patterson. 1999. “An Empirical Theory of National Nominating Behavior.” British Journal of Political Science 29 (2): 259-289.
Burden, Barry C., and David C. Kimball. 1998. “A New Approach to the Study of Ticket Splitting.” American Political Science Review 92 (3): 533-544.
Burden, Barry C., and David C. Kimball. 2002. Why Americans Split Their Tickets: Campaigns, Competition, and Divided Government. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
Cameron, A. Collin, and Pravin K. Trivedi. 2005. Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Campbell, Angus, and Warren E. Miller. 1957. “The Motivational Basis of Straight and Split-Ticket Voting.” American Political Science Review 51 (2): 293-312.
Campbell, Angus, Philip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller, and Donald E. Stokes. 1960. The American Voter. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Cartairs, Andrew McLaren. 1980. A Short History of Electoral Systems in Western Europe. London: Allen and Unwin.
Choi, Jungug. 2006. “Institutional Interaction and Strategic Voting in Korea''s New Mixed Electoral System.” Journal of International and Area Studies 13 (2): 111-122.
Christensen, Ray. 1998. “The Effect of Electoral Reforms on Campaign Practice in Japan: Putting New Wine into Old Bottles.” Asian Survey 38 (10): 986-1004.
Christensen, Ray. 2004. “Redistricting in Japan: Lessons for the United States.” Japanese Journal of Political Science 5 (2): 259-285.
Cox, Gary W., and Emerson Niou. 1994. “Seat Bonuses under the Single Non-Tranferable Vote System: Evidence from Japan and Taiwan.” Comparative Politics 26: 221-236.
Cox, Gary W., and Frances Rosenbluth. 1993. “The Electoral Fortunes of Legislative Factions in Japan.” American Political Science Review 87 (3): 577-589.
Cox, Gary W., and Frances Rosenbluth. 1994. “Reducing Nomination Errors: Factional Competition and Party Strategy in Japan.” Electoral Studies 13 (1): 4-16.
Cox, Gary W., and Frances Rosenbluth. 1996. “Factional Competition for the Party Endorsement.” British Journal of Political Science 26 (2): 259-269.
Cox, Gary W. 1996. “Is the Single Non-Tranferable Vote Superproportional? Evidence from Japan and Taiwan.” American Journal of Political Science 40 (3): 740-755.
Cox, Gary W. 1997. Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World’s Electoral Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cox, Gary W., and Michael F. Thies. 1998. “The Cost of Intraparty Competition: The Single, Non-Transferable Vote and Money Politics in Japan.” Comparative Political Studies 31 (3): 267-291.
Cox, Gary W., Frances McCall Rosenbluth, and Michael F. Thies. 1999. “Electoral Reform and the Fate of Factions: The Case of Japan’s Liberal Democratic Party.” British Journal of Political Science 29 (1): 33-56.
Cox, Karen E., and Leonard J. Schoppa. 2002. “Interaction Effects in Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: Theory and Evidence from Germany, Japan, and Italy.” Comparative Political Studies 35 (9): 1027-1053.
Curtis, Gerald L. 1971. Electioneering Japanese Style. New York: Columbia University Press.
Curtis, Gerald L. 1999. The Logic of Japanese Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
Donovan, Mark. 1995. “The Politics of Electoral Reform in Italy.” International Political Science Review 16 (1): 47-64.
Dore, Ronald P. 1956. “Japanese Election Candidates in 1955.” Pacific Affairs 29 (2): 174-181.
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
Dunleavy, Patric, and Helen Margetts. 1995. “Understanding the Dynamics of Electoral Reform.” International Political Science Review 16 (1): 9-30.
Duverger, Maurice. 1954. Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. London: Methuen.
Duverger, Maurice. 1986. “Duverger’s Law: Forty Years Later.” In Electoral Laws and Their Political Consequences, eds. Bernard Grofman and Arend Lijphart. New York: Agathon Press, 69-84.
Farrell, David M. 2001. Electoral Systems: A Comparative Introduction. New York: Palgrave.
Ferrara, Federico. 2004. “Electoral Coordination and the Strategic Desertion of Strong Parties in Compensatory Mixed Systems with Negative Vote Transfers.” Electoral Studies 23 (3): 391-413.
Ferrara, Federico, and Erik S. Herron. 2005. “Going It Alone? Strategic Entry under Mixed Electoral Rules.” American Journal of Political Science 49 (1): 391-413.
Ferrara, Federico, Erik Herron, and Misa Nishikawa. 2005. Mixed Electoral Systems. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Fiorina, Morris P. 1996. Divided Government. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Flanagan, Scott C., Shinsaku Kohei, Ichiro Miyake, Bradley M. Richardson, and Joji Watanuki. 1991. The Japanese Voter. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Fujimura, Naofumi. 2007. “The Power Relationship between the Prime Minister and Ruling Party Legislators: the Postal Service Privatization Act of 2005 in Japan.” Japanese Journal of Political Science 8 (2): 233-261.
Gallagher, Michael. 1998. “The Political Impact of Electoral System Change in Japan and New Zealand, 1996.” Party Politics 4 (2): 203-228.
Golder, Matt. 2005. “Democratic Electoral Systems Around the World, 1946-2000.” Electoral Studies 24 (1): 103-121.
Greene, William H. 2007. LIMDEP Version 9.0: Econometric Modeling Guide, Vol. 1. New York: Econometric Software, Inc.
Greene, William H. 2008. Econometric Analysis, 6th edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Gschwend, Thomas, Ron Johnston, and Charles Pattie. 2003. “Split-Ticket Patterns in Mixed-Member Proportional Election Systems: Estimates and Analyses of Their Spatial Variation at the German Federal Election, 1998.” British Journal of Political Science 33 (1): 109-127.
Gschwend, Thomas. 2007. “Ticket-splitting and Strategic Voting under Mixed Electoral Rules: Evidence from Germany.” European Journal of Political Research 46 (1): 1-23.
Hall, Peter A., and Rosemary C. R. Taylor. 1996. “Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms.” Political Studies 44(5): 936–957.
Heckman, James J. 1976. “The Common Structure of Statistical Models of Truncation, Sample Selection and Limited Dependent Variables and a Simple Estimator for Such Models.” Annals of Economic and Social Measurement 5 (4): 475-492.
Heckman, James J. 1978. “Dummy Endogenous Variables in a Simultaneous Equation System.” Econometrica 46 (6): 931-959.
Heckman, James J. 1979. “Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error.” Econometrica 547 (1): 153-161.
Herron, Erik S., and Misa Nishikawa. 2001. “Contamination Effects and the Number of Parties in Mixed-Superposition Electoral Systems.” Electoral Studies 21 (1): 63-86.
Hirano, H. 2004. “Split-ticket Voting under the Mixed Electoral System in Japan.” Review of Electoral Studies《選挙学会紀要》 2: 19-37.
Hizen, Yoichi. 2007. “The Effect of Dual Candidacy on Voting Decisions.” Japanese Journal of Political Science 7 (3): 289-366.
Horiuchi, Yusaku, and Jun Saito. 2003. “Reapportionment and Redistribution: Consequence of Electoral Reform in Japan.” American Journal of Political Science 47 (4): 669-682.
Horiuchi, Yusaku, and Masaru Kohno. 2004. “SNTV and Its Political Consequences: Mechanical Effect, Strategic Candidate Nomination, and the Origins of Japan’s One-Party Dominance.” Paper delivered at the 2004 Annual Meeting of American Political Science Association. Chicago, USA, September 2-5.
Horowitz, Donald. 2002. “Constitutional Design: Proposals Versus Processes.” In The Architecture of Democracy, ed. Andrew Reynolds. New York: Oxford University Press, 15-36.
Huang, Chi. 2007. “Assessing the Impact of Mixed Electoral System in Taiwan: Methodological Challenges of Testing Interaction Effects.” Paper Presented at the International Symposium on Mixed Electoral Systems in East Asia. 26-27 May 2008. Taipei, Taiwan: National Chengchi University.
Huang, Chi, Lu-huei Chen, and Ying-lung Chou. 2008. “Taiwan’s New Mixed Electoral System and Its Effects on 2008 Legislative Election.” Paper Presented at 2008年度選挙学会 分科会E アジア・比較部会「東アジアの選挙」. 17-18 May 2008. Tokyo, Japan: Chu University.
Iwai, Tomoaki. 1999. “The Pressing Need for Electoral Reform in Japan.” National Institute for Research Advancement Review 6 (4): http://www.nira.or.jp/past/publ/review/99autumn/iwai.html (viewed at 2010/9/8).
James, Peter. 2003. The German Electoral System. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
Jesse, Eckhard. 1988. “Split-Voting in the Federal Republic of Germany: An Analysis of the Federal Elections From 1953 to 1987.” Electoral Studies 7 (2): 109-124.
Jou, Willy. 2009. “Electoral Reform and Party System Development in Japan and Taiwan.” Asian Survey 49 (5): 759-785.
Jou, Willy. 2010. “Toward A Two-Party System or Two Party Systems? Patterns of Competition in Japan’s Single-Member Districts, 1996-2005.” Party Politics 16 (3): 370-393.
Kaihara, Hiroshi. 2007. “The Advent of a New Japanese Politics: Effects of the 1994 Revision of the Electoral Law.” Asian Survey 47 (5): 749-765.
Karp, Jeffrey A., Jack Vowles, Susan A. Banducci, and Todd Donovan. 2002. “Strategic Voting, Party Activity, and Candidate Effects: Test Explanations for Split Voting in New Zealand’s New Mixed System.” Electoral Studies 21 (1): 1-22.
Katz, Richard S. 1996. “Electoral Reform and the Transformation of Party Politics in Italy.” Party Politics 2 (1): 31-53.
Khandker, Shahidur R., Gayatri B. Koolwal, and Hussain A. Samad. 2010. Handbook on Impact Evaluation: Quantitative Methods and Practices. Washington D.C.: The World Bank.
Klevmarken, N. Anders. 1989. “Panel Studies: What can We Learn from them?” European Economic Review 33 (2-3): 523-529.
Kobayashi, Yoshiaki, and Kazuaki Nagatomi. 2009. “Changes in Voting Behavior after the Electoral System Reform in Japan.” Paper Presented at the International Conference on Elections in Taiwan, Japan, and Korea under the Mixed-Member Electoral Systems. 24 May 2009. Taipei, Taiwan: Chengchi University.
Kohei, Shinsaku. 1972. Political Behavior of the Japanese People. Mimeo: NHK Public Opinion Research Institute.
Kohno, Masaru. 1997. “Voter Turnout and Strategic Ticket-Splitting Under Japan''s New Electoral Rules.” Asian survey 37 (5): 429-440.
Kostadinova, T. 2002. “Do Mixed Electoral Systems Matter? A Cross-National Analysis of their Effects in Eastern Europe.” Electoral Studies 21 (1): 23-34.
Laakso, Markku, and Rein Taagepera. 1979. “Effective Number of Parties: a Measure with Application to West Europe.” Comparative Political Studies 12 (1): 3-27.
LeDuc, Lawrence, Richard G. Niemi, Pippa Norris (eds.). 1996. Comparing Democracies: Elections and Voting in Global Perspective. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Lijphart, Arend. 1984. Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Lijphart, Arend. 1994. Electoral Systems and Party Systems: A Study of Twenty-Seven Democracies 1945-1990. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lijphart, Arend. 1999. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Lin, Jih-wen. 2006. “The Politics of Reform in Japan and Taiwan.” Journal of Democracy 17 (2): 118-131.
Mackie, Thomas, and Richard Rose. 1991. The International Almanac of Electoral History. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly.
Maddala, G. S. 1983. Limited-dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Maeda, Ko. 2008. “Re-examining the Contamination Effect of Japan’s Mixed Electoral System Using Treatment-Effect Model.” Electoral Studies 27 (4): 723-731.
Maeda, Ko. 2010. "Factors Behind the Historic Defeat of Japan''s Liberal Democratic Party in 2009." Asian Survey 50 (5): 888-907.
Massicotte, L., and A. Blais. 1999. “Mixed Electoral Systems: A Conceptual and Empirical Survey.” Electoral Studies 18 (3): 341-366.
McCubbins, Mathew D., and Frances McCall Rosenbluth. 1995. “Party Provision for Personal Politics: Dividing the Vote in Japan,” In Structure and Policy in Japan and the United States, eds. Peter F. Cowhey and Mathew D. McCubbins. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 35-55.
Mckean, Margaret A., and Ethan Scheiner. 2000. “Japan’s New Electoral System: la plus ça Change…” Electoral Studies 19 (4): 447-477.
Morgan, Stephen L., and Christopher Winship. 2007. Counterfactual and Casual Inference: Method and Principles for Social Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Moser, Robert G. 1997. “The Impact of Parliamentary Electoral Systems in Russia.” Post-Soviet Affairs 13 (3): 284-302.
Moser, Robert G. 2001. Unexpected Outcomes: Electoral Systems, Political Parties and Representation in Russia. Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press.
Moser, Robert G., and Ethan Scheiner. 2004. “Mixed Electoral Systems and Electoral System Effects: Controlled Comparison and Cross-National Analysis.” Electoral Studies 23 (4): 575-599.
Mulgan, Aurelia George. 1997. “Electoral Determinants of Agrarian Power: Measuring Rural Decline in Japan.” Political Studies 45 (5): 875-899.
Nishikawa, Misa, and Eric S. Herron. 2004. “Mixed Electoral Rules’ Impact on Party Systems.” Electoral Studies 23 (4): 753-768.
Norris, Pippa. 1997. “Choosing Electoral Systems: Proportional, Majoritarian, and Mixed Systems.” International Political Science Review 18 (3): 297-312.
Norris, Pippa. 2004. Electoral Engineering: Voting Rules and Political Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pekkanen, Robert, Benjamin Nyblade, and Ellis S. Krauss. 2006. “Electoral Incentives in Mixed-Member Systems: Party, Posts, and Zombie Politicians in Japan.” American Political Science Review 100 (2): 183-193.
Poirier, Dale J. 1980. “Partial Observability in Bivariate Probit Models.” Journal of Econometrics 12 (2): 209-217.
Rae, Douglas W. 1971. The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Ranney, Austin. 2001. Governing: An Introduction to Political Science, 8th edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Reed, Steven R. 1994. “Democracy and the Personal Vote: A Cautionary Tale from Japan.” Electoral Studies 13 (1): 17-28.
Reed, Steven R. 1995. “The Nomination Process for Japan’s Next General Election: Waiting for the Heiritsu-sei.” Asian Survey 35 (12): 1075-1087.
Reed, Steven R. 1997. “The 1996 Japanese General Election.” Electoral Studies 16 (1): 121-125.
Reed, Steven R. 1999. “Strategic Voting in the 1996 Japanese General Election.” Comparative Political Studies 32 (2): 257-270.
Reed, Steven R. 2001. “Duverger’s Law is Working in Italy.” Comparative Political Studies 32 (3): 312-327.
Reed, Steven R. (ed.). 2003. Japanese Electoral Politics: Creating a New Party System. London: RoutledgeCurzon.
Reed, Steven R., and Ethan Scheiner. 2003. “Electoral Incentives and Policy Preferences: Mixed Motives Behind Party Defection in Japan.” British Journal of Political Science 33: 469-490.
Reed, Steven R. 2005. “Japan: Haltingly Towards a Two-Party System.” In The Politics of Electoral System, eds. Michael Gallagher and Paul Mitchell. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 277-293.
Reed, Steven R. 2007. “Duverger’s Law is Working in Japan.” Japanese Journal of Electoral Studies 22: 96-106.
Reed, Steven R. 2009. “Party Strategy or Candidate Strategy: How Does the LDP Run the Right Number of Candidates in Japan''s Multi-Member Districts?” Party Politics 15 (3): 295-314.
Reilly, Benjamin. 2007. “Democratization and Electoral Reform in the Asia-Pacific Region.” Comparative Political Studies 40 (11): 1350-1371.
Richardson, Bradley M. 1988. “Constituency Candidates Versus Parties in Japanese Voting Behavior.” American Political Science Review 82 (3): 695-718.
Riker, William H. 1982. Liberalism Against Populism: A Confrontation Between the Theory of Democracy and Theory of Social Choice. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
Riker, William H. 1986. “The Duverger’s Law Revisited?” In Electoral Laws and Their Political Consequences, eds. Bernard Grofman and Arend Lijphart. New York: Agathon Press, 19-42.
Robinson, W. S. 1950. “Ecological Correlations and the Behavior of Individuals.” American Sociological Review 15: 351-357.
Rochon, Thomas. 1981. “Electoral Systems and the Basis for the Vote: the Case of Japan,” In Parties, Candidates and Voters in Japan: Six Quantitative Studies, ed. J. C. Campbell. Michigan Papers in Japanese Studies, No. 2. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Center for Japanese Study, 1-28.
Rosenbaum, Paul R. 2002. Observational Studies, 2nd edition. New York: Springer.
Sakamoto, Takayuki. 1999. “Explaining Electoral Reform: Japan versus Italy and New Zealand.” Party Politics 5 (4): 419-438.
Scheiner, Ethan. 2006. Democracy Without Competition in Japan: Opposition Failure in One-Party Dominant State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schoen, Harald. 1999. “Split-Ticket Voting in German Federal Elections, 1953-90: An Example of Sophisticated Balloting?” Electoral Studies 18 (4): 473-496.
Shugart, Matthew S., and Martin P. Wattenberg (eds.). 2001. Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Shugart, Matthew S. 2005. “Comparative Electoral System Research: The Maturation of a Field and New Challenges Ahead.” in The Politics of Electoral Systems, eds. Michael Gallapher and Paul Mitchell. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 25-55.
Spafford, D. 1972. “Electoral Systems and Voters’ Behavior: Comment and a Further
Test.” Comparative Politics 5 (1): 129-134.
Stratmann, Thomas, and Martin Baur. 2002. “Plurality Rule, Proportional Representation, and the German Bundestag: How Incentives to Pork-Barrel Differ Across Electoral Systems.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (3): 506-514.
Taagepera, Rein, and Matthew S. Shugart. 1989. Seats and Votes: The Effects and Determinants of Electoral Systems. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Thames, F. 2001. “Legislative Voting Behavior in the Russian Duma: Understanding the Effect of Mandate.” Europe-Asia Studies 53: 869-884.
Van Deth, Jan W. 1990. “Interest in Politics.” In Continuities in Political Action: A Longitudinal Study of Political Orientations in Three Western Democracies, eds. M. Kent Jennings and Jan W. Van Deth. New York: Water de Gruyter.
Vowles, Jack. 1995. “The Politics of Electoral Reform in New Zealand.” International Political Science Review 16 (1): 95-115.
Wada, Junichiro. 1996. The Japanese Election System: Three Analytical Perspectives. New York: Routledge.
Watanuki, Joji. 1967. “Patterns of Politics in Present-Day Japan.” In Party Systems and Voter Alignments, eds. Seymour Martin Lipset and Stein Rokkan. New York: Free Press, 447-466.
Wright, Gerald C. 1989. “Level-of-Analysis Effects on Explanations of Voting: The Case of the 1982 US Senate Elections.” British Journal of Political Science 19: 381-398.
三、日文部分
リード,スティーブン・R (Reed, Steven R.),2003,〈並立制における小選挙区候補者の比例代表得票率への影響〉,《選挙研究》,18: 5-11。
川人貞史,1996,〈二大政党制に近づけた新選挙制度〉,《朝日新聞》,1996/10/22, 付朝刊。
三宅一郎、木下富雄、間場寿一,1967,《異なるレベルの選挙における投票行動の研究》,東京:創文社。
三宅一郎,1985a,《政党支持の分析》,東京:創文社。
三宅一郎,1985b,〈世論と市民の政治参加〉,三宅一郎、山口定、村松岐夫、進藤榮一(編),《日本政治の座標-戦後四〇年のあゆみ》,東京:有斐閣。
三宅一郎,1989,《投票行動》,東京:東京大学出版会。
大竹邦実,1996,《実務と研修のためのわかりやすい公職選挙法》,東京:ぎょうせい株式会社。
小林良彰,1994,《選挙制度:民主主義再生のために》,東京:丸善株式会社。
小林良彰,2002,《現代日本の政治過程:日本型民主主義の計量分析》,東京:東京大学出版会。
小林良彰、亀真奈文,2004,〈並立制下における投票行動の問題点〉,《選挙学会紀要》,2: 5-17。
上神貴佳,1999,〈小選挙区比例代表並立制における公認問題と党内の権力関
係〉,《本郷法政紀要》,8:80-115。
大嶽秀夫,1999,《日本政治の対立軸―93年以降の政界再編の中で》,東京:
中央公論新社。
大嶽秀夫,2006,《小泉純一郎ポピュリズムの研究:その戦略と手法》,東京:東洋経済新報社。
久禮義一,2001,《現代選挙論:投票行動と問題点》,奈良:萌書房。
内田満,1983,《政党政治の論理》,東京:三嶺書房。
水崎節文、森裕城,1998,〈得票データからみた並立制のメカニズム〉,《選挙研究》,13: 50-59。
水崎節文、森裕城,2006,《JED-M衆議院議員総選挙データ 28~44回》,東京:
木鐸社。
水崎節文、森裕城,2007,《総選挙の得票分析1958-2005》,東京:木鐸社。
北岡伸一,1997,〈与党と野党の政治力学-新制度の総括と政党政治の行方〉,《中央公論》,1月号: 28-37。
田中善一郎,2005,《日本の総選挙:1946-2003》,東京:東京大学出版会。
平野浩,2007,《変容する日本の社會と投票行動》,東京:木鐸社。
西平重喜,2005,〈選挙制度の理念〉,《選挙研究》,20: 5-18。
成田憲彦,2001,〈日本の連立政権形成における国会の論理と選挙制度の論
理〉,《選挙研究》,16: 18-27。
池田謙一,2004,〈2001年参議院選挙と『小泉効果』〉,《選挙研究》,19: 29-50。
池田謙一,2005,〈2003年衆議院選挙・2004年参議院選挙の分析:期待の政治のひとつの帰結と有権者〉,《年報政治学》,1期: 36-65。
佐藤誠三郎,1997a,〈新‧一党優位制の開幕〉,《中央公論》,4月号: 170-183。
佐藤誠三郎,1997b,〈選挙制度改革論者は敗北した〉,《諸君》,1月号: 60-70。
村松岐夫、伊藤光利、辻中豊,2001,《日本の政治》,東京:有斐閣。
沖野安春,1995,《現代日本の政治》,東京:芦書房。
和田淳一郎,1995,〈小選挙区比例代表並立制に関するゲーム論的一考察〉,《選挙研究》,10: 32-40。
河野武司,2007,〈日本の衆議院における選挙制度の改革を可能とした諸要因について〉,「東亞混合式選舉制度」國際學術研討會(5月26日),台北:政大選舉研究中心。
岸本一男、蒲島郁夫,1997,〈合理的選択理論から見た日本の政党システム〉,《レヴァイアサン》,20: 84-100。
宮川隆義,1996,《小選挙区比例代表並立制の魔術》,東京:政治広報センタ
ー。
高畠通敏,1994,《日本政治の構造転換》,東京:三一書房。
真鍋一,2004,《参議院制度論:その選挙制度、定数格差問題、そして参議院無用論について》,東京:東京図書出版会。
堀江湛、岡沢憲芙,1997,《現代政治學》,東京:法學書院。
梅津實、森脇俊雅、坪郷實、後房雄、山田真裕,1998,《比較‧選挙政治:90年代における先進五カ国の選挙》,京都:ミネルヴァ書房。
堤英敬,2002,〈選挙制度改革と候補者の政策公約-小選挙区比例代表並立制導入と候補者の選挙戦略〉,《香川法学》,22 (2): 90-120。
曽根泰教,2005,〈衆議院選挙制度改革の評価〉,《選挙研究》,20: 19-34。
渡部昇一,2000,〈二大政党制文明政治方〉,《産経新聞》,6 月30 日,版9。
富森馭兒,1993,《日本型民主主義の構圖》,東京:朝日新聞社。
菅源太郎、東恭弘,2009,《衆議院全300小選挙区データブック 2009年夏版》,東京:第一書林。
鈴木基史,2000,〈並立制における投票行動研究の統合的分析アプローチ〉,《選 挙研究》,15: 30- 41。
福岡政行,2001,《日本の選挙》,東京:早稲田大学出版部。
読売新聞社編,1996,《大変革への序章:検証.新制度下の’96衆院選》,東京:読売新聞社。
蒲島郁夫、綿貫譲治、三宅一郎、小林良彰、池田謙一,1998,《JES II コードブック》,東京:木鐸社。
蒲島郁夫,2000,〈地方の『王國』と都市の反亂〉,《中央公論》,9月号:130-143。
蒲島郁夫、菅原琢,2005,〈2005年総選挙分析―自民党圧勝の構図 地方の刺客が呼んだ『都市の蜂起』〉,《中央公論》,11月号: 108-118。
選挙制度研究会 編,2005,《衆議院選挙要覽》(平成17年最新版),東京:國政情報センター。


 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE