:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:世代所得變化與老人所得不均:芬蘭、德國、美國與臺灣
書刊名:國家與社會
作者:洪明皇 引用關係
作者(外文):Hong, Ming-hwang
出版日期:2018
卷期:20
頁次:頁97-164
主題關鍵詞:所得分配世代分析吉尼係數分解盧森堡所得資料庫家庭收支調查Income distributionCohort analysisDecomposition of the Gini coefficientLuxembourg income study databaseSurvey of family income and expenditure
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:20
  • 點閱點閱:4
本研究透過盧森堡所得研究資料庫與家庭收支調查,使用世代分析法、所得分位別的所得組成分析、吉尼係數分解等方法探討芬蘭、德國、美國與台灣的世代所得變化與老人所得不均。主要研究結果為:1.芬蘭與德國的青壯世代總所得隨年齡增長而增加,美國與台灣的青壯世代則因勞動所得成長停滯而出現總所得無成長甚至減少的現象。2.同在生命週期的40多歲,芬蘭青壯世代的總所得高於嬰兒潮世代,德國兩個世代的總所得相近,美國與台灣的青壯世代總所得則低於嬰兒潮世代。3.台灣老人的所得不均度高於芬蘭與德國,原因在於中、低所得組來自工作相關的社會保險移轉與高所得組差距過大。4.家庭收支調查的分析顯示,公共退休金的分配高度不均是造成台灣老人總所得不均度高的主因。
In this study, the Luxembourg Income Study Database, the Survey of Family Income and Expenditure, a cohort analysis, an income decile-based income composition analysis, and the decomposition of the Gini coefficient were used to investigate changes in the income between people of different generations and income inequality among older adults in Finland, Germany, the United States, and Taiwan. The study results are as follows: 1. In Finland and Germany, the gross income of the middle-aged generations increased with age. By contrast, in the United States and Taiwan, the gross income of the young generation did not increase or even decreased with age as a result of stagnant labor income growth. 2. In Finland, the gross income of the middle-aged generations (i.e., who aged 40+ years at the time of study) was higher than that of the baby boom generation when baby boomers were at the same age. In Germany, the gross incomes of the two generations were similar. In the United States and Taiwan, the gross income of the young generation was lower than that of the baby boom generation. 3. Income inequality was more pronounced among older adults in Taiwan than that among older adults in Finland and Germany because of the considerable difference in work-related insurance transfers between older adults who belonged to the low and medium income groups and those who belonged to the high income group. 4. Analysis performed using the Survey of Family Income and Expenditure showed that the highly uneven distribution of public pensions was the primary cause of gross income inequality among older adults in Taiwan.
期刊論文
1.Attanasio, O. P.(1998)。Cohort analysis of saving behavior by U.S. households。The Journal of Human Resources,33(3),575-609。  new window
2.Lerman, Robert I.、Yitzhaki, Shlomo(1985)。Income inequality effects by income source: A new approach and applications to the United States。The Review of Economics and Statistics,67(1),151-156。  new window
3.Shorrocks, Anthony F.(1982)。Inequality Decomposition by Factor Components。Econometrica,50(1),193-212。  new window
4.朱敬一、康廷嶽(20150300)。經濟轉型中的「社會不公平」。臺灣經濟預測與政策,45(2),1-22。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.楊靜利、黃于珊(2009)。台灣老年經濟保障制度簡介。台灣老年學論壇,3,1-12。  延伸查詢new window
6.林健次(20091200)。芬蘭經濟的特質。臺灣國際研究季刊,5(4),25-48。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.陶儀芬(2010)。長輩奪走年輕人的未來?。天下雜誌,444,94-96。  延伸查詢new window
8.鄭清霞、洪明皇、王靜怡、李佩芳(20171200)。臺灣年金改革的老年基本年金規劃。臺灣社會福利學刊,13(2),117-160。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Berloffa, G.、Villa, P.(2010)。Differences in Equivalent Income Across Cohorts of Households: Evidence from Italy。Review of Income and Wealth,56(4),693-714。  new window
10.Osberg, L.(2003)。Long Run Trends in Income Inequality in the United States, UK, Sweden, Germany and Canada: A Birth Cohort View。Eastern Economic Journal,29(1),121-142。  new window
11.Smeeding, T. M.、Sullivan, D. H.(1998)。Generations and the Distribution of Economic Wall-Being: A Cross-National View。The American Economic Review,88(2),254-258。  new window
會議論文
1.孫克難(2014)。臺灣財政收支、世代正義與稅制改革。于宗先院士公共政策研討會,(會議日期: 2014/05/02)。臺北:中央研究院經濟研究所。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.(2011)。消費者物價指數就業、失業統計。  延伸查詢new window
2.(2015)。消費者物價指數--總指數。  延伸查詢new window
3.(2018)。國民所得及經濟成長。  延伸查詢new window
4.Battisti, M.、Felbermayr, G.、Lehwald, S.(2016)。Inequality in Germany: Myths, Facts, and Policy Implications。  new window
5.Blomgren, J.、Hiilamo, H.、Kangas, O.、Niemelä, M.(2012)。Growing Inequalities and their Impacts in Finland。  new window
6.OECD(2015)。OECD Statistics: Consumer Prices。  new window
7.OECD(2015)。Level of GDP per capita and productivity。  new window
8.OECD(2017)。Unemployment rate, aged 25-54, all persons。  new window
9.Taylor, J. E.、Mora, J.、Adams, R.、Lopez-Feldman, A.(2005)。Remittances, Inequality and Poverty: Evidence from Rural Mexico。  new window
圖書
1.World Bank(1994)。Averting the Old Age Crisis: Policies to Protect the Old and Promote Growth。Oxford University Press。  new window
2.行政院主計總處(2017)。105年家庭收支調查報告。台北:行政院主計總處。  延伸查詢new window
3.奧村隆一、黃文玲(2011)。少子化的衝擊:改變中的勞動、消費、產業結構。新北:楓葉社。  延伸查詢new window
4.楊志良(2015)。分配正義救台灣。台北:時報出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.勞倫斯.克里寇夫與(、史考特.柏恩斯、葉家興(2005)。世代風暴:人口老化即將引爆新經濟危機?。台北:左岸。  延伸查詢new window
6.喬治.萊基、蔡裴驊(2017)。北歐模式。台北:寶鼎。  延伸查詢new window
7.OECD(2013)。Pension at a Glance: OECD and G20 Indicators。OECD Publishing。  new window
8.Esping-Andersen, Gøsta(1990)。The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism。Polity Press。  new window
9.Easterlin, Richard A.(1987)。Birth and Fortune: The Impact of Numbers on Personal Welfare。University of Chicago Press。  new window
其他
1.(20111212)。國債瀕爆表每人負債60萬。  延伸查詢new window
2.鄭琪芳(20170508)。潛藏債務17.85兆.主計長︰不改革有危機,https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/focus/paper/1100426。  延伸查詢new window
3.莊奕琦(20160305)。台灣應走的路,生活美學創意島。  延伸查詢new window
4.(20131202)。為青年尋路四部曲-給他未來。  延伸查詢new window
5.(20150420)。高負債、失業,芬蘭遲早變希臘。  延伸查詢new window
6.(20160320)。芬蘭淪歐洲病夫,財長怪賈伯斯搶飯碗。  延伸查詢new window
7.Luxembourg Income Study(2017)。Inequality and Poverty Key Figures,http://www.lisdatacenter.org/lis-ikf-webapp/app/search-ikf-figures。  new window
8.Fry, R.,Cohn, D'V.,Livingston, G.,Taylor, P.(2011)。The Rising Age Gap in Economic Well-being: The Old Prosper Relative to the Young,http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2011/11/07/therising-age-gap-in-economic-well-being/。  new window
9.Willetts, D.(2010)。The Pinch: How the baby boomers took their children's future and why they should give it back,http://www2.lse.ac.uk/assets/richmedia/channels/publicLecturesAndEvents/slides/20100216_Willetts_sl.pdf。  new window
10.World Economic Forum(2009)。The Global Competitive Report 2009-2010,http://www.weforum.org/reports/globalcompetitiveness-report-2009-2010。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE