期刊論文| 1. | 王兆鵬(20061000)。貫徹平等與實質之辯護制度。月旦法學，137，104-119。 延伸查詢 |
| 2. | 吳耀宗(20070400)。鑑定人在刑事訴訟程序的角色與權利義務--兼與證人、鑑定證人相比較。中央警察大學法學論集，12，155-180。 延伸查詢 |
| 3. | 邱筱雯、林志潔(20150300)。鑑定和專家證人制度之比較與對鑑識會計制度建構之建議。會計師季刊，262，17-33。 延伸查詢 |
| 4. | 蘇素娥(20121200)。刑事訴訟制度與司法為民--以無資力被告辯護依賴權的保障為中心。刑事法雜誌，56(6)，51-70。 延伸查詢 |
| 5. | Bailey, Carlton(2002)。Ake v. Oklahoma and an Indigent Defendant's 'Right' to an Expert Witness: A Promise Denied or Imagined?。William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal，10。  |
| 6. | Breger, Melissa L.(2006)。Introducing the Construct of the Jury into Family Violence Proceedings and Family Court Jurisprudence。Michigan Journal of Gender & Law，13。 |
| 7. | Giannelli, Paul C.(2004)。Ake v. Oklahoma: The Right to Expert Assistance in a Post-Daubert Post-DNA World。Cornell Law Review，89。 |
| 8. | Goebes, Lee Richards(2002)。The Equality Principle Revisited: The Relationship of Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals to Ake v. Oklahoma。Capital Defense Journal，15。 |
| 9. | Harris, David A.(1992)。The Constitution and Truth Seeking: A New Theory on Expert Services for Indigent Defendants。Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology，83。 |
| 10. | Higgins, Andrew Monaghan(2017)。Virginia’s Interpretation of Ake v. Oklahoma: A Hollow Right。Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice，23。 |
| 11. | Medine, David(1990)。The Constitutional Right to Expert Assistance for Indigents in Civil Cases。Hastings Law Journal，41。 |
| 12. | Murphy, Justin P.(2000)。Expert Witnesses at Trial: Where Are the Ethics?。Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics，14。 |
| 13. | Wiseman, Hannah Jacobs(2008)。Pro Bono Publico: The Growing Need for Expert Aid。South Carolina Law Review，60。 |