臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：文體、任務與文件評鑑標準之關聯研究：以全英語授課情境為例
書刊名：圖書館學與資訊科學
作者：古敏君 引用關係
作者(外文)：Ku, Min-chun
出版日期：2018
卷期：44:2
頁次：頁44-71
主題關鍵詞：文件評鑑；文體理論；資訊使用；工作任務；Document assessments；Genre theory；Information use；Work tasks
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:11
期刊論文
1.Rieh, S. Y.(2002)。Judgment of Information Quality and Cognitive Authority in the Web。Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology，53(2)，145-161。  new window
2.Borlund, P.(2003)。The concept of relevance in IR。Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology，54(10)，913-925。  new window
3.Leacock, T. L.、Nesbit, J. C.(2007)。A framework for evaluating the quality of multimedia learning resources。Educational Technology and Society，10(2)，44-59。  new window
4.陳淑嬌(20140400)。全球化下的臺灣英文教育 : 政策、教學及成果。教育人力與專業發展，31(2)，7-20。  延伸查詢new window
5.Vakkari, P.(2003)。Task-based information searching。Annual Review of Information Science and Technology，37(1)，413-464。  new window
6.Orlikowski, W. J.、Yates, J.(1994)。Genre repertoire: The structuring of communicative practices in organizations。Administrative Science Quarterly，39(4)，541-574。  new window
7.Rieh, S. Y.、Danielson, D. R.(2007)。Credibility: A multidisciplinary framework。Annual Review of Information Science and Technology，41(1)，307-364。  new window
8.Barry, C. L.、Schamber, L.(1998)。Users' criteria for relevance evaluation: A cross-situational comparison。Information Processing & Management，34(2/3)，219-236。  new window
9.Byström, K.、Hansen, P.(2005)。Conceptual framework for tasks in information studies。Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology，56(10)，1050-1061。  new window
10.Crowston, K.、Kwaśnik, B. H.(2003)。Can document-genre metadata improve information access to large digital collections?。Library Trends，52(2)，345-361。  new window
11.Li, Y.、Belkin, N. J.(2008)。A faceted approach to conceptualizing tasks in information seeking。Information Processing and Management，44(6)，1822-1837。  new window
12.Rosso, M. A.(2008)。User-based identification of Web genres。Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology，59(7)，1053-1072。  new window
13.Savolainen, R.(2011)。Judging the quality and credibility of information in Internet discussion forums。Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology，62(7)，1243-1256。  new window
14.Zhang, L.、Kopak, R.、Freund, L.、Rasmussen, E.(2011)。Making functional units functional: The role of rhetorical structure in use of scholarly journal articles。International Journal of Information Management，31(1)，21-29。  new window
15.Andersen, J.(2008)。LIS and genre: Between people, texts, activity and situation。Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology，34(5)，31-34。  new window
16.Dillon, A.(2008)。Why information has shape。Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology，34(5)，17-19。  new window
17.El Mhouti, A.、Nasseh, A.、Erradi, M.(2013)。How to evaluate the quality of digital learning resources?。International Journal of Computer Science Research and Application，3(3)，27-36。  new window
18.Kari, J.(2010)。Diversity in the conceptions of information use。Information Research，15(3)。  new window
19.Sundin, O.、Francke, H.(2009)。In search of credibility: Pupils' information practices in learning environments。Information Research，14(4)。  new window
20.Vaughan, M. W.、Dillon, A.(2006)。Why structure and genre matter for users of digital information: A longitudinal experiment with readers of a web-based newspaper。International Journal of Human-Computer Studies，64(6)，502-526。  new window
21.Freund, L. S.(2012)。A cross-domain analysis of task and genre effects on perceptions of usefulness。Information Processing and Management，49(5)，1108-1121。  new window
22.Sinclair, J.、Joy, M.、Yau, J. Y.-K.、Hagan, S.(2013)。A practice-oriented review of learning objects。IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies，6(2)，177-192。  new window
23.Wildemuth, B.、Freund, L.、Toms, E. G.(2014)。Understanding search task complexity and difficulty in the context of interactive information retrieval studies。Journal of Documentation，70(6)，1118-1140。  new window
24.Yates, J.、Orlikowski, W. J.(1992)。Genres of organizational communication: A structural approach to studying communication and media。The Academy of Management Review，17(2)，299-326。  new window
25.陳雅齡、廖柏森(20120700)。以溝通式翻譯輔助大學全英語教學之探討。輔仁外語學報，9，45-65。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.鄭愛倫(20120700)。多元化訓練模式英文口語教學成效之探究--以輔仁大學大一英文課程為例。輔仁外語學報，9，127-154。new window  延伸查詢new window
27.陳麗珠、程台生(20111200)。大學分子生物學課程實施全英語教學的困境。嘉南學報. 人文類，37，431-440。new window  延伸查詢new window
28.Wilson, Thomas D.(2000)。Human Information Behavior。Informing Science: The International Journal of An Emerging Transdiscipline，3(2)，49-56。  new window
29.Bishop, A. P.(1999)。Document structure and digital libraries: How researchers mobilize information in journal articles。Information Processing and Management，35(3)，255-279。  new window
會議論文
1.Roussinov, D.、Crowston, K.、Nilan, M.、Kwaśnik, B.、Cai, J.、Liu, X.(2001)。Genre based navigation on the web。The 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences。IEEE。  new window
2.Vakkari, P.(2000)。Relevance and contributing information types of searched documents in task performance。The 23rd Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval。New York, NY：Association for Computing Machinery。2-9。  new window
研究報告
1.戴曉霞(2007)。高等教育的國際化：台灣、日本及荷蘭外國學生政策之比較研究 (計畫編號：NSC 94-2413-H-009-001)。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.張育瑄(2015)。大學教師進行全英語授課之歷程研究(碩士論文)。淡江大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.Freund, L. S.(2008)。Exploiting task-document relations in support of information retrieval in the workplace(博士論文)。University of Toronto，Toronto。  new window
3.Ku, M. C.(2015)。Investigating the associations between credibility assessments and information use tasks with respect to document genres in the context of university teaching(博士論文)。Syracuse University。  new window
圖書
1.Neuendorf, Kimberly A.(2001)。The Content Analysis Guidebook。Thousand oaks, CA：Sage。  new window
2.Schreier, Margrit(2012)。Qualitative content analysis in practice。Sage。  new window
3.Strauss, Anselm、Corbin, Juliet(1998)。Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounder Theory。Sage。  new window
其他
1.教育部(2012)。教育部補助大專校院精進全英語學位學制班別計畫，http://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/LawContentDetails.aspx?id=GL000575&KeyWordHL=&StyleType=1。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Crowston, K.(2010)。Internet genres。Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences。New York, NY：CRC Press。  new window
2.Ellis, D.(2005)。Ellis's model of information-seeking behavior。Theories of information behavior。Medford, NJ：Information Today, Inc.。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關博士論文
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：602（臺灣：573，外國：29） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1451226 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67251592
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上