資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(18.227.111.192)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
發現學習論對英文閱讀創新教學之探究
書刊名:
樹德科技大學學報
作者:
許呈瑟
作者(外文):
Hsu, Cheng-se
出版日期:
2020
卷期:
22:1
頁次:
頁129-148
主題關鍵詞:
英文閱讀
;
發現學習論
;
心智圖
;
摘要
;
English reading
;
Discovery learning
;
Mind maps
;
Summarizing
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(
1
) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:
1
共同引用:
13
點閱:0
傳統的英文閱讀教學,主要是以靜態方式進行,並透過記憶性考試來衡量學習成果,但這樣的學習經驗往往讓學生感到無聊或挫折,導致在教學現場中,學生經常只顧著玩手機或做自己的事情,甚至直接趴下睡覺,而這樣消極的學習模式,通常讓授課教師很苦惱,又很無能為力。但在全球化的網路時代中,英文閱讀能力絕對是與世界接軌的必備能力之一,若學生無法透過閱讀網路內容來提升自己的競爭力,將來在職場上的發展將可能受限。有鑒於英文閱讀能力對學生未來的重要性,本研究以學生的學習經驗為出發點,應用發現學習論為基礎,旨在發展一個創新的英文閱讀教學方法,改善學生學習經驗,以期最終能針對此教學現場之問題,提出一解決策略。本研究實施課程為科技大學應用外語系之大二英文閱讀課,創新教學方法採用摘要及心智圖兩種教學技巧,提供學生主動建構知識的機會,並結合資訊科技,增加師生課堂之互動性;透過學習經驗調查及課程滿意度問卷調查顯示,學生對於此創新教學方法滿意度很高,且有一半以上學生認為英文閱讀課變得有趣,並期待未來能有更多類似創新創意課程。本研究成果對於目前教學現場之問題提供一解決策略,也同時提供未來欲嘗試創新教學之英文教師一參考教學模式。
以文找文
Traditionally, in an English reading class, English teachers usually lecture throughout the entire class, and students' academic performance depends on how well they can do in paper-based exams. This traditional teaching method sometimes causes students to lose interest and even consider this learning experience painful. Therefore, it is not uncommon to find that students play with their cell phones or even fall asleep during class, which becomes a serious problem in today's classrooms. However, in this global era with the proliferation of network access, English reading is definitely one of the key abilities for students to link themselves with the world. Due to the important role the English reading ability plays in students' future, this study, based on the theory of discovery learning, aims to solve this problem by developing an innovative teaching method in English reading to improve students' learning experience. This research was carried out in the English reading class of second-year students in the department of Applied Foreign Languages of a university. Techniques of summarizing and mind maps were employed in class so that students were provided with the opportunity to build knowledge upon what they had already learned. The study results revealed that students' learning experience improved significantly at the end of the semester. The results not only provide a practical solution for teaches who encounter the same problem in class, but also introduce a new teaching model for English teachers who wish to try innovative instruction in their classes.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Cook, L. K.、Dover, C.、Dickson, M.、Colton, D. L.(2012)。From care plan to concept map: A paradigm shift。Teaching and Learning in Nursing,7(3),88-92。
2.
Gagne, R. M.、Wager, W. W.、Golas, K. C.、Keller, J. M.、Russell, J. D.(2005)。Principles of instructional design。Performance Improvement,44(2),44-46。
3.
Bruner, Jerome S.(1961)。The act of discovery。Harvard Educational Review,31(1),21-32。
4.
Noonan, M.(2013)。Mind maps: Enhancing midwifery education。Nurse Education Today,33(8),847-852。
5.
Hid, S.、Anderson, V.(1986)。Producing written summaries: Task demands, cognitive operations and implications for instruction。Review of Education Research,56(4),473-493。
6.
King, Alison(1992)。Comparison of Self-Questioning, Summarizing, and Notetaking-Review as Strategies for Learning from Lectures。American Educational Research Journal,29(2),303-323。
7.
Wittrock, M. C.(1989)。Generative processes of comprehension。Educational Psychologist,24(4),345-376。
8.
Thomas, J. W.、Rohwer, W. D. Jr.(1986)。Academic Studying: The role of learning strategies。Educational Psychology,21(1/2),19-41。
9.
Doctorow, M. J.、Wittrock, M. C.、Marks, C. B.(1978)。Generative processes in reading comprehension。Journal of Educational Psychology,70(2),109-118。
10.
Eppler, M. J.(2006)。A comparison between concept maps, mind maps, conceptual diagrams, and visual metaphors as complementary tools for knowledge construction and sharing。Information Visualization,5(3),202-210。
11.
Davies, M.(2011)。Concept mapping, mind mapping and argument mapping: What are the differences and do they matter?。Higher education,62(3),279-301。
12.
Boley, D. A.(2008)。Use of premade mind maps to enhance simulation learning。Nurse Educator,33(5),220-223。
13.
Rosciano, A.(2015)。The effectiveness of mind mapping as an active learning strategy among associate degree nursing students。Teaching and Learning in Nursing,10(2),93-99。
14.
Davis, F. B.(1944)。Fundamental factors of comprehension in reading。Psychometrika,9(3),185-197。
15.
Edwards, S.、Cooper, N.(2010)。Mind mapping as a teaching resource。The Clinical Teacher,7(4),236-239。
16.
Weisberg, R.、Balajthy, E.(1990)。Development of disabled readers' metacomprehension ability through summarization training using expository text: Results of three studies。Journal of Reading, Writing, and Learning Disabilities International,6(2),117-136。
17.
王珩(20090600)。影響學生英語能力之內部因素探討。臺中教育大學學報. 人文藝術類,23(1),69-81。
延伸查詢
18.
Mayer, R. E.(1984)。Aids to text comprehension。Educational Psychologist,19(1),30-42。
19.
蔡正章(20090600)。The Study of EFL Reading Strategies Used by Proficient and Non-proficient Applied Foreign Languages Students。蘭陽學報,8,49-54。
20.
Buran, A.、Filyukov, A.(2015)。Mind mapping technique in language learning。Procedia--Social and Behavioral Sciences,206,215-218。
21.
Spencer, J. R.、Anderson, K. M.、Ellis, K. K.(2013)。Radiant thinking and the use of the mind map in nurse practitioner education。Journal of Nursing Education,52(5),291-293。
22.
劉沛琳(20081000)。概念構圖理解策略在大學英文閱讀教學之成效。課程與教學,11(4),137-162。
延伸查詢
23.
劉文雲(20170600)。Assessing Three International Students' Perceptions of Reflective Journal Writing and Its Role in Developing Better Competences for Academic Literacy。彰化師大文學院學報,14/15,101-125。
24.
楊愛施(20100400)。The Effect of Using the Live ABC Online Courseware on the Development of EFL Reading Comprehension。建國科大學報,29(3),61-79。
25.
洪銓修、黃亞瑟(20181200)。A Study of Students' Perceptions towards Collaborative Strategic Reading in EFL Context。朝陽人文社會學刊,16(2),91-106。
延伸查詢
26.
Alfieri, L.、Brooks, P. J.、Aldrich, N. J.、Tenenbaum, H. R.(2011)。Does discovery-based instruction enhance learning?。Journal of Educational Psychology,103(1),1-18。
27.
Al Naqbi, S.(2011)。The use of mind mapping to develop writing skills in UAE schools。Education, Business and Society: Contemporary Middle Eastern Issues,4(2),120-133。
28.
(2012)。「英語力與國家競爭力」研討會紀實。English Career,32。
延伸查詢
29.
Bicknell-Holmes, T.、Seth Hoffman, P.(2000)。Elicit, engage, experience, explore: Discovery learning in library instruction。Reference Services Review,28(4),313-322。
30.
Dorier, J.-L.、García, F. J.(2013)。Challenges and opportunities for the implementation of inquiry-based learning in day-to-day teaching。ZDM,45(6),837-849。
31.
Kern, C. S.、Bush, K. L.、McCleish, J. M.(2006)。Mind-mapped care plans: Integrating an innovative educational tool as an alternative to traditional care plans。Journal of Nursing Education,45(4),112-119。
32.
King, J. R.、Biggs, S.、Lipsky, S.(1984)。Students' self-questioning and summarizing as reading study strategies。Journal of Reading Behavior,16(3),205-218。
33.
Malone, L. D.、Mastropieri, M. A.(1991)。Reading comprehension instruction: Summarization and self-monitoring training for students with learning disabilities。Exceptional Children,58(3),270-279。
34.
Mosca, J. B.、Howard, L. W.(1997)。Grounded learning: Breathing life into business education。Journal of Education for Business,73(2),90-93。
35.
Ray, W. E.(1961)。Pupil discovery vs. Direct instruction。The Journal of Experimental Education,29(3),271-280。
36.
Papert, S.(2000)。What's the big idea? Toward a pedagogy of idea power。IBM Systems Journal,39(3/4),720-729。
37.
Wittrock, M. C.、Alesandrini, K.(1990)。Generation of summaries and analogies and analytic and holistic abilities。American Educational Research Journal,27(3),489-502。
圖書
1.
Schank, R. C.、Cleary, C.(1995)。Engines for education。Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Eelbaum Associates。
2.
Buzan, T.、Buzan, B.(2006)。The mind map book。Pearson Education。
3.
Henson, K. T.(2015)。Curriculum planning: Integrating multiculturalism, constructivism, and education reform。Waveland Press。
4.
Grabe, W.(2009)。Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice。Ernst Klett Sprachen。
5.
Stokke, A.(2015)。What to do about Canada's declining math scores?。CD Howe Institute。
單篇論文
1.
Bonwell, C. C.(1998)。Active Learning: Energizing the Classroom,Green Mountain Falls, CO:Active Learning Workshops。
其他
1.
林淑媛(2016)。閱讀教學,就只有讀嗎?,https://flipedu.parenting.com.tw/article/2054。
延伸查詢
2.
W3Techs(20190723)。Historical yearly trends in the usage of content languages for websites,https://w3techs.com/technologies/history_overview/content_language/ms/y。
圖書論文
1.
Buzan, T.、Buzan, B.(1996)。Radiant thinking。The mind map book: How to use radiant thinking to maximize your brain's untapped potential。
2.
Reigeluth, C. M.(2018)。Lesson blueprints based on the elaboration theory of instruction。Instructional Theories in Action。Routledge。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
英文篇章結構教學對提升技術型高中學生英文閱讀理解之探討
2.
技術型高中學生中英翻譯時態錯誤分析
3.
概念圖及網路同儕互評教學對國中生閱讀理解能力之影響
4.
閱讀動機與網路素養調查對大學通識課程之啟示
5.
A Study of Students' Perceptions towards Collaborative Strategic Reading in EFL Context
6.
概念圖搭配wiki製作網頁教材探討學生學習成效之研究
7.
Assessing Three International Students' Perceptions of Reflective Journal Writing and Its Role in Developing Better Competences for Academic Literacy
8.
結合即時診斷機制的行動學習與自我調整學習模式對學生運用概念圖的學習成就與行為之影響
9.
英語科補救教學對國中低成就學生英語學習動機、學習策略與學習成效影響之研究
10.
運用概念構圖於國小六年級學生動物繁殖概念學習之研究
11.
電腦化概念構圖與創意發想關係之研究
12.
偏遠地區泰雅族與漢族中學生中文識讀能力之分析
13.
影響學生英語能力之內部因素探討
14.
概念構圖理解策略在大學英文閱讀教學之成效
1.
閱讀與記憶策略在公職考試應用之研究
2.
MSM暨教育測驗統計之應用
3.
國立臺中教育大學教育測驗統計研究所博士論文
無相關書籍
無相關著作
1.
論地上權案地租計收方式調整之制度變遷
2.
影響房屋稅稅基因素案例解析--以臺南市為例
3.
確保移轉訂價結果與價值創造一致之跨國稅務治理
4.
複雜股權結構與企業避稅之關聯--以我國上市櫃公司為例
5.
福利支付型及租稅徵納型區塊鏈生態系解析--國際案例評估及臺灣實施展望
6.
從政策哲學檢視我國新冠病毒的防疫
7.
照護一位肌萎縮性側索硬化症末期病人之安寧護理經驗
8.
影響安寧居家護理病人在宅往生之因素
9.
管理學劇場:應用心理劇方法於管理學教學
10.
淺談浮世繪「青樓畫家」--喜多川歌麿
11.
資產策略應該集中或多角化?臺灣壽險業實證分析
12.
學院利益相關者的識別與需求分析--以北京師範大學經濟與工商管理學院為例
13.
從美國案例探討遊戲角色之實質相似性標準--兼評智慧財產法院104年民商訴字第27號民事判決
QR Code