:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:異議,別急著爭吵:科學語句的多元詮釋與協商空間
書刊名:科技、醫療與社會
作者:李一平盧佳慧洪宜君楊倍昌
作者(外文):Lee, Yi-pingLu, Chia-huiHung, I-chunYang, Bei-chang
出版日期:2021
卷期:33
頁次:頁121-166
主題關鍵詞:科學溝通語言屬性語意分岐反身性解釋焦點團體Scientific communicationLanguage attributesSemantic divergenceReflexive interpretationFocus group
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:20
  • 點閱點閱:1
期刊論文
1.Labov, William、Waletzky, Joshua(1997)。Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience。Journal of Narrative and Life History,7(1-4),3-38。  new window
2.Epstein, Steven(1995)。The Construction of Lay Expertise: AIDS Activism and the Forging of Credibility in the Reform of Clinical Trials。Science, Technology, & Human Values,20(4),408-437。  new window
3.Yore, Larry D.、Treagust, David F.(2006)。Current realities and future possibilities: Language and science literacy--Empowering research and informing instruction。International Journal of Science Education,28(2/3),291-314。  new window
4.Gardner, Rod(1998)。Between speaking and listening: The vocalization of understandings。Applied Linguistics,19(2),204-224。  new window
5.Wynne, Brian(1989)。Sheepfarming After Chernobyl: A Case Study in Communicating Scientific Information。Environment,31(2),10-39。  new window
6.Simis, Molly J.、Madden, Haley、Cacciatore, Michael A.、Yeo, Sara K.(2016)。The Lure of Rationality: Why Does the Deficit Model Persist in Science Communication?。Public Understanding of Science,25(4),400-414。  new window
7.李松濤(20171200)。大學生對於科學研究資訊的閱讀表現探究:以網路科學新聞為例。中華傳播學刊,32,91-128。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.林遠澤(20050600)。真理何為?--從哈伯瑪斯真理共識理論的實用轉向論真理的規範性涵義。歐美研究,35(2),363-404。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.陳秀玲(2010)。反身性解釋對焦點團體訪談之應用和啟示。東海教育評論,5,95-127。  延伸查詢new window
10.李旺龍(20140300)。科學家該怎麼投入科學傳播?。科學月刊,45(3)=531,194-198。  延伸查詢new window
11.楊倍昌(20160400)。知識辯證的微觀動態:當代生物科學期刊如何接受一篇論文。科技、醫療與社會,22,109-155+157。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Yeo, Sara K.、Xenos, Michael A.、Brossard, Dominique、Scheufele, Dietram A.(2015)。Selecting Our Own Science: How Communication Contexts and Individual Traits Shape Information Seeking。The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,658(1),172-191。  new window
13.李一平、楊倍昌(20210400)。科學溝通時的語詞解讀分歧。科技、醫療與社會,32,187-232。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.林宜平、王鈞瑜、陳信行、黃于玲、林崇熙(20150400)。議題討論:RCA法庭觀察。科技、醫療與社會,20,235-268。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.Weigand, Edda(1999)。Misunderstanding: The Standard Case。Journal of Pragmatics,31(6),763-785。  new window
16.Locke, Simon(2002)。The Public Understanding of Science--A Rhetorical Invention。Science, Technology, & Human Values,27(1),87-111。  new window
研究報告
1.Lewenstein, Bruce V.(2003)。Models of Public Communication of Science and Technology。  new window
圖書
1.Ricoeur, Paul、Czerny, Robert、McLaughlin, Kathleen、Costello, John(1977)。The Rule of Metaphor: The Creation of Meaning in Language。University of Toronto Press。  new window
2.Alvesson, Mats、Skoldberg, Kaj(2000)。Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research。Sage。  new window
3.Pinker, Steven(1994)。The Language Instinct: How the Mind Creates Language。William Morrow and Co.。  new window
4.Hymes, Dell H.(1974)。Foundations in Sociolinguistics: An Ethnographic Approach。University of Pennsylvania Press。  new window
5.Vico, Giambattista、Bergin, Thomas Goddard、Fisch, Max Harold(1984)。The New Science of Giambattista Vico。Cornell University Press。  new window
6.Yule, George(2010)。The study of language: An introduction。Cambridge University Press。  new window
7.Collins, Harry、Pinch, Trevor、李尚仁(2016)。柯倫醫生吐真言:醫學爭議教我們的二三事。左岸文化。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.楊倍昌(2008)。生物學的語言:變動的語意。看不見的工具:像生物學家一樣思考。成大醫科社研中心:麗文出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.楊倍昌(2018)。演化之下,人類為什麼會保留錯誤的認知模式?。變遷:生醫實驗室的知識拼圖。成大出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.Moldaschl, Manfred F.、Brödner, Peter(2002)。A Reflexive Methodology of Intervention。Creating Sustainable Work Systems: Emerging Perspectives and Practices。Routledge。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE