:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:平均分酬與不公平感
書刊名:中華心理學刊
作者:楊中芳許志超
作者(外文):Yang, Chung-fangHui, Harry C.
出版日期:1986
卷期:28:2
頁次:頁61-71
主題關鍵詞:平均分酬不公平感小團體大學生共同作業
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(0) 專書(1) 專書論文(4)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:117
  • 點閱點閱:74
     本研究嘗試用新的設計來探討在小作業團體中,影響個別團員不滿「平均」分酬的原因。過去有關的研究,過份強調團員的貢獻量,而忽略了:(1)團員對團體作業本身的滿意程度;(2)對團體的團隊精神的評估;(3)團員自身群體傾向等因素,所可能產生的影響。這個缺點多是由於這類研究的設計是採用實驗法,將上述因素加以控制。本研究用一種比較與實際團體作業情境相吻合的田野研究法,將這些因素與分酬後所產生的不公平感之間的關係,作了一個全面的探討。研究結果顯示小團體中因「平均」分酬所引起的不公平感,似乎不是針對著勞酬分配的原則。本研究取樣的大學生對與同學一起作一項共同作業,而共得一個團體總分的「平均」分酬行為,所產生的不公平感,只與團體的缺乏合作精神有關。而與團員自身的貢獻量並無顯著的關係。但是貢獻量卻與團員們是否寧願得一個個人分數(如果有選擇的話),有顯著相關。這個結果顯示,如果條件允許的話,有能力的人還是願意自勞自穫的。
     This study explored causes underlying group members' satisfaction regarding equal distribution of rewards derived from joint effort. Previous studies had focussed on the effects of members' levels of contribution, and had not paid enough attention to (1) group members' satisfaction with the joint effort itself; (2) assessment of the team spirit; and (3) group members' collectivist tendency. These factors were usually overlooked in a controlled experiment. In the present study, a field approach was employed to analyze more thoroughly the relationship between these factors and post-allocation feeling of unfairness. University students from Hong Kong and Taiwan, who received a group score for their small group term projects in a course, responded to an anonymous questionnaire. Results indicated that feelingof unfairness was a result more of a lack of group cooperation, than of the relative contribution levels of the group members. However, if circumstances permit, the high contributors were more willing to be assessed individually than the low contributors were.
期刊論文
1.Sampson, Edward E.(1975)。On Justice as Equality。Journal of Social Issues,31(3),45-64。  new window
2.Leung, K.、Bond, M. H.(1982)。How Chinese and Americans reward task-related contributions: A preliminary study。Psychologia,25,32-39。  new window
3.Yang, Kuo-Shu(1981)。Social Orientation and Individual Modernity among Chinese Students in Taiwan。Journal of Social Psychology,113,159-170。  new window
4.Hui, C. Harry、Triandis, Harry C.(1986)。Individualism-collectivism: A study of cross-cultural researchers。Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,17(2),225-248。  new window
5.Ng, S. H.(1984)。Equity and social categorization effects on intergroup allocation of rewards。British journal of Social Psychology,23,165-172。  new window
6.Baumeister, Roy F.(1982)。A self-presentational view of social phenomena。Psychological Bulletin,91(1),3-26。  new window
7.Walster, E.、Walster, G. W.(1975)。Equity and social justice。Journal of Social Issues,31(3),21-43。  new window
8.Hui, C. H.(1988)。Measurement of individualism-collectivism。Journal of Research in Personality,22,17-36。  new window
9.Leung, Kwok、Bond, Michael H.(1984)。The Impact of Cultural Collectivism on Reward Allocation。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,47,793-804。  new window
10.Dion, K. L.(1973)。Cohesiveness as a determinant of ingroup-outgroup bias。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,28,163-171。  new window
11.Reis, H. T.、Gruzen, J.(1976)。On mediating equity, equality, and self-presentation in social exchanges。Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,12,487-503。  new window
12.Bond, M. H.、Leung, K.、Wan, K. C.(1982)。How does cultural collectivism operate? The impact of task and maintenance contributions on reward allocation。Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,13,186-200。  new window
13.Feather, N. T.、O'Driscoll, M. P.(1980)。Observers' reactions to an equal or equitable allocator in relation to allocator input, causal attributions, and value importance。European Journal of Social Psychology,10,107-129。  new window
14.Kahn, A.、Lamn, H.、Nelson, R. E.(1977)。Preference for an equal or equitable allocator。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,35,837-844。  new window
15.Leventhal, G. S.、Michaels, J. W.、Sanford, C.(1972)。Inequity and interpersonal conflict: Reward allocation and secrecy about reward as methods of preventing conflict。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,23(1),88-102。  new window
16.Marin, G.(1981)。Perceiving justice across cultures: Equity vs. equality in Colombia and in the United States。International Journal of Psychology,16,153-159。  new window
17.Reis, H. T.、Burns, L. B.(1982)。The salience of the self in responses to inequity。Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,18,464-475。  new window
18.楊國樞(19810600)。中國人的性格與行為:形成及蛻變。中華心理學刊,23(1),39-55。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.朱真茹、楊國樞(19760300)。個人現代性與相對作業量對報酬分配行為的影響。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊,41,79-95。  延伸查詢new window
20.Deutsch, Morton(1975)。Equity, equality and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice?。Journal of Social Issues,31(3),137-149。  new window
21.Mahler, I.、Greenberg, L.、Hayashi, H.(1981)。A comparative study of rules of justice: Japanese versus American。Psychologia: An International Journal of Psychology in the Orient,24,1-8。  new window
圖書
1.Walster, E.、Walster, G. W.、Berscheid, E. S.(1978)。Equity: Theory and Research。Boston, Massachusetts:Allyn and Bacon。  new window
2.費孝通(1947)。鄉土中國。香港:鳳凰出版社。  延伸查詢new window
單篇論文
1.楊中芳(1986)。中國人在小團體中的酬勞分配行為。  延伸查詢new window
2.Anderson, N. H.(1983)。Psychodynamics of everyday life: Blaming and avoiding blames,Center for Human Information Processing, University of California, San Diego。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE