:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:已婚男性家庭事務分工態度之研究
書刊名:東吳社會工作學報
作者:莫藜藜 引用關係
作者(外文):Mo, Li-li
出版日期:1997
卷期:3
頁次:頁117-155
主題關鍵詞:已婚男性家務分工Married maleHousehold labor
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(25) 博士論文(6) 專書(1) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:24
  • 共同引用共同引用:125
  • 點閱點閱:318
     本研究先從理論基礎瞭解與主題相關之一般概念,再自行設計「已婚男性家庭事務分工態度」問卷,調查統計有效問卷2440份。經資料分析分三大方面陳述研究發現: 1.家務分工事實方面: (1).受訪男士每週在料理家務、照顧子女和管帳理財等方面所花的時間各以 平均五小時以下者佔大多數。 (2).已婚男士們最常做的家事勞務皆不為每日經常性的事;所做前五項排序 皆無與其妻重疊之項,可見其分工有性別區隔現象。而最常做的照顧子女項目 是從事室外活動。至於管帳理財則較常投入的是家中的大型開支部份。 2.家務分工態度方面: (1).多數男士對參與家事持肯定的看法;但當丈夫一人是家中經濟來源時, 傾向只負責女人做不來的家事;而當兩人都是家中經濟來源時,則會有「誰有空誰就做」的態度。 (2).大多數皆同意有察覺到孩子們希望經常和他在一起,並且與社經地位呈正相關。 (3).多數男人同意養家不完全是男人的責任;但丈夫一人為家中經濟來源、 或教育程度較低者,較持傳統性別態度;而夫妻兩人皆經濟來源、或教育程度較高者,較持現代的性別態度。 3.家務分工滿意程度: (1).最影響料理家務滿意程度的是:認為幫忙家務是體貼的男人。而最影響照顧子女滿意程度的是:察覺到孩子希望經常和他在一起。 由家務分工態度與分工事實之差距,可見已婚男性「觀念上支持,行動上卻仍保守」的形變質不變的事實,但社會的趨勢是期待「形」變,「質」也需對應的變。另外,從規範資源論→到符號互動論→到交換與選擇理論,其所強調的概念是從傳統到現代的態度,事實上,家庭已走到互助論的時候了。
     Base on the theories of exchange and choices; symbolic interactionism; and the theory of normative resources, this study is engaged in the exploration of the culture shock among the married men during the modern society. The quantitation method of a survey study is used。 There are 2440 samples that selected from the different stage of family life cycle in the north, south, east and middle part of Taiwan area. The results are as follows: 1. The facts of household labor division 1)The married men still are in less involvement in the household labors. 2) The most things the do are not everyday routine household labor. It is clearly divided by male-femal characteries. 2.The attitudes of household labor division 1)There are more men have recognized the importance of taking household labor。 2)There are more men have sensed that the children need to be with fathers。3)There are most men disgree that en who are the main person as a breadearner in the family C 3.The satisfaction of household labor When they realized that helping household labor is generally a considerable and caring men, they become the most satisfied with themselves. Over all, the difference between the facts and attuides reveals that the married males today are aving modern concepts, but somewhat still conservative in behavior and action C.
期刊論文
1.Erickson, Rebecca J.(1993)。Reconceptualizing Family Work: The Effect of Emotion Work on Perceptions of Marital Quality。Journal of Marriage and the Family,55,888-900。  new window
2.Atkison, J.、Houston, T. L.(1984)。Sex role orientation and division of labor early in marriage。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,46(2),330-345。  new window
3.Grizzle, J. E.(1969)。Analysis of categorical data by linear models。Biometrics,25,489-504。  new window
4.Douthitt, R. A.(1989)。The division of labor within the home: have gender roles change?。Sex Roles,20(11/12),693-704。  new window
5.Hawkins, A. J.(1994)。An evaluation of a program to help dual-earner couples share the second shift。Family Relations,43(2),213-220。  new window
6.Presser, H. B.(1994)。Employment schedules among dual-earner spouses and the division of household labor by gender。American Sociological Review,59,348-364。  new window
7.Huber, J.、Spitze, G.(1981)。Wives' emploment, household behaviors, and sex-role attitudes。Social Forces,60(1),150-169。  new window
8.Zhang, C. X.、Farley, J. E.(1995)。Gender and the distribution of household work: a comparaison of self-reports by female college faculty in the United States and China。Journal of Comparative Family Studies,26(2),195-205。  new window
9.Stohs, J. H.(1994)。Alternative ethics in employed women's household labor。Journal of Family Issues,15(4),550-561。  new window
10.Sanchez, L.(1994)。Marital resources, family structure resources, and housbands' housework participetion。Journal of Family Issues,15(3),379-402。  new window
11.蘇建文(1968)。兒童心目中父母職分之調查研究。師大心理與教育學報,2,87-109。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.伊慶春、楊文山、蔡瑤玲(19921200)。夫妻衝突處理模式的影響因素:丈夫、妻子、和夫妻配對樣本的比較。中國社會學刊,16,25-54。new window  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.王麗容(1994)。婦女二度就業需求與策略研究。  延伸查詢new window
2.莫藜藜、王行(1995)。已婚男性的家庭價值觀及其對家庭的需求之探究--兼論家庭政策之規劃 (計畫編號:NSC84-2411-H-031-002-H3)。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.林翠湄(1989)。父母的性別角色態度對兒童性別角色態度的影響--父母家務分工模式及對兒童家務指派的效應分析(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.周玟琪(1994)。影響臺灣地區家庭家務分工因素之探討(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.李宜靜(1990)。雙工作家庭家事分工及其影響因素之探討(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.李寬芳(1995)。家務分工、夫妻家庭角色類型與婚姻品質之間的關係(碩士論文)。東海大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳明穗(1986)。家庭型態、夫妻知覺一致性與婚姻滿足之關係研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.叢肇祥(1988)。丈夫參與家事工作及其對夫妻雙方生活感受影響之研究雙工作家庭與單工作家庭之比較(碩士論文)。東吳大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.王美惠(1987)。已婚職業婦女之家務分工、性別、角色態度和社會支援與婚姻滿意的研究(碩士論文)。中國文化大學。  延伸查詢new window
8.郭藜灩(1989)。已婚職業婦女性別態度、工作角色、家庭角色關係之研究(碩士論文)。台大。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.伊慶春、高淑貴(1986)。有關已婚婦女的性別角色態度。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳彰儀(1986)。已婚職業婦女之壓力、生活型態、休閒活動、婚姻滿足及工作滿足。台北:正昇教育科學社。  延伸查詢new window
3.Ekeh, P. P.(1974)。Social Exchange Theory。Harvard University Press。  new window
4.Heath, A.(1976)。Rational Choice and Social Exchange。Cambridge:English Cambridge University Press。  new window
5.馮燕(1995)。托育服務:生態觀點的分析。臺北:巨流。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Rubin, Allen、Babbie, Earl、趙碧華、朱美珍(1995)。研究方法:社會工作暨人文科學領域的運用。臺北:雙葉書廊。  延伸查詢new window
7.Blau, Peter Michael(1964)。Exchange and Power in Social Life。John Wiley & Sons, Inc.。  new window
圖書論文
1.Nye, F. I.(1979)。Choice, exchange, and the family。Contemporary Theories about the Family。New York:Free Press。  new window
2.伊慶春、蔡瑤玲(1989)。台北地區夫妻權力的分析--以家庭決策為例。台灣社會現象的分析。  延伸查詢new window
3.Blumberg, R. L.(1991)。Introduction: the 'triple overlap' of gender stratification, economy, and the family。Gender, Family, and Economy : The Triple Overlap,。Newburg Park, CA:Sage。  new window
4.Burr, W. R.(1979)。Symbolic interaction and the family。Contemporary Theories about the Family。New York:Free Press。  new window
5.Stryker, S.(1964)。The interactional and situational approaches。Handbook of Marriage and the Family。Chicago:Rand McNally。  new window
6.Shelton, B. A.、John, D.(1993)。Ethnicity, race, and difference: a comparison of White, Black, and Hispance men's household labor time。Men, Work and Family。Newbury Park:Sage。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE