:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:親密關係暴力:臺灣女性之受暴與求助經驗
書刊名:臺灣社會工作學刊
作者:林雅容 引用關係林東龍 引用關係陳杏容 引用關係歐紫彤潘淑滿 引用關係
作者(外文):Lin, Ya-jungLin, Dong-longChen, Hsing-jungOu, Tzu-tungPan, Shu-man
出版日期:2016
卷期:17
頁次:頁1+3-41
主題關鍵詞:親密關係暴力社會文化權力控制求助行為Intimate partner violenceSocial culturePower controlHelp-seeking behavior
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(7) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:7
  • 共同引用共同引用:293
  • 點閱點閱:202
本文旨在探究台灣女性在親密關係中的受暴與求助經驗,進而對暴力防治工作提出建議。研究資料源自北部及中部進行兩場焦點團體訪談,共計八名研究參與者。本研究結果有三,分別為:首先,女性難以察覺精神(或語言)暴力,而且將以個人臉面喪失和宗教之因果論說明暴力問題。此外,即使女性的個人資本較男性高,女性未藉此抵制男性的不當對待,甚至視自己為男性或夫家的財產,將暴力問題合理化。其次,有關求助經驗方面,部分女性有尋求警察、社工的經驗,能否取得有效的介入取決於專業人員對事件的看法及態度,其中家暴法具相當程度的影響力。部分女性曾求助娘家家人,從中顯現出不同世代對問題介入的程度有所差異,例如女性不易自父母取得正向支持,甚至要求隱忍;但是手足能給予經濟或情緒支持。最末,部分女性認為能否脫離暴力需倚重個人意願,但是政府單位可提供經濟安全或情緒支持,穩定女性離開暴力環境後的生活。本文最末針對暴力防治之教育與宣導工作、專業人員應具備的知能及服務提供,以及女性脫離暴力後的生活輔導此三方面提出建議。
This paper aims at exploring how Taiwanese women are affected by intimate partner violence and how they seek help, which will prove useful in proposing recommendations for the prevention of violence. Two focus group interviews were conducted respectively in the northern and central regions of Taiwan with a total of eight women as participants of this study, out of which three main findings were identified. Firstly, it was found that women are not always aware of psychological (or verbal) abuse and typically interpret issues of abuse in terms of loss of personal face or by resorting to religious theories of karma. Even in circumstances where women's personal assets are of higher value than that of their male counterparts, they do not utilize this advantage to resist the maltreatment perpetrated by men; at times women even perceive themselves as the property of their husbands or their families and thus rationalize domestic violence and abuse. Secondly, the study probed into women's help-seeking experiences; some approached law enforcement personnel whilst others turned to social workers for assistance. Whether or not these professionals were able to exercise effective intervention depended on their stance and attitude regarding the issue of abuse, two aspects greatly influenced by relevant laws and regulations on domestic violence prevention. Some of the subjects interviewed in this study turned to their families of origin for assistance, hence highlighting the generation gap in attitudes towards intervention on abuse-related issues. Indeed, few women obtained the positive support of their parents; some were even requested to endure in silence. Siblings, however, were better able to provide financial and even emotional support. Lastly, a portion of women believe personal will and determination to be of fundamental importance in liberating oneself from violence and abuse, but that government administrations also play crucial roles in the provision of financial security and emotional support, thus ensuring a stable life for women freed from the chains of domestic violence. This paper concludes by proposing suggestions in three major dimensions: increasing public awareness and improving education on violence prevention, ensuring that professionals are equipped with expert knowledge and able to provide necessary services, and providing women with access to lifestyle counseling following their escape from abuse and domestic violence.
期刊論文
1.Yoshihama, Meiko(2005)。A web in the patriarchal clan system: Tactics of intimate partners in the Japanese sociocultural context。Violence Against Women,11(10),1236-1262。  new window
2.王珮玲(20120600)。親密伴侶殺人案件之分析:以男性謀殺女性案件為例。中華心理衛生學刊,25(2),231-266。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.馬宗潔、廖美蓮、洪惠芬(20121200)。比較親密伴侶殺人案之性別差異。臺大社會工作學刊,26,1-40。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.邱獻輝、葉光輝(20140900)。臉面在教唆殺妻歷程的心理意涵:華人臉面理論的應用。人文及社會科學集刊,26(3),483-523。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.宋麗玉、施教裕(20120600)。受暴婦女之復元與負向感受:輪廓與相關因素之初探。中華心理衛生學刊,25(2),191-229。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.謝秀芬、馮瑞鶯、徐畢卿(20090900)。The Experiences of Taiwanese Women Who Have Experienced Domestic Violence。The Journal of Nursing Research,17(3),153-160。new window  new window
7.王珮玲(20101200)。親密伴侶暴力案件保護令成效與相關因素之研究:以禁制、遷出及遠離令為例。社會政策與社會工作學刊,14(2),1-47。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.吳東彥、林繼偉(20140800)。青少年婚暴子女分離個體化發展及其所知覺之家庭結構。中華輔導與諮商學報,40,27-58。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.潘淑滿(20040600)。婚姻移民婦女、公民權與婚姻暴力。社會政策與社會工作學刊,8(1),85-131。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.McDonald, G. W.(1980)。Family power: the assessment of a decade of theory and research, 1970-1979。Journal of Marriage and the Family,42(4),841-854。  new window
11.王珮玲(20120600)。臺灣親密關係暴力危險評估表(TIPVDA)之建構與驗證。社會政策與社會工作學刊,16(1),1-58。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.王珮玲(20090600)。親密關係暴力危險評估:實務操作方法的探討。社會政策與社會工作學刊,13(1),141-184。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.王珮玲(20150600)。如影隨形的暴力:親密伴侶跟蹤行為。社會政策與社會工作學刊,19(1),1-44。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.沈瓊桃(20130300)。大專青年的約會暴力經驗與因應策略初探。中華心理衛生學刊,26(1),1-31。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.林方晧(20011200)。另一種沉默--婚姻裡的性暴力。婦女與性別研究通訊,61,17-19。  延伸查詢new window
16.林盈秀、童伊廸、鍾道詮(20150100)。親密關係中的受暴經驗--以未成年階段懷孕女性為例。臺灣社會工作學刊,15,51+53-79。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.邱獻輝(20131200)。男性的夫妻角色期待與實踐:親密暴力者vs.無親密暴力者。犯罪學期刊,16(2),61-92。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.程淑華(20150400)。愛情嫉妒對親密伴侶選擇攻擊策略之調節效果分析。課程與教學,18(2),45-77。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.鄭詩穎(20151200)。受暴女性為何無法脫逃?--從「家庭暴力」到「高壓控管」。中華心理衛生學刊,28(4),481-497。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.Dalal, K.(2011)。Does economic empowerment protect women from intimate partner violence?。Journal of Injury & Violence,3(1),35-44。  new window
21.Aspalter, C.(2006)。East Asian Welfare model。International Journal of Social Welfare,15,290-301。  new window
22.Decker, M. R.、Nair, S.、NiranjanSaggurti, B. S.、Jethva, M.、Raj, A.、Donta, B.、Silverman, J. G.(2013)。Violence-related coping, help-seeking and health care-based intervention preferences among perinatal women in mumbai, India。Journal of Interpersonal Violence,28(9),1924-1947。  new window
23.Ergöçmen, B. A.、Yüksel-Kaptanoğlu, İ.、Jansen, H. A.(2013)。Intimate partner violence and the relation between help-seeking behavior and the severity and frequency of physical violence among women in Turkey。Violence Against Women,19(9),1151-1174。  new window
24.Haarr, R. N.(2010)。Suicidality among battered women in Tajikistan。Violence Against Women,16(7),764-788。  new window
25.Jayasuriya, V.、Wijewardena, K.、Axemo, P.(2011)。Intimate partner violence against women in the capital province of Sri Lanka: Prevalence, risk factors, and help seeking。Violence Against Women,17(8),1086-1102。  new window
26.Kang, N-S.(2004)。Confucian familism and its social/religious embodiment in christianity: Reconsidering the family discourse from a feminist perspective。Asia Journal of Theology,18,168-189。  new window
27.Kim, J. Y.、Lee, J. H.(2011)。Factors influencing help-seeking behavior among battered Korean women in intimate relationships。Journal of Interpersonal Violence,26(15),2991-3012。  new window
28.Kwon, H-J.(1997)。European welfare regimes: Comparative perspectives on East Asian welfare systems。Journal of Social Policy,26(4),467-484。  new window
29.Loke, A. Y.、Wan, M. L. E.、Hayter, M.(2012)。lived experience of women victims of intimate partner violence。Journal of Clinical Nursing,21,2336-2346。  new window
30.Naved, R. T.、Azim, S.、Bhuiya, A.、Persson, L. A. K.(2006)。Physical violence by husbands: Magnitude, disclosure and help-seeking behavior of women in Bangladesh。Social Science & Medicine,62,2917-2929。  new window
31.Ohnishi, M.、Nakao, R.、Shibayama, S.、Matsuyama, Y.、Oishi, K.、Miyahara, H.(2011)。Knowledge, experience, and potential risks of dating violence among Japanese university students: a cross-sectional study。Public Health,11,339。  new window
32.Panchanadeswaran, S.、Koverola, C.(2005)。The voices of battered women in India。Violence Against Women,11(6),736-758。  new window
33.Safilios-Rothschild, C.(1976)。A macro- and micro-examination of family power and love: An exchange model。Journal of Marriage and the Family,37,355-362。  new window
34.Truninger, E.(1971)。Marital violence: the legal solutions。Hasting Law Review,23(1),259-276。  new window
35.王珮玲(20100600)。警察、檢察官、法官對社工認知之探討:以家庭暴力與性侵害案件處理為例。臺大社會工作學刊,21,1-53。new window  延伸查詢new window
36.呂玉瑕(19841200)。婦女就業與家庭角色、權力結構之關係。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊,56,111-143。  延伸查詢new window
37.周月清(19940400)。臺灣受虐婦女社會支持探討之研究。婦女與兩性學刊,5,69-108。new window  延伸查詢new window
38.伊慶春、楊文山、蔡瑤玲(19921200)。夫妻衝突處理模式的影響因素:丈夫、妻子、和夫妻配對樣本的比較。中國社會學刊,16,25-54。new window  延伸查詢new window
39.林明傑、沈勝昂(20040600)。婚姻暴力加害人分類之研究。中華心理衛生學刊,17(2),67-92。new window  延伸查詢new window
40.陳芬苓(20010600)。私領域公問題--性侵害與家庭暴力的結構因素探討。臺大社會工作學刊,4,243+245-280。new window  延伸查詢new window
41.林雅容(20050600)。經濟變動中女性養家者的夫妻權力:以東石漁村為例。臺大社會工作學刊,11,1+3-44。new window  延伸查詢new window
42.邱獻輝、葉光輝(20131000)。失根的大樹:從文化觀點探究親密暴力殺人者的生命敘說。中華輔導與諮商學報,37,89-123。new window  延伸查詢new window
43.潘淑滿(20030500)。婚姻暴力的性別政治。女學學誌,15,195-253。new window  延伸查詢new window
44.陳若璋(19920300)。臺灣婚姻暴力之本質、歷程與影響。婦女與兩性學刊,3,117-147。new window  延伸查詢new window
45.王樂民、鄭瑞隆(20081200)。警察機關執行保護令對遭受婚姻暴力婦女脫離受暴關係成效之研究--以臺南市為例。亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊,4(2),1-30。new window  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.潘淑滿、游美貴(2012)。親密關係暴力問題之研究 (計畫編號:PG10005-0292)。內政部。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.呂佳芸(2011)。親密關係受暴女性求助行為分析(碩士論文)。國立臺北大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Frude, N.(1991)。Understanding Family Problems: A Psychological Approach。N.Y.:Chichester:John Wiley & Sons Ltd.。  new window
2.Dobash, R. E.、Dobash, R. P.(1979)。Violence against wives: A case against the patriarchy。New York:Free Press。  new window
3.潘淑滿(2003)。質性研究:理論與應用。臺北市:心理出版社股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.劉再復、林崗(1988)。傳統與中國人。臺北市:人間。  延伸查詢new window
5.潘淑滿(20070000)。親密暴力 : 多重身分與權力流動。臺北:心理。new window  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.世界衛生組織(2005)。WHO: Multi-country Study on Women's Health and Domestic Violence against Women,http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/violence/24159358X/en/。  new window
2.世界衛生組織(2010)。Global health observatory-Data repository,http://apps.who.int/gho/data/node.home。  new window
3.衛福部保服司(2016)。97年至104年家庭暴力事件被害人籍別及案件類型,http://www.mohw.gov.tw/CHT/DOPS/DM1.aspx?f_list_no=806&fod_list_no=4620。  延伸查詢new window
4.聯合國(2010)。2010年世界婦女:趨勢和統計,http://unstats.un.org/unsd/publication/Seriesk/SeriesK_19c.pdf。  延伸查詢new window
5.聯合國愛滋病規劃署(2015)。Global AIDS response progress reporting,https://aidsreportingtool.unaids.org/static/docs/GARPR_Guidelines_2016_EN.pdf。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE