:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:我國大學生對政治權利態度之分析
書刊名:東吳政治學報
作者:黃秀端 引用關係
作者(外文):Hawang, Shiow-daun
出版日期:1998
卷期:9
頁次:頁171-202
主題關鍵詞:政治權利人身自由言論自由集會遊行自由參政權請願權政治社會化政治預存傾向Political rightsFreedom of personFreedom of speechFreedom of meetingFreedom of political participationPolitical socializationPolitical predisposition
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:32
  • 點閱點閱:28
     本文旨在了解大學生對公民權利之態度,以及探討可能影響其人權態度之因素。在針對全國953位大學生樣本做調查訪問之後,本文發現,在人身自由上、在黑名單問題上、在政府對電視電影節目之檢查以及對參政權限制的問題上,大學生的態度仍然相當傳統與保守,因此人權教育在大學階段仍有其必要。 理論上,影響大學生人權態度的因素可能包括長期與短期因素,本文僅把焦點放在長期因素的影響。家庭社會化、權威型人格以及政治預存傾向皆屬於較長期的影響。而這些因素中,政治預存傾向似乎對大學生人權態度有較直接的影響,而政治預存傾向中,又以民主價值與人權態度有較直接的關係。權威型人格與民主價值有負面的關係,但是在大部份情況下兩者對政治權利皆有獨立之影響。家庭政治社會化的影響力相當微弱,可能是因為其對人權態度之影響較為間接,如透過人格特質或透過政治預存傾向而對人權態度產生間接影響。
This paper intends to study college students' attitudes toward political rights, and what factors affect their attitudes toward political rights. According to our results of interview with 937 college students in Taiwan, they are quite liberal in some cases, but in terms of freedom of person, freedom of travel for political dissident, qualification of presidential candidates, and censorship of moves and television, they are still quite conservative. There are long-term and short-term influences on political attitudes and behavior. In this paper, long-term influences of human rights attitudes are examined, these factors include political socialization, authoritarian personality, and political predisposition. Among these factors, political predisposition has more direct influence on college students' attitudes toward political rights, while the effect of authoritarian personality is negative. Political socialization has very little effect on their political right attitude.
期刊論文
1.Duckitt, John、Farre, Belinda(1994)。Right-Wing Authoritarianism and Political Intolerance among Whites in the Future Majority-Rule South Africa。The Journal of Social Psychology,134(6),735-741。  new window
2.Lawrence, David G.(1976)。Procedural Norms and Tolerance: A Reassessment。American Political Science Review,70(1),80-100。  new window
3.Avery, P. G.、Bird, K.、Johnstone, S.、Sullivan, J. L.、Thalhammer, K.(1992)。Exploring political tolerance with adolescents。Theory and Research in Social Education,20(4),386-420。  new window
4.Baldwin, Afred L.(1948)。Socialization and Parent Child Relationship。Child Development,19,126-136。  new window
5.Gibson, James L.(1992)。The Political Consequences of Intolerance: Cultural Conformity and Political Freedom。American Political Science Review,86(2),338-356。  new window
6.Gibson, James、Duch, Raymond M.(1992)。Anti-Semitic Attitudes of the Mass Public: Estimates and Explanations Based on a Survey of the Moscow Oblast。Public Opinion Quarterly,561,1-28。  new window
7.McClosky, Herbert(1964)。Consensus and Ideology in American Politics。American Political Science Review,58(2),361-382。  new window
8.Peffley, Mark、Sigelman, Lee(1990)。Intolerance of Communists during the McCarthy Era: A General Model。Western Political Quarterly,43(1),93-111。  new window
9.Sullivan, John L.、Marcus, George E.、Feldman, Stanley、Piereson, James E.(1981)。The Sources of Political Tolerance: A Multivariate Analysis。American Political Science Review,75(1),92-106。  new window
10.黃秀端(19960900)。臺灣民眾政治容忍的分析。東吳政治學報,6,1-38。new window  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.黃秀端(1997)。政治文化與政治民主化。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳義彥(1991)。我國大學生政治社會化之研究:十五年來政治價值與態度之變遷 (計畫編號:NSC80-0301-H004-18)。臺北:行政院國家科學委員會。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Giglo, Ernest(1995)。Rights, Liberties and Public Policy。Aldershot:Avebury。  new window
2.Greenstein, Gred I.(1969)。Personality and Politics: Problems of Evidence, Inference, and Conceptualization。Chicago:Markham。  new window
3.Marcus, George E.、Sullivan, John L.、Thesis-Morse, Elizabeth、Wood, Sandra L.(1995)。With Malice Toward Some: How People Make Civil Liberties Judgements。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
4.Adorno, Theodor W.(1950)。The Authoritarian Personality。New York:Harper and Row。  new window
5.Downs, Anthony J.(1957)。An Economic Theory of Democracy。New York:Harper and Row。  new window
6.Langton, Kenneth P.(1969)。Political Socialization。Oxford University Press。  new window
7.McClosky, Herbert、Zaller, John(1985)。The American Ethos: Public Attitudes Toward Capitalism and Democracy。Cambridge, Mass.:Harvard University Press。  new window
8.游盈隆(19960000)。民意與臺灣政治變遷:1990年代臺灣民意與選舉政治的解析。臺北:月旦。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Zaller, John R.(1992)。The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion。Cambridge University Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Sears, David O.(1993)。Symbolic Politics: A Socio-Psychological Theory。Explorations in Political Psychology。Durham, NC:Duke University Press。  new window
2.Adorno, Theodor W.(1951)。Freudian Theory and the Pattern of Fascist Propaganada。Psychoanalysis and the Social Sciences。New York:International Universities Press。  new window
3.McGuire, W. J.(1993)。The Poly-Psy Relationship: Three Phase of a Long Affair。Explorations in Political Psychology。Durham, NC:Duke University Press。  new window
4.Zaller, John(1996)。The Myth of Massive Media Impact Revised: New Support for a Discredited Idea。Political Persuasion and Attitude Change。Ann Arbor, Michigan:University of Michigan Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE