:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣民主轉型的「人權保障」未竟志業--「言論自由」和「集會遊行自由」往何處去
書刊名:臺灣民主季刊
作者:劉靜怡 引用關係
作者(外文):Liu, Ching-yi
出版日期:2009
卷期:6:3
頁次:頁1-46
主題關鍵詞:民主轉型人權保障言論自由集會遊行自由分裂社會Democratic transitionHuman rights protectionFreedom of speechFreedom of assembly and paradeDivided society
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:326
  • 點閱點閱:321
台灣社會歷經民主轉型和兩次政黨輪替,本應步入民主制度的「權力制衡」和「人權保障」常軌,但是,時至今日,民主制度良善運作的期待不僅未曾出現,台灣社會反而陷入分裂對立的民主困境。本論文首先分析台灣民主轉型所遭遇的瓶頸,指出「人權保障」是我們在嘗試緩和台灣社會分裂對立現狀時,最為可行的共識基礎。本論文的分析指出:自解嚴到政黨二次輪替,台灣無論在媒體改革或集會遊行自由保障的成效上,實質進展均相當有限,因此,台灣的公共空間從未真正解禁,公共領域也從未建立起堅實的基礎,因而使得公民參與無從真正蓬勃發展,公民社會也難以成為促成民主憲政體制良善運作的基石。因此,「人權保障」可說是台灣民主轉型的未竟志業。從「人權保障」的標準來看,台灣的民主轉型並未真正成功,然而,正因為「人權保障」可以做為現代文明社會的共識基礎,而真正符合民主憲政要求的政府,必須盡其所能地保障基本人權,也是無可否認的共識,因此,台灣目前基礎尚未穩固的公民社會,必須徹底反省,思考如何以集體的努力,建構並深化人權保障的共識基礎,進而促成更多人權保障的制度化成果出現。透過人權保障此一共同價值的普及化與深化,或能縮短對立陣營的距離,並藉由人權保障這個共識基礎,開啟真正理性溝通和對話的可能性,那麼,台灣民主轉型的未竟志業,或許才算勉強克盡其功。
This paper analyzes the reasons why “human rights protection” has become the unfulfilled promise in Taiwan’s democratic transition and searches for a common ground for Taiwan’s divided society. With its analysis on Taiwan’s development of freedom of speech and freedom of assembly and parade during the past two decades, this paper points out first that tight governmental control of public places gives evidence to the failure of media reform and the limited nature of the freedom of speech and assembly. Therefore, it is difficult for Taiwan’s civil society to witness the emergence of a sound and solid public sphere, suggesting that Taiwan’s democratic transition has never been successful. Secondly, this paper argues that since human rights are universal values, making the protection of human rights to be the ultimate mission of any democratic government who cherishes constitutional tradition, Taiwan’s civil society must push to institutionalize the values of human rights with a collective effort. By doing this, Taiwan will be able to end the confrontation of her divided society, create opportunities for reasonable communication and dialogue, and overcome any obstacles on the way to a true partnership democracy.
期刊論文
1.顏厥安(2009)。民主社會的合法性與正當性。思想,11,163-171。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.魏千峯(200812)。集會遊行法的三個面向問題。全國律師,12(12),87-94。  延伸查詢new window
3.Hughes, Sallie、Lawson, Chappell(2005)。Barriers to Media Opening in Latin America。Political Communication,22(1),9-25。  new window
4.Brunetti, Aymo、Weder, Beatrcie(2003)。A Free Press Is Bad News for Corruption。Journal of Public Economics,87(7/8),1801-1824。  new window
5.Chowdhury, Shyamal K.(2004)。The Effect of Democracy and Press Freedom on Corruption: An Empirical Test。Economics Letters,85(1),93-101。  new window
6.楊瑪利(20020400)。弱智媒體,大家一起來誤國?。天下雜誌,251,110-125。  延伸查詢new window
7.吳乃德(19890300)。搜尋民主化的動力:兼談民主轉型的研究取向。臺灣社會研究季刊,2(1),145-161。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.吳介民(20090300)。中國因素與臺灣民主。思想,11,141-157。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Diamond, Larry(2008)。The Democratic Rollback: The Resurgence of the Predatory State。Foreign Affairs,87(2),36-48。  new window
10.吳介民、李丁讚(20080500)。生活在臺灣:選舉民主及其不足。思想,9,33-68。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.李丁讚(20090300)。民主社會如何可能?二十年臺灣經驗的反省。思想,11,135-139。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.馮建三(20071100)。臺灣傳媒及其政策變遷20年:以中國為背景與想像。思想,7,119-139。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.林麗雲(20080400)。變遷與挑戰:解禁後的臺灣報業。新聞學研究,95,183-212。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.洪貞玲(20061200)。誰的媒體?誰的言論自由?--解嚴後近用媒介權的發展。臺灣民主季刊,3(4),1-35。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.許志雄(19980700)。集會遊行規制立法的違憲審查基準--司法院釋字第四四五號解釋評析。月旦法學,38,110-117。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.王金壽(20070900)。獨立的司法、不獨立的法官?--民主化後的司法獨立與民主監督。臺灣社會研究季刊,67,1-38。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.王金壽(20080600)。臺灣司法改革二十年:邁向獨立之路。思與言,46(2),133-174。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.何東洪(2009)。我的野草莓札記。思想雜誌,11,119-132。  延伸查詢new window
19.林照真(2004)。電視開票:一場騙局。天下雜誌,297,136-140。  延伸查詢new window
20.黃長玲(2009)。關於民主社會的幾點想法。思想,11,159-162。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.黃國昌(2008)。關於集會遊行法之修正:法律專業團體版的緣由。律師雜誌,12月號,67-86。  延伸查詢new window
22.Baker, Edwin C.(1983)。Unreasoned Reasonableness: Mandatory Parade Permits and Time, Place, and Manner Regulations。Northwestern University Law Review,78,973-1024。  new window
23.BeVier, Lillian(1992)。Rehabilitating Public Forum Doctrine: In Defense of Categories。Supreme Court Review,1992,79-122。  new window
24.Fell, Dafydd(2005)。Political and Media Liberation and Political Corruption in Taiwan。The China Quarterly,184,875-893。  new window
25.Heyman, Steven J.(2003)。Ideological Conflict and the First Amendment。Chicago-Kent Law Review,78,531-618。  new window
26.Post, Robert C.(1987)。Between Governance and Management: The History and Theory of the Public Forum。UCLA Law Review,34,1713-1775。  new window
27.Zick, Timothy(2006)。Speech and Spatial Tactics。Texas Law Review,84,581-651。  new window
28.Zick, Timothy(2006)。Space, Place and Speech: The Expressive Topography。George Washington Law Review,74,439-503。  new window
29.Zick, Timothy(2006)。Property, Place and Public Discourse。Washington University Journal of Law and Policy,21,173-223。  new window
會議論文
1.林峰正(2008)。警民衝突下的警察暴力。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.簡立欣(2008)。媒體時代的群眾運動:試論倒扁運動的框架演變(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Dworkin, Ronald、司馬學文(200709)。人權與民主生活。台北:韋伯文化。  延伸查詢new window
2.Fiss, Owen(1996)。Liberalism divided:Freedom of speech and the many uses of state power。Boulder, CO:Westview Press。  new window
3.Bagdikian, Ben H.(1997)。The Media Monopoly。Boston, MA:Beacon Press。  new window
4.Diamond, Larry(2008)。The Spirit of Democracy: The Struggle to Build Free Societies throughout the World。New York, NY:Times Books。  new window
5.Ackerman, B.、Fishkin, J. S.(2004)。Deliberation Day。New Haven:Yale University Press。  new window
6.Learner, David、Pevsner, Lucille W.(1958)。The Passing of Traditional Society: Modernizing the Middle East。Glencoe, IL:New York:Free Press。  new window
7.Sunstein, Cass R.(2001)。Republic.com。Princeton University Press。  new window
8.McChesney, Robert W.(1999)。Rich media, poor democracy: Communication politics in dubious times。Urbana-Champaign, IL:University of Illinois Press。  new window
9.Foucault, Michel、Sheridan, Alan(1977)。Discipline & Punish: The Birth of the Prison。New York:Pantheon Books。  new window
10.Dworkin, Ronald(2006)。Is Democracy Possible Here?--Principles for a New Political Debate。Princeton University Press。  new window
11.李震山(2001)。人性尊嚴與人權保障。臺北:元照出版有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Huntington, Samuel Phillips(1993)。The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century。University of Oklahoma Press。  new window
13.Sunstein, Cass R.(2009)。Going to Extremes: How Like Minds Unite and Divide。Oxford University Press。  new window
14.李金銓(2009)。臺灣傳媒與民主變革的交互光影:媒介政治經濟學的悖論。臺灣傳媒再解構。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
15.(2008)。關鍵力量的沈淪-回首報禁結束二十年。關鍵力量的沈淪-回首報禁結束二十年。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
16.張茂桂(2006)。臺灣族群和解的坎坷路。國家認同的文化論述。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
17.鍾起惠(2009)。臺灣電視節目品質:擺盪於創造性毀滅與重生的歷程。臺灣傳媒再解構。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
18.American Civil Liberties Union(2003)。Freedom under Fire: Dissent in Post-9/11 America。Freedom under Fire: Dissent in Post-9/11 America。New York, NY。  new window
19.Amnesty International(2009)。Amnesty International Report 2009: The State of the World's Human Rights。Amnesty International Report 2009: The State of the World's Human Rights。London, UK。  new window
20.Carrington, Paul(1999)。Stewards of Democracy: Law as a Public Profession。Stewards of Democracy: Law as a Public Profession。Boulder, CO。  new window
21.Dahlgren, Peter、Sparks, Colin(1995)。Communication and Citizenship。Communication and Citizenship。London, UK。  new window
22.Klarman, Michael J.(2004)。From Jim Crow to Civil Rights: The Supreme Court and the Struggle for Racial Equality。New York, NY:Oxford University Press。  new window
23.Lupia, Arthur、McCubbins, Mathew D.(1998)。The Democratic Dilemma。The Democratic Dilemma。Cambridge。  new window
24.Norris, Pippa(2000)。A Virtuous Circle。A Virtuous Circle。New York, NY。  new window
25.Pye, Lucian W.(1963)。Communications and Political Development。Communications and Political Development。Princeton, NJ。  new window
26.Zick, Timothy(2009)。Speech out of Doors: Preserving First Amendment Liberties in Public Places。Speech out of Doors: Preserving First Amendment Liberties in Public Places。New York, NY。  new window
圖書論文
1.洪貞玲(2009)。黨政軍退出媒體之後?--無線電視所有權的演變與規範。臺灣傳媒再解構。臺北:巨流。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.廖元豪(2005)。「我們的」法律,「她們的」命運--台灣法律如何歧視外籍與大陸配偶。不要叫我外籍新娘。臺北:左岸文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.汪宏倫(2008)。國族問題中的制度因素、全球脈絡與怨恨心態。跨戒:流動與堅持的臺灣社會。臺北:群學出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.何明修(2003)。民間社會與民主轉型:環境運動在臺灣的興起與持續。兩岸社會運動分析。臺北:新自然主義。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.陳炳宏(20090000)。電視服務產業的流變:政經勢力的消與長。臺灣傳媒再解構。臺北:巨流。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE