資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(3.145.156.204)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
學習能力與組合方式對學生學習成就與互動行為的影響
書刊名:
大專體育學刊
作者:
黃清雲
作者(外文):
Huang, Ching-yun
出版日期:
1999
卷期:
1:2
頁次:
頁61-71
主題關鍵詞:
互動式電腦教學
;
合作學習
;
互動學習
;
體育教學
;
Videodisc instruction
;
Cooperative learning
;
Heterogeneous
;
Homogeneous
;
Physical education
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(
16
) 博士論文(
1
) 專書(
1
) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:
16
共同引用:0
點閱:170
本研究主要目的在探討在合作學習情境下,不同能力學習者的組成方式,及其在 學習過程中的互動行為對運動認知學習成效的影響。本研究採用實驗研究法,隨機抽取中正 大學學生 80 名為受試對象,並以 20 對受試者做互動行為之分析。在進行實驗之前,依前 測 (pre-test) 結果將受試者分成高能力與低能力兩組。當學生完成影碟電腦系統教學單元 後,個別接受一份 30 題選擇題的紙筆測驗,以測量學生的概念理解程度及對於整個教學內 容的認知情形。電腦教學過程結束後,再以紙筆測驗方式,對受試者進行整體教學滿意度的 問卷調查。本研究結果發現: 學生在合作學習的情境下,高能力組比低能力組有更顯著的成 效,然而,異質性配對方式與同質性配對方式在學習成效上並無顯著差異。雖然文獻證明低 能力學習者由於得到高能力同伴的協助將增進其學習的效率,但是本研究並未支持這種觀點 。另外,在同伴互動行為的分析結果指出,異質性的配對方式與同質性配對方式,對於促進 互動的學習並無顯著的差異。在預測學習成就與互動行為的關係上,研究結果顯示有二種學 件互動行為類別與學習成效有顯著的關係。
以文找文
The purpose of the study is to investigate the effects of homogeneous versus heterogeneous ability grouping on performance and interaction of students working cooperatively during instruction. For this study, the experiment designed and interactive videodisc instruction on cognitive aspects ofpsychomotor performance as the material. The participants were 80 undergraduate students, classified as high and low-prior knowledge randomly sampled from the Chung Cheng University. Results showed that homogeneous low-prior knowledge groups scored significantly lower than the other three groups. The students in Heterogeneous group affect achievement compared to Homogeneous group under cooperatively condition did not have a significant effect on achievement. This finding does not confirm the results of other studies reporting heterogeneous group composition improve achievement for low-prior students. The results concerning peer interaction suggest that heterogeneous is not significant effect than homogeneous one in generating promotive interaction which is helpftil for group success. However, only two interactive behaviors can be used successfully to predict student achievement. The implications for designing instructional technology for physical education and future research are discussed.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Beane, W. D.、Lemke, E. A.(1971)。Group variables influencing the transfer of conceptual psychology。Journal of Educational Psychology,62(3),215-218。
2.
Brush, T. R.(1997)。The effects on student achievement and attitudes when using integrated learning systems with cooperative pairs。Education Technology Research and Development,45,51-65。
3.
Dalton, D. W.(1990)。The effects of prior learning on learner interaction and achievement during interactive video。Journal of Computer-Based Instruction,17,8-16。
4.
Dalton, D. W.、Hannafin, M. J.、Hooper, S.(1989)。Effects of individual and cooperative computer-assisted instruction on student performance and attitudes。Educational Technology Research and Development,37(2),15-24。
5.
Damon, W.、Phelps, E.(1989)。Critical distinctions among three approaches to peer education。International Journal of educational Research,13(1),9-19。
6.
Hooper, S.(1992)。Effects of peer interaction during computer-based mathematics instruction。Journal of Educational Research and Development,85(3),180-189。
7.
Hooper, S.、Hannafin, M. J.(1991)。The effects of group composition on achievement, interaction, and learning efficiency during computer-based cooperative instruction。Educational Technology Research and Development,39(3),27-40。
8.
Johnson, D. W.、Johnson, R. T.(1978)。Cooperative, competitive and individualistic learning。Journal of Research and DevelopmentJn Education,12,3-15。
9.
Klein, J. D.、Doran, M. S.(1999)。Implementing individual and small group learning structures a computer simulation。Educational Technology Research and Development,47(1),97-110。
10.
Morrison, C.、Reeve, J.(1988)。Effect of instruction and undergraduate major on qualitative skill analysis。Journal of Human Movement Studies,15,291-297。
11.
Rysavy, D. M.、Sales, G. C.(1991)。Cooperative learning in computer-based instruction。Educational Technology Research and Development,39(2),70-79。
12.
Simsek, A.、Tsai, B.(1992)。The impact of cooperative group composition on student performance and attitudes during interactive videodisc instruction。Journal of Computer-Based Instruction,19(3),86-91。
13.
Simsek, A.、Hooper, S.(1992)。The effects of cooperative versus individual videodisc learning on student performance and attitudes。International Journal of Media,19(3),209-218。
14.
Slavin, R. E.(1987)。Cooperative learning: where behavioral and humanistic approaches to classroom motivation meet。Elementary School Journal,88(1),29-37。
15.
Webb, N. M.(1988)。Peer interaction and learning in cooperative small groups, Student。Review of Educational Psychology,74(5),642-655。
16.
Webb, N. M.、Enter, P.、Lewis, S.(1986)。Problem-solving strategies and group processes in small groups learning computer programming。American Educational Research Journal,23,246-261。
17.
Webb, N. M.(1982)。Student Interaction and learning in small groups。Review of Educational Research,52(3),421-455。
18.
Carrier, C. A.、Sales, G. C.(1987)。A taxonomy for the design of computer-based instruction。Educational Technology,27(1),15-17。
會議論文
1.
Hooper, S.、Ward, T. J.、Hannafin, M. J.、Clark, H. T.(1989)。The effects of a performance contingency in heterogeneous and homogeneous small groups working at the computer。American Educational Research Association。Dallasm Texas。
圖書
1.
Cohen, E.(1986)。Designing Group work: Strategies for the Heterogeneous Classroom。New York:Teacher College Press。
2.
Gagné, Robert Mills、Briggs, L. J.(1979)。Principles of instructional design。Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.。
3.
Johnson, D. W.、Johnson, R. T.(1987)。Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive and individualistic learning。New Jersey:Prentice-Hall, Inc。
4.
Johnson, D. W.、Johnson, R. T.(1984)。Cooperative in the classroom。Edina, MM:International Book Company。
5.
Newman, G.(1987)。The Complete Golfer。White Plan, New York:Paramount publication Inc.。
6.
Anderson, J. R.(1985)。Cognitive psychology and its implications。W. H. Freeman and Company。
7.
Bandura, Albert(1977)。Social Learning Theory。Prentice-Hall, Inc.。
8.
Johnson, D. W.、Johnson, R. T.(1989)。Cooperation and competition: Theory and research。Interaction Book Company。
9.
Bandura, Albert(1986)。Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory。Prentice-Hall, Inc.。
圖書論文
1.
Levin, J. R.、Anglin, G. L.、Carney, R. N.(1987)。On empirically validating functions of pictures in prose。The Psychology of Illustration。New York:Springer。
2.
Johnson, D. W.、Johnson, R. T.(1993)。Cooperative learning and feedback in technology-based instruction。Interactive instruction and feedback。Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Educational Technology Publications。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
有效的同儕合作示範策略對舞蹈學習成效之研究
2.
不同教學法在不同能力組合方式下對技能學習成效之研究
3.
合作學習教學法對體操學習表現之影響
4.
獎勵模式與合作學習策略對大專不同能力舞蹈學習成效之研究
5.
合作精熟學習策略對舞蹈學習成效之研究
6.
動機型態對不同能力合作學習成效及互動行為之研究
7.
創意教學融入舞蹈課程設計之行動研究
8.
精熟學習在合作學習情境下對壁球選修課學生學習動機之研究
9.
原住民大學生在小組合作中的處境
10.
舞蹈創意教學課程設計及實施之研究
11.
不同教學法與學生能力對桌球反手推擋學習成效之影響
12.
以合作式概念構圖發展學童運動學習
13.
影像示範教學在合作學習情境下對大專舞蹈課程學習成效之研究
14.
合作學習與傳統學習對排球動作技能學習成效之影響研究
15.
合作學習對排球低手傳球學習成效影響之研究
1.
不同合作學習模式問題導向教學對技職校院學生邏輯思考能力與學習成效影響之研究以程式設計為例
1.
合作學習STAD模式對排球學習成效、動機及滿意度之探討
無相關著作
無相關點閱
QR Code