臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：都市脆弱度的空間分析與能值評估-以台灣西海岸平原洪災為例
作者：張力方
作者(外文)：Chang, Li-Fang
校院名稱：國立臺北大學
系所名稱：都市計劃研究所
指導教授：黃書禮
學位類別：博士
出版日期：2014
主題關鍵詞：脆弱度評估；都市洪災；能值評估；土壤覆蓋組合法；台灣西海岸平原；vulnerability assessment；urban flooding；emergy evaluation；soil cover complex method；Taiwan’s western coast plain
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:44
全世界超過50%以上的人口聚居在經濟活動與資產高度密集的都市地區。極端氣候事件日益增加所造成的大規模複合型災害，廣泛地影響人類聚居所(human settlement)的安全與財產損失。人類社會在有限的因應能力下，都市地區面對極端氣候事件的發生存在著脆弱性的特性。脆弱度評估為現階段在調適氣候變遷的重要研究議題。在許多氣候變遷對人類的衝擊中，洪災是台灣最立即需要正視的威脅。台灣有超過90%以上的人口聚集在高密度經濟產業軸帶的西海岸平原。由於都市發展的壓力，台灣西海岸平原主要都市與其週邊地區土地使用與地表覆蓋的改變，不僅影響生態系統服務的功能，也同時提高了洪災脆弱度。
脆弱度的觀念是必須考量複合生態與經濟系統間的關係與相互作用，但目前評估都市脆弱度所採用的方法與操作，大多欠缺考量研究地區自然作用、社經條件與都市因應機制系統性的相互作用。因此，本研究的主要目標是建立一個立基在生物物理系統觀，可以整合脆弱度三個組成分 - 暴露(exposure)、敏感度(sensitivity)與調適能力(adaptive capacity) - 間相互作用的評估架構，並對台灣西海岸平原進行都市洪災脆弱度(urban flooding vulnerability)的評估。為了達到這個目標，本研究以能值(emergy)觀念重新詮釋脆弱度的三個組成要素，並用共通性的能值單位來評估各組成要素的強度，再進一步建立都市洪災脆弱度的能值指數評估脆弱度。為了分析台灣西海岸平原各地區的洪災脆弱度差異，本研究利用土壤覆蓋組合法(Soil Cover Complex Method)與地理資訊系統的空間分析功能分析與討論台灣西海岸平原都市洪災脆弱度之空間性。
本研究依據暴露、敏感度與調適能力的能值評估結果進一步建立五個都市洪災脆弱度能值指數：潛在衝擊指數、都市系統的自我組織能力指數、自然與農業系統的自我組織能力指數、防護能力指數與都市洪災脆弱度指數。在指數研究分析成果中，本研究發現台灣西海岸平原中，潛在衝擊高的都市不必然有較高的都市洪災脆弱度，因這些都市有較佳的調適能力得以降低極端氣候事件所造成的脆弱度。然而像桃園、彰化、台中、台南與高雄地區的許多都市，有相對較高的潛在衝擊，卻沒有足夠的調適能力，因此最後的評估成果屬於高都市洪災脆弱度的地區。透過未來都市發展之情境評估，發現不斷成長與建設之都市，倘若調適能力沒有配合改進，則台灣西海岸平原將有更多的都市成為對洪災具有高潛在衝擊之都市。在評估洪災脆弱度的主題下，本研究所提出的能值方法得以有效地整合暴露、敏感度與調適能力的評估。
Currently, more than 50% of world population resides in urban areas. The consequences of the increasing extreme climate events are having widespread and significant negative impacts on human settlement. The insufficient ability of human society to cope with climate change has caused the vulnerability of urban areas. Vulnerability assessment is an important research theme under the context of climate change adaption. Among all the other impacts caused by climate change, flooding is considered the most immediate threat to Taiwan. Currently, over 90% of the population of Taiwan is concentrated in western coastal plain. Owning to the stresses of urban development, land use and land cover change in peri-urban areas of the major cities of Taiwan not only affect biophysical processes and ecosystem services, but also result in the increase of flooding vulnerability of cities due to climate change. This research argues that the assessment of vulnerability should consider the interaction between components of the integrated ecological economic system. The methodologies and tools used by most vulnerability assessment researches do not take the interactions among natural process, social financial conditions, and urban response mechanism into account. The primary goal of this research is to develop a framework, which is based on the biophysical system perspective, for assessing the spatial vulnerability of Taiwan’s western coastal plain that incorporates the interaction of the three components of vulnerability- exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity. To achieve this goal, this research interprets urban flooding vulnerability based on emergy concepts, develop emergy indices to assess urban flooding vulnerability, and use Soil Cover Complex Method and GIS to analyze and discuss the spatiality of urban flooding vulnerability. Based on the results of emergy evaluation of the three components of vulnerability, five emergy indices are developed to evaluate urban flooding vulnerability: the self-organization capability of urban system index; self-organization capability of natural and agricultural system index; potential impact index, preventing capability index; and urban flooding vulnerability index. As a result, cities with higher potential impact do not necessarily lead to higher vulnerability of urban flooding because the adaptive capacity also contribute to alleviate the vulnerability of cities to the extreme climate events. Several cities (e.g. Taoyuan, Taichung, Changhua, Tainan, and Kaohsiung) have lower adaptive capacity but with higher potential impact index and result in higher urban flooding vulnerability index. The results of scenario analysis indicate if the land use and land cover continue to convert to urban area without improving adaptive capacity at the same time, the urban flooding vulnerability of these cities will increase significantly. Using the framework developed by this research for assessing urban vulnerability, emergy concept can effectively provide a common measuring unit to evaluate exposure, sensitivity and adaptive capacity for the assessment of urban flooding vulnerability in Taiwan western coastal plain.
英文
1.Adger, W. N., 2006. Vulnerability, Global Environmental Change, 16: 268-281.
2.Adger, W.N., Brooks. N., Bentham. G., Agnew, M., and Eriksen, S., 2004. New indicators of vulnerability and adaptive capacity. Technical Report Number 7, Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research. Norwich: University of East Anglia.
3.Alberti, M., 2010. Maintaining ecological integrity and sustaining ecosystem function in urban areas, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2: 178-184.
4.ASTER Global Digital Elevation Map Announcement, 2011. GDEM. Download: http://asterweb.jpl.nasa.gov/gdem.asp.(2011.09.22).
5.Berkes, F., 2007. Understanding uncertainty and reducing vulnerability: lessons for resilience thinking, Natural Hazards, 41: 283-295.
6.Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., Davis, I., and Wisner, B., 1994. At Risk: Natural Hazards, People’s Vulnerability and Disasters, pp.1-26. London: Routledge. Download: http: //www.google.com/books. (2011.05.30).
7.Borden, K. A., Schmidtlein, M. C., Emrich, C. T., Piegorsch, W. W. And Cutter, S. L., 2007. Vulnerability of U.S. cities to environmental hazards, Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, Article 5. Downloaded: http://www.bepress.com/jhsem/vol4/iss2/5. (2009.10.31).
8.Brech, H., Dasgupta, S., Laplante, B., Murray, S., and Wheeler, D., 2012. Sea-Level Rise and Storm Surges: High Stakes for a Small Number of Developing Countries, The Journal of Environment Development, 21: 120-138.
9.Brooks, N., Adger, W. N., and Kelly, P. M., 2005. The determinants of vulnerability and adaptive capacity at the national level and the implication for adaptation, Global Environmental Change, 15: 151-163.
10.Chapin, F. S. Zavaleta, E. S., Eviner, V. T., Naylor, R. L., Vitousek, P. M., Reynolds, H. L., Hooper, D. U., Lavorel, S., Sala, O. E., Hobbie, S. E., Mack, M. C., and Diaz, S., 2000. Consequence of changing biodiversity, Nature, 405: 234-242.
11.Colding, J., 2007. Ecological land-use complementation for building resilience in urban ecosystem, Landscape and Urban Planning, 81: 46-55.
12.Cutter, S. L., 1996. Vulnerability to environmental hazards, Progress in Human Geography, 20: 529-539.
13.Cutter, S. L., Boruff, B. J., and Shirley, W. L., 2003. Social vulnerability to environmental hazards, Social Science Quarterly, 84(2): 242-261.
14.Daily, G.C., 1997. Introduction: what are ecosystem services? In: Dailey, G. C. (Ed.), Nature’s Services –Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems, pp. 1-10. Washington, D. C: Island Press.
15.Dercon, S., and Krishnan, P., 2000. Vulnerability, seasonality and poverty in Ethiopia, Journal of Development Studies, 36: 25-53.
16.De Lange, H. J., Sala, S., Vighi, M., and Faber, J. H., 2010. Ecological vulnerability in risk assessment- A review and perspectives, Science of the Total Environment, 408: 3871-3879.
17.Dolan, A. H., and Walker, I. J., 2006. Understanding vulnerability of coastal communities to climate to climate change related risks, Journal of Coastal Research, Special Issue 39: 1317-1324.
18.Downing, T. E., Butterfield, R., Cohen, S., Huq, S., Moss, R., Rahman, A., Sokona, Y., and Stephen, L., 2001. Vulnerability Indices: Climate Change Impacts and Adaption. UNEP Policy Series3. Nairobi: UNEP.
19.ESG, 2009. Earth System Governance Project- People, Places, and the Planet, Science and Implementation Plan of the Earth System Governance Project, IHDP Report No. 20. Bonn: ESG.
20.Folke, C., Carpenter, S., Walker, B., Scheffer, M., Elmqvist, T., Gunderson, L., and Holling, C. S., 2004. Regime shifts, resilience, and biodiversity in ecosystem management, Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 35: 557-581.
21.Fuchs, R. J., 2010. Cities at risk: Asia's coastal cities in an age of climate change, AsiaPacific Issues, 96: 1-12.
22.Fuch, R., Conran, M., and Louis, E., 2011. Climate Change and Asia’s Coastal Urban Cities: Can they meet the Challenge, Environment and Urbanization ASIA, 2: 13-28.
23.Füssel, H.-M., 2007. Vulnerability: A generally applicable conceptual framework for climate change research, Global Environmental Change, 17 (2): 155-167.
24.Gallopin, G. C., 2006. Linkages between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity, Global Environmental Change, 16: 293-303.
25.GLP, 2005. Science Plan and Implementation Strategy, IGBP Report No.53/ IHDP Report No. 19. Stockholm. Sweden: IGBP.
26.Goulder, L. H., and Kennedy, D., 1997. Valuing ecosystem services: philosophical bases and empirical methods. In: Dailey, G. C. (Ed.), Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystem, pp.23-47. Washington D. C: Island Press.
27.Huang, S. -L., 1998. Urban ecosystems, energetic hierarchies, and ecological economics of Taipie metropolis, Journal of Environmental Management, 52:39-51.
28.Huang, S. -L., Lai, H. -Y., and Lee, C. -L., 2001. Energy hierarchy and urban landscape system, Landscape and Urban Planning, 52: 145-161.
29.Huang, S. -L., and Hsu, W. -L., 2003. Materials flow analysis and emergy evaluation of Taipei’s urban construction, Landscape and Urban Planning, 63: 61-74.
30.Huang, S.-L. and Chen, C.-W., 2005. Theory of urban energetics and mechanism of urban development, Ecological Modelling, 189: 49-71.
31.Huang, S. -L., Chen, Y. -H., Kuo, F. -Y., and Wang, S. -H., 2011a. Emergy-based evaluation of peri-urban ecosystem services, Ecological Complexity, 8: 38-50
32.Huang, S. -L., Chang, L. -F., and Yeh, C.- T., 2011b. How vulnerable is the landscape when the typhoon comes? An emergy approach, Landscape and Urban Planning, 100: 415-417.
33.Hansen, J. E., and Sato, M., 2011. Paleo climate implications for human-made climate change. Download: http://www.columbia.edu/~jeh1/mailings/2011/20110118_Milankovic-Paper.pdf. (2012.10.12).
34.Hanson, S., Nicholls, R., Ranger, N., Hallegatte, S., Corfee-Morlot, J., Herweijer, C., and Chateau, J., 2011. A global ranking of port cities with high exposure to climate extremes, Climatic Change, 104: 89-111.
35.ICSU, 2008. A Science Plan for Integrated Research on Disaster Risk-Addressing the challenge of natural and human-induced environmental hazards (IRDR), ICSU Science Plan. Paris: International Council of Scientific Union.
36.IPCC, 2007. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. London: Cambridge University Press.
37.Juhola, S., Peltonen, L., and Niemi, P., 2012. Chapter 7 Assessing Adaptive Capacity to Climate Change in European Regions. In: Schmidt-Thomé, P., and Greiving, S. (Eds.). European Climate Vulnerabilities and Adaptation: A Spatial Planning Perspective, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Published Online, pp.113-130.
38.Kasperson, R. E., and Kasperson J. X., 2001. Climate Change, Vulnerability and Social Justice. In: Kasperson, R. E., and Kasperson J. X.(Eds.), Risk and Vulnerability Programme. Stockholm: Stockholm Environment Institute.
39.Klein, R. J. T., and Nicholls, R. J., 1999. Assessment of coastal vulnerability to climate change, Ambio, 28: 182-187.
40.Ligon, E., and Schechter, L., 2003. Measuring vulnerability, Economic Journal, 113: C95-C102.
41.Lin, Y. -C., Huang, S. -L., and William, W. B., 2013. Assessing the environmental impacts of high-altitude agriculture in Taiwan: A Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) framework and spatial emergy synthesis, Ecological Indicators, 32: 42-50.
42.Liverman, D. M., 1990. Chapter 26: Vulnerability to global environmental change. In: Kasperson, R. E., Dow, K., Golding, D., Kasperson, J. X. (Eds.), Understanding Global Environmental Change: The Contributions of Risk Analysis and Management. Clark University, Worcester, MA. Download: http://www.environment.arizona.edu/files/env/profiles/liverman/liverman-1990-kasperson-et-al.pdf. (2010.10.30).
43.LOICZ, 2005. Land-Ocean Interactions in the Coastal Zone, Science Plan and Implementation Strategy, IGBP Report No.51/ IHDP Report No. 18. Stockholm: UNT Digital Library.
44.Luers, A. L., Lobell, D. B., Sklar, L.S., Addams, C. L., and Matson, P., 2003. A method for quantifying vulnerability, applied to the agricultural system of the Yaqui Valley, Mexico, Global Environmental Change, 13: 255-267.
45.Luers, A. L, 2005. The surface of vulnerability: an analytical framework for examining environmental change, Global Environmental Change, 15: 214-223.
46.Lppolito, A., Sala, S., Faber, J. H., and Vighi, M., 2010. Ecological vulnerability analysis: a river basin case study, Science of The Total Environment, 408: 3880-3890.
47.McCarthy, J. J., Canziani, O. F., Leary, N. A., Dokken, D. J., and White, K. S., 2001. Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability, pp. ix-8. London: Cambridge University Press.
48.Metzger, M. J., Rounsevell, M. D. A., Acosta-Michlik, L., Leemans, R., and Schröter, D., 2006. The vulnerability of ecosystem services to land use change, Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 114: 69-85.
49.Morduch, J., 1994. Poverty and vulnerability. American Economic Review, 84: 221-225.
50.Nicolis, G., and Prigogine, I., 1977. Self-organization in nonequilibrium systems: From dissipative structures to order through fluctuations. Wiley: New York.
51.O’Brien, K., Leichenko, R., Kelkar, U., Venema, H., Aandahl, G., Tompkins, H., Javed, A., Bhadwal, S., Barg, S., Nygaard, L., and West, J., 2004. Mapping vulnerability to multiple stressors: climate change and globalization in India, Global Environmental Change, 14: 303-313.
52.O’Brien, K. L., Eriksen, S., Nygaard, L. and Schjolden, A., 2007. Why different interpretations of vulnerability matter in climate change discourses, Climate Policy, 7:73-88
53.Odum, H. T., 1983. System Ecology: An Introduction. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
54.Odum, H. T., Odum, E. C. and Blisset, M., 1987. Ecology and Economy:"Emergy"Analysis and Public Policy in Texas. Policy Research Project Report No.78 Austin. Texas: Lyndon B. Johnson School of Public Affairs. University of Texas at Austin.
55.Odum, H. T., 1988. Self-organization, transformity, and information. Science, 242: 1132-1139
56.Odum, H. T., 1996. Environmental Accounting. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
57.Pelling, M., 2003. The Vulnerability of Cities-Natural Disasters and Social Resilience. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd.
58.Perry, D. A., 1995. Self-organizing systems across scales, Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 10: 241-244.
59.Phillips, J. D., 1999. Divergence, Convergence, and Self-Organization in Landscapes, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 89: 466-488.
60.Polsky, C., Neff, R., and Yarnal, B., 2007. Building comparable global change vulnerability next term assessments: the previous term vulnerability next term scoping diagram, Global Environmental Change, 17: 472-485.
61.Preston, B., Westaway, R., and Yuen, E., 2011. Climate adaptation planning in practice: an evaluation of adaptation plans from three developed nations, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 16: 407-438.
62.Sarewitz, D., Pielke, R., and Keykhah, M., 2003. Vulnerability and risk: some thoughts from a political and policy perspective, Risk analysis, 56: 805-810.
63.Schröter, D. et al., 2004. The ATEAM final report 2004 - Detailed report related to overall project duration. Advanced Terrestrial Ecosystem Analysis and Modelling, a project funded under the 5th framework Programme of the European Union, pp. 139. Download: http://www.pik-potsdam.de/ateam/. (2012.11.20).
64.Schröter, D., Polsky, C., and Patt, A., 2005. Assessing vulnerability to the effect of global change: an eight step approach, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 10: 573-595.
65.Smit, B., and Wandel, J., 2006. Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability, Global Environmental Change, 16: 282-292.
66.Szlafsztein, C. F., 2005. Climate change, sea-level rise and coastal natural hazards: a GIS vulnerability assessment, state of Pará, Brazil, Human Security and Climate Change an International Workshop, June 21-23, 2005, Oslo, pp.1-31.
67.Turner, B.L., Kasperson, R.E., Matson, P., McCarthy, J.J., Corell, R.W., Christensen, L., Eckley, N., Kasperson, J.X., Luers, A., Martello, M.L., Polsky, C., Pulsipher, and Schiller, A., 2003. A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 100(4): 8074–8079.
68.UNEP, 2009. Climate in Peril: A popular guide to the latest IPCC reports. Norway: Birkeland Trykkeri.
69.United States Department of Agriculture,1986. Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds –Technical Release 55 (TR-55) (Second Edition ed.). Natural Resources Conservation Service, Conservation Engineering Division. Download: http://www.hydrocad.net/pdf/TR-55%20Manual.pdf. (2013.02.18).
70.Vermeer, M., and Rahmstorf, S., 2009. Global sea level linked to global temperature, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106: 21527-21532.
71.von Bertalanffy, L., 1968. General System Theory, pp.3-17, New York: George Braziller.
72.Wang, S. -H., Huang, S. -L., and William, W. B., 2012, Resilience analysis of the interaction of between typhoons and land use change, Landscape and Urban Planning, 106: 303-315.
73.Watts, M. J., and Bohle, H. G., 1993. The space of vulnerability: the causal structure of hunger and famine, Progress in Human Geography, 17: 43-67.
74.MA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment), 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: General Synthesis. Washington D.C. : Island Press and World Resources Institute.

中文
1.水利法規公告，2013，區域排水一覽表。Download: http://wralaw.wra.gov.tw/wralawgip/lawCatalogue.jsp?lawClass=1&lawType=11. (2013.09.22)。
2.水利署地理資訊倉儲中心，2012，堤防或護岸位置圖之圖資說明-資料檢索。Download: http://gic.wra.gov.tw/gic/DataIndex/Data/Main.aspx. (2012.07.02)。
3.水利署地理資訊倉儲中心，2012，海堤位置圖-資料檢索。Download: http://gic.wra.gov.tw/gic/DataIndex/Data/Main.aspx. (2012.07.02)。
4.地理資訊倉儲中心，2012，抽水站位置圖之圖資說明-資料檢索。Download http://gic.wra.gov.tw/gic/DataIndex/Data/Main.aspx. (2013.11.15)。
5.中央氣象局網站之台灣颱風分析與預報輔助系統，2011，颱風資料庫。Download: http://photino.cwb.gov.tw/tyweb/mainpage.htm. (2011.03.21)。
6.台北市政府，1971~2006，台北市統計要覽，台北市政府。
7.台中市政府，1971~2006，台中市統計要覽，台中市政府。
8.台南市政府，1971~2006，台南市統計要覽，台南市政府。
9.台北市政府工務局，2008，公務統計年報。Download: http://www.pwb.taipei.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=1169661&ctNode=34437&mp=106001. (2013.09.22)。
10.交通部中央氣象局，2006，氣候資料年報(第一部分-地面資料)，交通部中央氣象局。
11.行政院國家科學委員會，2011，台灣氣候變遷科學報告2011，行政院國家科學委員會。
12.行政院經濟建設委員會，2011，都市及區域統計彙編，行政院經濟建設委員會。
13.行政院經濟建設委員會，2010，規劃推動氣候變遷調適政策綱領及行動計畫，行政院經濟建設委員會。
14.財團法人國土規劃及不動產資訊中心，2006，國土規劃前置作業辦理計畫-子計畫10國土保育地區防災空間規劃策略之整合型規劃（第一期），內政部營建署市鄉規劃局。
15.國土利用調查成果資訊網，2013，關於國土利用調查。Download: http://lui.nlsc.gov.tw/LUWeb/Home/Content.aspx?MUID=89cb9ee9-6a8e-44dc-b14d-82185fa984ad. (2013.01.31)。
16.國土測繪中心，2006，全台國土利用調查，國土測繪中心。
17.黃書禮，2000，生態土地使用規劃，台北:詹氏書局。
18.黃書禮，2001，台灣地區都市代謝作用的永續性，行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫。
19.黃書禮，2004，都市生態經濟與能量，台北:詹氏書局。
20.黃書禮，2012，全球環境變遷與土地使用改變對生態系統服務與都市脆弱度影響之研究:台灣西部海岸平原為例(2/3)-第二冊 台灣西海岸平原生態經濟系統空間模擬模型建置與土地使用變遷模擬，行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫。
21.農林航測所，1971，全台地表覆蓋圖，行政院農委會。
22.新北市政府(原台北縣政府)，1971~2006，台北縣統計要覽，台北縣政府。
23.新竹縣政府，1971~2006，新竹縣統計要覽，新竹縣政府。
24.經濟部水利署，2006，易淹水地區水患治理計畫綱要計畫書，經濟部水利署。
25.經濟水利署-水災保全計畫網頁，2010，水災保全圖資。Download: http://www.dprc.ncku.edu.tw/download/main.htm. (2011.03.20)。
26.經濟部水利署，2011，嚴重地層下陷地區及圖資資料。Download: http://www.wra.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=25688&ctNode=5487&comefrom=lp. (2011.04.01)。
27.審計部，2006a，民國95年度直轄市及縣市地方決算綜合審核結果年報。Download: http://www.audit.gov.tw/files/15-1000-932,c107-1.php. (2013.10.02)。
28.審計部，2006b，民國95年度鄉鎮縣轄市綜合審核結果年報。Download: http://www.audit.gov.tw/files/15-1000-933,c107-1.php. (2013.10.02)。
29.嘉義市政府，1971~2006，嘉義市統計要覽，嘉義市政府。
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：379（臺灣：376，外國：3） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2017497 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67810431
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上