:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國小學生電視識讀能力影片測驗發展之研究
書刊名:測驗年刊
作者:洪碧霞 引用關係吳知賢
作者(外文):Hung, Pi-hsiaWu, Chih-hsien
出版日期:2001
卷期:48:1
頁次:頁71-87
主題關鍵詞:電視識讀影片測驗廣告技巧製作立場年級差異Television literacyFilm testAdvertisement skillProduction techniquesDifference
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:16
  • 點閱點閱:33
     本研究旨在發展兒童電視識讀能力影片測驗,希望豐富國小學生電視識讀能力相關議題探討的工具資源,並藉由該工具初步檢視臺灣現階段國小學生電視識讀能力的發展概況。研究中以學校為單位,隨機抽取國小四、六年級學生作為樣本,預試樣本340人,常模樣本1048人。測驗內容分為(1)情節與畫面的區辨;(2)技術與立場的覺察;(3)廣告技巧的辨識;及(4)真實性與適切性的判斷等四個層面的選擇式試題共39題及開放式題兩題。正式題本分為甲乙兩式,每式27題,其中15題為共同試題。研究中以共同試題為定錨,採兩式測驗參數同時估計的方式進行題目反應理論的參數估計。基於討論需求,研究中同時編擬一份兒童電視觀賞習慣量表進行分步的調查。就常模樣本典型學生而言,預期答對概率大致在.70左右(四、六年級分別為.65及.76),針對中等能力學生的能力估計而言,預期信度在.85左右。對國小中高年級學生,難度和信度大致適切。學生最感困難的題目題電視影片分級標誌及影片氣氛和重合資訊的進階精緻區辨。問向調查發現有28%的學生每天平均看電視的時間超過兩個小時,而家人對兒童觀看電視時間的電範,及學童與家人或者師討論電視節目的機會等議題,都有待家庭和學校教育進一步的反思和調整。電視識讀與閱讀理解相關為.56,與在校成績相關為.43。城鄉與性別對電視識讀能力變異的解釋量都不大,但年及之間差異卻是系統而明顯的,四、六年及學生平均答對概率的差異為.11。排除閱讀理解能力的差異,年級對學生電視識讀表現變異的解釋力尚達13%,顯示電視識讀能力構念合理的獨立性和年級發展性,值得後續工具研究的參考。
     The purpose of this study is to develop a television literacy film test (TVLFT) for the elementary school chidren to enrich the instrument resources of academic researches and empirical applications. One thousand and forty-eight students were sampled as the norm. the major issues covered in the test are (1) comprehension of message and program type; (2) awareness of production techniques and news programming; (3) recognition of advertisement skills; and (4) evaluation of the reality and appropriateness. About 28% students spend more than two hours watching TV everyday. They seldom discussed with their parents or teachers about the TV programs they watched. For the typical for the and sixth graders of the norm, the expected programs they watched. For the typical forth and sixth graders of the norm, the expected probabilities of correct answers are around .65 and .75 respectively. The expected reliability coefficient is around .85. The correlation coefficients among TV literacy and reading comprehension and school achievement are .56 and .43 respectively. Using reading comprehension as the covariant, the differences of TV literacy between forth and sixth graders are significant (the ETA Square is around 13% between grades). The preliminary reliability and validity evidences suggested that the operational construct of TVLFT was reasonably supported.
期刊論文
1.洪碧霞、邱上真、林素微、葉千綺(19980700)。國小中低年級國語文成就測驗題庫建立之研究。測驗年刊,45(2),1-17。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Dorr, A.、Graves, S. B.、Phelps, E.(1980)。Television literacy for young children。Journal of Communication,30(3),71-83。  new window
3.Singer, D. G.、Zuckerman, D. M.、Singer, J. L.(1980)。Helping elementary-school children learn about TV。Journal of Communication,30(3),84-93。  new window
4.吳翠珍(19930200)。解「毒」電視?解讀電視!-- 談媒體教育中的電視識讀。教學科技與媒體,7,3-11。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Rapaczynski, W.、Singer, D.、Singer, J.(1982)。Teaching Television: A Curriculum for Young Children。Journal of Communication,32(2),46-55。  new window
6.Vooijs, M. W.、Van Der Voort, T. H. A.(1993)。Teaching children to evaluate television violence critically: The impact of a Dutch schools television project。Journal of Educational Television,19(3),139-152。  new window
7.Vooijs, M. W.、Van Der Voort, T. H. A.、Hoogeweij, J.(1995)。News: The impact of a Dutch schools television project。Journal of Educational Television,21(1),23-36。  new window
研究報告
1.邱上真、洪碧霞(1999)。中文閱讀成分與歷程模式之建立及其在實務上的應用:評量與診斷、課程與教材、學習與教學--國語基本能力檢定診斷與協助系統之發展 (計畫編號:NSC88-2614-H-017-004-F18)。中華民國行政院國家科學委員會。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳翠珍、朱則剛(1994)。我國國小學生電視識讀能力研究 (計畫編號:NSC81-0301-H-032-504)。台北。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.饒淑梅(1995)。國民中學實施電視素養課程之研究(碩士論文)。國立師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.李秀美(1995)。兒童故事基模發展與電視卡通暴力訊息解讀之關聯性研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Craggs, C. E.(1992)。Media Education in the Primary School。London:Routledge。  new window
2.Masterman, L.(1985)。Teaching the media。London:Routledge。  new window
3.吳知賢(1998)。兒童與電視。台北:桂冠圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.Alvarado, M.、Boyd-Barrett, O.(1992)。Media education: An introduction。London:British Film Institute。  new window
5.Anderson, J. A.、Ploghoft, M. E.(1993)。Children and media in media education。Television literacy curriculum in action: A long-term study。沒有紀錄。  new window
6.Bazalgette, C.(1989)。Primary media education: A curriculum statement。London:British Film Institute。  new window
7.(1998)。Teaching the Media: International Perspectives。Teaching the Media: International Perspectives。Mahwah, NJ。  new window
8.Lloyd-Kolkin, D.、Tyner, K. R.(1991)。Media and you: An elementary media literacy curriculum。Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Educational technology Publications。  new window
9.Silverblatt, A.(1995)。Media Literacy: Keys to Interpreting Media Messages。Media Literacy: Keys to Interpreting Media Messages。Westport, CT:Praeger。  new window
10.Singer, D.、Singer, J.、Zuckerman, D.、Hirshman, R.(1979)。Teaching Elementary School Children How to Use Television Effectively。Teaching Elementary School Children How to Use Television Effectively。New Haven, CT:Family Television Research and Consultation Centre, Yale University。  new window
圖書論文
1.Buckingham, D.(1991)。Teaching about the media。The media studies book: A guide for teachers。London:Routledge。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top