:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:高一學生數學合作解題歷程之分析研究--以四位學生為例
書刊名:臺東師院學報
作者:陳彥廷 引用關係姚如芬 引用關係
作者(外文):Chen, Yen-tingYau, Ru-fen
出版日期:2001
卷期:12(下)
頁次:頁213-244
主題關鍵詞:數學合作解題非例行性題目非同步放聲思考法原案分析Co-problem solvingNon-routine problemProtocols analysis
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:39
  • 點閱點閱:11
     本研究旨在探討高一學生數學合作解題的歷程,首先說明的是社會互動學習對 於知識建構的重要性,再探討數學解題的意表與認知歷程。最後,以Schoenfeld數學解題的 認知歷程等相關的理論作為本研究之理論基礎進行探究。  本研究主要採質的研究方法,以Schoenfeld的解題模式為基礎,並參考研究者在實施非 同步放聲思考法中所得到的結果等資料,編成「解題歷程階段表」,分析學生在合作解題過 程中所涉及的行為階段。  研究結果發現:學生在經由合作解題訓練的歷程中,學習並體會到Vygotsky所主張知我 的建構係在社會文化情境中透過與人們社會互動而產生。透過合作解題的方式,學生學習到 他人的另類思考方向,也讓自己的解題行為提升,頗符合Vygotsky所提出近側發展區(the zone of proximal development)的發展。
     This study is aimed to explore the process of senior high school freshmen's mathematical co-problem solving. Initially, it explains that learning through social interaction does put an important influence on knowledge construct. Next, it explores the significance and cognitive process in mathematical co-problem solving. Finally, Schoenfeld's theory of the cognitive process in mathematical co-problem solving and other relevant theories serve as the theoretical basis of this study for further investigation. This study is conducted primarily in qualitative methodology, with Schoenfeld's mode of problem-solving as the basis and with the reference to the consequence of the non-thinking aloud approach. From the above data, the "diagram of problem-solving process stages' is accordingly created to analyze students' behavioral stages involved in the co-problem solving process.. In this study, it is discovered that through the co-problem solving process the students realize and learn Vygotsky's theory that knowledge construct results from people's interaction in the social and cultural contexts and situation. Namely, through the approach of co-problem solving, the students can learn others' Namely, through the approach of co-problem solving, the students can learn others' modes of thought, and they can promote their own ability of problem-solving at the same time. The consequence can satisfy Vygotsky's theory of the zone of proximal development.
期刊論文
1.Mayer, R. E.(1982)。Memory for Algebra Story Problems。Journal of Educational Psychology,74(2),199-216。  new window
2.周立勳(19951100)。小組獎勵對國小兒童分組學習表現的影響。嘉義師院學報,9,175-222。  延伸查詢new window
3.Gergen, K. J.(1985)。The social constructivist movement in modern psychology。American Psychologist,40(3),266-275。  new window
4.Bruffee, K. A.(1986)。Social construction, language, and the authority of knowledge: A bibliographical essay。College English,48(8),773-790。  new window
5.Schoenfeld, A. H.(1982)。Measures of problem solving performance and of problem solving instruction。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,13(1),31-49。  new window
6.蕭見文(19960600)。數學解題策略教學之研究。教育學刊,12,367-399。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.章勝傑(19990600)。數學題目難度對合作學習小組同儕互動質與量的影響。臺東師院學報,10,75-103。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.涂金堂(19990200)。國小學生數學解題歷程之分析研究。初等教育學刊,7,295-332。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.張景媛(19940600)。數學文字題錯誤概念分析及學生建構數學概念的研究。教育心理學報,27,175-200。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.甄曉蘭(19951100)。合作行動研究--進行教育研究的另一種方式。嘉義師院學報,9,297-318。  延伸查詢new window
11.張靜嚳(19950900)。問題中心教學在國中發展之經過、效果及可行性之探討。科學教育學刊,3(2),139-165。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.蔡承哲(1996)。高雄地區高二學生空間向量之解題歷程分析研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.柯登淵(1996)。國小四年級新數學實驗課程師生數學解題討論與共識發展之觀察研究(碩士論文)。國立屏東師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
3.梁新正(1996)。高雄地區高二學生數學解題之基模知識與歷程之分析研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.李靜瑤(1994)。高雄市國二學生數學解題歷程之分析研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.葉明達(1998)。高一學生數學合作解題與後設認知行為之個案研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Schoenfeld, A. H.(1985)。Mathematical problem solving。Orlando, Florida。  new window
2.Vygotsky, L. S.(1986)。Thought and Language。Cambridge, MA:MIT Press。  new window
3.張春興(1994)。認知心理學--三化取向的理論與實踐。台北市:東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
4.劉錫麒(1991)。數學解題教學研究。台北市:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
5.Vygotsky, L. S.、Knox、Carol(1978)。Mind in society: The development of higher psychological process。Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press。  new window
6.Berger, Peter L.、Luckmann, Thomas(1966)。The social construction of reality。Doubleday。  new window
圖書論文
1.Schoenfeld, A. H.(1987)。What's all the fuss about metacognition?。Cognitive science and mathematics education。Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.。  new window
2.Kilpatick, J.(1985)。A retrospective account of the past 25 years of research and learning mathematical problem solving。Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspective。Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
3.Lester, K. F.(1983)。Trends and issues in mathematical problem-solving research。Requisition of mathematics concepts and processes。New York:Academic Press。  new window
4.吳芝儀(2000)。建構論及其在教育研究上的應用。質的研究方法。高雄市:麗文文化。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE