:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:CPS教學對國小學生自然領域學習態度、創造力、後設認知與學習成就之影響
書刊名:臺中教育大學學報. 教育類
作者:蔡玉瑟曾俊鋒張妤婷 引用關係
作者(外文):Tsay, Yuh-sheTseng, Chun-fengChang, Yu-ting
出版日期:2008
卷期:22:2
頁次:頁35-59
主題關鍵詞:創造性問題解決教學學習態度創造力後設認知學習成就Creative problem solving teaching programLearning attitudesCreativityMetacognitionLearning achievement
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:6
  • 共同引用共同引用:1910
  • 點閱點閱:116
本研究旨在探討創造性問題解決教學與一般傳統講解示範教學對國小六年級學童的學習態度、創造力、後設認知及學習成就之影響。研究對象取自臺中縣某國小六年級普通班學生兩班,每班34人共68人,以準實驗研究法,選擇一班爲實驗班進行CPS教學,一班爲控制班採傳統教學,再比較兩種教學法之學習成效。研究工具爲「國小學習態度問卷」、「國小學生創造力量表」、「後設認知量表」、「自然科學習成就測驗」。所得的資料應用t檢定、單因子共變數分析、組內迴歸係數同質性考驗、LSD事後檢定等統計方法,分析實驗班與控制班,經教學實驗後在學習態度、創造力、後設認知及學習成就等四方面之差異,以探討創造性問題解決教學對全體學生所造成之影響,並提出研究的具體建議,供教育及心理輔導與未來相關研究之參考。 本研究發現:實施創造性問題解決教學之後,兩班全體學生在「學習態度」、「創造力」、「後設認知」等方面,實驗班比控制班有顯著的正向提升,但在「成就測驗」及「成就測驗的延宕測驗」部份,實驗班與控制班兩班學生,則未達顯著差異。研究結果發現,創造性問題解決教學對於小六學生自然與生活科技領域的學習態度、創造力、後設認知有顯著的幫助。
The purpose of this study is to compare the effect of creative problem solving and traditional teaching program on the learning attitude, creativity, metacognition and learning achievement of six-grade regular students. The subjects are two regular six-grade classes with students in each class from Lung-Shan Elementary in Taichung County. One class is assigned as the experimental group, and the other is assigned as the control group. The research tools of "Elementary Learning Attitude Scale", "Assessment of Creativity for Elementary Students", "Assessment of Metacognition", and "Assessment of Learning Achievement on Nature Science", are utilized to analyze the difference in learning attitude, creativity, metacognition, and learning achievement of the two groups of students. The results of the study are intended to explore the impact of the creative problem solving teaching program on the students, and to provide theoretical framework and practical suggestion for the educational and counseling program and future research. The findings of this study indicate that the creative problem solving teaching program has a more positive effect on the students from the experimental group than those from the control group, in terms of their "learning attitude", "creativity", and "metacognition". However, there is no significant effect on "achievement test" and "delay test of achievement" for all the students. The results of this study suggest that the creative problem solving teaching program would enhance the students' learning attitude, creativity, and metacognition in the fields of nature science and technology.
期刊論文
1.Towsend, G. C.、Winning, T. A.、Wetherell, J. D.、Mullins, G.(1997)。New PBL dental curriculum at the university of Adelaide。Journal of Dental Education,61(4),374-387。  new window
2.王文科(19890600)。教育研究的基本性質及其相關概念剖析。特殊教育學報,4,271-304。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.陳龍安(2002)。創造思考教學與策略。創造思考活動專題講座手冊,5-9。  延伸查詢new window
4.湯梅英(19991000)。課程改革--限制與可能。國教新知,46(1),10-19。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Schwartz, R. W.(1997)。Problem-based learning and performance-based testing : Effective alternatives for undergraduate surgical education and assessment of student performance。Medical Teacher,19(1),19-23。  new window
6.Albanese, M. A.、Mitchell, S.(1993)。Problem-based learning: A review of literature on its outcome and implementation issues。Academic Medicine,68(1),52-81。  new window
7.張景媛(19900100)。不同後設認知能力的大學生在學業成績與認知適應上之差異。測驗年刊,37,143-161。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Isaksen, Scott G.、Parnes, Sidney J.(1985)。Curriculum planning for creative thinking and problem solving。The Journal of Creative Behavior,19(1),1-29。  new window
9.邱上真(19890300)。後設認知研究在輕度障礙者教學上的應用。特殊教育季刊,30,12-16。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.張靜嚳(19950900)。問題中心教學在國中發展之經過、效果及可行性之探討。科學教育學刊,3(2),139-165。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Vantil, C.(1997)。Problem-based learning behavior: The impact of differen-ces in problem-based learning style and activity on students' achie-vement。Annual Meeting o f the American Educa-tion Research Association,(會議日期: 19970324-28)。Chicago, IL。  new window
學位論文
1.王貴春(2000)。STS教學與國小學生創造力及學習態度之研究(碩士論文)。臺北市立師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳玨名(2006)。問題本位學習教學模式對國小五年級學生數學科學習動機、學習態度與學習成就之影響(碩士論文)。中原大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.林寶山(1989)。教學原理與技巧。臺北市:五南。  延伸查詢new window
2.Belasco, James A.、李宛蓉(1994)。企業革命。臺北:遠流出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.方俊明(1993)。認知心理學與人格教育。臺北:水牛出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.教育部(2003)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要~自然與生活科技領域。臺北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳龍安、朱湘吉(1993)。創造與生活。臺北市:空中大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.王文科、簡茂發、黃光雄(1991)。教育研究法。臺北市:五南圖書出版公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.葛樹人(1990)。心理測驗學。臺北:桂冠圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
8.張春興(2000)。現代心理學--現代人研究自身問題的科學。臺北:東華書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Hoerr, Thomas R.、陳佩正(2001)。多元智慧融入教學與領導 : 新城小學的發展歷程與現身說法。臺北:遠流。  延伸查詢new window
10.Hunt, P.(1994)。An introduction to children's literature。New York:Oxford University Press。  new window
11.毛連塭(1987)。資優教育教學模式。臺北:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
12.郭生玉(1989)。心理與教育測驗。臺北市:東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
13.陳龍安(1993)。創造思考教學的理論與實際。台北:心理。  延伸查詢new window
14.彭聃齡、張必隱(2000)。認知心理學。臺北市:東華書局股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
15.簡茂發(1987)。心理測驗與統計方法。臺北市:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
16.賈馥茗(1976)。英才教育。台北市:開明書店。  延伸查詢new window
17.Williams, F. E.、林幸台、王木榮(1994)。威廉斯創造力測驗:指導手冊。臺北:心理。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Tobin,K.et al.(1994)。Research on instructional strategies for teaching science。Handbook of research on science teaching and learning。New York:NSTA。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE