我國廣播電視體制歷經戒嚴時期的緊密控制，以及民主開放之後日漸失序的商業化風潮，行政管制實務與法律規範之間不免有所脫節。網際網路興起典電訊傳擔技術進步所帶來的媒體整合，則更進一步挑戰歷來依傳擋路徑區分電信與大眾媒體，隨後又將廣撥電視細分無線、有線及衛星各自立法的管制架構。就長程法制發展的觀點而言，伴隨廣播電視媒體在解嚴之後的轉型，固然促使潛藏多年的產業生態深層問題漸次浮現;其實，我國廣播電視行政管制規範架構，已經臨界全盤更張、非積極立法無以肆應變局的緊要關頭。 本文從司法院大法官釋字第三六四號解釋出發，自國內法制實踐經驗中整理、釐清問題意識，再整理法釋義與法制實童聲兩個面向上的相開研究，試圖建構國家為廣播電視積極立法的憲法規範論述。除傳統土就詮釋性質的文獻進行分析之外，本文並將針對我國廣擂電視行政管制實務，檢視各項規範論述的事實基礎及其問題所在。 在「規範領域」部分，本文則試圖提出當前我國廣撥電視管制所亟需的憲法規1範論述，藉以擴大釋字第三六四號所奠定的「公平合理之分配」、「平等『接近使用傳橋媒體』之權利」、「傅搪媒體車騎車車自由原則」、「法律保留」等論誰基礎，發展後續法制建構過程所需的積極諧音量模式。

The broadcast system in Taiwan experienced rigid control of the state in the era of martial law and commercialization in times of liberalization. Regulation often went first beyond then below legislative authorization. The internet technology and the convergence of media in the recent years further challenge the legal boundaries set by telecommunication and broadcast statutes. The legal framework stands now before an overall re-construction. In the realm of legal norms, the Judicial Yuan Interpretation No.364 provides a positive perspective for this re-construction. This article analyses the argumentation schema of this Interpretation and makes a comparison with the later Interpretations which based on the Institution Guarantee theory. The finding that individualistic interpretation of the Prof. Dr. iur., Director of Institute of Financial and Economic Law, National Dong-Hwa Univ.constitution won't provide any legal basis for solving conflicts between “right of the access to the media" and the “free press" urges the legislator to develop a positive objective legal order for the freedom of expression.