臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：個人影像隱私與新聞自由之權衡--Von Hannover及Peck判決分析與臺灣借鏡
書刊名：政大法學評論
作者：廖福特 引用關係
作者(外文)：Liao, Fort Fu-te
出版日期：2006
卷期：91
頁次：頁145-198
主題關鍵詞：個人影像；尊重個人私人生活；隱私權；表達自由權；言論自由；新聞自由；通訊傳播委員會；Individual image；Surveillance videotapes；Respect for private life；Right to privacy；Right to freedom of expression；Freedom of speech；Freedom of the press；National communication commission
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(9) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:8
  • 共同引用共同引用:354
  • 點閱點閱:265
媒體拍攝個人照片及使用監視錄影帶之個人影像，牽涉個人之隱私權與新聞自由之保障、衝突與權衡。過去國內學術界已從不同之比較法觀點探討這些議題，然而比較法之範疇是可以擴張的，相對地國內學術界對於區域及國際組織內之人權理念探討是比較少的。因而本文希望藉由分析歐洲人權法院之相關判決，探討個人影像隱私及新聞自由之保障及平衡。本文共分為五部分：首先，本文比較歐洲人權公約與我國憲法規範及大法官會議解釋有何異同，以作為後續討論個案之基礎。其次，本文分析＂Von Hannover v. Germany＂此一引人注目之案件，以探究要求尊重私人生活與新聞自由之界限及其理由。第三，本文探討＂Peck v. the United Kingdom＂，以分析國家機關及媒體使用個人影像之方式及界限。第四，本文帶入國內相關法制情形之探討，希望能提供台灣相關議題思考之借鏡。最後本文於第五部分作總結。本文認為因為我國憲法未明確保障隱私權，所以這方面之保障遠落後於歐洲人權公約之內涵。而歐洲人權公約之規範可作為我國未來憲改之借鏡，同時歐洲人權法院兩個判決之理念，亦可作為未來改進我國法制之參考，其包括確認國家保障隱私權之義務、修改管理媒體法律之方向、擴充通訊傳播委員會之職權、採用禁止令制度、釐清隱私權之範疇等。
Photographing individuals and using individual images from surveillance videotapes involve the protection, conflict and balance between the right to privacy and freedom of the press. Domestic academia has presented viewpoints from diffenent comparative law perspectives. However, few of them derive from the views of international human rights law. This essay, therefore, focuses on judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, and offers different approaches of analyses on how to balance the two rights. This essay includes five parts. The first part compares rules of rights between the European Convention on Human Rights and the Taiwanese Constitution to provide a basis for discussions on individual cases. Secondly, it provides analyses on ＂Von Hannover＂, which focuses on balancing private life and freedom of the press. The third part further examines ＂Peck＂, reviewing the method and limitations governing the use of individal images by administrative authorities and the media. The fourth part probes into Taiwanese laws, and offers suggestions for amendments. The last part provides conclusions. It is argued that, because there has been no particular provision in the Taiwanese Constitution to protect the right to privacy, the protection of this field in Taiwan falls behind that of the European Convention on Human Rights. Therefore, it is suggested that future constitutional amendments should include the right to privacy. This essay also argues that, in taking the two judgments examined as models, Taiwanese laws can be changed or inserted to confirm the government's positive obligation to protect privacy, direct the ways of media management laws, extend the powers of the National Communication Commission, provide the system of injunction and clarify the ambit of the right to privacy.
期刊論文
1.Basil Markesinis、Colm O’Cinneide、Myriam Hunter-Henin、JÖrg Fedtake(2004)。Concerns and Ideas About the Developing English Law of Privacy( and How Knowledge of Foreign Law Might Be of Help)。American Journal of Comparative Law，52，133-208。  new window
2.陳河泉(20010600)。隱私權在我國法制之規範現況與未來展望。全國律師，5(6)，21-33。  延伸查詢new window
3.林世宗(200004)。隱私權。全國律師，5(4)，33-51。  延伸查詢new window
4.廖福特(200212)。引進國際人權準則--比較分析與台灣借鏡。東海法學研究，17，153-224。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Hudson, Anthony(2003)。Privacy: A right by other name。EUROPEAN HUMAN Rights，Special，73-85。  new window
6.廖福特(20001100)。Defamation, Free Expression and the European Convention on Human Rights。東海大學法學研究，15，187-217。new window  new window
7.Fenwick, Helen(2004)。Clashing Rights, the Welfare of the Child and the Human rights Act。Modern Law Review，67(6)，889-927。  new window
8.Thorgeirsdttir, Herds(2003)。Self-Censorship among Journalists: A (Moral) Wrong or a Violation of ECHR Law?。European Human Rights L. Rev.，4，383-399。  new window
9.Deringer, Kathryn F.(2003)。Piracy and the Press: The Convergence of British and French Law in Accordance with the European Convention on Human Rights。Penn State International Law Review，22。  new window
10.Carnegie, Les P.(1998)。Privacy and the Press: The Impact of Incorporating the European Convention on Human Rights in the United Kingdom。Duke Journal of Ccomparative and Int’l. L.，9，338-339。  new window
11.Taylor, Nick(2003)。Policing, Privacy and Proportionality。EUROPEAN HUMAN Rights L. Rev.，1，86-100。  new window
12.Milmo, Patrick(2003)。Courting the Media。EUROPEAN HUMAL RIGHTS L. Rev.，Special，1-11。  new window
13.張立宇(19910900)。論公眾人物隱私權的救濟。中山社會科學季刊，6(3)，127-139。  延伸查詢new window
14.石世豪(20020200)。偷拍性愛光碟案有如雪球愈滾愈大--媒體競爭下的隱私權保障及其漏洞。月旦法學，81，167-177。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.詹文凱(19980200)。公眾人物--新聞自由與隱私權的界限。律師雜誌，221，32-41。  延伸查詢new window
16.鄧衍森(19990100)。歐洲人權公約的法制化發展。月旦法學，44，22-34。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.林建中(19970700)。隱私權概念初探--從美國法之觀點切入。憲政時代，23(1)，53-78。  延伸查詢new window
18.李震山(20041200)。從公共場所或公眾得出入之場所普設監視錄影器論個人資料之保護。東吳法律學報，16(2)，45-92。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.李惠宗(19990800)。論新聞自由與隱私權的衝突--愛滋病學童案。臺灣本土法學雜誌，3，162-166。  延伸查詢new window
20.Misthal, Marc P.(1998)。Reigning in the Paparazzi: The Human Rights Act, the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, and the Rights of Privacy and Publicity in England。International Legal Perspectives，10，287。  new window
21.Singh, Rabinder、Strachan, James(2003)。Privacy Postponed。European Human Rights Law Review，12-24。  new window
學位論文
1.詹文凱(1998)。隱私權之研究(博士論文)。國立臺灣大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Ovey, Clare、White, Robin C. A.(2002)。Jacobs & White, the European Convention on Human Rights。Oxford University Press。  new window
2.Reid, Karen(1998)。A Practitioner's Guide to the European Convention of Human Rights。London：Sweet & Maxwell。  new window
3.Leckie, David、Pickersgill, David(1999)。The 1998 Human Rights Act Explained。The Stationery Office。  new window
4.Baker, Christopher(1998)。Human Rights Act 1998: A Practitioner's Guide。  new window
5.Council of Europe(1979)。Collected Editions of the “Travaux Prepara-TOIRES” OF THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS。  new window
6.Merrills, G.(1993)。The Development of International Law by the Euopean Court of Human Rights。  new window
7.Heffernan, Liz(1994)。Human Rights: A European Perspective。  new window
8.Colvin, Madeleine(2002)。Developing Key Privacy Rights。  new window
9.Macovei, Monica(2001)。A Guide to the Implementation of Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights。  new window
10.Van Dijk, P.、Van Hoof, G. J. H.(1998)。Theory & Practice of the European Convention on Human Rights。  new window
11.The Committee of Ministers(19820429)。Declaration on the Freedom of Expression and Information。  new window
12.法治斌(2003)。法治國家與表達自由憲法專論。正典。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.張永明(2001)。新聞傳播自由及界限。永然文化。  延伸查詢new window
14.Harris, D. J.、O'Boyle, M.、Warbrick, C.(1995)。Law of the European Convention on Human Rights。Butterworths。  new window
15.廖福特(2003)。歐洲人權法。台北：學林文化事業公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.林子儀(1993)。言論自由與新聞自由。元照出版有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.陳水扁(20041205)。「人權與文化公民權」研討會開幕致詞。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.法治斌(1994)。新聞報導與誹謗罪--一個憲法觀點。人權保障與司法審查憲法專論。月旦出版社股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.張永明(2001)。大眾傳播自由權之研究。新聞傳播自由及界限。永然文化。  延伸查詢new window
3.張永明(2001)。新聞報導自由權及被報導者人格權。新聞傳播自由及界限。永然文化。  延伸查詢new window
4.張永明(2001)。德國傳播法體系的演進與特色。新聞傳播自由及界限。永然文化。  延伸查詢new window
5.張永明(2001)。隱私權與資訊公開作為基本人權之法律地位。新聞傳播自由及界限。永然文化。  延伸查詢new window
6.瘳福特(200305)。歐洲人權公約之發展歷史。歐洲人權法。學林。  延伸查詢new window
7.廖福特(2003)。歐洲人權法院。歐洲人權法。學林。  延伸查詢new window
8.Kingston, James(1994)。[Human Rights: A European Perspective of James Kingston]Introduction。Human Rights: A European Perspective of James Kingston。  new window
9.Kingston, James(1994)。Sex and Sexuality under the European Convention on Human Rights。Human Rights: A European Perspective of James Kingston。  new window
10.Stratford, Jemima(2002)。Striking the Balance: Privacy v. Freedom of Expression under the European Convention on Human Rights。Developing Key Privacy Rights of Jemima Stratford。  new window
11.Coughlon, Paul(1994)。Personal Information and Privacy。Human Rights: A European Perspective of Paul Coughlon。  new window
12.Kilkely, Ursula(2001)。The Right to Respect For Private And Family Life。A Guide For the Impltmentation of Article 8 of the European Convemtion on Human Rights。  new window
13.張永明(2002)。從我國與德國釋憲機關之相關解釋與裁判論新聞傳播自由之界限與我國新聞傳播之立法。憲法解釋之理論與實務。臺北：中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
14.陳耀祥(2002)。論廣播電視中犯罪事實之報導與人格權保障之衝突--以德國聯邦憲法法院之雷巴赫裁判爲討論核心。當代公法新論--翁岳生教授七秩誕辰祝壽論文集。元照。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.翁曉玲(2002)。新聞報導自由與人格權保護--從我國與德國釋憲機關對新聞報導自由解釋之立場談起。當代公法新論（上）--翁岳生教授七秩誕辰祝壽論文集。元照出版公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.法治斌(2003)。保障言論自由的遲來正義--評司法院大法官釋字第509號解釋。法治國家與表意自由。臺北：正典。  延伸查詢new window
17.蕭文生(20040000)。自基本權保障觀點論街頭監視錄影設備裝設之問題。法治與現代行政法學：法治斌教授紀念論文集。臺北：元照。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.林子儀(20020000)。言論自由導論。臺灣憲法之縱剖橫切。元照。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：727（臺灣：716，外國：11） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1931025 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67733196
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上