空言無物、行之無悟？--課程行動研究中的實踐反省__臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	空言無物、行之無悟？--課程行動研究中的實踐反省
書刊名：	教育研究集刊
作者：	林佩璇
作者(外文)：	Lin, Pei-hsuan
出版日期：	2003
卷期：	49:3
頁次：	頁195-219
主題關鍵詞：	課程行動研究；課程實踐；實踐反省；Curriculum action research；Curriculum practice；Reflections in/on practic
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(2) 專書(1) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:0 共同引用:9 點閱:24

課程行動研究受到重視乃是認為課程活動中教師必須更有系統地從事慎思以進行課程改進。本文首先說明自從Dewey區分反省和例行實踐後，反省在實踐上的重要性益受矚目，然而反省是如此抽象，教師要反省什麼？反省至何種程度？才能表現出專業智慧，進行有效的知識宣稱？本文主張實踐反省既不是空口白話，也不是各說各話，而是教師在特定的脈絡下，主動投入社會系統中進行慎思和專業對話，產生視野轉化的過程。而反省的面向不僅在解決課程實踐問題，更要從是否增進教師的理解和改進課程實踐所在的情境等面向作思考。反省的深度則要超越技術層次，從不同課程觀點進行經驗交流，以刺激自我理解和解放的學習。最後，作者說明儘管目前的確潛在著阻礙教師反省的因素，而產生一些假釐清的現象，然而察覺這些限制¾¾行之有悟，正是提昇教師實踐反省的趨動力。

以文找文

Reflection is very important in curriculum action research. However, few studies have empirically investigated the nature of reflection. As a result, many questions remain unanswered. For instance, what in particular ought to be reflected on by teachers? What inspires concrete plans during the process of reflection? To what degree should deliberation by teachers incorporate the critiques of the institutional contexts in which they work? To explore these questions, the author analyzes the characteristics and levels of reflection in curriculum action research and articulates several obstacles that prevent teachers from engaging in reflection.

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	Stenhouse, L.(1981)。What Counts as Research?。British Journal of Educational Studies，29(2)，103-114。
2.	Bullough, B. V.、Gitlin, A. N.、Goldstein, S. L.(1984)。Ideology, Teacher Role, and Resistance。Teachers College Record，86(2)，339-358。
3.	Buchmann, M.(1987)。Teaching knowledge: the lights that teachers live by。Oxford Review of Education，13(2)，151-164。
4.	Zeichner, Kenneth M.、Liston, Daniel P.(1987)。Teaching student teachers to reflect。Harvard Educational Review，57(1)，23-48。
5.	Elbaz, Freema(1981)。The Teacher's "Practical Knowledge": Report of a Case Study。Curriculum Inquiry，11(1)，43-71。
6.	Harrison, M.(1997)。School-based curriculum decision making: A personal viewpoint。Curriculum Perspectives，2(1)，47-52。
7.	van Manen, M.(1977)。Linking ways of knowing with ways of being practical。Curriculum Inquiry，6(3)，205-228。
8.	甄曉蘭(19951100)。合作行動研究--進行教育研究的另一種方式。嘉義師院學報，9，297-318。延伸查詢
9.	Connelly, M.(1972)。The functions of curriculum development。Interchange，3(2/3)，161-177。
10.	Taylor, M.、Hart, P.、Robottom, I.(1994)。Dilemmas of Participatory Enquiry: A Case Study of Method-in-action。Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education，19(3)，201-214。
11.	Schwab, J. J.(1969)。The Practical: A Language for Curriculum。School Review，78(1)，1-23。
12.	Kirk, D.(1990)。School knowledge and the curriculum package-as-text。Journal of Curriculum Studies，22(5)，409-425。
13.	林佩璇(2002)。行動研究在課程發展中的理念與實踐。課程與教學，5(2)，81-96。延伸查詢
14.	Trumbull, D. J.(1986)。Practitioner knowledge: An examination of the artistry in teaching。The Journal of Educational Thought，20(3)，113-124。

會議論文
1.	林佩璇(2002)。課程行動研究中的教師角色。香港。延伸查詢
2.	Greene, J.、Southare, M.(1995)。Participatory approaches to evaluation for supporting school management: Three case studies。San Francisco, CA。

學位論文
1.	Harrison, M.(1979)。Toward empirical based curriculum theory: A participant observation study of school-based curriculum decision-making(博士論文)。Macquarie University，Australia。

圖書
1.	Corey, Stephen M.(1953)。Action Research to Improve School Practices。New York：Teachers College Columbia University。
2.	Schön, Donald A.、夏林清、鄭村棋(2004)。反映的實踐者：專業工作者如何在行動中思考。台北：遠流。延伸查詢
3.	Altrichter, Herbert、Posch, Peter、Somekh, Bridget、夏林清、蕭幸玲、林益民、黃宜敏、中華民國基層教師協會(1997)。行動研究方法導論--教師動手作研究。臺北：遠流。延伸查詢
4.	Elliott, J.(1993)。Reconstructing teacher education: Teacher development。The Falmer Press。
5.	Elliott, John(1992)。Action research for educational change。Milton Keynes：Open University Press。
6.	Schön, Donald A.(1987)。Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Towards a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions。San Francisco, California：Jossey-Bass Inc.。
7.	陳惠邦(1998)。教育行動研究。師大書苑。延伸查詢
8.	Carr, Wilfred、Kemmis, Stephen(1986)。Becoming Critical: Education, Knowledge, and Action Research。Falmer Press。
9.	蔡清田(2000)。教育行動研究。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。延伸查詢
10.	Stenhouse, Lawrence(1975)。An Introduction to Curriculum Research and Development。Heinemann Educational Books。
11.	McKernan, J.(1996)。Curriculum Action Research: A Handbook of Methods and Resources for the Reflective Practitioner。Kogan Page。
12.	Zeichner, K. M.、Gore, J. M.(1995)。Using action as research a vehicle for student teacher reflection: a social reconstructionist approach。Educational action research - Becoming practically critical。NY。
13.	周淑卿(2002)。學校教師文化的「再造」與課程改革的績效－對教師協同合作現象的分析。新世紀教育工程：九年一貫課程再造。臺北。延伸查詢
14.	Brunner, L.(1995)。The death of idealism? Or issues of empowerment in the preservice setting。Educational action research: Becoming practically critical。New York, NY。
15.	Chayanuvat, A.、Lukkunaprasit, D.(1997)。Classroom-centered research at Chulalongkorn University Language Institute。International action research: a casebook for educational reform。Washington, DC。
16.	Davidoff, S.(1997)。School organization development in a changing political environment。International action research: a casebook for educational reform。Washington, DC。
17.	Feldman, A.、Atkin, M.(1995)。Embedding Action Research in Professional Practice。Educational Action Research: Becoming Practically Critical。New York, NY。
18.	Friedman, V. J.(2002)。Action science: Creating communities of inquiry in communities of practice。Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice。London, UK。
19.	Gitlin, A.、Hadden, J.(1997)。Educative research: Acting on power relations in the classroom。International action research: a casebook for educational reform。Washington, DC。
20.	Goodson, I. F.(1997)。Action research and 'the reflexive project of selves'。International action research: a casebook for educational reform。Washington, DC。
21.	Grundy, S.(1997)。Participatory educational research in Australia: The first wave - 1976 to 1986。Participatory Action Research: International Contexts and Consequences。New York, NY。
22.	Kemmis, S.、McTaggart, Robin(1988)。Introduction。The action research reader。Victoria, Australia。
23.	Losito, B.、Pozzo, G.(1997)。The double track: The dichotomy of roles in action research。International action research: a casebook for educational reform。Washington, DC。
24.	Mayer, M.(1997)。Action research and the production of knowledge: The experience of an international project on environmental education。International action research: a casebook for educational reform。Washington, DC。
25.	Noffke, S. E.、Brennan, M.(1997)。Reconstructing the politics of action in action research。International action research: a casebook for educational reform。Washington, DC。
26.	Reason, P.、Bradbury, H.(2002)。Introduction: Inquiry and Participation in Search of a World Worthy of Human Aspiration。Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice。London, UK。
27.	Rosas, C. L. O.(1997)。Using participatory action research for the reconceptualization of educational practice。International action research: a casebook for educational reform。Washington, DC。
28.	Schuyler, P.、Sitterley, D.(1995)。Preservice teacher supervision and reflective practice。Educational action research: Becoming practically critical。New York, NY。
29.	Soffer, E.(1995)。The principal as action researcher: A study of disciplinary practice。Educational action research: Becoming practically critical。New York, NY。
30.	Winter, R.、Lee, J. B.、Bishop, L.、Maisch, M.、McMillan, C.、Sobieschowska, P.(1997)。The ambiguities of educational reform: Action research and competence specification in social work education。International action research: a casebook for educational reform。Washington, DC。

圖書論文
1.	Carson, T. R.(1995)。Reflective practice and a reconceptualization of teacher education changing。Changing times in teacher education: restructuring or reconceptualization?。Falmer Press。
2.	Sach, J.(2000)。Rethinking the Practice of Teacher Professionalism。The Life and Work of Teachers: International Perspectives in Changing Times。Falmer Press。
3.	Webb, G.(1996)。Becoming critical of action research for development。New directions in action research。Falmer。
4.	Argyris, C.、Schon, D. A.(1991)。Participatory action research and action science compared: A commentary。Participatory action research。Sage。
5.	Zuber-Skerritt, Ortrun T.(1996)。Introduction: New directions in action research。New directions in action research。Falmer Press。
6.	Jennings, L. E.、Graham, A. P.(1996)。Exposing discourses through action research。New directions in action research。Falmer Press。
7.	張芬芬(2001)。研究者必須中立客觀嗎？行動研究的知識論與幾個關鍵問題。行動研究與課程教學革新。臺北市：揚智出版社。延伸查詢
8.	Grundy, S.(1988)。Three modes of action research。The action research reader。Victoria：Deakin University。
9.	Kemmis, S.、Wilkinson, M.(1998)。Participatory action research and the study of practice。Action research in practice: Partnerships for social justice in education。Routledge。
10.	Kemmis, S.(1996)。Emancipatory aspirations in a postmodern Era。New directions in action research。The Falmer Press。
11.	Fenstermacher, G. D.(1986)。Philosophy of research on teaching: Three aspects。Handbook of research on teaching。Collier Macmillan Publishers。
12.	Kemmis, Stephen(1988)。Action Research in Retrospect and Prospect。The Action Research Reader。Deakin University。
13.	Kemmis, S.、Grundy, S.(1988)。Educational action research in Australia: The state of the art (an overview)。The Action research reader。Deakin University。
14.	Adams, E.、McGonagle, R.、Watts, P.、Weiner, G.(1997)。Action research and social justice: Some experiences of schools in the inner city。International action research: a casebook for educational reform。Falmer。
15.	Day, C.(1997)。Working with the different selves of teachers: Beyond comfortable collaboration。International action research: a casebook for educational reform。Washington, DC。
16.	Hall, S.(1996)。Reflexivity in Emancipatory action research: Illustrating the researcher's constitutiveness。New directions in action research。London。
17.	Lock, R. S.、Minarik, L. T.(1997)。Gender equity in an elementary classroom: The power of praxis in action research。International action research: a casebook for educational reform。Falmer。
18.	Mezirow, J.(1988)。A critical theory of adult learning and education。The action research reader。Deakin University Press。
19.	Park, P.(2002)。Knowledge and participatory research。Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice。London：Sage。
20.	Somekh, B.、Thaler, M.(1997)。Contradictions of management theory, organizational cultures, and the self。International action research: a casebook for educational reform。Falmer。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	校本課程評鑑：實踐啟蒙的課程改進
2.	「閱讀與書寫」之教學實踐--以軍事院校「左傳外交事例選讀」課程為例
3.	以異業合作的行動研究發展校長專業增能課程
4.	九年一貫課程脈絡底下之教師角色論述形構，1994~2005 ：Foucault的論述分析觀點
5.	課程行動研究的實踐論述：從自我到社會文化
6.	從課程理解到課程知識的實踐--以生涯教育融入綜合活動領域課程發展為例
7.	教育領導與教學革新：建構實踐反省的教學文化
8.	邁向課程實踐理論化的行動研究
9.	課程行動研究--從「專業成長」剖析教師角色轉化的困境
10.	行動研究在課程發展中的理念與實踐
11.	行動研究的知識宣稱--教師實踐知識

1.	奈米科技新課題融入學校教學的支持系統研究
2.	探討BBL取向體育教學成效及其對教師實務知識的影響
3.	原住民小學教師多元文化意識培力之行動研究
4.	A.Giddens「反思現代性」及其對課程理論之啟發

1.	學校本位課程 : 發展與評鑑

無相關著作

無相關點閱

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫