:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:世代因素對公務人員工作價值觀影響之實證分析:以考試院暨所屬機關為例
書刊名:東吳政治學報
作者:蔡秀涓 引用關係
作者(外文):Tsai, Hsiu-chuan
出版日期:2004
卷期:18
頁次:頁41-67
主題關鍵詞:世代嬰兒潮世代X世代公務人員工作價值觀考試院GenerationBaby boomersGeneration XersWorking valuesPublic employeeExamination yuan
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(11) 博士論文(1) 專書(1) 專書論文(2)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:11
  • 共同引用共同引用:94
  • 點閱點閱:93
以組織員工的人口特性為分類基礎,進行差異化與多樣化管理,已成為當代組織追求卓越績效目標時,必須高度關注的管理議題之一。其中,對於不同世代工作者的工作價值觀予以瞭解,更是受到晚近研究者諸多關切。然而,衡諸國內外相關文獻,以不同世代公務人員工作價值觀為研究主題者卻甚為稀少。 因此本研究最主要目的,就在於探索世代因素是否會形成我國不同世代公務人員工作價值觀的明顯差異。本研究主要是以文獻檢閱法和次級實證資料分析法為主,研究對象則是考試院暨所屬機關之公務人員。 研究發現,世代因素對於公務人員部分的工作價值觀的確會產生明顯的差異。屬於較年輕的X世代受訪者與較年長的嬰兒潮世代受訪者相較,明顯地更為重視薪酬晉升此外在工作價值。但在總體工作價值觀、內在工作價值、以及權力名望此外在價值,則不同世代受訪者並無顯著差異性看法。總體研究呈現不同世代公務人員工作價值觀同質性高於異質性的結果。如此結果與國內外部分相關研究結論頗為一致。 文末,本研究則針對相關研究結果提出討論,並論述在理論研究方面,後續應有更多相關研究的累積才能對此議題有更周全的了解。而在實務管理方面,則應增加績效報酬與快速升遷制度的機制,才能符合不同世代公務人員的工作價值觀。
Based on the classification of the population characteristic in organizational employees for differentiated and varied management, it becomes one of mainly focusing management topics for pursuing best performance in organization.。In this topic, lot of researchers pay more attentions to this issue which is about the working values in different generations. However, it seemed to be little for these kinds of literatures which are about the research for working values of public employees in different generations. The main purpose in this paper is to explore whether there are exist different working values in different generational public employees. In this study, the used methods are literature review and analysis of secondary empirical data. The sample of the target group is the related public employees in Examination Yuan. The study shows the generation really had the influence for the part of working values in public employees. Compare with elder Boomers, the younger GenXers pay more attention to the externally working values which is about raising salary and promotion. It is no significant difference for different generations among overall working values , internal working value , and external values in power and promotion. Overall, the research shows the result for working values of public employees in different generations: That is commonality higher than difference. The findings match the result for related report of this field in worldwide. In the end of paper, the author makes some conclusions, and articulates there are in need of more theoretical studies to understand comprehensively the issue. In practical management, the author argues more flexible mechanisms for promotion and performance pay can meet the working values of public employees in different generations.
期刊論文
1.Smola, Karen Wey、Sutton, Charlotte D.(2002)。Generational differences: Revisiting generational work values for the new millennium。Journal of Organizational Behaviors,23(4),363-382。  new window
2.Cordeniz, Judy A.(2002)。Recruitment, Retention, and Management of Generation X: A Focus on Nursing Professionals。Journal of Healthcare Management,47(4),237-249。  new window
3.Jurkiewicz, C. L.(2000)。Generation X and the Public Employee。Public Personnel Management,29(1),55-74。  new window
4.de Vaus, David、McAllister, Ian(1991)。Gender and work orientation: Values and satisfaction in Western Europe。Work mid Occupations,18(1),72-93。  new window
5.劉義周(19940500)。臺灣選民政黨形象的世代差異。選舉研究,1(1),53-73。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.陳金貴(19980100)。公務人員世代差異管理的探討。公務人員月刊,19,10-19。  延伸查詢new window
7.諸承明(20010400)。新新人類工作生活品質需求類型之研究--Q分類方法之實證應用。企業管理學報,49,71-95。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Weston, Marla(2001)。Coaching generations in the workplace。Nursing Administration Quarterly,25(2),11-21。  new window
9.陳義彥(19961200)。不同族群政治文化的世代分析。政治學報,27,83-121。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Jurkiewicz, C. L.、Brown, R. G.(1998)。GenXers vs. Boomers vs. Matures: Generational Comparisons of Public Employee Motivation。Review of Public Personnel Administration,18(4),18-37。  new window
11.Kuppershmidt, B. R.(2000)。Multigeneration Employee: Strategies for Effective Management。Health Care Manager,19(1),65-76。  new window
會議論文
1.余致力、曾得宜(2002)。考績制度與生產力。臺中。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.王叢桂(1992)。社會轉型中之工作價值觀變遷研究。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.張潤書、施能傑(1996)。公務人員升遷制度之研究。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
3.銓敘部(1994)。中央三級以上行政機關公務人力評估研究報告。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.廖秋月(2001)。"X"世代護理工作人員工作價值觀之探討(碩士論文)。台北醫學院。  延伸查詢new window
2.鍾淑珍(1999)。台灣與大陸新人類工作價值觀比較--以一電腦公司為例(碩士論文)。國立中央大學,新竹。  延伸查詢new window
3.徐增圓(2001)。新世代工作者之工作價值觀、期望報酬類型暨兩者相關因素與組織承諾之關係(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳淑玲(1996)。新人類的工作價值觀與工作特性對工作投入影響之研究(碩士論文)。國立中山大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.田蘊祥(2003)。公務人員工作壓力之世代差異研究:以考試院部會機關為例(碩士論文)。東吳大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.呂星蕙(2001)。高科技產業新新人類福利知覺與績效之關聯性研究--以工作價值觀為干擾變項(碩士論文)。靜宜大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.陳人豪(2001)。兩岸員工工作價值觀與工作特性對工作態度之影響(碩士論文)。國立中央大學,新竹。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Raymond, A. N.(1999)。Employee Training and Development。McGraw-Hill。  new window
2.齊思賢、Warren, Bennis、Robert, Thomas(2002)。奇葩與怪傑:時代、價值觀和關鍵時刻如何塑造領袖。臺北市:時報文化。  延伸查詢new window
3.Zemke, R.、Raines, C.、Filipczak, B.(2000)。Generations at work: Managing the clash of veterans, boomers, xers, and nexters in your workplace。American Management Association。  new window
4.Klingner, Donald E.、Nalbandian, John、江大樹、呂育誠、陳志瑋(2001)。人事行政新論。臺北:韋伯文化。  延伸查詢new window
5.Klingner, Donald E.、Nalbandian, John(1998)。Public personnel management: Contexts and strategies。Prentice-Hall, Inc.。  new window
6.Rokeach, M.(1975)。The Nature of Human Values。New York:Free Press。  new window
7.Robbins, Stephen P.(2003)。Organizational behavior: Concepts, controversies, applications。Prentice-Hall, Inc.。  new window
8.吳瓊恩、李允傑、陳銘薰(2001)。公共管理。台北:智勝文化。  延伸查詢new window
9.Robbins, Stephen P.(2000)。Organizational Behavior。Upper Saddle, New Jersey:Prentice Hall。  new window
10.Cozzetto, D. A.、Pedeliski, T. B.、Tipple, T. J.(1996)。Public Personnel Administration: Confronting the Challenge of Change。Public Personnel Administration: Confronting the Challenge of Change。New Jersey。  new window
11.Elizur, D.(1984)。Systematic Job Evaluation and Comparable Worth。Systematic Job Evaluation and Comparable Worth。Brookfield。  new window
12.Griffin, Ricky W.、Moorhead, G.(2001)。Organizational Behavior: Managing People and Organizations。Organizational Behavior: Managing People and Organizations。New York, NY。  new window
13.(1999)。Human Resource Development: Learning and Training for Individual and Organizations。Human Resource Development: Learning and Training for Individual and Organizations。London, UK。  new window
14.考試院(1996)。公務人員升遷法制之研究問卷調查報告。公務人員升遷法制之研究問卷調查報告。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE