:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:建構長期照護體系先導計畫--理念與實踐
書刊名:臺灣公共衛生雜誌
作者:吳淑瓊戴玉慈莊坤洋張媚呂寶靜 引用關係曹愛蘭王正 引用關係陳正芬 引用關係
作者(外文):Wu, Shwu-chongDai, Yu-tzuChuang, Kun-yangChang, MeiLu, Pau-chingTsao, Ai-lanWang, Cheng G.Chen, Chen-fen
出版日期:2004
卷期:23:3
頁次:頁249-258
主題關鍵詞:長期照護體系資源發展財務支持照顧管理實驗社區Long-term care systemResource developmentFinancial supportCare managementExperimental communities
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(15) 博士論文(6) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:15
  • 共同引用共同引用:164
  • 點閱點閱:96
     目標:本文說明建構長期照護體系先導計畫的理念、計畫策略、和初步執行結果。該計畫希望能以可負擔的居家和社區式服務協助身心功能障礙者,以達到「在地老化」的目標。方法:在2000年行政院核定「建構長期照護體系先導計畫」三年計畫。該計畫選擇嘉義市和臺北縣三鶯為實驗社區,於2001年10月分別在兩社區成立社區中心,每一中心配置4-5位照顧經理,一位主任,和一位行政專員,負責推展照顧管理服務、及督導新型服務模式的發展。從2002年1月起,社區開始提供各項居家和社區式服務。結果:到2002年7月為止,照顧經理總共替1031位個案擬定照顧計畫,其中,469位個案依據照顧計畫接受服務。除補助兩社區新型服務的開辦費(約1400萬元)外,兩社區補助民眾接受服務的費用共約474萬元。結論:初步結果顯示服務提供者有發展居家和社區式服務的意願,但是民眾對此服務並不熟悉,可能造成初始之低使用率。在計畫的補助標準和照顧管理制度的設計下,提供居家和社區式服務的財務負擔並不如預期沈重,但須更長的觀察,才能驗證上述之成果。
     Objectives: This report described the conceptual framework, strategic planning and implementation, and preliminary results of the Pilot Program for the Development of Long-Term Care System. The program aimed to achieve 毣ging in Place?by making home and community-based services affordable to the disabled. Methods: In the year 2000, the Executive Yuan approved a three-year project, the Pilot Program for the Development of Long-Term Care. Chia-Yi City, and the San-Yin Townships of Taipei County were selected as experimental communities. In October, 2001, a community center was established in each experimental community. Personnel included 4-5 care managers, 1 director, and 1 administrative assistant. The main tasks of the center were to carry out care management scheme, and to supervise new long-term care service models being implemented in the communities. Starting in February 2002, home and community based services became available to the disabled in the communities. Results: By the end of July 2002, care managers had drawn up care plans for 1,031 disabled residents. Among them, 469 people had used home or community-based services according to a care plan. Subsidies to service providers were at about 14 million NT dollars. Reimbursement for services totaled about 4.74 million NT dollars. Conclusions: Initial results had shown that service providers were willing to invest in developing resources for home and community based services. Unfamiliarity with the services had probably initially led to lower than expected level of utilization. Under the current care management and service reimbursement schemes, financial burden of providing home and community based services was not as heavy as anticipated. However, continual observation is needed to confirm initial findings.
期刊論文
1.Cuellar, Alison E.、Wiener, Joshua M.(2000)。Can Social Insurance for Long-Term Care Work? The Experience of Germany。Health Affairs,19(3),8-25。  new window
2.吳淑瓊、陳正芬(20001200)。長期照護資源的過去、現在、與未來。社區發展季刊,92,19-31。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Campbell, John. C.、Naoki, Ikegami(2000)。Public long-term Care Insurance comes to Japan。HEALTH AFFAIRS,19(3),26-39。  new window
4.吳淑瓊、江東亮(19950600)。臺灣地區長期照護的問題與對策。中華公共衛生雜誌,14(3),246-255。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.吳淑瓊、莊坤洋(20010600)。在地老化:臺灣二十一世紀長期照護的政策方向。臺灣公共衛生雜誌,20(3),192-201。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.吳淑瓊、莊坤洋、陳亮汝(20040600)。建構長期照護體系先導計畫:實驗社區介入前的照護需求與自付費用。臺灣公共衛生雜誌,23(3),209-220。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Fine, M. D.(1999)。Coordinating Health Extended Care, and Community Support Services: Reforming Aged Care in Australia。J Aging Soc Policy,11,67-90。  new window
8.Watanabe, R.、Lai, O. K.(2001)。Aged Care Service Delivery in Japan: Preparing for the Long-Term Care Insurance Scheme。J Aging Soc Policy,13,21-34。  new window
9.Stuart, M.、Weinrich, M.(2001)。Home- and Community-Based Long-Term Care: Lessons from Denmark。Gerontologist,41,474-480。  new window
研究報告
1.行政院經濟建設委員會(2002)。中華民國臺灣地區民國91年至140年人口推計。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.呂淑瓊、呂寶靜、王正、莊坤洋、張媚、戴玉慈(2002)。建構長期照護體系先導計畫. 第二年計畫。臺北:內政部。  延伸查詢new window
3.吳淑瓊、呂寶靜、盧瑞芬、國立臺灣大學公共衛生學研究所[執行](1998)。配合我國社會福利制度之長期照護政策研究。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.陳亮汝(2002)。社區居家身心功能障礙者居家支持服務使用分析(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.曾昭蓉(1998)。居家式與機構式照護病人型態及照護費用之比較研究(碩士論文)。高雄醫學院。  延伸查詢new window
3.傅子珍(1996)。全民健康保險實施第一年居家照護服務利用之初探,高雄。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.OECD(1996)。Caring for Frail Elderly People: Policies in Evolution。Paris:Organization for Economic Cooperation Development。  new window
2.The Royal Commission on Long Term Care(1999)。With respect to old age: long term care - rights and responsibilities。London:The Stationary Office。  new window
3.Gibson, D.(1998)。Aged Care: Old Policies, New Problems。New York, NY。  new window
4.Kane, Rosalie A.、Kane, Robert L.、Ladd, Richard C.(1998)。The Heart of Long-Term Care。Oxford。  new window
5.吳淑瓊、張明正(1997)。臺灣老人的健康照護現況分析。臺北:國立臺灣大學公共衛生研究所曁衛生政策研究中心。  延伸查詢new window
6.Sundstrom, G.、Thorslund, M.(1994)。Sweden。International Handbook on Services for the Elderly。London, UK。  new window
7.Kono, S.、Ogawa, N.、Maeda, D.(1996)。Aging in Japan。Aging in Japan。Tokyo, Japan。  new window
8.行政院社會福利推動委員會長期照護專案小組(2002)。建構長期照護體系先導計畫問與答。建構長期照護體系先導計畫問與答。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.呂寶靜(1999)。我國推動福利社區化的省思:從英國社區照顧政策的發展出發。臺灣社會福利的發展:回顧與展望。臺北:五南圖書。  延伸查詢new window
2.Myers, G. C.(1990)。Demography of Aging。Handbook of Aging and Social Sciences。New York, NY:Academic Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE