臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：國際制度在國際霸權競逐的權力作用
書刊名：政治學報
作者：陳欣之 引用關係
作者(外文)：Chen, Hsin-chih
出版日期：2006
卷期：40
頁次：頁115-148
主題關鍵詞：國際制度；路徑依存；議程控制；權力；霸權；Agenda control；Hegemony；International institution；Path-dependence；Power
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(1) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:87
  • 點閱點閱:54
國際關係十分重視權力對國家行為的作用，不過各種國際關係理論，對於權力的定義、本質及運用方式，並沒有提出令人滿意的解釋。大部份的國際關係論述，仍然以掌握資源的多寡，作為衡量權力大小的指標，忽視宰制國家決策環境及決策選項的其他種類權力面貌。權力雖是國際關係的一個重要概念，不過國際關係對於此種概念的各種運作方式及內涵，並沒有深入的探索。 霸權對國際制度的創設，有重大的影響，不過霸權對於國際制度的操縱，以及霸權運用國際制度應對新興挑戰國的各種可能作為，值得更多的探索。國際制度內由於霸權的存在，呈現出國家間權力不對稱的現象，而且霸權經由創設國際制度，滿足與實現其利益，並鞏固其優勢的霸權地位。最後，霸權推動國際制度與促進國際合作時，透過限制決策背景與選項，削弱其他國家與霸權較勁的可能。 尋求國際合作的過程中，霸權利用對議題的控制，以及限制其他國家決策選項的方式，展示霸權所擁有的權力，迫使其他國家處於不利的決策地位，進而達成符合霸權最大利益的國際合作運作模式。故而國際制度的運作中，存在著贏家（winner）與輸家（loser），而且隨著國際制度的運作，不斷強化贏者的地位，提昇輸家退出此種制度尋求其他解脫的成本，迫使弱者繼續在不利於本國利益的國際制度中，陷入兩害相權取其輕的決策困境。 中共與美國的霸權競爭態勢，已成為近年來最熱門的國際關係課題，中共的權力地位或許十分驚人，不過在世界貿易組織中的表現卻處處受限，中共取代美國，主導全球主要國際制度的地位，顯然有一大段的距離，無論如何，中共仍會與美國在國際制度內，上演公權力爭奪的老戲。
Power has been an important factor in deciding the state’s behavior in the international system; however, the International Relations Theories did not propose satisfied explanations on the issue of the definition, nature and the exercise of power. Most of the international relations theories insist that the measuring index of power is the amount of capabilities. They ignore the other power faces which demonstrate by means of dominating the decision-making environment the decision agenda. Hegemony has great influence on the establishment of international institution, and the ways how hegemony manipulates the international institution deserve more attentions. There is power asymmetry in the international institution because of the existence of hegemony. Besides, hegemony exercised her power and fulfilled her interests through the function of the international institution, which consolidate further her predominant position in the international system. In the process of international cooperation, hegemony limited the possible choices in the rational choice bargaining, which demonstrate the hegemony’s power in the international institution and achieve a certain kind of international cooperation in which the hegemony becomes beneficent and the other countries were forces to accept an unfavorable terms. So, there are winner and losers in the international institution. The winner becomes powerful and the losers are trapped in a dilemma between the high cost to quit the international institution and the unfavorable position in such international institution.
期刊論文
1.Barnett, Michael、Duvall, Raymond(2005)。Power in International Politics。International Organization，59(1)，39-75。  new window
2.Baldwin, David A.(1979)。Power Analysis and World Politics: New Trends versus Old Tendencies。World Politics，31(2)，161-194。  new window
3.Ikenberry, G. John(1999)。Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and Persistence of American Postwar Order。International Security，23(3)，43-78。  new window
4.Singer, David J.、Deutsch, Karl W. J.(1964)。Multipolar Power Systems and International Stability。World Politics，16(3)，390-406。  new window
5.Gunberg, Isabele(1990)。Exploring the Myth of Hegemonic Stability。International Organization，44(4)，431-477。  new window
6.Bachrach, Peter、Baratz, Morton. S.(1962)。Two Faces of Power。American Political Science Review，56(4)，1021-1047。  new window
7.Kaplan, Morton A.(1957)。Balance of Power, Bipolarity and Other Models of International Systems。The American Political Science Review，51(3)，684-695。  new window
8.Christensen, Thomas J.(2001)。Posing Problems without Catching Up: China's Rise and Challenges for U.S. Security Policy。International Security，25(4)，5-40。  new window
9.曾雅真(20051200)。論中國大陸入世之過渡時期貨品特別防衛機制--兼論美國421市場擾亂特別防衛機制。東海大學法學研究，23，173-221。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Pierson, Paul(2000)。Increasing Return, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics。American Political Science Review，94(2)，251-267。  new window
11.Wohlforth, William C.(1999)。The Stability of A Unipolar World。International Security，24(1)，5-41。  new window
12.Keohane, Robert O.、Martin, Lisa L.(1995)。The Promise of Institutionalist Theory。International Security，20(1)，39-51。  new window
13.Dahl, Robert Alan(1957)。The Concept of Power。Behavioral Science，2(3)，201-215。  new window
14.Rosecrance, Richard N.(1966)。Bipolarity, Multipolarity, and the Future。The Journal of Conflict Resolution，10(3)，314-327。  new window
15.Krasner, Stephen D.(1991)。Global Communications and National Power: Life on the Pareto Frontier。World Politics，43(3)，336-366。  new window
16.郭秋永(20040600)。對峙的權力觀：行為與結構。政治科學論叢，20，29-78。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.Grieco, Joseph M.(1988)。Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism。International Organization，42(3)，485-507。  new window
18.蘇長和(2005)。發現中國新外交--多邊國際制度與中國外交新思維。世界經濟與政治，2005(4)，11-16。  延伸查詢new window
19.左正東(20050900)。全球網路治理中的知識與權力。問題與研究，44(5)，103-142。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.Lake, David A.(2003)。The New Sovereignty in International Relations。International Studies Review，5(3)，303-323。  new window
21.Dreyer, June Teufel(2004)。The Limits to China's Growth。Orbis，48(2)，233-246。  new window
22.Ikenberry, G. John(2001)。American Power and the Empire of Capitalist Democracy。Review of International Studies，27(5)，191-212。  new window
23.Hart, Jeffrey(1976)。Three Approaches to the Measurement of Power in International Relations。International Organization，30(2)，289-305。  new window
24.秦亞青(2004)。權勢霸權、制度霸權與美國的地位。現代國際關係，2004(3)，6-8。  延伸查詢new window
25.Lai, Hongyi Harry(2001)。Behind China's World Organization Agreement with the USA。Third World Quarterly，22(2)，237-255。  new window
圖書
1.Baratz, M. S.、Bachrach, Peter(1970)。Power and Poverty: Theory and Practice。Power and Poverty: Theory and Practice。New York, NY：Oxford University Press。  new window
2.Haftendorn, H.、R. O. Keohane、C. Wallander(1999)。Imperfect Unions: Security Institutions over Time and Space。New York：Oxford University Press。  new window
3.Perrow, Charles(1993)。Complex Organizations: A Critical Essay。New York, NY：McGraw-Hill。  new window
4.Keohane, Robert O.、Nye, Joseph S.、Hoffmann, Stanley(1993)。After the Cold War: International Institutions and State Strategies in Europe, 1989-1991。Cambridge, Mass.：Harvard University Press。  new window
5.Baldwin, David A.(1993)。Neorealism and Neoliberalism:the Contemporary Debate。New York：Columbia University Press。  new window
6.Johnston, Alastair Iain、Ross, Robert S.(1999)。Engaging China: The Management of an Emerging Power。Routledge。  new window
7.Nye, Joseph S. Jr.(2004)。Power in the Global Information Age: From Realism to Globalization。London, UK：New York, NY：Routledge。  new window
8.Waltz, Kenneth(1978)。Theory of International Politics。Reading, Mass：Addison-Wesley。  new window
9.Tammen, Ronald L.、Kugler, Jacek、Lemke, Douglas、Stam, Allan C. III、Abdollahian, Mark A.、Alsharabati, Carole、Efird, Brian、Organski, Abramo Fimo Kenneth(2000)。Power Transitions: Strategies for the 21st Century。Chatham House Publishers of Seven Bridges Press。  new window
10.Kindlebrg, Charles P.(1973)。The World in Depression, 1929-1939。Berkeley, CA：University of California Press。  new window
11.Wendt, Alexander E.(1999)。Social Theory of International Politics。Cambridge：Harvard University Press。  new window
12.Morgenthau, Hans J.、Thompson, Kenneth W.(1985)。Politics among Nations: the Struggle for Power and Peace。New York：McGraw-Hill。  new window
13.Brown, Michael E.、Coté, Owen R. Jr.、Lynn-Jones, Sean M.、Miller, Steven E.(2000)。The Rise of China。Cambridge, Massachusetts：The MIT Press。  new window
14.Nye, Joseph S. Jr.(2003)。The Paradox of American Power: Why the World's Only Superpower Can't Go it Alone。New York：Oxford University Press。  new window
15.胡為真(2001)。美國對華「一個中國」政策之演變：從尼克森到柯林頓。台北：臺灣商務。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Gruber, Lloyd(2000)。Ruling the World: Power Politics and the Rise of Supranational Institutions。Princeton, N.J.：Princeton University Press。  new window
17.Keohane, Robert O.(1989)。International Institutions and State Power: Essays in International Relations Theory。Westview Press。  new window
18.Gilpin, Robert(1981)。War and Change in World Politics。Cambridge University Press。  new window
19.Keohane, Robert O.、Nye, Joseph S. Jr.(1977)。Power and interdependence: world politics in transition。Boston, Massachusetts：Little Brown。  new window
20.Mearsheimer, John J.、Alterman, G.(2001)。The Tragedy of Great Power Politics。W. W. Norton & Company。  new window
21.Organski, A. F. Kenneth、Kugler, Jacek(1980)。The War Ledger。University of Chicago Press。  new window
22.Lukes, Steven Michael(1974)。Power: A Radical View。Macmillan Press。  new window
23.Keohane, Robert O.(1984)。After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy。Princeton University Press。  new window
24.Krasner, Stephen D.(1983)。International Regimes。Cornell University Press。  new window
25.Porter, Gareth、Brown, Janet Welsh(1996)。Global Environmental Politics: Dilemmas World Politics。Global Environmental Politics: Dilemmas World Politics。Colorado。  new window
26.Baldwin, David A.(1989)。Paradox of Power。New York, NY：Basil Blackwell。  new window
27.Tuschhoff, Christian(1999)。Alliance Cohesion and Peaceful Change in NATO。Imperfect Unions: Security Institutions over Time and Space。Oxford, UK。  new window
28.Taylor, Alan John Percivale(1963)。The Origins of the Second World War。The Origins of the Second World War。London, UK。  new window
其他
1.Office of the United States Trade Representative(2005)。Memorandum of Understanding between the Government of the US and the People's Republic of China Concerning Trade in Textile and Apparel Products，0。  new window
圖書論文
1.Levi, Margaret(1997)。A Model, a Method, and a Map: Rational Choice in Comparative and Historical Analysis。Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
2.Dahl, Robert(1986)。Power as the Control of Behavior。Power。New York, NY：New York University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：768（臺灣：767，外國：1） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1972506 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67771134
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上