臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：氣候變化綱要公約／京都議定書、美歐不同立場與和WTO補貼暨平衡措施協定之互動
書刊名：中華國際法與超國界法評論
作者：許耀明 引用關係
作者(外文)：Hsu, Yao-Ming
出版日期：2007
卷期：3:1
頁次：頁73-120
主題關鍵詞：全球暖化；氣候變遷；氣候變化綱要公約；京都議定書；本益分析；國際貿易法；國際環境法；補貼暨平衡措施協定；Global warming；Climate change；UNFCCC；Kyoto Protocol；Cost-benefit analysis；International Trade Law；SCM Agreement
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(2)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:79
  • 點閱點閱:106
面對日益嚴重之全球暖化問題，本文從全球氣候變化綱要公約(UNFCCC)與京都議定書之規範出發，討論美國與歐盟為何對於京都議定書之規範有不同之立場；美國基於本益分析，認為開發中國家未負相當義務，美國之經濟將受傷害而不願加入京都議定書，而歐盟卻基於國際環境衡平原則，積極進行溫室氣體排放減量與進行對開發中國家之財務與技術援助。美國此一作法，引發相關國際人權保護與國際間分配正義之討論。此外，美國此一作法，也可能引發貿易與環境互動議題中WTO下SCM協定之適用。但歐盟採行之歐體內國家排放權交易之具體實踐（德國之無償排放權交易），也可能引發SCM之爭議。本文最後以前述為借鏡，簡短討論臺灣未來在全球暖化議題應有之角色與因應策略。
Facing the more and more serious problem of global warming, this article tries to analyses the different positions toward this possible catastrophe and the UNFCCC/Kyoto Protocol between the United States and the European Union. Based on the cost-benefit analysis, the US thought that joining the Kyoto Mechanism would do harm to their economy, because in this mechanism the developing countries wouldn't bear any obligations; on the contrary, based on the principle of equity in international law of environment, the EU has positively engaged to the delimitation of the emission of greenhouse gas, and has tried to provide technical and financial assistance to the developing countries. The position of the US provokes some problem of conformities to international protection of human rights and international distributive justice. Besides, it would also intrigue the possibleuse of the SCM agreement in the WTO system. However, the intra-EU trade of emission unit, especially the free transaction system in Germany, would be subject to the SCM Agreement, too. In conclusion, we could learn a lot from the American and the European experience for the future construction of the Taiwanese policies and strategies toward the global warming.
期刊論文
1.Sunstein, Cass R.(2007)。Of Montreal and Kyoto: A Tale of Two Protocols。Harvard Environmental Law Review，31(1)，1-65。  new window
2.Aminzadeh, Sara C.(2007)。A moral imperative: The human rights implications of climate change。Hastings International and Comparative Law Review，30(2)，231-265。  new window
3.施文真(20050300)。臺灣參與國際環保類之組織與公約的意義與可行性。臺灣國際法季刊，2(1)，125-173。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Pervical, Robert V.(2007)。Environmental Law in the Twenty-First Century。Virginia Environmental Law Journal，25，1。  new window
5.Blomquist, Robert F.(2006)。Globoecopragmatism: How to Think (and How Not to Think) about Trade and the Environment。University of Kansas Law Reviews，55(1)，129。  new window
6.Heinzerling, Lisa(2006)。The Accidental Environmentalist: Judge Posner on Catastrophic Thinking。Georgetown Law Journal，94(3)，833。  new window
7.Barrett, Scott(2006)。The Problems of Averting Global Catastrophe。Chicago Journal of International Law，6(2)，527。  new window
8.Pierrehumbert, R. T.(2006)。Climate Change: A Catastrophe in Slow Motion。Chicago Journal of International Law，6(2)，573。  new window
9.Posner, Richard A.(2006)。Efficient Responses to Catastrophic Risk。Chicago Journal of International Law，6(2)，511-525。  new window
10.Sagemuller, Imke(2006)。Forest Sinks under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Kyoto Protocol: Opportunity Risk for Biodiversity?。Columbia Journal of Environmental Law，31(2)，189。  new window
11.Lohan, Dagmar(2006)。Assessing the Mechanisms for the Input of Scientific Information Into the UNFCCC。Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law and Policy，17(2)，249-265。  new window
12.Nihoff, Mindy G.(2006)。The Clean Development Mechanism: Does the Current Structure Facilitate Kyoto Protocol Compliance。Georgetown International Environmental Law Review，18(2)，249-276。  new window
13.Doelle, Meinhard(2006)。The Cat Came Back, or the Nine Lives of the Kyoto Protocol。Journal of Environmental Law and Practice，16(3)，261-268。  new window
14.Harris, Paul G.(2006)。The European Union and Environmental Change: Sharing the Burdens of Global Warming。Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law and Policy，17(2)，309-321。  new window
15.Baumert, Kevin A.(2006)。Participation of Developing Countries in the International Climate Change Regime: Lessons for the Future。The George Washington International Law Review，38，365-407。  new window
16.Diener, Shari L.(2006)。Ratification of the Kyoto Aside: How International Law and Market Uncertainty Obviate the Current U.S. Approach to Climate Change Emissions。William And Mary Law Review，47，2089-2106。  new window
17.Abate, Randall S.(2006)。Kyoto or Not, Here We Come: The Promise and Perils of the Piecemeal Approach to Climate Change Regulation in the United States。The Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy，15(2)，369-370。  new window
18.Sunstein, Cass R.(2007)。On the Divergent American Reactions to Terrorism and Climate Change。Columbia Law Review，107(2)，503-509。  new window
19.Middaugh, Marguerite E.(2006)。Linking global warming to Inuit human rights。San Diego International Law Journal，8(1)，179-191。  new window
20.Carothers, Claire(2006)。United We Stand: The Interstate Compact as a Tool for Effecting Climate Change。Georgia Law Review，41(1)，229-236。  new window
21.Meier, Benjamin Mason(2007)。Employing Health Right for Global Justice: The Promise of Public Health in Response to the Insalubrious Ramification of Globalization。Cornell International Law Journal，39，711。  new window
22.Caney, Simon(2006)。Cosmopolitan Justice, Rights and Global Climate Change。Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence，19(2)，255-278。  new window
23.Petsonk, Annie(1999)。The Kyoto Protocol and the WTO: Integrating Greenhouse Gas Emissions Allowance trading into the Global Market place。Duke Environmental Law & Policy Forum，10，185。  new window
24.Carlarne, C. P.(2006)。Climate Change Policies an Ocean Apart: EU & US Climate Change Policies Compared。Pennsylvania State Environmental Law Review，14(3)，435-482。  new window
25.Wolf, Liana G. T.(2006)。Countervailing a Hidden Subsidy: The U.S. Failure to Require Greenhouse Gas Emission Reductions。Georgetown International Environmental Law Review，19(3)，83-89。  new window
26.Ellis, Jaye(2006)。Overexploitation of a Valuable Resource? New Literature on the Precautionary Principle。The European Journal of International Law，17(2)，445。  new window
27.Shah, Vidhi R.(2007)。The Allocation of Free Emissions Allowances by Germany to its Steel Industry: a Possible Subsidy Claim under the WTO Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures。American University International Law Review，22，445-455。  new window
28.許耀明(20070400)。從WTO生技產品案爭端解決小組報告看GMO國際貿易中國際貿易法與國際環境法之衝突與解決可能。科技法學評論，4(1)，225-266。new window  延伸查詢new window
29.施文真(20050700)。氣候變遷國際管制體系與關稅暨貿易總協定／世界貿易組織之關係：以京都機制為主要探討對象。國立臺灣大學法學論叢，34(4)，179-228。new window  延伸查詢new window
30.李河清(20041100)。知識社群與全球氣候談判。問題與研究，43(6)，73-102。new window  延伸查詢new window
31.牛惠之(20050500)。預防原則之研究--國際環境法處理欠缺科學證據之環境風險議題之努力與爭議。國立臺灣大學法學論叢，34(3)，1-71。new window  延伸查詢new window
32.Kahan, Dan M.、Slovic, Paul、Braman, Donald、Gastil, John(2006)。Fear of Democracy: A Cultural Evaluation of Sunsteinon Risk。Harvard Law Review，119(4)，1071-1076。  new window
圖書
1.Verheyen, Roda(2005)。Climate Change Damage and International Law: Prevention Duties and State Responsibility。Leiden：Brill Academic Publishers。  new window
2.Arnaud, Emmanuel、Berger, Arnaud、de Perthuis, Christian(2006)。Le développement durable。  new window
3.Singer, Peter、李尚遠(2003)。我們只有一個世界：全球化的倫理學。臺北：商周。  延伸查詢new window
4.(200409)。National Geographic。  new window
5.(200508)。National Geographic。  new window
6.(200603)。National Geographic。  new window
7.(200502)。Nature。  new window
8.(200509)。Nature。  new window
9.(200511)。Nature。  new window
10.(200409)。國家地理雜誌。  延伸查詢new window
11.(200311)。科學人。  延伸查詢new window
12.Posner, Richard A.(2004)。Catastrophe: Risk and Response。Oxford University Press。  new window
13.Sampson, Gary P.、Chambers, W. Brandee(2002)。Trade, Environment and the Millennium。United Nations University Press。  new window
14.WTO Secretariat(2000)。Trade, Development and the Environment。Springer。  new window
15.Maljean-Dubois, Sandrine(2003)。Droit de l'Organisation Mondiale du Commerce et protection de l'environnement。  new window
16.Kiss, Alexandre、Beurier, Jean-Pierre(2004)。Droit international de l'environnement。  new window
17.Kooten, G. Comelisvan(2005)。Climate Change Economics: Why International Accords Fail。Edward Elgar Publishing。  new window
18.Sunstein, Cass R.(2004)。Risk and Reason: Safety, Law, and the Environment。Cambridge University Press。  new window
19.Sunstein, Cass R.(2002)。The Cost-Benefit State: The Future of Regulatory Protection。American Bar Association。  new window
20.Sudre, Frédéric(2006)。Droit europeen et international des droits de l'homme。  new window
21.Rawls, John、張曉輝(2001)。萬民法：公共理性觀念新論。吉林省長春市：吉林人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
22.Victor, David G.(2001)。The Collapse of the Kyoto Protocol and the Struggle to Slow Global Warming。Princeton University Press。  new window
23.Sunstein, Cass R.(2005)。Laws of fear: Beyond the precautionary principle。Cambridge University Press。  new window
24.廖福特(2003)。歐洲人權法。臺北：新學林。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.Sands, P.(2003)。Principles of International Environmental Law。Cambridge。  new window
26.Birnie, Patricia、Boyle, Alan、Redgwell, Catherine(2002)。International Law and the Environment。Oxford University Press。  new window
27.丘宏達、陳純一(2002)。現代國際法參考文件。三民書局股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
28.丘宏達(2006)。現代國際法。三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.簡惠貞(20050510)。溫室氣體減量策略，http://61.221.142.1Q9/AllText/J/94TS溫室氣體減量策略.pdf， 2007/05/13。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Victor, David G.(2001)。Appendix: The Causes and Effects of Global Warming: A Brief Survey of the Science。The Collapse of the Kyoto Protocol and the Struggle to Slow Global Warming。Princeton University Press。  new window
2.Plant, Glen(1991)。Institutional and Legal Responses to Global Warming。International Law and Global Climate Change。Springer Press。  new window
3.Salles, Jean-Michel(2002)。Analyse économique du dispositif juridique。L'outil économique en droit international et européen de l'environnement。  new window
4.牛惠之(200301)。WTO之SPS協定v.生物安全議定書--就預防原則與風險型態論衝突之不必然性。臺灣WTO新紀元--貿易之開放與防衛。台北：元照出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.倪貴榮、曾文智、魏翠亭(2006)。從WTO荷爾蒙案論預防原則之適用與發展。貿易、環境與公共健康--全球治理與在地化需求之調和。元照出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1173（臺灣：1170，外國：3） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1951065 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67745754
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上