On the basis of advancing personal quality, the military established different qualifications and restrictions as promotional criteria of every ranking. Since many units get their subordinates well trained, they figured that was very hard to make their decisions from candidates who have the approximately equal criteria. Therefore, this study tries to figure out an appropriate method and establish an integrated personal performance evaluation model by surveying related literatures. For the factors of“Personal Performance”and“Consideration of Superior Officer”, this study will classify the“Personal Performance Evaluation”into three hierarchical levels by applying the hierarchical conception of the AHP. The first level will be the overall performance evaluation which is combined with“Personal Performance”and“Consideration of Superior Officer”while the second level will establish a set of common weights for the evaluating indices by according to the viewpoint of superior officers. The third level will apply DEA-AR model to compute personal performance for each candidate. Comparably, the evaluating process and the results in this study will be more thoughtful, more objective and fairer than only use “Personal Performance”and“Consideration of Superior Officer”as the criteria. Some sequences of candidates changed after the comparison of evaluation method with the results of this study and different performance. In this study, different factors of consideration or performance evaluation method will cause and affect the results of performance evaluation, and personal rights. Therefore, the organization must establish a suitable and reasonable performance evaluation model for the purpose of achieving the real objective and fair according to the suggestion of this study.