:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:九族文化村擁擠感之研究
書刊名:造園景觀學報
作者:吳紫宸李英弘
作者(外文):Wu, Tzu-chenLi, Ying-hung
出版日期:2009
卷期:15:3
頁次:頁1-21
主題關鍵詞:模擬相片可接受度偏好度主題樂園Computer simulationAcceptabilityPreferenceTheme park
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:39
  • 點閱點閱:189
本研究針對高密度遊客使用之主題樂園進行擁擠相關研究,透過模擬相片探討現地相片與非現地相片評估九族文化村三大環境分區之遊客人數認知(擁擠感、可接受度、偏好度)。研究結果顯示,兩種評估方法所得之負面感受評價臨界值相近,歐洲花園區臨界值為20人、25人;機械式遊樂區兩種方法結果均為25人;原住民文化區臨界值為30人、40人,顯示現地相片與非現地相片兩種方法之結果大致相同,因此非現地相片評估法能得到明確之遊客感受。且由負面感受臨界值分析結果發現,自然環境高於人工化之環境,因此,於高使用量之主題樂園,遊客為體驗刺激冒險之機械化設施,偏好較少的使用人數,而屬於自然環境之原住民文化區則因無體驗設施,故遊客能容忍較多的使用人數。
The purpose of this study is to study crowding issue on a high use level area - theme park. By way of computer simulation, different use levels of encounter at three areas are simulated to measure degree of crowding, acceptability, and preference. Subjects are collected from onsite survey and internet survey. Study results show that critical points for crowding at European Garden District are 20 encounters for on-site and 25 encounters for internet; 25 encounters for both one-site and internet, at UFP Roll Coaster District, and 30 encounters for on-site and 40 encounters for internet at Aboriginal Culture District. Based on these results, this study suggests that visual simulation approach is useful in measuring perceived crowding. Furthermore, people tend to accept more encounters at natural and open district than at artificial facility district in theme park.
期刊論文
1.Lawson, S. R.、Manning, R. E.、Valliere, W. A.、Wang, B.(2003)。Proactive monitoring and Adaptive Management of Social Carrying Capacity in Arches National Park: An Application of Computer Simulation Modeling。Journal of Environmental Management,68(3),305-313。  new window
2.Lee, H.、Graefe, A. R.(2003)。Crowding at an arts festival: extending crowding models to the front country。Tourism Management,24(1),1-11。  new window
3.Manning, R.、Valliere, W.、Wang, B.、Jacobi, C.(1999)。Crowding norms: Alternative measurement approaches。Leisure Sciences,21,97-115。  new window
4.Stokols, D. A.(1972)。Social-Psychological Model of Human Crowding Phenomena。Journal of American Institute of Planners,38(2),72-83。  new window
5.林晏州(20000300)。社會遊憩容許量評估方法之比較。戶外遊憩研究,13(1),1-20。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.林晏州(19880600)。社會心理遊憩容許量之研究。東海學報,29(2),819-848。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Stokols, Daniel(1976)。The Experience of Crowding in Primary and Secondary Environments。Envirenment and Behavior,8(1),47-86。  new window
8.陳沛悌、林晏州(19970900)。秀姑巒溪泛舟活動社會心理容許量之探討。戶外遊憩研究,10(3),19-36。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.何立智、張俊彥(1996)。以電腦模擬方法探討主題式遊憩區遊憩容許量之研究。規劃與設計學報,1(4),97-117。  延伸查詢new window
10.許義忠、方志鵬(2004)。泛舟遊客接觸規範、擁擠知覺、與知覺接觸數量之研究。觀光研究學報,10(4),71-86。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.陳水源、李明宗、Stankey G. H.(1987)。遊憩規劃中之容許量─一個可供替選之理論架構。造園季刊,2(2),11-19。  延伸查詢new window
12.蔡厚男(1985)。環境模擬在規劃及設計上應用。造園季刊,1(1),73-80。  延伸查詢new window
13.Hsu, Y.C., Li C.L,、Chuang, L.J.(2007)。Encounters, norms and perceived crowding of hikers in a non-North American backcountry recreational context。Snow Lands. Res.,81(1/2),99-108。  new window
14.Lawson, S. R., Manning, R. E.(2001)。Solitude Versus Access: A Study of Tradeoffs in Outdoor Recreation Using Indifference Curve Analysis。Leisure Sciences,23,179-191。  new window
15.Shelby, B.(1980)。Crowding Models for Backcountry Recreation。Land Economics,56(1),43-55。  new window
會議論文
1.王正平、陳祖裕(2008)。日月潭國家風景區社會心理承載量之研究─以遊艇視覺模擬為例745-756。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.何立智(1995)。以電腦模擬方法探討主題式遊憩區遊憩容許量之研究(碩士論文)。逢甲大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.羅國瑜(2002)。社會心理承載量與情緒體驗關係之研究(碩士論文)。朝陽科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.張嘉宇(2004)。遊客面對遊憩區擁擠所採行調適機制之探討--以劍湖山主題遊樂園遊客為例(碩士論文)。南華大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳沛悌(1992)。秀姑巒溪泛舟活動社會心理容許量之探討(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.王心惠(1997)。相片評估都市公園社會容許量之探討以青年公園為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.范盛楨(2005)。國家公園社會心理承載量之研究─以玉山國家公園為例,台中縣。  延伸查詢new window
7.Yeh, Y.E.(1997)。The effects of the visitor impact management (VIM) approach on crowding, recreation displacement, recreation product shift, and recreation dissatisfaction:a study of the Yang-Ming-Shan National Park。  new window
圖書
1.Manning, R. E.(1999)。Studies in outdoor recreation: Search and research for satisfaction。Corvallis, Oregon:Oregon State University Press。  new window
2.張俊彥(1987)。遊憩規劃中遊客擁擠知覺之分析─以陽明山國家公園為例。台北:淑馨。  延伸查詢new window
3.Manning, R. E.(2007)。Parks and Carrying Capacity。USA Washington,DC:Island Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE