:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:我國人權報告之省思與展望
書刊名:臺灣國際法季刊
作者:林雍昇
作者(外文):Lin, Iong-sheng
出版日期:2009
卷期:6:1
頁次:頁215-241
主題關鍵詞:人權報告人權報告體系普世定期審查監督機制條約機構Human rights reportReporting systemUniversal periodical reviewMonitoring mechanismsTreaty body
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:37
  • 點閱點閱:27
自二次大戰結束以來,國際人權法規範的建構與發展,一直都是國際法上最爲重視的議題之一,戰後至今,在聯合國的積極推動下,先後已通過近七十個人權保護法規範,且仍不斷地在深化及擴充其質與量。上述人權公約中最重要的之成員義務,即爲定期向條約機構提出人權報告以供監測,時至今日,人權報告體系已被公認爲係檢視個別國家是否已確實履行其人權條約下之義務的最有效監督機制。我國因不具聯合國會籍,故亦非上述人權公約之締約國,國際法上並無定期提出國家人權報告之義務。但人權保障已是普世價值,亦爲國際社會之共通語言,台灣若能主動編撰並公布國家人權報告,對展現國家擔負國際責任之實質能力與提昇在國際社會上之形象觀感,皆有莫大之助益。自2000年總統大選後,我國開始進行國家人權試行報告之編撰,至2008年共計4次,雖逐次不斷自我改進,但仍未臻國際標準。本文目的除檢討我國歷次人權報告之缺失外,也試圖提供國際上人權報告之典範模式,以供政府將來製作人權報告時之參考。
Since the end of the World War II, the construction and developments on international human rights regulations have been the most essential issues in International Law. Nearly 70 pieces of treaties regarding human rights protection have been passed by the United Nation, and the depth and broadness of these regulations have been increasing in terms of both quality and quantity. The most important obligation mentioned in those human rights treaties, is to render human rights reports regularly to the treaty body for monitoring purpose. Up to present, the reporting system is deemed as the most effective monitoring mechanism to examine whether the individual member of the United Nations has fulfilled the obligations stated by the above treaties. As Taiwan is not a member of the United Nations, there's no legal obligation for Taiwan to render national human rights reports to the treaty body on a regular basis. Nevertheless, human rights are universal accepted values, and also the common language in the global community. If Taiwan can take the initiative to produce and publish these reports, it will help to prove the substantial capability for Taiwan to take international responsibilities as well as to promote Taiwan's image in the international society. From the 2000 presidential election to the year of 2008, Taiwan has tried to produce human rights reports up to four times, yet none of them has achieved the international standard despite the continuous progress and improvement in the process. In the light of that, this article is aimed at disclosing the shortcomings of previous Taiwan human rights reports and offering an internationally recognized standards on the human rights reporting procedures, in an attempt to provide the government with relevant knowledge for future reports.
期刊論文
1.廖福特(2008)。期待台灣設立國家人權委員會。TAHR報,2008(9),7。  延伸查詢new window
2.Heinze, Eric(2008)。Even-handedness and the Politics of Human Rights。Harvard Human Rights Journal,21,483。  new window
3.Heyns, Cnristoph H.、Viljoen, Frans J.(2001)。The Impact of the United Nations Human Rights Treaties on the Domestic Level。Human Rights Quarterly,23(3),483-535。  new window
4.Ginsburg T.(2008)。Commitment and diffusion: how and why national constitutions incorporate international law。University of Illinois Law Review,2008,201-238。  new window
5.Guzman, Andrew T.(2002)。A Compliance-Based Theory of International Law。California Law Review,90(6),1823-1887。  new window
6.Hafner-Burton, Emilie M.、Tsutsui, Kiyoteru(2005)。Human Rights in a Globalizing World: The Paradox of Empty Promises。American Journal of Sociology,110(5),1373-1411。  new window
7.陳俊宏(20000900)。人權與民主(1):共生或互斥﹖。東吳政治學報,11,107-142。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.李孟玢(19980700)。論世界人權宣言之基本性質與法律效力。國立中正大學法學集刊,1,333-361。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.廖福特(20000700)。歐盟與歐洲人權公約。月旦法學,62,87-98。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.(2004)。2003年國家人權報告(試行報告)。台北:行政院硏究發展考核委員會。  延伸查詢new window
2.(2007)。2005-2006年國家人權報告(試行報告)。台北:行政院硏究發展考核委員會。  延伸查詢new window
3.(2003)。2002年國家人權報告(試行報告)。台北:行政院硏究發展考核委員會。  延伸查詢new window
4.黎淑慧(2004)。人權概論。臺北:新文京出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
5.俞寬賜、國立編譯館(2002)。國際法新論。臺北:啟英文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
6.陳隆志、許慶雄、李明峻(1998)。當代國際法文獻選集。臺北:前衛。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Alston, Philip(1997)。The Purposes of Reporting。Manual on Human Rights Reporting。  new window
2.Byrnes, Andrew(2000)。Uses and aouses of the treaty reporting procedure: Hong Kong between two systems。THE FUTURE OF UN HUMAN RIGHTS TREATY MONITORING。Cambridge University Press。  new window
3.Clapham, Andrew(2000)。UN human rights reporting procedures: An NGO perspective。THE FUTURE OF UN HUMAN RIGHTS TREATY。Cambridge University Press。  new window
4.Harris, David(2000)。Lessons from the reporting system of the European Social Chater,。THE FUTURE OF UN HUMAN RIGHTS TREATY MONITORING。University Press。  new window
5.Risse, Thomas、Sikkink, Kathryn(1999)。The Socialization of International Human Rights Norms in Domestic Practices。Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE