:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:世界主要權威人權調查機構對臺灣人權調查結果之比較
書刊名:中華行政學報
作者:黃國敏 引用關係
作者(外文):Hwang, Edward K.
出版日期:2011
卷期:9
頁次:頁177-198
主題關鍵詞:人權臺灣人權調查Human rightsTaiwanHuman rights investigation
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:210
  • 點閱點閱:233
人權是人類文明發展的普世價值和共有資產,沒有一個國家或個人可以被排除,或者存在著雙重標準。馬英九總統在就職過年前夕(98年3月)完成兩項聯合國國際人權公約的簽署程序,獲得國際普遍肯定,象徵臺灣在人權議題和國際接軌,也再次展現臺灣深層參與國際社會的決心。為了解臺灣人權發展的現況,本文擬比較歐美五個被普遍認同的權威人權研究機構近年來對臺灣人權表現的評鐘,作為臺灣人權信度分析的基礎。根據本文五個主要權威人權調查機構對臺灣人權調查結果之比較,建議未來臺灣必須積極研擬人權發展策略如下:第一、法務部各級法院檢察署、調查局、內政部警政署應更積極查察賄選,第二、政府應該更積極探求民瘼,回應民眾的需要,第三、在這波政府再造運動中應在法務部設立廉政署,積極檢肅貪潰,第四、將內政部消防署提升位階為災害防救委員會,第五、尋求廢除死刑,第六、修正(集會遊行法),第七、性工作除罪化,第八、通過難民法,中國難民亦應一併適用,第九、重視婦女人權,第十、加強查察販賣人口與虐待外鑄勞工,第十一、加強保障公民自由權,例如集會結社自由、入出境自由、言論自由,第十二、繼續推動司法獨立。
Human rights are universal values of human civilization and total assets, no country or individual can be excluded、and there is no double standard. To understand the current status of human rights development in Taiwan, this paper intends to compare the human rights performance by five widely recognized human rights institutions in recent years. According to the comparison of the survey results, the 12 strategies for the development of human rights in Taiwan are porvided as the following: first, the Anti-corruption Bureau, Investigation Bureau, and Nationa1 Police Agency should more proactively inspect the bribery; second, the government should more actively explore the hardships and sufferings, and respond to the needs of the people; third, to establish the Anti-corruption Bureau in this wave of reinventing government movement; fourth , to enhance the Fire-fighter Bureau to the Disaster Prevention and Protection Commission; fifth, to abolish the death penalty; sixth, to amend the Group and Rallies Law; seventh, the decriminaliation of sex workers; eighth, to legalize the Refugee Act, refugees should also be applicable to Chinaese; ninth, pay attention to the human rights of women; tenth, to serious1y inspect the foreign labor trafficking and abuse; eleventh, strengthen to protect the civil liberties, such as assembly, freedom of association, freedom of entry and exit, freedom of speech; finally continue to promote the independence of the judiciary.
期刊論文
1.Poe, Steven C.、Tate, C. Neal、Keith, Linda Camp(1999)。Repression of the Human Right to Personal Integrity Revisited: A Global Cross-national Study Covering the Years 1976-1993。International Studies Quarterly,43(2),291-313。  new window
2.陳俊宏(20000900)。人權與民主(1):共生或互斥﹖。東吳政治學報,11,107-142。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.陳秀容(19970600)。近代人權觀念的轉變:一個社會生態觀點的分析。人文及社會科學集刊,9(2),101-132。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Vasak, Karel(1977)。A 30-year struggle; the sustained efforts to give force of law to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights。The UNESCO Courier,30(11),29-32。  new window
5.張國聖(2003)。現代人權發展源流與意涵。通識研究集刊,4,1-18。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.De Mesquita, B. B.、Downs, G. W.、Smith, A.、Cherif, F. M.(2005)。Thinking inside the Box: A Closer Look at Democracy and Human Rights。International Studies Quarterly,49(3),439-457。  new window
7.Anderson, C. J.、Regan, P. M.、Ostergard, R. L.(2002)。Political Repression and public perceptions of Human Rights。Political Research Quarterly,55(2),439-456。  new window
8.Davenport, C.、Armstrong,D. A., II(2004)。Democracy and the Violation of Human Rights: A Statistical Analysis from 1976 to 1996。American Journal of political Science,48(3),538-554。  new window
9.Donnelly, J.(1999)。Human Rights, Democracy and Development。Human Rights Quarterly,21(3),608-632。  new window
10.Landman, T.(2004)。Measuring Human Rights: Principle, Practice and Policy。Human Rights Quarterly,26(4),906-931。  new window
11.Langlois, A. J.(2003)。Human Rights without Democracy? A Critique of the Separationist Thesis。Human Rights Quarterly,25(4),90-1019。  new window
12.Park, H. S.(1987)。Correlates of Human Rights: Global Tendencies。Human Rights Quarterly,9(3),405-413。  new window
13.Poe, S. C.、Tate,C. N.(1994)。Repression of Human-Rights to Personal Intergrity in the 1980s: A Global Analysis。American political Science Review,88(4),853-872。  new window
14.Roshwald, M.(1959)。The Concept of Human Rights。Philosophy and Phenomenological Research,19(3),354-379。  new window
會議論文
1.呂炳寬、揚智傑(2005)。全球化脈絡下的人權保障。臺中。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.McNitt, A. D.(1988)。Some Thoughts on the Systematic Measurement of Abuse of Human Rights。Human Rights Theory and Measurement。New York:St. Martin's press。  new window
2.Vasak, K.(1982)。Civil and Political Rights。K. Vasak ed.: The International Dimensions of Human lights。Paris:United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization。  new window
3.Huntington, S. P.(1997)。Freedom in the World: Political Rights and Civil Liberties。New York, NY:Freedom House。  new window
4.Paine, Thomas(1969)。The Rights of Man。London:Everyman。  new window
5.張佛泉(2003)。自由與人權。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
6.Sorensen, George(1998)。Democracy and Democratization: Processes and Prospects in a Changing World。Oxford:Westview Press。  new window
7.Locke, John、Shapiro, Ian(2003)。Two Treatises of Government and A Letter Concerning Toleration。Yale University Press。  new window
8.劉文彬(20050000)。西洋人權史:從英國大憲章到聯合國科索沃決議案。臺北:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.江宜樺(20010000)。自由民主的理路。臺北:聯經。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Partsch, K. J.(1982)。Fundamental principles of Human Rights: Self-Determination, Equality and Non-Discrimination。The International Dimensions of Human Rights。Paris。  new window
其他
1.United Nations(1966)。International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights。  new window
2.自由之家(2009)。自由之家2009年世界自由度調査全球發表會,http://www.tfd.org.tw/HTML/fm090113。  延伸查詢new window
3.國際特赦組織臺灣總會(2009)。兩公約之歷史及意義:國際人權運動的經驗,臺北。,http://hr-leaming.ouk.edu.tw/database/news_20091120_ihro_speech.html。  延伸查詢new window
4.Cingranelli, D. L.,Richards, R. L.(2008)。Short Variable Descriptions for Indicators in THE CINGRANELLI-RICHARDS (CIRI) HUMAN RIIGHTS DATASET',http://ciri.binghamton.edu/documentation.asp。  new window
5.Cingranelli, D. L.,Richards, R. L.(2008)。THE CINGRANELLI-RICHARDS (CIRI) HUMAN RIGHTS DATA PROJECT Coding Manual,http://ciri.binghamton.edu/documentation.asp。  new window
6.Freedom House(2009)。Freedom in the World Aggregate and Subcategory Scores,http://www.freedomhouse.org/template.cfm?page=276。  new window
7.Office of the United Nation High Commissioner for Human Rights(2008)。What are Human Rights,http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/pages/WhatareHumanRights.aspx。  new window
8.Untied Nation(1948)。Universal Declaration of Human Rights,http://www2.ohchr.org/english/law/index.htm。  new window
9.Untied Nation(1966)。International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights,http://www2.ohchr.org/english/law/index.htm。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE