臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：尼可拉斯．魯曼的系統傳播概念與應用：旺旺中時集團vs. NCC風波的案例分析
書刊名：新聞學研究
作者：孫維三
作者(外文)：Sun, Wei-san
出版日期：2010
卷期：104
頁次：頁31-65
主題關鍵詞：自我再製；社會系統理論；普遍象徵化傳播媒介；傳播；魯曼；Autopoiesis；Communication；Luhmann；Social systems theory；Symbolically generalized media of communication
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:47
  • 點閱點閱:74
尼可拉斯‧魯曼是當代極有成就的社會學家，他的社會系統理論對歐洲社會科學界的影響深遠，但他在英語系國家的接受度卻遠不如他的筆戰對手哈伯瑪斯。類似的情況也發生在台灣，魯曼的系統理論亦非傳播學論文中常被引用或應用的理論。本文介紹魯曼系統理論中的傳播概念和媒介理論，並以中視∕中天負責人變更案風波為系統分析案例，解釋旺旺中時集團與NCC 間的差異和爭議乃源自不同之系統操作邏輯；這兩個系統無法溝通，因為兩者無法透過此一事件各自實現對自己有意義的自我再製活動。藉由概念介紹和案例分析，本文希望邀請更多的傳播學界讀者一起開發社會系統理論在傳播學研究上的潛能。
Niklas Luhmann was an enormously accomplished sociologist, whose social systems theory has significant impacts on European social sciences. However, comparing with his intellectual rival, Habermas, Luhmann certainly did not enjoy the same recognition in the English-speaking world. Likewise, Luhmann is not widely appreciated in the field of communication studies in Taiwan. This is unfortunate, especially for students of communication, since Luhmann and Habermas are the only two theorists who use communication as the basic unit in constructing social theories. This essay introduces Luhmann’s systemic concept of communication and media theory, and use the dispute over CTV and CtiTV’s change of ownership as a case study to demonstrate systems theory’s application.
期刊論文
1.Zolo, Danilo(1986)。Function, Meaning, Complexity: The Epistemolgical Premmisses of Niklas Luhmann's 'Sociological Enlightenment'。Philosophy of the Social Science，16(1)，115-127。  new window
2.張錦華(19970200)。多元文化主義與我國廣播政策--以臺灣原住民與客家族群為例。廣播與電視，3(1)，1-23。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.陳一香(19990100)。媒介多元化意涵之初探。新聞學研究，58，141-169。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Luhmann, N.(1992)。What is communication?。Communication Theory，2，251-259。  new window
5.Luhmann, Niklas(1996)。On the Scientific Context of the Concept of Communication。Social Science Information，35(2)，257-267。  new window
6.Wagner, G.(1995)。The end of Luhmann's social systems theory。Philosophy of the Social Sciences，27(4)，387-409。  new window
7.Arnoldi, J.(2001)。Niklas Luhmann。Theory, Culture & Society，18，1-13。  new window
8.Bohmann, J.(1994)。Complexity, pluralism, and the constitutional State: On Habermas’s Faktizitat und Geltunt。Law and Society Review，28，897-930。  new window
9.Bluhdorn, I.(2000)。An offer one might prefer to refuse: The systems theoretical legacy of Niklas Luhmann。European Journal of Social Theory，3(3)，339-354。  new window
10.Chernilo, D.(2002)。The theorization of social co-ordinations in differentiated societies: The theory of generalized symbolic media in Parsons, Luhmann and Habermas。The British journal of sociology，53(3)，431-449。  new window
11.Fleischaker, G.(1988)。Autopoiesis: The status of its system logic。Biosystems，22，37-49。  new window
12.Fuchs, S.(1999)。Niklas Luhmann。Sociological Theory，17(1)，117-119。  new window
13.Knodt, E.(1994)。Toward a non-foundationalist epistemology: The Habermas Luhmann controversy revisited。New German Critique，61，77-100。  new window
14.Luhmann, N.(1997)。The control of intransparency。Systems research and behavioral. Science，14(2)，359-371。  new window
15.Maturana, H.、Varela, F.(1975)。The organization of the living。International Journal of Man-Machine Study，7，313-332。  new window
圖書
1.Schiller, Herber I.(1991)。Culture Inc.: The Corporate Takeover of Public Expression。N.Y.：Oxford University Press。  new window
2.Mingers, J.(1995)。Self-Producing Systems。New York：Plenum。  new window
3.Spencer-Brown, George(1979)。Laws of Form。New York, NY：Geroge Allen and Unwin Ltd.。  new window
4.Parsons, Talcott、Shils, Edward(1951)。Toward a General Theory of Action。Harvard University Press。  new window
5.Habermas, J.、McCarthy, T.(1984)。The Theory of Communicative Action。Boston：Beacon Press。  new window
6.Campbell, Jeremy(1982)。Grammatical Man: Information, Entropy, Language, and Life。New York：Simon and Schuster。  new window
7.Giddens, Anthony(1984)。The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration。Cambridge：Polity Press。  new window
8.Luhmann, Niklas(1990)。Essays on Self-Reference。New York：Columbia University。  new window
9.Luhmann, Niklas、Bednarz, John Jr.、Baecker, Dirk(1995)。Social Systems。Stanford, California：Stanford University Press。  new window
10.von Foerster, Heinz(1984)。Observing Systems。Seaside, CA：Intersystems Publications。  new window
11.Maturana, H.、Varela, F.(1980)。Autopoiesis: Reproduction, heredity and evolution, in autopoiesis dissipative structures and spontaneous social order。Boulder。  new window
12.Parsons, T.(1967)。On the concept of political power。Sociological theory and modern society。NY。  new window
13.Schutz, A.(1970)。Collected papers I。The Hague。  new window
14.von Foerster, H.(1970)。Cybernetics of cybernetics。Urbana。  new window
15.李明穎、施盈廷、楊秀娟(譯)；Briggs, A.,、Burke, P.(2005)。大眾傳播史/從古騰堡到網際網路的時代 (A social history of the media from Gutenberg to the Internet)。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
16.Bednarz, J.(1989)。Introduction to ecological communication。Ecological communication。Chicago。  new window
17.Knodt, E.(1995)。Forward。Social Systems。Stanford。  new window
18.Luhmann, N.(1990)。The cognitive program of constructivism and a reality that remains unknown。Self-organization: Portrait of a scientific revolution。Norwell, MA。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：641（臺灣：636，外國：5） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2017497 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67816991
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上