臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：國家機關與產業發展：馬來西亞與泰國汽車產業政策的政治經濟分析
書刊名：問題與研究
作者：戴萬平 引用關係
作者(外文)：Tai, Wan-ping
出版日期：2010
卷期：49:3
頁次：頁71-103
主題關鍵詞：汽車產業；發展型國家；馬來西亞汽車產業；泰國汽車產業；馬來西亞國產車；政治經濟分析；Automotive industry；Developmental state；Malaysia automotive industry；Thai automotive industry；PROTON；Political economics analysis
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:35
  • 點閱點閱:63
國家機關（the State）是否利用國家資源干預市場（the Market）、國家機關是否應選擇某些特定產業加以扶植（selective policy）？這些投入資源是否能被有效達成發展的目的？是政治經濟學界有關「新古典經濟學派」與「發展型國家學派」爭辯的焦點。在東協國家中，同樣自1970 年代發展汽車產業，為何泰國與馬來西亞的汽車產業發展出現差距？差距是否源自國家機關與產業政策互動的結果？本研究藉由探討馬來西亞與泰國汽車產業的發展歷程，試圖比較與論證在國家機關所建立的產業策略下，兩國汽車產業發展的差異。本文發現：雖然發展中國 家的產業發展有賴於國家機關的介入，產業政策的策略選擇也會有所不同：其一是在「自主發展」（馬來西亞）與「依賴發展」（泰國）之間產業策略的選擇；其二是馬來西亞汽車產業的「政治性」阻礙後續產業政策「追隨市場」的調整。國家機關的「策略選擇」與「政治 介入」是本文認為馬來西亞汽車產業發展遜於泰國的主因。
Whether should the state interfere the market by using state resources? Should the state cultivate certain industries? Does the state resources work to help the state achieve developmental goals? These are the arguments between the ‘New Classical Economics School’ and the ‘National Development School’. Automobile industries in both Thailand and Malaysia developed in the 1970s with governmental interference but the development in the two countries diverged. Does the difference come from the interactions between the states and the industries? This paper compares the developmental differences between the automobile industries under different industrial policies of the two countries. This paper discovers that although the development of industries in developing countries require interference from the government, the political and economical background differences affect the policies adopted. The choice between ‘autonomous development (Malaysia)’ and ‘dependent development (Thailand)’ is the first issue. The second issue is that the politics in automobile industry in Malaysia deters the industrial adjustment toward ‘market follow’. This paper finds that the ‘strategy choice’ and ‘political interference’ are the two reasons Malaysian automobile industry has less competitiveness than that in Thailand.
期刊論文
1.靖心慈(20010300)。東協國家的工業合作和發展方向。主要國家產經政策動態季刊，2001(1)，49-53。  延伸查詢new window
2.Wade, Robert(2003)。What Strategies are Viable for Developing Countries Today? The World Trade Organization and the Shrinking of'Development Space。Review of International Political Economy，10(4)，621-644。  new window
3.瞿宛文(1997)。產業政策的示範效果--台灣石化業的產生。台灣社會研究季刊，27，97-138。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Bhagwati, Jagdish(1988)。Export-Promoting Trade Strategy: Issues and Evidence。World Bank Research Observer，3(1)，27-57。  new window
5.吳泉源(20040600)。產業研究的下一步 : 評瞿宛文、安士敦, 《超越後進發展：臺灣的產業升級策略》。臺灣社會學刊，32，223-228。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.鄭陸霖(19920900)。全球商品鍊與半邊陲國家之鞋類出口。思與言，30(3)，107-139。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Freeman, J. R.,(1982)。State Entrepreneurship and Dependence Development。American Journal of Political Science，, Vol. 26, No. 1，pp. 90~112。  new window
8.Holland, Lorien(2001)。Proton's Positive Spin。Far Eastern Economic Review，164(22)，55-56。  new window
9.Humphrey, J.(2000)。Assembler-Supplier Relations in the Auto Industry: Globalization and National Development。Competition & Change，4，245-271。  new window
10.Jenkins, R.,(1995)。The Political economy of industrial policy: Automobile Manufacture in the Newly Industrializing Countries。Cambridge Journal Economics，No. 15，pp.625~645。  new window
11.Machado, K. G.,(1989)。Japanese Transnational Corporations in Malaysia’s State Sponsored Heavy Industrialization Drive: The HICOM Automobile and Steel Projects。Pacific Affairs，Vol. 62, No. 4，pp. 504~531。  new window
12.朱雲漢(2008)。美國政治菁英重新擁抱政府。商業周刊，第1080 期，頁20。  延伸查詢new window
13.許福添(2002)。東亞金融危機對東協自由貿易區之發展概況。東南亞投資雙月刊，第10 期，頁3~4。  延伸查詢new window
14.劉靜(2005)。泰國汽車工業發展概況及前景。汽車工業研究，第6 期，頁1~3。  延伸查詢new window
15.瞿宛文(2001)。台灣產業政策的初步評估。台灣社會研究季刊，第42 期，頁61~117。  延伸查詢new window
16.Rasiah, R. and I. Shari,(2001)。Market, Government and Malaysia’s New Economic Policy,”。Cambridge Journal of Economics，Vol. 25, No. 1，pp. 57~78。  new window
17.Torii, T.,(1991)。“Changing the Manufacturing Sector, Reorganizing Automobile Assemblers, and Developing the Auto Component Industry under the New Economic Policy,”。The Developing Economies,，No. XXIX，pp. 387~413。  new window
會議論文
1.Jomo K. S.(2002)。“State and Market in Economic Development: Southeast Asian Industrial Policy in Comparative East Asian Perspective”。  new window
2.Nenham, L.,(2006)。ASEAN Automotive Integration-Private Sector Perspective。Bali Indonesia。  new window
3.Rashid, R.,(2006)。Business Response to the Regional Demands and Opportunity: A Study of Malaysian Automobile Industry。Port Dickson。  new window
4.Abdullah, R.,(2006)。Business Response to the Regional Demands and Opportunity: A Study of Malaysian Automobile Industry。Port Dickson。  new window
研究報告
1.Kuckiki, Akifumi,(2007)。Industrial Policy in Asia,。  new window
2.Rasiah, R.,(1999)。Liberalization and the car industry in South East Asia。  new window
3.Wad, P.,(1999)。Business Relations in Crisis? The Case off the National Auto Manufacturers in South Korea and Malaysia during the East Asian Crisis,”。  new window
4.Wad, P.,(2001)。Transforming Industrial Relations: the Case of the Malaysian Auto Industry。Amsterdam。  new window
5.Zysman, J. and Doherty E.,(1995)。The Evolving Role of the State in Asian Industrialization。  new window
學位論文
1.Fuangkajonsak, W.(2006)。Industrial Policy Options for Developing Country: The Case of the Automotive Sector in Thailand & Malaysia。  new window
2.Gustafsson, H.,(2006)。The Greasy Palm: Malaysian Industrial Policy and the Palm Oil Industry，Sweden。  new window
3.Kesavatana, W.,(1989)。Political Economy of Direct Foreign Investment in Thailand: A Case Study of the Automobile Industry。  new window
圖書
1.PROTON Holdings Berhad(2007)。Annual Report 2006。KL：PROTON Holdings。  new window
2.Jenkins, Rhys(1987)。Transnational Corporations and Uneven Development-Development & Underdevelopment。London：Rutledge。  new window
3.Abbott, J.,(2003)。Developmentalism and Dependency in Southeast Asia: The Case of the Automotive Industry。New York：Taylor & Francis。  new window
4.Fishlow, Albert,(1994)。Miracle or Design? Lessons from the East Asian Experience。Washington, DC：Overseas Development Council。  new window
5.Doner, Richard F.(1991)。Driving a Bargain: Automobile Industrialization and Japanese Firms in Southeast Asia。Berkeley：University of California Press。  new window
6.顧長永(2000)。東南亞政府與政治。臺北：五南圖書出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
7.Dicken, Peter(1998)。Global Shift: Transforming the World Economy。Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd.。  new window
8.Balassa, Bela、Berlinski, Julio(1982)。Development Strategies in Semi-industrial Economics。Baltimore, MD：The Johns Hopkins University Press。  new window
9.Amsden, Alice H.、Chu, Wan-Wen(2003)。Beyond Late Development: Taiwan's Upgrading Policies。Cambridge, Mass：MIT Press。  new window
10.宋鎮照(1996)。東協國家之政經發展。臺北：五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
11.Giddens, A.(1988)。Sociology: A Brief but Critical Introduction。London：Macmillan。  new window
12.Buchanan, James M.、Tollison, Robert D.、Tullock, Gordon(1980)。Toward a Theory of the Rent-Seeking Society。College Station, TX：Texas A&M University Press。  new window
13.Evans, Peter B.(1979)。Dependent Development: The Alliance of Multinational, State, and Local Capital in Brazil。Princeton University Press。  new window
14.Johnson, Chalmers(1982)。MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925-1975。Stanford University Press。  new window
15.Fujita, M.,(1998)。“Industrial Policies and Trade Liberalization: The Automotive Industry in Thailand and Malaysia,”。The Deepening Economic Interdependence in the APEC Region。Singapore:。  new window
16.Gereffi, Gary and Donald L. Wyman,(1990)。Industrial Policy in East Asia: Does it Lead or Follow the Market?”。Manufacturing Miracles: Path of Industrialization in Latin American and East Asia。New Jersey:。  new window
17.Heggard, S. M.,(1998)。“Business, Politics and Policy in East and Southeast Asian,”。Behind East Asian Growth: The Political and Social Foundations of Prosperity。London:。  new window
18.Heggard, Stephan M.,(1998)。“Business, Politics and Policy in East and Southeast Asian,”。Behind East Asian Growth: The Political and Social Foundations of Prosperity。London:。  new window
19.Hewison, K., R. Robison, and G. Rodan(1993)。Southeast Asia in the 1990’s: Authoritaranism, Democracy and Capitalism。St. Leonards。  new window
20.Hewison, Kevin,(1988)。“The State and Capitalist Development in Thailand,”。Sociology of Development Societies: Southeast Asia。London:。  new window
21.Jomo, K. S.,(1994)。“Rethinking the Role of Government Policy in Southeast Asia,”。The East Asian Miracle: Economic Growth and public Policy-A World Bank Policy Research Report。New York:。  new window
22.Konosuke, K.,(1993)。The Motor vehicle industry in Asia: A Study of Firms and Stats in Modern Capitalism。Singapore:。  new window
23.Kruegert, Anne O.(1993)。The Political Economy of Public Policy Reform in Developing Countries。Cambridge, MA.：MIT Press。  new window
24.Kumon, S. and H. Rosovsky(1972)。The Political Economy of Japan: Cultural and Social Dynamics。Stanford, California。  new window
25.Lindauder, David L. and M. Roemer(1994)。Development in Asia and Africa: Legacies and Opportunities。New York。  new window
26.Parvez, Hasan(1976)。Korea: Problems and Issues in a Rapidly Growing Economy。Baltimore。  new window
27.Abdulsomad, Kamaruding,(2003)。Building Technological Capabilities of Local Auto Parts FirmsUnder Contrasting Industrial Policies: A Comparative Study of Malaysia and Thailand 1960-2000。Industrial Technology Development In Malaysia。London。  new window
28.Ahmad, Z. H. and S. M. Alatas,(2005)。Malaysia: In an Uncertain Mode,”。Driven by Growth: Political Change in the Asia-Pacific Region。Singapore:。  new window
29.Amsden Alice H.(1992)。Asia’s Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization。NY。  new window
30.Audet, Denis and Van Grasstek,(1997)。“Market Access Issues in the Automobile Sector,”。OECD, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Market Access Issues in the Automobile Sector。Paris。  new window
31.Audet, Denis(1997)。Market Access Issues in the Automobile Sector。Paris。  new window
32.Automotive Federation of Malaysia（AFM）(1984)。The ASEAN Motor Industry in Economist Intelligence Unit。KL。  new window
33.Boyd, Richard and Tak-Wing Ngo,(2005)。“The State-Market Condominium Approach,” ,。Asian States: Beyond the Developmental Perspective。London:。  new window
34.Camilleri, Joseph A.,(2000)。States, Markets and Civil Society in Asia Pacific。NY。  new window
35.Tan, Kock Wah and K. S. Jomo,(1995)。“Economic Theory and Industrial Policy in East Asia,”。The State and Economic Development-Lessons from Far East。London。  new window
36.Tan, Liok Ee(1992)。Fragmented Vision: Culture and Politics in Contemporary Malaysia。Australia。  new window
37.White, P(1988)。Developmental Sates in East Asia。London。  new window
38.Khoo, T.,(1995)。The Paradoxes of Mahathirism。New York。  new window
39.Office of Industrial Economics(200)。Ministry of Industry, and Automotive Industry in Thailand。Bangkok。  new window
圖書論文
1.Lubeck, P. M.(1992)。Malaysia Industrialization, Ethnic Divisions, and the NIC Model: the Limits to Replication。States and Deployment in the Asian Pacific Rim。London：Sage。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：261（臺灣：261，外國：0） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1885225 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67693964
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上