:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:張君勱的新儒學啟蒙計畫:一個現代vs.後現代視角
書刊名:臺灣東亞文明研究學刊
作者:何信全 引用關係
作者(外文):Ho, Hsin-chuan
出版日期:2011
卷期:8:1=15
頁次:頁209-234
主題關鍵詞:張君勱新儒家哈伯瑪斯李歐塔現代vs.後現代視角Carsun ChangNeo-ConfucianismHabermasLyotardModern vs. postmodern perspective
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:57
  • 點閱點閱:60
本文從「現代vs.後現代」的視角,檢視張君勱新儒學中的啟蒙精神,並探討此種啟蒙哲學如何應對因現代性某些偏弊而引發的爭議。本文指出,現代社會與文化中所謂「理性獨霸」的缺失,乃是實證主義思潮之下,工具理性當道以致造成文化偏頗與社會宰制。面對此一偏弊,哈伯瑪斯與李歐塔皆有深刻的反思,然而二者的進路與對治之方卻迥異其趣。本文根據哈伯瑪斯與李歐塔的論爭脈絡,指出張君勱的新儒學啟蒙計畫就解決現代社會的偏弊而言,並非採取李歐塔式的解構與顛覆理性進路,而是回歸儒家仁智兼顧的基本論旨。此一基本論旨,與哈伯瑪斯之重返啟蒙傳統的未竟志業,二者頗有同工之處:張君勱與哈伯瑪斯各自傳承的中國新儒學與西方近代啟蒙傳統,皆有其未竟志業,可以進一步開發立基於人類理性基礎之上豐厚的內在哲學資源,以回應後現代場景下的相關挑戰。
This paper interprets the Enlightenment spirit in Carsun Chang's neo-Confucianism from a modern vs. postmodern perspective, and further, to explore his approach for the issue of the criticisms of modernity. I point out that the problem of so-called "hegemony of reason" results from the employment of instrumental reason, which originates from positivism prevailing in modern age, and consequentially tends to the unavoidable phenomenon of cultural bias and social domination. For the elimination of the deficiencies of modernity, Habermas and Lyotard adopt the different approaches respectively: the former makes an effort to the completion of unfinished project of Enlightenment, and the latter focuses on the deconstruction of modernity. From this point of view, I indicate that just as Habermas, there is also an unfinished project of neo-Confucianism for Chang. Instead of Lyotard's approach of deconstruction, Chang's approach to remedy the deficiencies of modernity is the Enlightenment project of neo-Confucianism which based on both ren (仁) and zhi (智). That is to say, for Chang and Habermas, the solution of the deficiencies of modernity should be still based on human reason, and at this point, we could seek the philosophical resources from both Western Enlightenment tradition and Chinese neo-Confucianism to response the related challenges in postmodern era.
期刊論文
1.勞思光(2007)。關於「中國哲學研究」的幾點意見 (代發刊辭)。中國哲學與文化,1-9。  延伸查詢new window
2.Habermas, Jürgen(1987)。The Entry into Postmodernity: Nietzsche as a Turning point。The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Twelve Lectures。  new window
圖書
1.蔡錚雲(1995)。從現象學到後現代。臺北:蔡錚雲。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.McCarthy, Thomas(1978)。The Critical Theory of Jürgen Habermas。Cambridge, MA:Polity Press。  new window
3.Chang, Carsun(1957)。The Development of Neo-Confucian Thought。New York:Bookman Associates。  new window
4.Bottomore, Tom(1984)。The Frankfurt School。Tavistock Publications。  new window
5.Lyotard, Jean-François、Bennington, Geoff、Massumi, Brian、Jameson, Fredric(1984)。The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge。Manchester:Manchester University Press。  new window
6.Kearney, Richard(1986)。Modern Movements in European Philosophy。Manchester:Manchester University Press。  new window
7.張君勱、程文熙(1981)。中西印哲學文集。臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
8.胡秋原(1983)。關於「中國哲學研究」的幾點意見(代發刊辭)。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
9.張君勱(1977)。人生觀。科學與人生觀:科學與玄學論戰集。桂林。  延伸查詢new window
10.Habermas, Jürgen、Shapiro, Jeremy J.(1987)。Knowledge and Human Interests。Cambridge:Polity Press。  new window
11.Habermas, Jürgen、Cronin, Ciaran、De Greiff, Pablo(2005)。The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory。Cambridge:Polity Press。  new window
12.Kolb, David(1990)。Postmodern Sophistications, Architecture, and Tradition。Chicago。  new window
13.Habermas, Jürgen、McCarthy, Thomas(1991)。The Theory of Communicative Action。Cambridge。  new window
14.Habermas, Jürgen(1985)。Modernity versus Postmodernity。Habermas and Modernity。Taipei。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE