:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:軍人角色性格與紀律性初探:以九位軍校生的軍事社會化經驗為例
書刊名:復興崗學報
作者:錢淑芬許志弘
作者(外文):Chien, Shu-fenHsu, Chih-hung
出版日期:2011
卷期:101
頁次:頁203-228
主題關鍵詞:軍人角色性格紀律軍事社會化全控制度The role characteristics of soldieryDisciplineMilitary socializationTotal institution
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:88
  • 點閱點閱:45
本研究旨在觀察軍校生在紀律性上的發展情形,並詮釋這種發展情形對於他們軍人角色性格形成所具有的意義。研究主要分成兩部分:第一,依據假設「軍人角色性格是受化者在軍事社會化模塑與全控制度下所產生的一種現象」,提出軍人角色性格在理論上的分析架構,並以紀律性代表其中的性格特徵之一。第二,以接受政戰學院軍事教育的九位學生為研究對象,透過深度訪談法來暸解受訪軍校生在軍事社會化過程中,面對軍校教育的嚴格規定和訓練要求時的感受、想法與行為反應等。然後,經由詮釋這些感受、想法與反應對他們的紀律發展所具有的意義,來暸解他(她)們的軍人角色性格的形成情形。關於受化者的紀律性發展,是結合分析架構與軍校教育各年級的現況,將發展過程依照紀律層次依序由低到高分成四個階段,分別是外在約束、行為自制、道德內化、利他精神實踐等。在經由對訪談內容的詮釋分析後,發現受訪軍校生在某些情形下,他們的紀律發展會隨著年級愈高而提升層次,在層次提升的順序上也大致符合分析架構對發展過程的假設。因此,初步推論在軍事社會化的全控制度下,對受化者的模塑會讓他們形成紀律性,使他們出現軍人角色的性格特徵。此外,研究還發現,如果受化者出現以下情形將影響他們紀律層次的發展,包括受化者對遵守規定的疑惑不解、施化者的錯誤指導、制度設計的周延性不足等。
The purpose of this study is to explore the cadets' disciplinary development and their role characteristics of soldiery how to be molded in the total institution by military socialization. This study is divided into two parts. First, the intention is to accomplish the theatrical framing of the soldiery role characteristics, and to illustrate disciplinary as one of the role characteristics. Furthermore, complete the conceptual construction of military disciplinary, including four levels where each one has particular meaning. Second, the proposition is to explore how cadets experience ”disciplinary shaping” process during military academy training. We adopted in-depth interviews to understand 9 cadets' socialization experiences, and to analyze and interpret by qualitative research approach. As a result, the 9 cadets' military socialization experiences can be divided into four shaping stages of disciplinary development, corresponding with the conceptual construction of disciplinary development presents four levels. Therefore, to achieve the contribution of the disciplinary development of cadets, this study constructs the following findings and recommendations. 1. Disciplinary development level increased with grades of cadets. 2. Should pay attention to ”object” internal conflicts and contradictions of cadets in order to avoid disciplinary development into ”contradiction period”. 3. ”Subject” guidance will influence the disciplinary development of cadets. 4. Provisions of the Military Academy may affect the development of the level of discipline and depth.
期刊論文
1.Soeters, J.、Recht, R.(1998)。Culture and Discipline Military Academiec: an International Comparison。Journal of Political and Military Sociology,26(2),169-189。  new window
2.Sinder, Don M.(1996)。An Uniformed Debate on Military Culture。Orbis,43(1),11-26。  new window
3.曾端真(20110300)。正向管教與紀律的養成。中等教育,62(1),20-31。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Miewald, Robert D.(19700300)。Weberian Bureaucracy and The Military Model。Public Administration Review,30(2),129-133。  new window
5.錢淑芬(19930600)。國軍軍事學校「軍事社會化」之研究。復興崗學報,49,333-364。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.錢淑芬(20100900)。「穿制服的人」與制度化作用:軍人角色模塑的理論性探討。復興崗學報,99,45-80。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.錢淑芬(20091200)。階級、符號與角色:軍事社會化的模塑技術。復興崗學報,96,127-153。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Kelman, Herbert C.(1961)。Processes of Opinion Change。Public Opinion Quarterly,25(1),57-78。  new window
9.Arvey, R.、Jones, A.(1985)。The Use of Discipline in Organizational Settings: a Framework for Future Research。Research in organizational Behavior,7,367-408。  new window
10.Soeters, J.(1997)。Value 0rientations in Military Academies: A Thirteen Country Study。Armed Forces & Society,20(1),7-32。  new window
圖書
1.Shalit, B.(1988)。The Psychology of Conflict and Combat。New York:Praeger。  new window
2.Vagts, A.(1937)。A History of Militarism。New York, NY:W. W. Norton and Co。  new window
3.James, B.(1999)。Military Culture。Encyclopedia of Violence, Peace and Conflict。Diego, Calif:Academic Press。  new window
4.Lang, K.(1965)。Military Organization。Handbook of Organizations。Chicago:Rand McNally。  new window
5.芮逸夫、管東貴(2000)。人類學。雲五社會科學大辭典。臺北市:臺灣商務印書館股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
6.Curwin, R. L.、Mendler, A. N.(1988)。Discipline with dignity。Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development。  new window
7.Akers, R. L.(1985)。Deviant Behavior: A Social Learning Approach。Wadsworth, Belmont, CA。  new window
8.Foucault, Michel、Sheridan, Alan(1977)。Discipline & Punish: The Birth of the Prison。New York:Pantheon Books。  new window
9.Goffman, Ervin(1959)。The Presentation of the Self in Everyday Life。New York:Doubleday Anchor。  new window
10.李英明(20050000)。新制度主義與社會資本。臺北:揚智文化事業股份有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Goffman, E.(1961)。Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates。London:Penguin。  new window
12.Edles, Laura Desfor(2002)。Cultural Sociology in Practice。Massachusetts:Blackwell Publications Inc.。  new window
13.Gordon, T.(1989)。T.E.T: Teaching Children Self-discipline: Promoting Self-discipline in Children。New York:Penguin。  new window
14.Gordon, T.(1974)。T.E.T: Teacher Effectiveness raining。New York。  new window
15.Janowitz, M.、Little, R.(1965)。Sociology and he Military Establishment。United States of America。  new window
圖書論文
1.Clifford, J.(1986)。Introduction: Partial Truths。Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography。Berkeley:University of California Press。  new window
2.阮新邦(1993)。批判詮釋論的理論基礎。批判詮釋論與社會研究。香港:八方文化企業公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.畢恆達(1996)。詮釋學與質性研究。質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。巨流圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE