:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:簡報多媒材設計初探:以賈伯斯2008年主題簡報為例
書刊名:廣告學研究
作者:江靜之 引用關係周筱梵
作者(外文):Chiang, Chin-chihChou, Hsiao-fan
出版日期:2011
卷期:36
頁次:頁71-97
主題關鍵詞:口語多媒材設計書寫圖像影像PowerPointImageMultimodal designSpeechWriting
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:46
  • 點閱點閱:85
期刊論文
1.Bezemer, J.、Kress, G.(2008)。Writing in multimodal texts: A social semiotic account of designs for learning。Written Communication,25(2),166-195。  new window
2.Doumont, J. L.(2002)。Verbal versus visual: A word is worth a thousand pictures, too。Technical communication,49(2),219-224。  new window
3.Kress, G.(2004)。Reading images: multimodality, representation and new media。Information Design Journal + Document Design,12(2),110-119。  new window
4.Kress, G.(1986)。Language in the media: The construction of the domains of public and private。Media, Culture and Society,8,395-419。  new window
5.Kraeplin, C.、Criado, C.(2005)。Building a Case for Convergence Journalism Curriculum。Journalism & Mass Communication Educator,60,47-56。  new window
6.Cazden, Courtney、Cope, Bill、Fairclough, Norman、Gee, Jim(1996)。A pedagogy of multiliteracies: designing social futures。Harvard Educational Review,66(1),60-92。  new window
7.翁秀琪(19980700)。批判語言學、在地權力觀和新聞文本分析:宋楚瑜辭官事件中李宋會的新聞分析。新聞學研究,57,91-126。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Iedema, R.(2003)。Multimodality, resemiotization: Extending the analysis of discourse as multi-semiotic practice。Visual communication,2(1),29-57。  new window
9.李冬豔、胥國紅(2010)。多模態視角分析PPT教學語篇。中美英語教學,7(5),21-25。  延伸查詢new window
10.Farkas, D. K.(2009)。Managing three mediation effects that influence powerpoint deck authoring。Technical Communication,56(1),28-38。  new window
11.Farkas, D. K.(2006)。Toward a better understanding of powerpoint deck design。Information Design Journal + Document Design,14(2),162-171。  new window
12.Farkas, D. K.(2005)。Explicit structure in print and on-screen documents。Technical Communication Quarterly,14(1),9-30。  new window
13.Alley, M.、Neeley, K. A.(2005)。Rethinking the design of presentation slides: A case for sentence headlines and visual evidence。Technical Communication,52(4),417-426。  new window
14.Berkeley L.(2009)。Media education and new technology: A case study of major curriculum change within a university media degree。Journal of Media Practice,10(2/3),185-197。  new window
15.Katt, J.、Murdock, J.、Butler, J.、Pryor, B.(2008)。Establishing best practices for the use of powerpoint™ as a presentation aid。Human Communication,11(1),192-200。  new window
16.Deuze, M.(2001)。Educating “New” journalists: Challenges to the curriculum。Journalism & Mass Communication Educator,56(1),4-17。  new window
17.Doumont, J. L.(2005)。The cognitive style of powerpoint: Slides are not all evil。Technical Communication,52(1),64-70。  new window
18.Levasseur, D. G.、Sawyer, J. K.(2006)。Pedagogy meets PowerPoint: a research review of the effects of computer-generated slides in the classroom。The Review of Communication,6(1/2),101-123。  new window
19.Mackiewicz, J.(2008)。Comparing PowerPoint experts' and university students' opinions about PowerPoint presentation。Journal of Technical Writing and Communication,38(2),149-165。  new window
20.Neeley, K. A.、Alley, M.、Nicometo, C. G.、Srajek, L. C.(2009)。Challenging the common practice of PowerPoint at an institution: lessons from instructors。Technical Communication,56(4),346-360。  new window
21.Stoner, M. R.(2007)。Powerpoint in a new key。Communication Education,56(3),354-381。  new window
22.van Leeuwen, T.(2006)。Towards a semiotics of typography。Information Design Journal + Document Design,14(2),139-155。  new window
23.Gabriel, Y.(2008)。Tyranny of powerpoint: Technology-in-use and technology abuse。Organization Studies,29(2),255-276。  new window
24.Garner, J. K.、Alley, M.、Gaudelli, A. F.、Zappe, S. E.(2009)。Common use of PowerPoint versus the assertion-evidence structure: A cognitive psychology perspective。Technical Communication,56(4),331-345。  new window
25.Hentz, B. S.(2006)。Enhancing presentation narratives through written and visual integration。Business Communication Quarterly,69(4),425-429。  new window
圖書
1.Kress, Gunther R.(2010)。Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication。Routledge。  new window
2.沈錦惠(2007)。電子語藝與公共溝通。臺北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
3.van Leeuwen, T.(1999)。Speech, music, sound。Hampshire, UK:MacMillan。  new window
4.Tufte, E. R.(2003)。The cognitive style of powerpoint。Cheshire, CT:Graphics Press。  new window
5.Barthes, Roland、Heath, Stephen(1977)。Image,Music,Text。New York:Noonday Press。  new window
6.張國儀、Reynolds, G.(2010)。簡報藝術2.0:創意簡報的設計與展現。台北。  延伸查詢new window
7.張國儀、Reynolds, G.(2008)。簡報藝術2.0 presentationzen。台北。  延伸查詢new window
8.閻紀宇、Gallo, C.(2010)。大家來看賈伯斯:向蘋果的表演大師學簡報。台北。  延伸查詢new window
9.Kress, G.、van Leeuwen, T.(2001)。Mulitmodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication。Arnold。  new window
10.Kress, G.、van Leeuwen, T.(2006)。Reading images。London。  new window
11.Filliettaz, L.(2004)。The multimodal negotiation of service encounters。Discourse and technology: multimodal discourse analysis。Washington, D.C.。  new window
12.Jewitt, C.(2004)。Multimodality and new communication technology。Discourse and technology: multimodal discourse analysis。Washington, D.C.。  new window
13.Kress, G.(2000)。Design and transformation: new theories of meaning。Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures。London。  new window
14.Lim, Fei V.(2004)。Problematising 'semiotic resource'。Perspectives on multimodality。Amsterdam:John Benjamins Publishing。  new window
其他
1.韓明文(2009)。錯用簡報軟體反而減分,http://mypaper.pchome.com.tw/lingkid/post/1313024984, 20100722。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Fowler, R.、Kress, G.(1979)。Critical Linguistics。Language and Control。Routledge。  new window
2.Kress, G.(2000)。Multimodality。Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures。London:Routledge。  new window
3.Kress, G.(1998)。Visual and verbal modes of representation in electronically mediated communication: The potentials of new forms of text。Page to Screen: Taking literacy into the electronic era。London, UK:Routledge。  new window
4.Stöckl, H.(2004)。In between modes: Language and image in printed media。Perspectives on multimodality。Amsterdam:John Benjamins。  new window
5.van Leeuwen, T.(2004)。Ten reasons why linguists should pay attention to visual communication。Discourse and technology: Multimodal discourse analysis。Washington, DC:Georgetown University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE