參考文獻
一、中文
王孝勇(2007)。女性主義立場論的主體與權力問題。政治與社會哲學評論,21,89 -146 。
王明珂(1996)。誰的歷史:自傳、傳記與口述歷史的社會記憶本質。思與言,34(3),147-184。王勇智、鄧明宇(譯)(2003)。C. K. Riessman著。敘說分析(Narrative analysis)。臺北市:五南。
卯靜儒(2004)。重構女性教師的主体性研究─女性主義研究觀點的探索。載於潘慧玲(主編),教育研究方法論:觀點與方法(頁319-338)。臺北市:心理。
卯靜儒(2004)。理論化女性教師的性別意識與認同建構過程。通識教育,11:1-2。
卯靜儒、楊滿玉、張宜煌(譯)(2006)。Thayer-Bacon & S.Bacon著。教育的應用哲學:培育教室裡的民主社群。臺北市:學富文化。
成令方、蔡麗玲、張盈堃(2009)。拆解臺灣的父權違建。發表於第三屆亞太地區性別平等教育論壇。
成虹飛(2007)。行動與敘說研究的個人學習筆記。行動研究在台灣-2007年。
吳慎慎(2006)。藝術人的終身學習:生命故事敘說的教學實踐。藝術教育研究,12:1-30。呂美慧(2008)。M. Foucault 與D. E. Smith 論述分析之比較及其對教育研究之啟示,臺北市立教育大學學報,39(2):71-104李金鳳、劉健芝(譯)(1999)。Keith W.Hoskin著。教育與學科規訓制度的緣起:意想不到的逆轉。載於劉健芝等(主編),學科,知識,權力(頁43-84)。北京:生活讀書,新知三聯書店。
李淑君(2017)。從成人教育到大學體制:女性主義教育模式的嘗試與實踐。台灣社會學刊,6,16-23。
李嘉齡(2002)。教育研究中的女性發聲:以碩博士論文為例。人文與社會科學教學通訊,12(5),91-110。
汪文聖(2001)。現象學與科學哲學。臺北市:五南。林美珠(2000)。敘事研究:從生命故事出發。輔導季刊,36(4),27-34頁。社會田野中的實踐者研討會:第二冊。臺北市:蘆荻社區大學。林香君(2015)。在互為主體性中建構主體性:以批判實踐取向敘說與對話為方法的教學實踐。教育實踐與研究,28(2),181-212。林香君(2015)。置身處境、在地實踐:走一條主體性的專業發展道路。應用心理研究,63(12),51-104。林麗珊(2014)。女性主義與性別關係。臺北市:五南。
邱麗珍(2000)。女性雜誌中美容美體論述的解構。未出版,國立台灣師範大學碩士論文,臺北市。
柯倩婷(譯)(2004)。Mary Talbot著。語言與社會性別導論。武昌市:華中師範大學出版社。
洪久賢(2001)。教師性別教育專業成長之分析研究。師大學報:教育類,46(2),213-231。胡紹嘉(2008)。敘事、自我與認同:從文本考察到課程探究。臺北市:秀威資訊科技。
夏傳位(譯)(1997)。Clough, Patricia Ticineto著。女性主義思想-慾望、權力及學術論述。臺北市:巨流。
孫文菁(2009)。女性主義教育學對我國高等教育改革的啟示。浙江海洋學院學報,26(4)。
翁秀琪(1998)。批判語言學、在地權力觀和新聞文本分析:宋楚瑜辭官事件中李宋會的新聞分析。新聞學研究,57,91-126。張君玫(譯)(2006)。Spivak Gayatri Chakravorty著。後殖民理性批判:邁向消逝當下的歷史。臺北市:群學。
張宏輝(1992)。結構化論旗手:季登斯,載於葉啟政(主編),當代社會思想巨擘,臺北市:正中。
張華蓀(2005)。蝸行20 年:女性主義地理學在臺灣的發展。地理學報,(42),25-46。張學謙(2005)。從『中國化』到『多元化』的台灣語文政策:語言生態的觀點。載於臺北市立教育大學(主編),中華文化與台灣本土化研討會」論文集(頁155-180)。臺北市:臺北市立教育大學。
許芳懿(2006)。課程概念重建的發展與爭議-兼論其在課程理解典範之重要性。師大學報,51(2),195-217。陳向明(2002)。社會科學質的研究。臺北市:五南。陳素秋(2015)。以學生抗拒作為性別教育資源:結構vs.能動性教學模式之實踐。載於彰化師範大學輔諮系(主編),高教工作者生活世界的反映與回顧:性別運動與學術勞動。彰化:國立彰化師範大學教育學院與輔諮系。
曾漢塘、林季薇(譯)(2000)。Noddings, N.著。教育哲學。臺北市:弘智。
游美惠(2003)。女性主義方法論。兩性平等教育季刊,23,112-115頁。
游美惠(2004)。從方法論的要求到女性主義方法論的追求-檢視教育研究期刊中的性別論述。載於潘慧玲(主編),教育研究方法論:觀點與方法(頁371-400)。臺北市:心理。
游美惠、黃馨慧、潘慧玲、謝小岑(2004)。從性別盲到性別敏感的教育研究:以婦女成人教育與性教育研究的文獻回顧為例。通識教育季刊,11(1,2),1-38。
游家政(2005)。後現代課程理論的探究取向和特性。載於游家政、莊梅枝(主編),後現代課程:實踐與評鑑(頁5-16)。臺北市:中華民國教材研究發展學會。
湯仁燕(2015)。邁向以學生為主體的轉化教學。臺灣教育評論月刊,4(5),142-144。
甯應斌(1997)。女性主義立場論的一些問題。刊於國科會哲學學門專題計畫研究成果發表會。
黃秀香(2001)。婦女教育現況與問題探討。社教雙月刊,7。
黃瑞祺(2003)。後學新論。臺北市:左岸文化。
黃鈺樺(2004)女性主義觀點在社區大學婦女教育之應用。載於2004兩岸大學經營理念與運作實務研討會論文集。臺北市:中華民國社區教育學會。
楊幸真(2002)。由女性主義的觀點探究女性研究生在課堂裡沉默的真相,載於謝臥龍(主編),性別平等教育-探究與實踐(頁441-484)。臺北市:五南。
楊幸真(2006)。女性主義教室與校園生活:敘說女性主義教師實踐女性主義教育學之困境與抗拒,論文發表於淡江大學教育學院舉辦之「教育改革微觀分析國際學術研討會」,臺北市市。楊幸真(2010)。校園生活與性別:性別學習與教學實踐。臺北市:巨流。楊幸真(2010)。探究女性主義教師關懷倫理與教學實踐策略。臺東大學教育學報,21(2),117-145。楊深坑(1998)。理論詮釋與實踐:教育學方法論論文集。臺北市:師大書苑。楊雅婷譯(2009)性別與女性研究手冊。臺北市:韋伯文化。
劉美慧(2009)。多元文化教育名著導讀。臺北市:學富文化。
劉淑雯、蔡易儒(2013)。大學通識課程以「性別與習俗」為主題的性別議題教學。性別平等教育季刊,63,66-73。
歐素汝(譯)(2000)。Stewart, D. W. & Shamdasani, P. N.著。焦點團體:理論與實務。臺北市:弘智。
潘才學(2015)。大學生參與性別教育經驗和性別意識關係研究:以逢甲大學修習性別教育相關課程為例。學生事務與輔導,54:3,18-34。
潘慧玲(1999)。教育學發展的女性主義觀點:女性主義教育學初探。載於臺灣師範大學(主編),教育科學的國際化與本土化。臺北市:揚智。
潘慧玲、梁文蓁、陳宜宣(2000)。台灣近十年教育領導碩博士論文分析:女性主義的觀點。婦女與兩性學刊,(11),151-190。鄭夙芬(2005)。焦點團體研究法的理論與應用。選舉研究,12(1),211-239。鄭明長(1999)。教學創新-從改變教室言談型態做起。載於高雄師範大學(主編),新世紀中小學課程改革與創新教學學術研究論文彙編,高雄市:國立高雄師範大學。
謝小岑(1998)。性別與教育期望。婦女與兩性學刊,9期,205-231頁。
謝小岑(譯)(1999)。Sophia Phoca著。後女性主義。臺北市:立緒文化。
謝小岑、楊佳羚(1999)。教育研究中的性別論述:十年來台灣性別與教育的文獻回顧。論文發表於「邁向21 世紀兩性平等教育國內學術研討會」。高雄:高雄醫學大學兩性研究中心。
謝小芩(1995)。教育:從父權的複製到女性的解放。載於劉毓秀(主編),臺灣婦女處境白皮書(頁182-218)。臺北市:時報文化。
謝小芩(2000)。臺灣的性別教育:回顧與前瞻。載於張建成(主編),多元文化教育:我們的課題與別人的經驗(頁103-122)。臺北市:師大書苑。
簡成熙(2003)。女性主義的教育哲學。載於邱兆偉(主編),當代教育哲學(頁209-246)。臺北市:師大書苑。蘇玉欣 (2011)。營造關懷的情境,締造師生雙贏的可能性-Noddings關懷倫理學初探。網路社會學通訊期刊,94,引自http://society.nhu.edu.tw/e-j/94/a10.htm。
蘇芊玲(2001)。教什麼?怎麼教?-通識課程「性別文化研究」的內涵與教學。通識教育季刊,8(2),1-31。
二、西文
Alcoff, L.(1988). Cultural feminism versus post-structuralism: The identity crisis in feminist theory. Signs, 13, 405-436.
Beane,J.A.,&Apple,M.W.(2007).The case for democratic school.InM.W. Apple,&J.A. Beane l(Eds), Democratic school-Lessons in powerful education(pp.1-29) NH: Heinemann.
Beyer, A. M. (2008). The Beauty of Focus Groups, Marketing Matters, GCI, 32-33.
Calderhead, J., & Miller, E. (1986). The integration of subject matter knowledge in studentteachers'classroom practice . Research Monograph, School of Education, University of Lancaster.
Carole Leathwood(2006). Gender,equity and the discourse of the independent learner in higher education. Higher Education,52: 611–633.
Chambliss,J.M.&Calfee,R.C.(1998).Textbooks for learning. Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell.ee
Cherryholmes, C. H. (1988). Power and criticism : Poststructural investigations in education. NY. : Teachers College.
Christine Etherington Wright(2009). Gender, Professions and Discourse:Early Twentieth-Century Women's Autobiography.NT: New York:Palgrave Macmillan.
Clark, M. C.(2006).“He hits me and my world shatters…”: How could adult education possibly make a difference here? In Merriam S. B.,. Courtenay B. C, & R.Cervero (Eds.). Global issues and adult education: Perspectives from Latin America, Southern Africa, and the United States(pp.61-63). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Cook, Judith A., & Fonow, Mary M. (1986). Knowledge and Women's Interests: Issues ofEpistemology and Methodology in Feminist Sociological Research. SociologicalInquiry, 56(2) : 611–633.
David Comer Kidd&*Emanuele Castano(2013)Reading Literary Fiction Improves Theory of Mind. Science 18 Oct 2013:Vol. 342, Issue 6156, pp. 377-380.DOI: 10.1126/science.1239918
Education Policy Analysis Archives, 3(1). Available http:// seammonkey. ed.asu.edu/epaa.
Eichler, M. (1989). Nonsexist Research Methods. Boston. MA: Allen & Unwin.
Elkind, D. (1995). School and family in the postmodern world. Phi Delta Kappan, 77(1), 8-14.
Epstein, J. L., Coates, L., Salinas, K. C., Sanders, M. G., & Simon, B. S. (1997). School, family, and community partnerships: Your handbook for action.
Ericsson K. & Simon H.A. (1993). Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data, Revised Edition. Cambridge. MA:MIT Press.
Ericsson K. & Simon H.A. (1993). Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data, Revised Edition. Cambridge:MIT Press.
Fisher, B. M. (2001). No angel in the classroom - Teaching through feminist discourse. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.
Flannery & Hayes(eds)(2000).Women as learners. San Francisco:Jossey-bass.
Foucault,M.(1972).The archaeology of knowledge and discourse on language. New York Pantheon.
Gestwicki, C. (2000). Home, school, and community relations. Albany, NY: Delmar.
Gill Kirkup(2010).Gendered knowledge production in universities in a web 2.0 world.In Shirley Booth&Sara Goodman&Gill Kirkup (Eds.), Gender issues in learning and working with information technology : social constructs and cultural contexts(pp.231-243). New York : Hershey& PA : Information Science Reference.
Gore, Jennifer. (1993). The struggle for pedagogies: Critical and feminist discourse as regimes of truth. New York: Routledge.
Griffith, A. (1995). Coordinating family and school: Mothering for schooling. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 3(1). Available http:// seammonkey. ed. asu.edu/epaa.
Hall, R.M. and Sandler, B.R. (1984). Out of the classroom: A chilly campus climate for women? Washington: Association of American Colleges.
Hall, R.M.& Sandler, B.R. (1982).The classroom climate: A chilly one for women? Washington: Association of American Colleges.
Harding, Sandra (1987). Feminism & Methodology: Social Science Issues. Bloomington:Indiana University Press.
Joan Swann(2003). Schooled language: language and gender in educational settings.In Janet Holmes & Miriam Meyerhoff(Eds.), Handbook of Language and Gender(pp.624-644). Malden, MA : Blackwell.
Judy S.Richardson, Raymond F.Mogan, Charlene E.Fleener (2011).Reading to learn in the content areas. CA: Thomson Higher Education.
Julie Thompson Klein(1996).Crossing boundaries: knowledge, disciplinarities, and interdisciplinarities. Publisher: University of Virginia Press
Liao(2001).Adult learning in social action: homemakers’union and foundation (huf) of Taiwan.Northern illinois university.
Madeleine Arnot(2006). Gender voices in the classroom. In Christine Skelton&Becky Francis&Lisa Smulyan (Eds.), The Sage handbook of gender and education(pp.407-421). Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage Publications.
Maher 及 Tetreault(2001).The Feminis Classroom: Dynamics of Gender, Race, and Privilege.
Marie-Pierre Moreau&Carole Leathwood(2006) Graduates’ employment and
Masher,F.A.(1987).Toward a richer theory of feminist pedagogy:A comparison of“liberation”and “gender” models for teaching and learning. Journal of Education,169(3),91-100.
McCarthy, E. D. (1996). Knowledge as cultural the new sociology of knowledge. N. Y. :Routledge.
Merton R. (1968) Social Theory andSocial Structure: Part One on Theoretical Sociology: Five Essays Old and New. New York: Free Press.
Meyer, K.A. (2010). A study of online discourse at the chronicle of higher education. Innovative Higher Education, 35(3).
Michaelson,G. and Pohl,M.(2001).Gender in email-based co-operative problem-solving’,inE.Green and A.Adam(eds),Virtual Gender: London: Routledge.
Morgan, D. L. (1997). Focus groups as qualitative research (2ⁿd ed.). Thounsand Oaks,CA: Sage.
Noddings ,N(1992).Gender and curriculum. In Jackson Ed. Handbook of research on curriculum. pp659-684, A project of the American Educational Research Association 1992.
Noddings, N. (2002). Educating Moral People-A Caring Alternative To Character Education. New York: Teachers College Press.
Noddings, N. (2007).Philosophy of Education. Boulder, Colorado :Westview Press.
Noddings, N.(1992). The Challenge to Care in Schools:An Alternative Approach to Education. New York: Teachers College Press.
Noddings, N.(2003).Caring: a Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education (2nd ed.). Berkeley:University of California Press.
Noddings, N.(2005).Educating Citizens for Global Awareness. New York: Teachers College Press.
Noddings,N. (2008).Caring and Moral Education, Handbook of Moral and Character Education(pp161-174). New York: Routledge Press.
Pascarella, E.T& P.T. Terenzini (2005) .How College Affects Students (Vol.2): A Third decade of research. San Grncisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Pascarella, E.T., Whitt, E.J., Edison, M.I., Nora, A., Hagedorn, L.S., Yeager, P.M., and Terenzini, P.T. (1997). Women’s perception of a “chilly climate” and their cognitive outcomes during the first year of college. Journal of College Student Development,38(2): 109-110.
Pinar,W.F.(1978).The reconceptionalization of curriculum studies.Journal of Curriculum studies,10(3),205-214
Popkewitz,T.S(2003).Governing the child and pedagogicalization oh the parent:A historical excursus into the present.In M.N.Bloch, K.Holmlund,I.Moqvist, &T.S.Popkewitz(Eds), Governing children,families and education(pp.35-61)Macmillan:Palgrave.
Popkewitz2003Popkewitz,T.S(1998).The sociology knowledge and the sociology of education:Michel Foucault and critical tradition.In C.A.Torres,&T.R.Mitchell(Eds),Sociology of education-Emerging perspectives(pp.47-89).New York:State University of New York:State Press.
Reiharz, S. (1992). Feminist Methods in Social Rresearch. New York: Oxford University Press.
Reinharz,S.(1992).The principles of feminist research: A matter of debate.In C.Kramarae& D.Spender (Eds),The knowledge preduction:Generations of feminist scholarship (pp.423-437).New York:Teacher College Press.
Sarah J. Mann(2008)Study, power and the university. New York : McGraw Hill. Sax, L.J., Bryant, A..N., and Harper, C.E. (2005) The differential effects of student-faculty interaction on college outcomes for women and men. Journal of College Student Development, 46(6): 642-659.
Sarah J.Mann(2001). Alternative Perspectives on the Student Experience:alienation and engagement. Studies in Higher Education,26(1),7-19.
Saville T. Roike&Muriel(1985). The Place of Silenceinan In tegrated Theory of Communication.Norwood: Ablex.
Sax, L.J., Bryant, A..N., and Harper, C.E. (2005). The differential effects of student-faculty interaction on college outcomes for women and men. Journal of College Student Development, 46(6): 642-659.
Serex, C.P. and B.K. Townsend (1999). Student perceptions of chilling practices in sex-atypical majors. Research in Higher Education, 40(5): 527-538.
Shrewsbury, C. M.(1987). What is feminist pedagogy. Women's Studies Quarterly,15(3-4), 6-14.
Stanely, Liz (1990). Feminist Praxis-Research, Theory and Epistemology in Feminist sociology . London: Routledge.
Stanley, L. & Wise, S. (1979). Feminist Research, Feminist Consciousness and Experiences of Sexism. In Women’s Studies International Quarterly, 2:359-74.
Stanley, L. & Wise, S. (1983). Breaking Out: Feminist Consciousness and Feminist Research. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Stanley, L. (1984). How the Social Science Research Press Discriminates Against Women. In Sandra Acker and David Warren Piper (Eds.), Is Higher Education Fair to Women ? (pp.189-209). London: Nelson.
Stanley, L. (1997). Methodology Matters!In V. Robinson and D. Richardson(Eds.), Introducing Women’s Studies. (pp.199-219). New York: New York University Press.
Sullivan,P.(2002).”It’seasier to be yourself when you are invisible”:Female college students discuss their online classroom experiences’, Innovative Higher Education,27(2).the discourse of employability:a critical analysis.Journal of Education and Work,19(4)pp. 305–324.
Thomas D.R. (2000) .Qualitative DataAnalysis: Using A General Inductive Approach. Health Research Methods Advisory Service, Department of Community Health University of Auckland, New Zealand.
Tiisdell,E.J.(1996).Feminist pedagogy and adult learning: Underlying theory and emancipatory practice. Adult Education Research Conference.No.37.Tampa:University of South Florida.
Tiisdell,E.J.(1998). Poststructural feminist pedagogies:The possibilities and limitations of feminist emancipatory adult learning theory and practice. Adult Education Quarterly ,48(3),139-156.
Tong,R.P(1998).Feminist Thought : A more Comprehensive Introduction.Boulder,CO:Westview Press..
Townsend, L. F. & Hanson, C. (2001). The self and narrative : A conversation on education biography. Educational Studies, 32(1), 38-52.
Wormeli, R. (2004). Summarization in any subject: 50 techniques to improve student learning.