:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:不同家庭結構中兒童之家庭動力繪畫研究
書刊名:國際藝術教育學刊
作者:范睿榛 引用關係
作者(外文):Fan, Ruei-jen
出版日期:2012
卷期:10:1
頁次:頁151-204
主題關鍵詞:一般家庭單親家庭新住民家庭家庭動力繪畫Traditional familiesSingle-parent familiesNew immigrant familiesKinetic family drawing
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:91
  • 點閱點閱:348
家庭是人類成長中最重要的人際關係,因此家庭對於兒童的人際、生活適應及情緒成長都有相當的影響牲,我們可以透過了繪畫來瞭解兒童與家庭成員之間的互動情形或是自我對家庭的看法。繪畫對兒童而言,是他們內心世界與外在世界的一種溝通橋梁,也是對其所處生活情境的一種認知表現。本研究屬於實驗,性研究,對象是來自於一般家庭、單親家庭、新住民家庭共三組不同家庭結構之低年級兒童,分別是30名,三組一共是90名兒童,以探討三組不同家庭結構兒童中家庭動力繪畫表現情形。結果是三組家庭的兒童在「人物間互動和動作」變項中;“父親在室內"一項以新住民家庭兒童最為顯著性且大於其他兩組,“其他人物在戶外"一項,以單親家庭兒童這組大於其他兩組;在「人物的問距、障礙物」變項中,並末在三組兒童繪畫中發現差異性;在「圖畫的樣式」變項中並未發現差異性;在「人物特徵」變項中,以單親家庭在「省略父親」、「省略母親」這兩部分都比其他兩組來得顯著;在「象徵符號」變項中,使用「遠離自己的太陽」、「電視」象徵符號表現是新住民家庭兒童的顯著性大於其他兩組,此現象與「人物間互動和動作」變項中「父室內」、「父看電視」有相當的關係。在未來的研究需增加且普遍性的選擇研究對象,研究結果將是較客觀且有效的信效度,以提供為學校或輔導機構為介入家庭治療的參考資料。
Family is the source of the most important interpersonal relationships in the process of personal growth. Family life, therefore, is highly influential in the development of a child’s interpersonal relationships, life skills, and emotions. Through drawings, we are able to understand the interaction between a child and his/her family members, or his/her perceptions of the family. For a child, drawing serves as a bridge between the inner self and the outside world. It also reflects cognitive performance with respect to a child’s living environment. The subjects of this experiment-based study are three groups of students in the junior grades (Grade 1 and Grade 2) of elementary school, with different family structures including traditional families, single-parent families, and new immigrant families. In total, there are 90 children in the three groups, with 30 children in each group. We engage in an exploration of the Kinetic Family Drawings of these three groups of children, focusing on their different family structures. In terms of the variable of “Action of and Between Figures,” the group from new immigrant families exhibits a higher level of significance than the other two groups in the category of “father is outside of the room;” and the group from single-parent families has the highest level of significance among the three in the category of “other people outside of the house.” With respect to the variable of “Distance between Figures, Barriers,” no difference has been identified among the drawings of the three groups of children. There is also no difference with the variable of “Styles.” Concerning the variable of “Figure Characteristics,” the group from single-parent families displays a higher level of significance than the other two groups with both “omitting the father” and “omitting the mother figure.” With the variable of “Symbols,” the group from new immigrant families has the highest significance level among the three in using symbols such as “Far Away the Sun” or “TV.” This phenomenon is highly correlated to the “father figure is in the room” and “father figure watches the TV” categories under the variable of “Action of and Between Figures ” To improve the objectivity, reliability and validity of future studies, the researcher should increase the number and diversity of the research subjects, and the researcher hopes that research results can be offered to schools or counseling organizations as helpful reference materials for relevant family therapy intervention programs.
期刊論文
1.卓紋君、陳瑤惠(19991100)。兒童的家庭動力畫(KFD)與其親子關係及社會行為之研究。嘉義師院學報,13,1-23。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳麗欣、翁福元、許維素、林志忠(20000300)。我國隔代教養家庭現況之分析。成人教育通訊,2,37-40。  延伸查詢new window
3.范瓊方(2001)。說不出來只能畫(焦點話題:藝術+心理=生之頌)。美育,122,4-14。  延伸查詢new window
4.洪瑞兒、鄭文華(2006)。使用「家庭動力圖」作為探所繼親家庭的親子互動關係之研究。台南科技大學學報,25(1),77-98。  延伸查詢new window
5.范瓊方(1998)。探討兒童對家庭動力繪圖的認知表達:家庭動力繪畫的試驗性分析研究。美育,93,39-49。  延伸查詢new window
6.Anastasi, A.、Foley, J. P., Jr.(1940)。A Survey of the Literature on Artistic Behavior in Abnormal: III. Spontaneous Productions。Psychol Monogr,52(6),i-71。  new window
7.Bender, L.(1937)。Art and Therapy in the Mental Disturbances of Children。Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease,86,249-263。  new window
8.Buck, J. N.(1948)。The H-T-P Test。Journal of Clinical Psychology,4,151-159。  new window
9.Church, A. T.、Katigbak, M. S.(1988)。The Emic Strategy in the Identification and Assessment of Personality Dimensions in a Non-Western Culture。Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,19,140-163。  new window
10.Hulse, W. C.(1952)。Childhood Conflict Expressed Through Family Drawing。Journal of Projective Techniques,16,66-79。  new window
11.Tomas, G. V.、Gray, R.(1992)。Children’s Drawings of Topics Differing in Emotional Significance: Effects on Placement Relative to a Self-drawing。Journal of Psychology and Psychiatry,33,1097-1104。  new window
12.Joiner, T. E.、Schmidt, K. L.、Barnett, J.(1996)。Size, detail, and line heaviness in children’s drawings as correlates of emotional distress: (more) Negative evidence。Journal of Personality Assessment,67,127-141。  new window
13.Kuthe, J. L.(1962)。Social Schemas and the Reconstruction of Social Object Displays from Memory。Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,64,71-74。  new window
14.Kuthe, J. L.(1964)。The Pervasive Influence of Social Schemas。Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,68,248-254。  new window
15.McPhee, J.、Wegner, K.(1976)。Kinetic-Family-Drawing Styles and Emotionally Disturbed Childhood Behavior。Journal of Personality Assessment,40,487-491。  new window
16.Marijcke, W. M.、Veltman, B. A.、Browne, K. D.(2001)。Identifying Childhood Abuse through Favorite Kind of and Kinetic Family Drawing。The Arts in Psychotherapy,28(4),251-259。  new window
17.Mostkoff, D. L. M.、Lazarus, P. J.(1983)。The Kinetic Family Drawing: The Reliability of an Objective Scoring System。Psychology in the Schools,20(1),16-20。  new window
18.Appel, K.(1931)。Drawings by Children as Aids in Personality Studies。American Journal of Orthopsychiary,1,129-144。  new window
19.Nuttall, E.、Chieh, L.、Nutall, R.(1988)。View of the Family by Chinese and U.S. Children: A Comparative Study of Kinetic Family Drawing。Journal of Social Psychology,26,191-194。  new window
20.O’Brien, R. P.、Patton, W. F.(1974)。Development of an Objective Scoring Method for the Kinetic Family Drawing。Journal of Personality Assessment,58,156-164。  new window
21.Rabinowitz, A.(1991)。The Relation of Acceptance-Rejection to Social Schemata and Kinetic Family Drawings。Social Behavior and Personality,19(4),263-272。  new window
22.Cummings, J. A.(1980)。An Evaluation of Objective Scoring Systems for Kinetic Family Drawings。Dissertation Abstracts International,41(6),AAT8029117。  new window
23.Hulse, W. C.(1951)。The Emotionally Disturbed Child Draws His Family。Quart. Child Behavior,3,152-174。  new window
24.Rabinowitz, A.(1992)。Acceptance-Rejection and Height of Parental Figures on the Kinetic Family Drawings。Perceptual and Motor Skills,74,329-330。  new window
25.WeinsteinL L.(1967)。Social Experience and Social Schemata。Journal of Personality,6(4),429-434。  new window
26.Wolff, W.(1942)。Projective Methods for Personality Analysis of Expressive Behavior in Pre-school Children。Character and Personality,10,309-330。  new window
27.Tomas, G. V.、Jolley, r. P.(1998)。Drawing Conclusions: A Re-examination of Empirical and Conceptual Bases for Psychological Evaluation of Children from Their Drawings。Journal of Clinical Psychology,37,127-139。  new window
會議論文
1.Fukada, N.(1990)。Family Drawing: A New Device for Cross-Cultural Comparison。Kyoto, Japan。  new window
研究報告
1.行政院主計處(2006)。大陸與外籍配偶人數統計。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.張梅菊(1997)。國小兒童之家庭動力畫與其家庭關係之相關研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.呂淑玲(2005)。情緒困擾兒童的家庭動力畫表現與敘說之分析研究(碩士論文)。國立臺南大學,台南市。  延伸查詢new window
3.曾雅薇(2009)。隔代教養兒童之家庭動力繪畫與家庭互動關係之研究。國立台北教育大學,台北。  延伸查詢new window
4.吳慧玲(1999)。國小兒童之家庭動力圖、風景構成圖與其生活適應關係之硏究。國立臺南師範學院,台南。  延伸查詢new window
5.Chartouni,T.(1992)。Self-Concept and Family Relations of American-Lebanese Children。Andrews University,Berrien Springs, MI。  new window
6.Cho, M.(1987)。The Validity of Kinetic Family Drawings as Measure of Self-Concept and Parent/Child Relationship among Chinese in Taiwan。Andrews Unversity。  new window
7.Chuah, V.(1992)。Kinetic Family Drawing of Chiness-American Children。Andrews University,Berrien Springs, MI。  new window
8.Heineman, T.(1975)。Kinetic Family Drawings of Siblings of Severely Emotionally Disturbed Children。University of California,Berkeley。  new window
9.Johnston, D. D.(1975)。Comparison of DAF and K-F-D in Children from Intact and Divorced Homes,San Jose。  new window
圖書
1.Jung, Carl G.(1964)。Man and His Symbol。New York:Doubleday Dell Publishing Group。  new window
2.范瓊方(1996)。兒童繪畫心理分析與輔導。臺北:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.Despert, J. L.(1938)。Emotional problems in children。New York, NY:State Hospitals Press。  new window
4.吳武烈(2003)。兒童繪畫治療:繪畫--兒童的心靈之窗。臺北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
5.DiLeo, J. H.(1973)。Children's Drawings as Diagnostic Aids。New York, NY:Brunner/Mazel。  new window
6.Naglieri, J. A.、McNeish, T. J.、Bardos, A. N.(1991)。Draw A Person: Screening pro-cedure for emotional disturbance。Austin, TX:Pro-Ed。  new window
7.Burns, R. C.、Kaufman, S. H.(1970)。Kinetic Family Drawings (K-F-D): An introduction to understanding children through kinetic drawings。New York:Brunner/Mazel。  new window
8.陸雅青(1997)。藝術治療團體實務研究:以破碎家庭兒童為例。臺北:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.陸雅青(2005)。藝術治療:繪畫詮釋--從美術進入孩子的心靈世界。臺北:心理。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.范瓊方(1997)。藝術治療--家庭動力繪畫概論。台北。  延伸查詢new window
11.Anderson, L.(2004)。A Comparison of Kinetic Family Drawings of firstborn and Secondborn Siblings。  new window
12.Brook, S. L.(1996)。A Therapist’s Guide to Art Therapy Assessments: Tools of the Trade。Illinois。  new window
13.Burns, R. C.、Kaufman, S. H.(1972)。Action, Styles and Symbols in Kinetic Family Drawings (K-F-D). An interpretation Manual。New York。  new window
14.Burns, R. C.(1982)。Self-Growth in Families。New York。  new window
15.Burns, R. C.(1987)。Kinetic-House-Tree-Person Drawings (K-H-T-P)。PA。  new window
16.Feder, B.、Feder, E.(1986)。The Expressive Arts Therapies。Fl.。  new window
17.Jung, C. G.(1965)。Memories, Dreams, Reflections。New York:Vintage Books。  new window
18.Koppitz, R. M.(1968)。Psychological Evaluation of Children’s Human Figure Drawing。New York。  new window
19.Knoff, M.、Prout, T.(1985)。The Kinetic Drawing System for Family and School。Log Angeles。  new window
20.Ricci, C.(1887)。The Art of Children。Italy。  new window
21.Freud, S.(1938)。The interpretation of dreams。The Basic Writings of Sigmund Freud。New York。  new window
其他
1.內政部(2006)。95年底我國戶籍登記人口結構分析,http://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/。  延伸查詢new window
2.行政院主計處(2010)。99年普査重要性別統計指標單親家庭概況,http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/fp.asp?xltem=30392&ctNode=3273。  延伸查詢new window
3.行政院主計處。89年單親戶普査,http://www.stat.gov.tw/ct.asp?xltem=1185&ctNode=3273。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE