:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:美國大學教學改革的新典範--日本「單元教學研究」的應用
書刊名:課程與教學
作者:黃月美 引用關係歐用生
作者(外文):Huang, Yueh MeiOu, Yung Sheng
出版日期:2013
卷期:16:2
頁次:頁57-88
主題關鍵詞:大學的教學改革單元教學研究教學學術Instructional innovation in higher educationLesson studyScholarship of teaching and learningSoTL
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(11) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:11
  • 共同引用共同引用:23
  • 點閱點閱:105
「單元教學研究」(lesson study)源於日本的中小學,是結合課程改革、教學創新和教師專業發展的校本研修方式。2003年,Bill Cerbin教授等在威斯康辛大學進行「單元教學研究」實驗和試辦後,加以推廣,現在已成為美國大學教學改革的一個新典範,值得研究者關注。本文的主要目的在探討美國大學改革新典範的運作情形,特色,及其在建構大學教、學學術上的意義。全文分為三部份,首先,分析日本單元教學研究的理念,探討它如何協助教師改進教學;其次,闡述美國大學如何實施單元教學研究,說明其特點和問題;最後,呼籲建構新的大學教、學學術,作為大學教學研究和改進的參考。
Originated from middle and elementary schools in Japan, lesson study was promoted and undertaken by a group led by Professor Bill Cerbin and his colleagues at the University of Wisconsin-La Crosse in 2003. As a school-base in-service training model, lesson study combined curriculum reform, instructional innovation and professional development. It has become a new paradigm of instructional innovation in American higher education. The aims of this study were three-fold. First of all, it was to explore the methodology of Japanese lesson study and analyze how it improved instructional practice. Secondly, it was to examine how the lesson study was applied at the university in American and analyze its process, characteristics and problems. Finally, the study pointed to a need to construct a new scholarship of teaching and learning as a reference for improving teaching and instructional research in higher education.
期刊論文
1.Cerbin, W.、Kopp, B.(2006)。Lesson study as a model for building pedagogical knowledge and improving teaching。International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education,18(3),250-257。  new window
2.Schwab, J.(1969)。The practical-the language for curriculum。School Review,74,1-12。  new window
3.Asanuma, Shigeru(201206)。Lesson Study and Curriculum Politics in Contemporary Japan。Asia Pacific Journal of Educational Development,1(1),25-32。new window  new window
4.Lewis, C.、Perry, R.、Hurd, J.(2002)。A deeper look at lesson study。Educational Leadership,61(5),18-22。  new window
5.Shulman, Lee S.(2002)。Making Differences: A Table of Learning。Change The Magazine of Higher Learning,34(6),36-44。  new window
6.Mishler, E. G.(1990)。Validation in inquiry-guided research: The role of exemplars in narrative studies。Harvard Educational Review,60(4),415-442。  new window
7.歐用生(20120600)。日本中小學「單元教學研究」分析。教育資料集刊,54,121-147。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Fernandez, C.(2002)。Learning from Japanese approaches to professional development: The case of lesson study。Journal of Teacher Education,53(5),393-405。  new window
圖書
1.稻垣忠彥、佐藤學(1996)。授業研究入門。東京都:岩波書店。  延伸查詢new window
2.Cerbin, B.(2011)。Lesson study: Using classroom inquiry to improve teaching and learning in higher education。Sterling, VA:Stylus。  new window
3.佐藤學、鍾啟泉(2004)。課程與教師。北京:教育科學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.丸野俊一、松尾剛(2008)。対話を通した教師の対話と学習。授業の研究・教師の学習--レッスンスタディへの誘い。東京:明石書店。  延伸查詢new window
5.佐藤学(2010)。教師花伝書--専門家として成長するために。東京:小学館。  延伸查詢new window
6.松本健一(2008)。創造改變學校的授業研究。授業の研究・教師の学習--レッスンスタディへの誘い。東京:明石書店。  延伸查詢new window
7.秋田喜代美(2008)。授業検討会談話と教師の学習。授業の研究・教師の学習--レッスンスタディへの誘い。東京:明石書店。  延伸查詢new window
8.秋田喜代美(2012)。学びの心理学--授業をデザインする。東京:左右社。  延伸查詢new window
9.Lewis, K.、秋田喜代美(2008)。授業研究--アメリカ合衆国における発展と挑戦。授業の研究・教師の学習--レッスンスタディへの誘い。東京:明石書店。  延伸查詢new window
10.Wolf, J.、秋田喜代美(2008)。レッスンスタディの国際的動向と授業研究への問い。授業の研究・教師の学習--レッスンスタディへの誘い。東京:明石書店。  延伸查詢new window
11.Hutchings, P.(2011)。Foreword。Lesson study: Using classroom inquiry to improve teaching and learning in higher education。Sterling, VA:Stylus。  new window
12.Lyons, N.、LaBoskey, V. K.(2002)。Introduction。Narrative inquiry in practice-Advancing the knowledge of teaching。New York:Teachers College Press。  new window
13.Fullan, M.(2003)。The moral imperative of school leadership。Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin Press。  new window
14.佐藤學、鍾啟泉(2004)。學習的快樂:走向對話。教育科學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
15.佐藤學、鐘啟泉、陳靜靜(2012)。教師的挑戰:寧靜的課堂革命。華東師範大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
16.Schön, Donald A.、夏林清、鄭村棋(2004)。反映的實踐者:專業工作者如何在行動中思考。台北:遠流。  延伸查詢new window
17.歐用生(2006)。課程理論與實踐。臺北:學富文化。  延伸查詢new window
18.Pinnegar, S.、Hamilton, M. L.(2009)。Self-study of practice as a genre of qualitative research: Theory, methodology, and practice。New York, NY:Springer。  new window
19.佐藤學、黃郁倫、鍾啟泉(2012)。學習的革命:從教室出發的改革。臺北市:天下雜誌股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
20.佐藤學、鍾啟泉(2010)。學校的挑戰:創建學習共同體。華東師範大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
21.Bruner, Jerome Seymour(1986)。Actual minds, possible worlds。Harvard University Press。  new window
22.歐用生(1996)。教師專業成長。師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
23.Kuhn, Thomas Samuel(1970)。The Structure of Scientific Revolutions。University of Chicago Press。  new window
24.Stigler, J. W.、Hiebert, J.(1999)。The teaching gap: best ideas from the world's teachers for improving education in the classroom。New York:Free Press。  new window
25.Bloom, B. S.、Englehart, M. D.、Furst, E. J.、Hill, W. H.、Krathwohl, D. R.(1956)。A Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Handbook 1, the Cognitive Domain。New York, NY:David Mckay。  new window
26.Lewis, C.(2002)。Lesson study: A handbook of teacher-led instructional improvement。Philadelphia, PA:Research for Better Schools。  new window
圖書論文
1.Shulman, L. S.(1998)。Course anatomy: The dissection and analysis of knowledge through teaching。The course portfolio: How faculty can examine their teaching to advance practice and improve student learning。Washington, DC:American Association for Higher Education。  new window
2.Smith, D. G.(2008)。The farthest west is but the farthest east-The long way of oriental/occidental engagement。Cross-cultural studies in curriculum: Eastern thought, educational insights。New York:Routledge。  new window
3.Wang, H.(2005)。Chinese aesthetics, fractals, and the Tao of curriculum。Chaos, complexity, curriculum and culture: A conversation。Peter Lang Publishing。  new window
4.Zeichner, K. Z.、Noffke, S. E.(2001)。Practitioner Research。Handbook of Research on Teaching。American Educational Research Association。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE