:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣國中教師對共同備課、公開觀課與集體議課的實施目的、關注內容以及專業成長知覺之研究
書刊名:當代教育研究季刊
作者:劉世雄 引用關係
作者(外文):Liu, Shih-hsiung
出版日期:2017
卷期:25:2
頁次:頁43-76
主題關鍵詞:共同備課公開觀課教師專業成長教師協同Collaborative lesson preparationOpen classroom observationTeacher professional developmentLesson study
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(13) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:13
  • 共同引用共同引用:54
  • 點閱點閱:8
研究目的 近年來,臺灣部分學校教師借鏡國外經驗,實施共同備課、公開觀課與集體議課,但其實施目的與關注焦點以及是否著實提升自己的教學專業,是臺灣推動此教育改革之當下需要檢視的。本研究之目的在於瞭解臺灣國中教師在共同備課、公開觀課與集體議課的實施目的、關注內容以及在教學專業成長的知覺。研究設計/方法/取徑 本研究自編問卷,針對臺灣國中教師進行調查研究,以縣市進行分層立意叢集方式抽取2,374 位教師,其中753 位教師有共備、觀課與議課的完整參與經驗,741 位教師從未有過類似經驗,其餘則有部分參與經驗。本研究以獨立樣本t 考驗和Friedman 等級變異數分析「完整參與」和「從未參與」的兩群教師,在實施目的、關注內容和教學專業成長知覺上的差異以及在其分項知覺的高低情形。研究發現或結論 本研究發現完整參與教師在實施目的、關注內容和教學專業成長知覺均顯著高於未曾參與的教師。而完整參與教師在實施目的之分項(教學專業能力、學科教材知識和學生學習成效)均有等同程度的知覺,然而,從未參與的教師較少以促進學生學習成效為目的。在關注內容上,兩群教師仍比較在乎教學策略的應用,較少關注學科知識與學習能力的培養。研究原創性/價值 臺灣學校早期的教學觀摩多是行政作為,教師是被觀察的對象,而學校教師的專業成長多為聆聽知識或資訊的活動。透過本研究的實證結果,可以更瞭解參與共同備課、公開觀課與集體議課的教師之國中教師的協同經驗,並提出透過教師協同進行教學專業成長的改善建議。
Purpose Many Taiwanese teachers have begun implementing the activities of collaborative lesson preparation, open classroom observation, and discussion on completed lessons, according to teacher collaborative practices in foreign schools. The perceptions on the purposes of and concerns about these activities as well as their effectiveness in the professional development of teachers warrant investigation. Therefore, this study compared Taiwanese teachers experienced in collaborative lesson study and their inexperienced counterparts. Design/methodology/approach A survey was conducted to collect data from 2,374 secondary school teachers from 21 regions by using stratified random cluster sampling. Of these teachers, 753 were experienced in collaborative lesson study, 741 were inexperienced, and the remaining teachers were partly experienced. The independent-samples t test and Friedman rank analysis were used to compare the ranking of various variables between the experienced and inexperienced teachers. Findings Significant differences were observed between the study groups in the perceptions on the purposes of and concerns about collaborative activities and the effectiveness in professional development. Friedman rank analysis of the experienced teachers revealed identical rankings on the purposes of collaborative activities, namely professional ability, subject matter knowledge, and students' learning effectiveness. However, students' learning effectiveness was less considered by inexperienced teachers in collaborative activities. Moreover, regardless of whether collaborative activities were implemented, the teachers were more concerned about instructional strategies than subject matter and learner abilities when collaborating. Originality/value Previously in Taiwan, classroom teaching demonstration was considered an administrative affair, in which the focus was often on the demonstrating teachers' behaviors rather than students' learning performance. The present findings provide a more comprehensive outlook on the experiences of Taiwanese secondary school teachers in collaborative lesson preparation, open classroom observation, and discussion on completed lessons, thus enabling further improvements in teacher collaborations for professional development.
期刊論文
1.Watanabe, T.(2002)。Learning from Japanese lesson study。Educational Leadership: Journal of the Department of Supervision and Curriculum Development, N. E. A.,59(6),36-39。  new window
2.Little, J. W.(1990)。The persistence of privacy: Autonomy and initiative inteachers' professional relations。Teachers College Record,91(4),509-536。  new window
3.Lange, John D.、Burroughs-Lange, Sue G.(1994)。Professional uncertainty and professional growth: A case study of experienced teachers。Teaching and Teacher Education,10(6),617-631。  new window
4.Pang, M. F.、Marton, F.(2003)。Beyond "lesson study": Comparing two ways of facilitating the grasp of some economic concepts。Instructional Science,31(3),175-194。  new window
5.Ling, L. M.、Chik, P.、Pang, M. F.(2006)。Patterns of variation in teaching the colour of light to primary 3 students。Instructional Science: An International Journal of Learning and Cognition,34(1),1-19。  new window
6.Saito, E.、Atencio, M.(2013)。A Conceptual discussion of lesson study from a micro-political perspective: implications for teacher development and pupil learning。Teaching and Teacher Education,31,87-95。  new window
7.王為國(20070300)。從實務社群談課程發展與教師專業發展。課程研究,2(2),41-63。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.洪詠善(20140300)。藝術教師的學習共同體:美學社群之建構與實踐。中等教育,65(1),41-57。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Doppenberg, J. J.、den Brok, P. J.、Bakx, A. W. E. A.(2012)。Collaborative teacher learning across foci of collaboration: Perceived activities and outcomes。Teaching and Teacher Education,28(6),899-910。  new window
10.丁一顧、簡賢昌、張德銳(2003)。國民中小學教師教學專業發展標準及其資源檔之研究。教育資料集刊,28,213-239。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Chassels, C.、Melville, W.(2009)。Collaborative, reflective and iterative Japanese lesson study in an initial teacher education program: Benefits and challenges。Canadian Journal of Education,32(4),734-763。  new window
12.Chokshi, S.、Fernandez, C.(2005)。Reaping the systematic benefits of lesson study: Insights from the US。Phi Delta Kappan,86(9),674-680。  new window
13.Doppenberg, J. J.、den Brok, P. J.、Bakx, A. W. E. A.(2013)。Relationships between primary school teachers' perceived learning outcomes of collaboration, foci and learning activities。Learning and Individual Differences,28,1-8。  new window
14.Fernandez, C.、Chokshi, S.(2002)。A practical guide to translating lesson study for a US setting。Phi Delta Kappan,84(2),128-134。  new window
15.James, C. R.、Dunning, G.、Connolly, M.、Elliott, T.(2007)。Collaborative practice: A model of successful working in schools。Journal of Educational Administration,45(5),541-555。  new window
16.Kadroon, T.、Inprasitha, M.(2013)。Professional development of mathematics teachers with lesson study and open approach: The process for changing teachers values about teaching mathematics。Psychology,4(2),101-105。  new window
17.Kleinknecht, M.、Schneider, J.(2013)。What do teachers think and feel when analyzing videos of themselves and other teachers teaching?。Teaching and Teacher Education,33,13-23。  new window
18.Levine, T. H.、Marcus, A. S.(2010)。How the structure and focus of teachers' collaborative activities facilitate and constrain teacher learning。Teaching and Teacher Education,26(3),389-398。  new window
19.Lim, C.、Lee, C.、Saito, E.、Haron, S. Syed(2011)。Taking stock of lesson study as a platform for teacher development in Singapore。Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education,39(4),353-365。  new window
20.Ono, Y.、Ferreira, J.(2010)。A case study of continuing teacher professional development through lesson study in South Africa。South African Journal of Education,30(1),59-74。  new window
21.Orland-Barak, L.、Tillema, H.(2006)。The 'dark side of the moon': A critical look at teacher knowledge construction in collaborative settings。Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice,12,1-12。  new window
22.So, K.(2013)。Knowledge construction among teachers within a community based on inquiry as stance。Teaching and Teacher Education,29,188-196。  new window
23.So, K.、Shin, J.、Son, W.(2010)。A comparative study of classroom teaching in Korea and Japan: A case study on reforming schools into learning communities。Asia Pacific Education Review,11(3),273-283。  new window
24.Tolley, L. M.、Johnson, L.、Koszalka, T. A.(2012)。An intervention study of instructional methods and student engagement in large classes in Thailand。International Journal of Educational Research,53,381-393。  new window
25.Vangrieken, K.、Dochy, F.、Raes, E.、Kyndt, E.(2015)。Teacher collaboration: A systematic review。Educational Research Review,15(3),17-40。  new window
26.Xu, H.(2015)。The development of teacher autonomy in collaborative lesson preparation: A multiple-case study of EFL teachers in China。System,52,139-148。  new window
27.Kwakman, K.(2003)。Factors affecting teachers' participation in professional learning activities。Teaching and Teacher Education,19(2),149-170。  new window
28.Lee, J. F. K.(2008)。A Hong Kong case of lesson study--Benefits and concerns。Teaching and Teacher Education,24(5),1115-1124。  new window
29.Fernandez, Clea、Cannon, Joanna、Chokshi, Sonal(2003)。A US-Japan lesson study collaboration reveals critical lenses for examining practice。Teaching and Teacher Education,19(2),171-185。  new window
30.Zaare, Masoumeh(2013)。An investigation into the effect of classroom observation on teaching methodology。Procedia: social and behavioral sciences,70,605-614。  new window
31.歐用生(20120600)。日本中小學「單元教學研究」分析。教育資料集刊,54,121-147。new window  延伸查詢new window
32.Lewis, C.、Perry, R.、Hurd, J.、O'Connell, M. P.(2006)。Lesson study comes of age in north America。Pat Phi Delta Kappan,88(4),273-281。  new window
33.Stewart, R. A.、Brendefur, J. L.(2005)。Fusing lesson study and authentic achievement。Phi Delta Kappan,86(9),681-687。  new window
34.Yang, S.-C.、Liu, S.-F.(2004)。Case study of online workshop for professional development of teachers。Computers in Human Behavior,20(6),733-761。  new window
會議論文
1.Groves, S.、Doig, B.(2010)。Adapting and implementing Japanese lesson study: Some affordances and constraints。The fifth East Asia regional conference on mathematics education: In search of excellence in mathematics education。Tokyo:Japan Society of Mathematical Education。699-706。  new window
2.黃詣峰(2013)。學習共同體:教師專業學習社群經驗分享。教育領導與學習共同體國際研討會。臺北市淡江大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.蔡傳懿(2013)。教師專業學習社群經驗分享。教育領導與學習共同體國際研討會。臺北市淡江大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.Sato, M.(2008)。Japanese lesson studies: Looking back and looking forward。The annual conference of the World Association of Lesson Studies。Hong Kong:Hong Kong Institute of Education。  new window
研究報告
1.National Commission on Teaching and America's Future(1996)。What matters most: Teaching for America's future。Woodbridge, VA:National Commission on Teaching and America's Future。  new window
學位論文
1.施雅慧(2011)。教師專業學習社群之建構與運作--以一所國中創新教學為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Fernandez , C.、Yoshida, M.(2004)。Lesson study: A Japanese approach to improving mathematics teaching and learning。Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc。  new window
2.Cohen, L.、Manion, L.、Morrison, K. R. B.(2007)。Research methods in education。Routledge。  new window
3.Lewis, C. C.(2002)。Lesson study: A handbook of teacher-led instructional change。Philadelphia, PA:Research for Better Schools。  new window
4.佐藤學、黃郁倫(2013)。學習共同體:構想與實踐。天下雜誌。  延伸查詢new window
5.佐藤学、黃郁倫、鐘啟泉(2012)。學習的革命:從教室出發的改變。臺北:天下。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.盧敏玲(2007)。觀課能優化課堂教與學嗎?,https://www.ied.edu.hk/cls/resources/lesson_observation.pdf。  延伸查詢new window
2.Delors, J.(1996)。Learning, the treasure within: Report to UNESCO of the International Commission on Education for the Twenty-first Century,http://www.voced.edu.au/content/ngv%3A1399。  new window
圖書論文
1.潘慧玲、張新仁、張德銳(2008)。臺灣中小學教師評鑑/專業標準之建構:歷程篇。教師評鑑理論與實務。臺北:國立臺灣師範大學教育評鑑與發展研究中心。  延伸查詢new window
2.劉祐彰、王全興(2013)。國中教師對於12年國教課程實施關注階段之研究。課程實踐與教學創新。屏東:屏東教育大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Murata, A.(2010)。Teacher learning with lesson study。International encyclopedia of education。Oxford:Elsevier。  new window
4.Thiessen, D.(1992)。Classroom-based teacher development。Understanding teacher development。London:Cassell。  new window
5.Vrasidas, C.、Glass, G. V.(2004)。Teacher professional development: Issues and trends。Online professional development for teachers。Greenwich, CT:Information Age。  new window
6.Hawley, W. D.、Valli, Linda(1999)。The essentials of effective professional development: A new consensus。Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice。San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE