:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:中文色塊測驗認知成分分析:LLTM與SEM取向
書刊名:教育與心理研究
作者:林月仙
作者(外文):Lin, Yueh-hsien
出版日期:2013
卷期:36:2
頁次:頁113-144
主題關鍵詞:中文色塊測驗建構效度結構方程模式認知成分分析線性logistic測驗模式Mandarin Token TestConstruct validityStructural equation modelValidation of cognitive structuresLinear logistic test model
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:28
  • 點閱點閱:57
期刊論文
1.Dimitrov, D. M.(2007)。Least squares distance method of cognitive validation and analysis for binary items using their item response theory parameters。Applied Psychological Measurement,31(5),367-387。  new window
2.林月仙(20071200)。學前兒童色塊測驗之編製。特殊教育研究學刊,32(4),85-109。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.林月仙、曾進興、吳裕益(20110600)。「中文色塊測驗」之Rasch模式分析。測驗學刊,58(2),343-365。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.洪碧霞、蕭嘉偉、楊佩馨(20081200)。從認知負荷觀點分析國小二至四年級數與計算成就測驗。教育研究與發展期刊,4(4),151-167。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Chen, Y. H.、MacDonald, G.、Leu, Y. C.(2011)。Validating cognitive sources of mathematics item difficulty: Application of the LLTM to fraction conceptual items。The International Journal of Educational and Psychological Assessment,7(2),74-93。  new window
6.De Renzi, E.、Vignolo, L. A.(1962)。The token test: A sensitive test to detect receptive disturbance in aphasia。Brain,85,665-678。  new window
7.Embretson, S. E.(1983)。Construct validity: Construct representation versus nomothetic span。Psychological Bulletin,93(1),179-197。  new window
8.Embretson, S.(1984)。A general latent trait model for response processes。Psychometrika,49,175-186。  new window
9.Fischer, G. H.(1973)。The liner logistic test model as an instrument in educational research。ActaPsychologica,37,359-374。  new window
10.Gao, S.、Jin, Y.、Hall, K. S.、Liang, C.、Unverzagt, F. W.、Ji, R.、Hendrie, H. C.(2007)。Selenium level and cognitive function in rural elderly Chinese。American Journal of Epidemiology,165(8),955-965。  new window
11.Hahne, J.(2008)。Analyzing position effects within reasoning items using LLTM for structurally incomplete data。Psychology Science Quarterly,50,379-390。  new window
12.Kubinger, K. D.(2008)。On the revival of the Rasch model-based LLTM: From constructing tests using item generating rules to measuring item administration effects。Psychology Science Quartely,50(3),311-327。  new window
13.Orgass B.、Poeck, K.(1966)。Clinical validation of a new test for aphasia: An experimental study of the token test。Cortex,2,222-243。  new window
14.Poinstingl, H.(2009)。The Linear Logistic Test Model(LLTM)as the methodological foundation of item generation rules for a new verbal reasoning test。Psychology Science Quartely,51(2),123-134。  new window
15.Sheehan, K.、Mislevy, R. J.(1990)。Integrating cognitive and psychometric models to measure document literacy。Journal of Educational Measurement,27,255-272。  new window
16.Sonnleitner, P.(2008)。Using the LLTM to evaluate an item-generating system for reading comprehension。Psychology Science Quarterly,50,345-362。  new window
17.Wassenberg, R.、Hurks, P. P. M.、Hendriksen, J. G. M.、Feron, F. J. M.、Meijs, C. J. C.、Vies, J. S. H.、Jolles, J.(2008)。Age-related improvement in complex language comprehension: Results of a cross-sectional study with 361 children aged 5 to 15。Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology,30(4),435-448。  new window
18.Willmes, K.(1981)。A new look at the Token Test using probabilistic test models。Neuropsychologia,19,631-645。  new window
19.Xie, Y.、Wilson, M.(2008)。Investigating DIF and extensions using an LLTM approach and also an individual difference approach: An international testing context。Psychology Science Quartely,50(3),403-416。  new window
20.Yliherva, A.、Olsén, P.、Järvelin, M. R.(2001)。Linguistic skills in relation to neurological findings at 8 years of age in children born preterm。Log Phon Vocol,26,66-75。  new window
21.Zimmerman, D. W.(2007)。Correction for attenuation with biased reliability estimates and correlated errors in populations and samples。Educational and Psychological Measurement,67,920-939。  new window
22.Dimitrov, D. M.、Raykov, T.(2003)。Validation of Cognitive Structures: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach。Multivariate Behavioral Research,38(1),1-23。  new window
23.Embretson, S. E.、Daniel, R. C.(2008)。Understanding and quantifying cognitive complexity level in mathematical problem solving items。Psychology Science Quarterly,50(3),328-344。  new window
24.Embretson, S. E.、Gorin, J.(2001)。Improving construct validity with cognitive psychology principles。Journal of Educational Measurement,38(4),343-368。  new window
25.Green, K. E.、Smith, R. M.(1987)。A Comparison of Two Methods of Decomposing Item Difficulties。Journal of Educational Statistics,12(4),369-381。  new window
26.林世華、葉嘉惠(19990700)。數字系列完成測驗試題認知成分分析之研究。教育心理學報,31(1),139-165。new window  延伸查詢new window
27.Arvedson, C. J.、McNeil, M. R.、West, T.(1985)。Prediction of Revised Token Test overall, subtest, and linguistic unit scores by two shortened versions。Clinical Aphasiology,15,57-63。  new window
28.Hula, W.、Doyle, P. J.、McNeil, M. R.、Mikolic, J. M.(2006)。Rasch modeling of Revised Token Test performance: Validity and sensitivity to change。Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research,49,27-46。  new window
29.Embretson, S. E.(1998)。A cognitive design system approach to generating valid tests: Application to Abstract Reasoning。Psychological Method,3(3),380-396。  new window
30.Tatsuoka, K. K.(1983)。Rule space: An approach for dealing with misconceptions based on item response theory。Journal of Educational Measurement,20(4),345-354。  new window
31.洪碧霞、蕭嘉偉、林素微(20100100)。PISA數學素養認知成份分析對補救教學的意涵。課程與教學,13(1),47-66。new window  延伸查詢new window
32.洪碧霞、林素微、林娟如(20061200)。認知複雜度分析架構對TASA-MAT六年級線上測驗試題難度的解釋力。教育研究與發展期刊,2(4),69-86。new window  延伸查詢new window
33.丁振豐(19970600)。認知分析與心理計量分析對解平衡桿問題認知發展層次與解題運作成份測量之比較。初等教育學報,10,81-125。new window  延伸查詢new window
34.Eberwein, C. A.、Pratt, S. R.、McNeil, M. R.、Fossett, T. R. D.、Szuminsky, N. J.、Doyle, P. J.(2007)。Auditory Performance Characteristics of the Computerized Revised Token Test (CRTT)。Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research,50(4),865-877。  new window
35.Shiota, M.、Koeda, T.、Takeshita, K.(2000)。Cognitive and Neurophysiological Evaluation of Japanese Dyslexia。Brain & Development,22,421-426。  new window
36.Cohen-Mimran, R.、Sapir, S.(2007)。Deficits in Working Memory in Young Adults with Reading Disabilities。Journal of Communication Disorders,40,168-183。  new window
37.Blosser, J. L.、Weidner, W. E.、Dinero, T.(1976)。The Effect of Rate-controlled Speech on the Auditory Receptive Scores of Children with Normal and Disordered Language Abilities。The Journal of Special Education,10,291-298。  new window
研究報告
1.林月仙、曾進興(2006)。學前輕度障礙兒童口語理解測驗之發展及其相關研究(I)。高雄縣:樹德科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.林月仙、曾進興(2008)。學前輕度障礙兒童口語理解測驗之發展及其相關研究 (計畫編號:NSC 96-2413-H-366-004)。高雄縣:樹德科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.張欣戊(1991)。學前兒童語言能力的測驗 (計畫編號:NSC 79-0301-H-002-067)。臺北市:國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.陳奕秀(2008)。學前兒童色塊測驗擴充版在成人失語症的應用(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.林寶貴、錡寶香(2002)。兒童口語理解測驗指導手冊。臺北市:國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育中心。  延伸查詢new window
2.鍾玉梅、李淑娥、張妙鄕(2003)。簡明失語症測驗指導手冊。臺北市:心理。  延伸查詢new window
3.DiSimoni, F.(1978)。The Token Test for children manual。Austin, TX:Pro-ed。  new window
4.Fischer, G. H.、Ponochny-Seliger, E.(1998)。Structural Rasch modeling: Handbook of the usage of LPCM-WIN 1.0。Croningen, Netherlands:ProGAMMA。  new window
5.McGhee, R. L.、Ehrler, D. J.、DiSimoni, F.(2007)。TTFC-2: Token Test for Children Second Edition examiner’s manual。Austin, TX:Pro-ed。  new window
6.Miller, J. F.、Paul, R.(1995)。The Clinical Assessment of Language Comprehension。Baltimore, Maryland:Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.。  new window
7.洪碧霞、邱上真、葉千綺、林素微、張漢評、方金雅、王惠川、翁麗雅、黃美秀、葉峰男(1999)。國民中小學國語文成就測驗。臺北市:國立臺南師範學院測驗發展中心:教育部特殊教育工作小組。  延伸查詢new window
8.陳振宇、謝淑蘭、成戎珠、黃朝慶、洪碧霞、櫻井正二郎、吳裕益、邱上真、陳小娟、曾進興(1996)。兒童認知功能綜合測驗使用手冊。台北:教育部社教司。  延伸查詢new window
9.陸莉、劉鴻香(1994)。修訂畢保德圖畫詞彙測驗。心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.McNeil, M. R.、Prescott, T. E.(1978)。Revised Token Test。Austin, TX:Pro-ed。  new window
11.曾進興(1996)。兒童認知功能綜合測驗之七--語言測驗使用手冊。臺北市:教育部社教司。  延伸查詢new window
12.林寶貴、黃玉枝、黃桂君、宣崇慧(2008)。修訂學前兒童語言障礙評量表。臺北市:國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育中心。  延伸查詢new window
13.Linacre, J. M.(2008)。A user’s guide to Winsteps。Chicago, IL:MESA Press。  new window
其他
1.Mavridis, N.,Roy, D.(2006)。Grounded situation models for robots: Where words and percepts meet,http://media.mit.edu/cogmac/publications/IROS_2006.pdf。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE