:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:高槓桿傳統產業、代理問題與信用風險模型之實證研究
書刊名:華人經濟研究
作者:吳克 引用關係余惠芳 引用關係梁榮輝 引用關係魏利安
作者(外文):Wu, KeYu, Hui-funLiang, Jung-huiWei, Li-an
出版日期:2013
卷期:11:2
頁次:頁1-17
主題關鍵詞:財務槓桿代理問題信用風險公司治理Financial leverageAgency problemCredit riskCorporate governance
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:348
  • 點閱點閱:122
本研究以台灣上市櫃之傳統產業為研究對象,利用統計方法Logistic迴歸分析,針對資本結構之高負債比率企業,建構企業信用風險模型(Credit Risk Models)。樣本資料選取期間為2000年至2012年,共14項產業類別93組樣本資料,採Beaver(1966)之1比1配對原則,選取固定資產規模相近之同類型產業,合計共186組樣本資料進行分析。實證結果發現,影響公司績效的主要變數除了現金流量指標之外,公司治理指標亦是重要因素。研究建議,提高營業活動現金流量以增加企業流動性,能支應到期債務利息壓力,增加每股金流量比率,可改善企業的財務結構,增加投資人信心,有利於企業籌資;增強公司治理能力,考慮公司專業經理人(CEO)的經營權與股東的所有權(Ownership)分開,提高專業經營能力與公司績效。因此,本文實證價值與管理意涵為,傳統產業公司應重視公司管理階層,採分權式的雙重領導結構,提高專業經營,增強公司治理能力,有效降低信用風險發生的可能性。
This study took listed the traditional industries of Taiwan as subjects. By logistic regression statistics, Against the Debts ratio for the corporate capital structure> 50%, this study constructed a Credit Risk Models. The sample data were collected during year 2000 to 2012, including 93 sample data of 14 industry categories. By Beaver (1966) 1 to 1 matching principle, selecting the similar scale of fixed assets and the same type of industry, for a total of 186 sample data analysis.According to the fingings, the main variables of corporate performance are corporate governance except cash fiow under efficient capital markets. This study thus suggests that raising cash flow of operating activities in order to increase liguidity can slove the debt interest and increase the cash flow rate per share to improve financial structure and increase investor confidence to finance; In order to enhance the corporate governance power, considering companies with seperated management and ownership could adversely affect professional capability and corporate performance. Lastly, a seperated management and ownership arrangement would reduce the probability of credit risk.
期刊論文
1.葉銀華(19981200)。家族控股集團與股票報酬共變性之實證研究。臺大管理論叢,9(1),25-49。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.吳克、余惠芳、陳文郎、林美娟(20111200)。家族企業專業經營與信用風險模型之實證研究。全球管理與經濟,7(2),1-19。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Yu, H. F.、Liang, J. H.(2011)。Management Ownership and Corporate Performance。African Journal of Business Management,5(4),1441-1453。  new window
4.周百隆、盧俊安(2007)。以Cascaded Logistic Model建構我國企業財務危機預警模型之研究。中華管理評論國際學報,10(2),69-85。  延伸查詢new window
5.王健安(20020900)。公司治理的模式與評估。臺灣金融財務季刊,3(3),159-187。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.余惠芳、郭如秀、蔡牧婷(20121100)。CEO專業經營、代理問題與信用風險模型之實證研究。華人前瞻研究,8(2),43-63。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.陳惠玲(19980100)。定期定額投資與贖回策略。貨幣觀測與信用評等,9,27-43。  延伸查詢new window
8.Fischer, R. D.(1992)。Endogenous Probability of Protection and Firm。Behavior, Journal of International Economics,32,149-163。  new window
9.Whitaker, Richard B.(1999)。The Early Stages of Financial Distress。Journal of Economics and Finance,23(2),123-133。  new window
10.Modigliani, Franco、Mille, Merton H.(1963)。Corporate Income Taxes and the Costs of Capital: A Correction。American Economic Review,53(3),433-443。  new window
11.Barnea, A.、Haugen, R. A.、Senbet, L. W.(1981)。An equilibrium analysis of debt financing under costly tax arbitrage and agency problems。Journal of Finance,36(3),569-581。  new window
12.余惠芳、王永昌(20111200)。財務預警與公司治理--臺灣傳統產業之實證研究。應用經濟論叢,90,209-241。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.余惠芳、張士軍、黃于軒(20110900)。企業財務資訊、代理問題與信用風險模型之實證研究。華人經濟研究,9(2),1-19。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.余惠芳(20090600)。股權結構、股東權益與公司價值之實證研究。全球管理與經濟,5(1),1-21。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.許美滿、吳壽山、鍾惠民、林怡群(20041200)。控制股東代理問題對公司價值之影響與舉債之監督效果分析。會計與公司治理,1(2),67-90。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Laitinen, E.(199109)。Financial Ratios and Different Failure Process。Journal of Business Finance and Accounting,18(5),649-673。  new window
17.Beaver, W. H.(1966)。Financial Rations as Predictors of Failure in Empirical Research in Accounting: Selected Studies。Supplement to Journal of Accounting Research,4,71-111。  new window
18.Fama, Eugene F.、Jensen, Michael C.(1983)。Separation of ownership and control。The Journal of Law & Economics,26(2),301-325。  new window
19.Titman, Sheridan、Wessels, Roberto(1988)。The determinants of capital structure choice。The Journal of Finance,43(1),1-19。  new window
20.Foster, George(1977)。Quarterly Accounting Data: Time-Series Properties and Predictive Ability Results。The Accounting Review,52(1),1-21。  new window
21.Ang, James S.、Cole, Rebel A.、Lin, James Wuh(2000)。Agency Costs and Ownership Structure。Journal of Finance,55(1),81-106。  new window
22.Shleifer, Andrei、Vishny, Robert W.(1997)。A survey of corporate governance。The Journal of Finance,52(2),737-783。  new window
23.Andrade, G.、Kaplan, S. N.(1998)。How Costly is Financial (not economic) Distress? Evidence from Highly Leveraged Transactions that Became Distressed。Journal of Finance,53(5),1443-1493。  new window
24.Jensen, Michael C.、Meckling, William H.(1976)。Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure。Journal of Financial Economics,3(4),305-360。  new window
學位論文
1.林文修(2000)。演化式類神經網路危機的企業危機診斷模型:智慧資本之應用(博士論文)。國立中央大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.林建丞(1999)。財務危機公司之預警偵測(碩士論文)。東海大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.梁立衡(2007)。台灣企業財務危機預警模型之實證研究(碩士論文)。佛光大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.黃俊雄(1993)。企業財務危機預警模型在銀行授信決策之運用(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.蔡麗君(1994)。審計報告之資訊内涵--運用於信用危機之預測(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.黃文隆(1993)。財務危機預警模式建立與驗證(碩士論文)。東吳大學,台北。  延伸查詢new window
7.潘玉葉(1990)。臺灣股票上市公司財務危機預警分析(博士論文)。淡江大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.陳肇榮(1983)。運用財務比率預測企業財務危機之實證研究(博士論文)。國立政治大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Dun and Bradstreet(1978)。The Business Failure Record。New York:The Dun and Bradstreet Corporation。  new window
2.葉銀華、李存修、柯承恩(2013)。公司治理與評等系統。台北:智商文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE