:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:教師協同教學策略對國小學童表面積學習之影響與效益
書刊名:人文社會學報. 國立臺灣科技大學
作者:楊凱翔 引用關係梁立鑑譚寧君 引用關係
作者(外文):Yang, Kai-hsiangLiang, Li-chienTan, Ning-chun
出版日期:2014
卷期:10:1
頁次:頁1-28
主題關鍵詞:協同教學設計表面積教學方案設計本位Collaborative teaching designSurface areaTeaching programDesign-based research
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:31
  • 點閱點閱:40
本研究之目的為探討利用教師協同教學策略,設計及整合實體教具與數位教材的表面積教學方案,是否能有效解決國小學生學習幾何的困難。本研究採用設計本位研究法,首先組成共11人的研究團隊,包括一位數學領域專家及一位資訊教育專家,以及九位教師。而團隊中五人再組成協同教學設計團隊以設計教學方案。本研究參與者為桃園縣某國小五年級3個班及六年級1個班,共131位學生。研究期間為2012年2月至2013年5月,共計15個月。研究發現透過教師協同教學策略,可輔助教師對數學表面積的教學歷程,深入掌握表面積實際教學所涵蓋的各式問題,及制訂因應之問題解決策略。透過教學設計,讓學生展開小組合作學習,不但增進學習興趣亦可克服學習困難。此外亦發現,透過教具融合多媒體的教學設計,的確能讓學生產生學習興趣,對於學生的幾何學習產生助益,但衍生的班級經營及教具太昂貴等問題,亦是日後須克服的問題。本研究最後根據研究結果對行政單位與將要進行表面積教學的教師提出教學上的建議。
The purpose of this study was to focus on developing a teaching program for surface area that integrates physical manipulation and multimedia using a collaborative teaching design in order to solve the difficulties students face learning geometry. In the study, design-based research was adopted. First, a team consisting of eleven teachers, including a math expert, an IT education expert and nine experienced teachers, was set up. Five members of this team developed a teaching program using a collaborative teaching strategy. A total of 131 students from three fifth-grade classes and one sixth-grade class participated in the study. After the experiment, we found that the teachers' collaborative teaching design was a feasible solution. Using an appropriate teaching design can allow students to learn in small groups, not only enhancing their interest in learning but also overcoming their difficulties in learning. We found that teaching programs integrating physical manipulation and multimedia can enhance students' interest in learning and facilitate geometry learning. However, there are two drawbacks to this design. First, classroom management is a challenge, and second, the physical manipulations are expensive. The study ends with some suggestions to teachers regarding the teaching of surface area.
期刊論文
1.陳廉偉、譚寧君(2010)。發展國小資優兒童之數學教學方案--以面積概念為例。數理學科教學知能,2,45-67。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳鴻綸、曹雅玲(20051200)。國小學童在幾何問題的解題表現研究--長方體的體積和表面積為例。國教新知,52(4),65-78。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.黃幸美(20100300)。美國當代小學幾何課程發展及其對台灣幾何教學之啟示。教育資料集刊,45,233-269。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.譚寧君、沈明輝(20120200)。應用設計本位研究發展國小數學數位教材初探。國民教育,52 (3),31-38。  延伸查詢new window
5.Friend, M.、Cook, L.、Hurley-Chamberlain, D.、Shamberger, C. T.(2010)。Co-teaching: an illustration of the complexity of collaboration in special education。Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation,20(1),9-27。  new window
6.Henning, J. E.、McKeny, T.、Foley, G. D.、Balong, M.(2012)。Mathematics discussions by design: creating opportunities for purposeful participation。Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education,15(6),453-479。  new window
7.Herrenkohl, L. R.、Kawasaki, K.、Dewater, L. S.(2010)。Inside and outside: Teacher researcher collaboration。The New Educator,6(1),74-92。  new window
8.Parzysz, B.(1988)。"Knowing" vs "seeing". Problems of the plane representation of space geometry figures。Educational Studies in Mathematics,19(1),79-92。  new window
9.Pittalis, M.、Christou, C.(2010)。Types of reasoning in 3D geometry thinking and their relation with spatial ability。Educational Studies in Mathematics,75(2),191-212。  new window
10.Wang, Feng、Hannafin, Michael J.(2005)。Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments。Educational Technology Research and Development,53(4),5-23。  new window
11.Wu, H.-K.、Shah, P.(2004)。Exploring visuospatial thinking in chemistry learning。Science Education,88(3),465-492。  new window
12.張世忠、羅慧英(20090200)。協同教學對國中學生所知覺的科學教師PCK之影響。科學教育學刊,17(1),49-68。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.王素芸(20090600)。協同教學的意義、特質與類型。教育研究與發展期刊,5(2),55-79。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.林碧珍、蔡文煥(20030500)。四年級學生在國際教育成就調查試測的數學成就表現。科學教育,258,2-20。  延伸查詢new window
15.翁穎哲、譚克平(20080400)。設計研究法簡介及其在教育研究的應用範例。科學教育月刊,307,15-30。  延伸查詢new window
16.Brown, Ann L.(1992)。Design Experiments: Theoretical and Methodological Challenges in Creating Complex Interventions in Classroom Settings。Journal of the Learning Sciences,2(2),141-178。  new window
17.Cook, Lynne、Friend, Marilyn(1995)。Co-teaching: Guidelines for Creating Effective Practices。Focus on Exceptional Children,28(3),1-16。  new window
會議論文
1.王儀雅、劉祥通(2011)。增進數學試題鑑別力--從分析開放式題目的解題類型。第三屆科技與數學教育學術研討會,國立臺中教育大學數學教育學系 。台中。  延伸查詢new window
2.廖冠智、劉奕帆(2012)。空間能力訓練之魔術方塊悅趣化學習系統設計與建置。TWELF2009 台灣數位學習發展研討會,國立臺南大學 。台南:國立臺南大學。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.Williams, T.、Jocelyn, L.、Roey, S.、Kastberg, D.、Brenwald, S.、Gonzales, P.(2008)。Highlights from TIMSS 2007: Mathematics and Science Achievement of U.S. Fourth- and Eighth-Grade Students in an International Context (計畫編號:NCES 2009-001)。Washington, DC:US Department of Education。  new window
學位論文
1.江重輝(2008)。國小長方體表面積之補充教學(碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳毓梅(2011)。不同教具教學環境對國小一年級學生學習立方體積木堆疊計數的影響(碩士論文)。中原大學,桃園市。  延伸查詢new window
3.吳明郁(2004)。國小四年級學童空間能力學習的研究:以立體幾何展開圖為例(碩士論文)。國立臺北師範學院,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.徐振邦、梁文蓁、吳曉青、陳儒晰、Cohen, L.、Manion, L.、Marrison, Keith(2010)。最新教育研究法。韋伯文化。  延伸查詢new window
2.Guion, L. A.(2002)。Triangulation: establishing the validity of qualitative studies。Gainesville:Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida。  new window
3.Henning, J. E.(2008)。The art of discussion-based teaching: Opening up conversation in the classroom。New York:Routledge。  new window
4.Murawski, W. W.(2010)。Collaborative teaching in elementary schools: making the co-teaching marriage work!。CA:Corwin Press。  new window
5.江吟梓、蘇文賢、Lichtman, M.(2010)。教育質性硏究:實用指南。台北:學富。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.張倩葦(2007)。設計研究:促進教育技術研究的方法論,http://jyjs.e21.cn/e21web/content.php?acticle_id=367, 2013/03/12。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Reeves, T.、Akker, J.、Gravemeijer, K.、McKenney, S.、Nieveen, N.(2006)。Design research from the technology perspective。Educational design research。London:Routledge。  new window
2.Berthelot, R.、Salin, M. H.(1998)。The role of pupil’s spatial knowledge in the elementary teaching of geometry。Perspectives on the teaching of geometry for the 21st century。Dordrecht:Kluwer。  new window
3.Clements, D.、Battista, M.(1992)。Geometry and spacial reasoning。Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning。New York:Macmillan Publishing Company。  new window
4.Reimann, P.(2011)。Design-based research。Methodological Choice and Design。NY:Springer。  new window
5.Wadkins, T.、Wozniak, W.、Miller, R. L.(2004)。Team teaching models。UNK/CTE: Compendium of teaching resources and ideas。NE:University of Nebraska at Kearney。  new window
6.Duval, R.(1998)。Geometry from a Cognitive Point of View。Perspective on the Teaching of Geometry for the 21st Century。Dordrecht:Kluwer。  new window
7.Clements, D. H.(2003)。Teaching and learning geometry。A Research Companion to Principles and Standards for School Mathematics。National Council of Teachers of Mathematics。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE