:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:揭露下課十分鐘的秘密:國小六年級學生遊戲的階級意義
書刊名:教育與心理研究
作者:鄭英傑 引用關係張建成 引用關係
作者(外文):Jheng, Ying-jieChang, Jason Chien-chen
出版日期:2014
卷期:37:3
頁次:頁93-120
主題關鍵詞:下課時間同儕團體身分認同階級遊戲BreakPeer groupIdentitySocial classPlay and games
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:7
  • 點閱點閱:29
本研究旨在了解社會文化因素(尤以階級為主軸)對學生遊戲的影響,以及學生透過遊戲所型塑之身分認同。為達上述目的,先選取一所位於階級混雜學區的國小,再從中挑選一班六年級學生為研究對象,透過觀察與訪談,蒐集實徵資料。本研究發現,中產階級遊戲團體的遊戲性質較有「學術性」,反觀勞動階級遊戲團體,則較有「肢體性」。不同階級屬性的遊戲性質,在學校脈絡下的意義有所不同,中產階級遊戲團體是順從學校規定進行遊戲,但勞動階級遊戲團體則是遊走於學校規定邊緣進行遊戲。不同遊戲團體之間,因為身分認同作用,有「涇渭分明」的現象,而各遊戲團體內部則有階級「淨化」作用。
The study was designed to analyze the influence of socio-cultural factors, especially focusing on social class, on the sixth graders’ play and games as well as how students create their identities accordingly. To this end, after choosing an elementary school in an area where different classes coexist, a class of sixth graders was selected as research participants. The study adopted classroom observation and interviews to collect the empirical data. According to the research findings, the attributes of middle-class students’ play and games tend to be more academic while their working-class counterparts’ play and games tend to be more athletic. Furthermore, considering the meanings of the play and games of students from dissimilar social backgrounds within the field of the school, middles-class students’ play and games follow the rules of the school whereas working-class students may break the rules of the school. Each play group has its own self-identity, which strengthens the separation and constitution of each group, and also shows the phenomenon of “class purification.”
期刊論文
1.Alder, Patricia A.、Adler, Peter(1996)。Preadolescent Clique Stratification and the Hierarchy of Identity。Sociological Inquiry,66(2),111-142。  new window
2.Kehily, M. J.、Pattman, R.(2006)。Middle-class struggle? Identity-work and leisure among sixth formers in the United Kingdom。British Journal of Sociology of Education,27(1),37-52。  new window
3.Udwin, O.、Shmukler, D.(1981)。The influence of sociocultural, economic and home background factors on children’s ability to engage in imaginative play。Development Psychology,17(1),66-72。  new window
4.林郡雯、張建成(20081200)。不同階級國中生之文憑意象的探究。當代教育研究,16(4),199-235。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Fein, G.、Stork, L.(1981)。Sociodramatic play: Social class effects in integrated preschool classrooms。Journal of Applied Development Psychology,2(3),267-279。  new window
6.Langlois, J. H.、Downs, A. C.(1980)。Mothers, fathers, and peers as socialization agents of sex-typed play behaviors in young children。Children Development,51(4),1217-1247。  new window
學位論文
1.黃淑君(2000)。社會階級與青少年性別世界之建構--以台北都會區兩所國中為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.陳奎憙(2004)。現代教育社會學。臺北市:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
2.Blatchford, P.、Pellegrini, A. D.(2003)。The child at school: Interactions with peers and teachers。New York, NY:Oxford University Press。  new window
3.Bramham, C. C. P.、Tomlinson, A.(1995)。Sociology of leisure: A reader。London, UK:E & F. N. Spon。  new window
4.Opie, I.(1969)。Childrens games in street and playground。London, UK:Oxford University Press。  new window
5.Roberts, K.(1981)。Leisure。New York, NY:Longman。  new window
6.Schwartzman, H. B.(1978)。Transformations: The anthropology of childrens play。New York, NY:Plenum。  new window
7.Cratty, B. J.(1986)。Perceptual and motor development in infants and children。Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall。  new window
8.Ibrahim, Hilmi(1991)。Leisure and society: A comparative approach。Dubuque, IA:Wm. C. Brown。  new window
9.Frost, Joe L.、Wortham, Sue C.、Reifel, Stuart(2001)。Play and Child Development。Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice-Hall。  new window
10.Corsaro, William A.(1997)。The sociology of childhood。Thousand Oaks, CA:Pine Forge Press。  new window
11.Veblen, Thorstein(1994)。The Theory of the Leisure Class。New York, NY:Dover Publications。  new window
12.黃鴻文(2003)。國民中學學生文化之民族誌研究。臺北市:學富文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
13.陳淑敏(2005)。幼兒遊戲。台北:心理。  延伸查詢new window
14.吳幸玲(2003)。兒童遊戲與發展。臺北市:揚智文化事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
15.Parker, J. S.(1976)。The sociology of leisure。London:Allen and Unwin。  new window
16.Johnson, James E.、Christie, James F.、Yawkey, Thomas D.、吳幸玲、郭靜晃(2003)。兒童遊戲:遊戲發展的理論與實務。揚智文化事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
17.Corrigan, P.(1979)。Schooling the smash street kids。London:Macmillan。  new window
18.Bourdieu, Pierre(1984)。Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste。Harvard University Press。  new window
19.Willis, Paul E.(1977)。Learning to Labor: How Working Class Kids Get Working Class Jobs。New York, NY:Columbia University Press。  new window
20.Bourdieu, Pierre、Passeron, Jean-Claude、Nice, Richard、Bottomore, Tom(1977)。Reproduction in education, society and culture。Sage。  new window
21.Bourdieu, Pierre、Nice, Richard(1977)。Outline of a Theory of Practice。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Davidson, J. I. F.(1998)。Language and play: Natural partners。Play from birth to twelve and beyond: Contexts, perspectives, and meanings。New York, NY:Garland。  new window
2.Johnson, J. E.(1986)。Attitudes toward play and beliefs about development。Cultural dimensions of play, games, and sport。Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics Publishers。  new window
3.King, N. R.(1987)。Researching play in school。Meaningful play, playful meaning。Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics。  new window
4.Miracle, A. W.、Rowan, B.、Suggs, D. N.(1984)。Play activities and elementary school peer groups。The masks of play。New York, NY:Leisure Press。  new window
5.Slaughter, D. T.、Dombrowski, J.(1989)。Cultural continuities and discontinuities: Impact on social and pretend play。The ecological context of children's play。Norwood, NJ:Ablex。  new window
6.Bourdieu, P.(1986)。The forms of capital。Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education。Greenwood Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE