適地適性的設施配置一直是景觀規劃設計的重點，而設施物的色彩更是影響環境觀感的重要因子。然而色彩環境適合度的相關研究及準則多著眼於視覺上的適合程度，較少考慮地點的功能與意義上的影響。因此本研究之目的便是為了暸解自然環境中設施色彩環境適合度的評估除了受視覺調和的影響外，是否也會因為地點意義之不同而改變色彩適宜性的評估。本研究以電腦模擬不同色彩之涼亭於相同背景之景觀照片，利用網路問卷讓受測者進行色彩環境適合度評估。受測者評估時，所觀看的景觀照會被隨機標示為代表不同開發程度的國家公園、生態保護區、風景區、遊憩區、或無標籤等五種處理。研究結果顯示，涼亭的色彩之環境適合度及景觀偏好確實會因地點標籤之不同而有所差異，以遊憩區最高而風景區得分最低；但是色彩與標籤間並沒有顯著的交互作用，表示研究中所使用之色彩並沒特別適合用於某些地點標籤；而不同地點標籤所適合或偏好的涼亭色彩種類多寡並沒有明顯差異。研究同時也發現當受測者越同意景觀符合所賦予的標籤時，對設施色彩的環境適合度及偏好會越高。本研究初步証明了地點意義對於設施物色彩環境適合度及偏好的影響力，相關結果將可應用於環境色彩計畫或是環境影響評估之中。

Environment fitness of facilities' color has been one of the most important issues for landscape planning and design. However, existing literature were mostly focusing on the visual aspects of compatibility. It is still unclear if the judgments of environmental fitness would be influenced by the meanings of place. An online photo-based survey was conducted to understand people's judgments of fitness toward the same pavilion with different colors in the same landscape background. Each respondent were randomly assigned one out of four place labels (national park, ecological protection area, scenic area and recreational area) for the landscape background in the picture. Results showed the fitness and preference for different colored pavilion will be significantly changed while given different place labels. The label of recreational area will significantly increase fitness and preference, and scenic area will decrease them. However, there was no significant difference between the numbers of appropriate or preferred colors in different place labels. Besides, preference and fitness of the colored pavilions were also found to be influenced by the judgment of typicality for the assigned label. The current study documented the influence of place meanings on the fitness and preference of facilities' colors in landscapes. The results will contribute to environmental color scheme or environment impact evaluations.