臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：以眺望、躲藏、脫逃評估安全知覺之類型--以國小校園為例
書刊名：造園景觀學報
作者：張淑貞 引用關係／何曉萍 引用關係
作者(外文)：Chang, Shu-chen／Ho, Shiao-ping
出版日期：2013
卷期：19:3
頁次：頁35-53
主題關鍵詞：校園安全；照片評估；犯罪恐懼感；安全空間特質；Campus safety；Photo evaluation；Fear of crime；Characteristics of safe space
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:50
  • 點閱點閱:22
提供一個安全的學習環境是學校最基本之條件，目前有關校園安全維護的策略，大多忽略了「空間」面向。根據環境犯罪學觀點，空間環境雖不會直接造成犯罪，但往往扮演著誘導及提供犯罪的機會；而犯罪恐懼感就是人們對危險環境的一種反應機制。因此，若能了解校園內哪種空間特質會影響安全知覺，將有助於透過環境設計來提升安全感和預防犯罪。本研究目的為探討「眺望」、「躲藏」、「脫逃」等三種空間特質是否會交互影響安全知覺，並提出以此三因子評估受害者安全知覺之類型。本研究以台中市某一國民小學校園做為實證基地，以照片評估方法來測量學童安全知覺，有效樣本共351位。研究結果顯示：(1)眺望、躲藏、脫逃對安全知覺具有顯著交互影響，可知人們對環境安全感知的判斷，同時會受到此三項空間特質的影響，並非僅受到單獨一項或二項因子之影響。(2)眺望、躲藏、脫逃的高低對安全知覺具有顯著差異，其中眺望高、躲藏低、脫逃高的環境給人的安全感最高。(3)以眺望、躲藏、脫逃的高低組合提出一個可評估受害者安全知覺之類型，安全等級可分為五種：最安全、中度安全、中度不安全、不安全、最不安全。
To provide a safe learning environment is the most basic condition for schools. Currently, the strategies related with campus security protections mostly ignore the ＂spatial＂ aspects. According to the viewpoint of the environmental criminology, though the spatial environments cannot cause crimes directly, they usually play the induced roles and provide crimes with opportunities. And, the fear of crime is one of reactive mechanisms while people are confronted by the dangerous environments. Therefore, if it enables to understand which spatial characteristic on campus could affect the safety perception, it would help improving the sense of security and preventing crimes through the environmental designs. This study aims at exploring whether the three spatial characteristics, ＂prospect＂, ＂refuge＂ and ＂escape＂, could interwork the safety perception, and also addressing the categories of safety perceptions by using the evaluation of victims through these three factors. We use one elementary school campus in Taichung City as case study, and calculate the safety perception of students by the method of photo evaluation receiving a total of 351 valid samples. The results show that: (1) Prospect, refuge and escape, interwork the safety perception significantly, and it is knowable that these three spatial characteristics influence people's judgments on the sense of security to the environments at the same time. Not only by one or two factors alone effect. (2) The high or low degrees of prospect, refuge and escape, clearly distinguish the safety perception. The environments with high prospect, low refuge, and high escape, give people the highest sense of security. (3) Using the high-low combinations of prospect, refuge and escape, raises a category of safety perceptions for evaluating victims. The security levels can be divided into 5 categories：the most security, moderate security, moderate insecurity, insecurity, and the most insecurity.
期刊論文
1.Fekkes, M.、Pijpers, F. I. M.、Vereloove-Vanhorick, S. P.(2005)。Bullying: Who does what, when and where? Involvement of children, teachers and parents in bullying behavior。Health Education Research，20(1)，81-91。  new window
2.李素馨、張淑貞(20060300)。都市街道特性與被搶恐懼感之研究。造園學報，12(1)，41-58。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.張淑貞(20110600)。觀賞者對農村道路景觀之認知。造園景觀學報，17(2)，1-22。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Blobaum, A.、Hunecke, M.(2005)。Perceived danger in urban public space: The impact of physical features and personal features。Environment and Behavior，37(4)，465-486。  new window
5.Borg, M. G.(1999)。The extent and nature of bullying among primary and secondary schoolchildren。Educational Research，41(2)，137-153。  new window
6.Loewen, L. J.、Steel, G. D.、Suedfeld, P.(1993)。Perceived safety from crime in the urban environment。Journal of Environmental Psychology，13(4)，323-331。  new window
7.Newman, O.、Franck, K. A.(1982)。The effects of building size on personal crime and fear of crime。Population and Environment，5，203-220。  new window
8.Petherick, N.(2000)。Environmental Design and Fear: The Prospect-Refuge Model and the University College of the Cariboo Campus。Western Geography，10/11，89-112。  new window
9.Herzog, T. R.、Flynn-Smith, J. A.(2001)。Preference and perceived danger as a function of the perceived curvature, length, and width of urban alleys。Environment and Behavior，33(5)，653-666。  new window
10.Nasar, J. L.、Fisher, B.、Grannis, M.(1993)。Proximate physical cues to fear of crime。Landscape and urban planning，26(1-4)，161-178。  new window
11.Schroeder, H. W.、Anderson, L. M.(1984)。Perception of personal safety in urban recreation sites。Journal of Leisure Research，16(2)，178-194。  new window
12.Keane, C.(1998)。Evaluating the Influence of Fear of Crime as an Environmental Mobility Restrictor on Women's Routine Activity。Environment and Behavior，30(1)，60-74。  new window
13.林晏州(20011200)。行道樹景觀美質之評估。造園學報，7(2)，71-97。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Nasar, J. L.、Hong, X.(1999)。Visual Preferences in Urban Signscapes。Environment and Behavior，31(5)，671-691。  new window
15.Shafer, E. L.、Hamilton, J. F.、Schmidt, E. A.(1969)。Natural landscape preferences: A predictive model。Journal of Leisure Research，1(1)，1-19。  new window
16.劉芝伶、賴香如(20090600)。臺北市國中八年級學生知覺學校氣氛與危害健康行為研究。健康促進與衛生教育學報，31，31-50。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.Box, Steven、Hale, Chris、Andrews, Glen(1988)。Explaining Fear of Crime。British Journal of Criminology，28(3)，340-356。  new window
18.Sheet, V. L.、Manzer, C. D.(1991)。Affect, cognition, and urban vegetation: some effects of adding trees along city streets。Environment and Behavior，23(3)，285-304。  new window
19.李素馨(19990600)。都市視覺景觀偏好之研究。都市與計劃，26(1)，19-40。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.李懿芳、江芳盛、蔡佳燕(20101200)。校園安全觀感與國小學生數學及科學學業成就之相關研究。教育學刊，35，99-128。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.Fisher, B. S.、Nasar, J. L.(1992)。Fear of crime in relation to three exterior site features: Prospect, refuge, and escape。Environment & Behavior，24(1)，35-65。  new window
研究報告
1.Burgess, J.(1994)。The Politics of Trust: Reducing Fear of Crime in Urban Park。London：Comedia。  new window
學位論文
1.范尹柔(2010)。國小校園圍牆改造與師生安全感認同度之研究--以台南市為例(碩士論文)。國立成功大學，台南。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃振賢(2011)。國小學生班級同儕關係與霸凌行為相關之研究(碩士論文)。國立屏東教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.吳玫芳(2005)。以女性安全觀點探討校園空間規劃之研究--以中國科技大學為例(碩士論文)。中國技術學院，台北市。  延伸查詢new window
4.Fernandez, M.(2005)。Crime Prevention and the Perception of Safety in Campus Design(碩士論文)。Louisiana State University。  new window
5.李雅君(201006)。嘉義市國小高年級學生校園被霸凌現況與影響之研究(碩士論文)。國立中正大學，嘉義。  延伸查詢new window
6.吳長穎(2002)。國小兒童校園環境知覺、被害經驗與被害恐懼感之關聯性研究(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.張惠玲(2006)。臺北市國民小學校園空間之研究--以性別使用觀點(碩士論文)。國立政治大學，臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
8.邱逸華(1999)。女性大學生犯罪被害恐懼感之研究：整合模式之實證分析(碩士論文)。國立中正大學，嘉義縣。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Abrahamsen, D.(1967)。The psychology of crime。New York：Columbia University Press。  new window
2.Appleton, J.(1975)。The experience of place。London：Wiley。  new window
3.Florida Department of Education(2003)。Florida safe school design guidelines strategies to enhance security and reduce vandalism。Tallahassee：F L.。  new window
4.Golledge, R. G.、Stimson, R. J.(1997)。Spatial Behaviour: A Geographic Perspective。New York：The Guilford Press。  new window
5.Schneider, T.(2001)。Safer Schools through Environmental Design。Oregon：ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Management, University of Oregon, Eugene.。  new window
6.Brantingham, Paul J.、Brantingham, Patricia L.(1981)。Environmental Criminology。Sage。  new window
7.Goffman, E.(1971)。Relations in public: Micro studies of the public order。New York：Harper and Row。  new window
8.Merrill, P. F.、Hammons, K.、Vincent, B. R.、Reynolds, P. L.、Christensen, L. B.(1996)。Computer in education。Boston：Allyn & Bacon。  new window
9.Newman, O.(1972)。Defensible Space : Crime Prevention Through Urban Design。New York：Collier Books。  new window
10.Jacobs, Jane(1961)。The Death and Life of Great American Cities。New York, NY：McGraw-Hill。  new window
11.Norman, W. H.、Leslie, H. M.、王錦堂(1987)。環境心理學。臺北：茂榮圖書。  延伸查詢new window
12.Jeffery, C. Ray(1977)。Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design。Beverly Hills, CA：Sage。  new window
圖書論文
1.畢恆達(1995)。婦女與都市公共空間安全--文獻回顧。性別與空間。臺北：性別與空間研究室。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1033（臺灣：1031，外國：2） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1641614 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67438575
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上