:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣生物科技產業市場結構、政府持股與成本效率關係之研究
書刊名:經濟與管理論叢
作者:陳振銘盛子駿 引用關係楊永列
作者(外文):Chen, Chen-mingSheng, Tzu-chunYang, Yung-lieh
出版日期:2015
卷期:11:1
頁次:頁69-100
主題關鍵詞:市場結構政府持股成本效率臺灣生物科技產業隨機共同邊界模型Market structureGovernment shareholdingCost efficiencyTaiwan biotech industryStochastic meta frontier model
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:115
  • 點閱點閱:11
生技產業涵蓋範圍甚廣,不同領域術、廠商特性及對環境變遷之調適情況差異 生技產業涵蓋範圍甚廣,不同領域術、廠商特性及對環境變遷之調適情況差異 生技產業涵蓋範圍甚廣,不同領域術、廠商特性及對環境變遷之調適情況差異 生技產業涵蓋範圍甚廣,不同領域術、廠商特性及對環境變遷之調適情況差異 生技產業涵蓋範圍甚廣,不同領域術、廠商特性及對環境變遷之調適情況差異 生技產業涵蓋範圍甚廣,不同領域術、廠商特性及對環境變遷之調適情況差異 生技產業涵蓋範圍甚廣,不同領域術、廠商特性及對環境變遷之調適情況差異 甚大。為正確評量生技產業廠商經營效率,以及謀求解決對策則需視此一差異性有鑑於此,本文將生技產業劃分為製藥、醫療器材二群組採用 有鑑於此,本文將生技產業劃分為製藥、醫療器材二群組採用 有鑑於此,本文將生技產業劃分為製藥、醫療器材二群組採用 有鑑於此,本文將生技產業劃分為製藥、醫療器材二群組採用 有鑑於此,本文將生技產業劃分為製藥、醫療器材二群組採用 有鑑於此,本文將生技產業劃分為製藥、醫療器材二群組採用 有鑑於此,本文將生技產業劃分為製藥、醫療器材二群組採用 Huang HuangHuangHuang et et et al . (201 1) 1) 所發展之隨機共同邊界模型 (HHL 模型 ),設立隨機邊界迴歸模型推估共同 成 本邊界, 邊界, 排除環境變數之影響,以期真實反映廠商效率表現。 排除環境變數之影響,以期真實反映廠商效率表現。 排除環境變數之影響,以期真實反映廠商效率表現。 排除環境變數之影響,以期真實反映廠商效率表現。 整體生技產業平均共同成本效率 (MCE) 值達0.7241,亦即存在27.59%的成本無效率,其中生技製藥業平均共同成本效率值達0.7496,略高於醫療器材產業之0.7002。實證結果發現,透過政府透過 持股生技公司,對促進產業整體成本效率具正面貢獻。考慮差異方實證結 持股生技公司,對促進產業整體成本效率具正面貢獻。考慮差異方實證結 持股生技公司,對促進產業整體成本效率具正面貢獻。考慮差異方實證結 持股生技公司,對促進產業整體成本效率具正面貢獻。考慮差異方實證結 持股生技公司,對促進產業整體成本效率具正面貢獻。考慮差異方實證結 持股生技公司,對促進產業整體成本效率具正面貢獻。考慮差異方實證結 持股生技公司,對促進產業整體成本效率具正面貢獻。考慮差異方實證結 果指出,廠商研發活動對生技製藥產業及醫療器材成本效率均具顯著正向關係。而 果指出,廠商研發活動對生技製藥產業及醫療器材成本效率均具顯著正向關係。而 果指出,廠商研發活動對生技製藥產業及醫療器材成本效率均具顯著正向關係。而 果指出,廠商研發活動對生技製藥產業及醫療器材成本效率均具顯著正向關係。而 果指出,廠商研發活動對生技製藥產業及醫療器材成本效率均具顯著正向關係。而 代理問題與成本效率關 係,在生技製藥產業「利益收斂」假說獲得實證支持。醫療器 係,在生技製藥產業「利益收斂」假說獲得實證支持。醫療器 係,在生技製藥產業「利益收斂」假說獲得實證支持。醫療器 係,在生技製藥產業「利益收斂」假說獲得實證支持。醫療器 係,在生技製藥產業「利益收斂」假說獲得實證支持。醫療器 係,在生技製藥產業「利益收斂」假說獲得實證支持。醫療器 係,在生技製藥產業「利益收斂」假說獲得實證支持。醫療器材產業,則視代理變數而定。
Based on the two-step stochastic Meta frontier model developed by Huang et al. (2011), this study establishes translog cost functions. Our purpose is to estimate the performance of firms in terms of cost efficiency in Taiwan’s biotech and pharmaceutical industry, and to analyze group-specific and firm-specific environmental variables. The empirical results show that the value of the Meta frontier cost efficiency (MCE) indicator of the industry is 0.7241, indicating that it is basically 27.59% cost inefficient. The value of MCE in the pharmaceutical industry (0.7496) is higher than that in the medical equipment industry (0.7002). The empirical results also show that the cost efficiency of Taiwan’s biotech firms can positively benefit from the government’s contributions. In considering the differences between sub-industries, R&D activities are found to promote the growth of cost efficiency in both the pharmaceutical industry and medical equipment industry. As for the relationship between agency issues and cost efficiency, support is found for the Convergence-of-Interest Hypothesis in the pharmaceutical industry.
期刊論文
1.汪倩人、賴廷松(20081000)。研究發展、專利與健保合作對於廠商經營績效的影響--臺灣生物科技產業之研究。朝陽商管評論,7(4),25-48。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.葉彩蓮、陳澤義、陳晴榆(20070900)。資本結構、所有權結構與成本效率之研究--以臺灣生物科技產業為例。臺灣金融財務季刊,8(3),45-64。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.顏晃平、張靜文、吳榮杰(20081200)。臺灣農會信用部成本效率之研究--共同邊界函數應用。應用經濟論叢,84,159-193。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.林江亮、鄭菽萱(20061100)。政府持股與公司價值之關聯性研究。當代會計,7(2),237-260。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.邱永和、胡均立、曹嘉麟(20031200)。臺灣生物科技廠商之成本效率分析。農業與經濟,31,55-78。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Battese, George E.、Rao, D. S. Prasada(20020800)。Technology Gap, Efficiency, and a Stochastic Metafrontier Function。International Journal of Business and Economics,1(2),87-93。new window  new window
7.Battese, G. E.、Prasada Rao, D. S.、O'Donnell, C. J.(2004)。A Metafrontier Production Function for Estimation of Technical Efficiencies and Technology Gaps for Firms Operating Under Different Technologies。Journal of Productivity Analysis,21(1),91-103。  new window
8.李揚、李曉娟(20080600)。亞洲生技產業之總要素生產力解析--應用隨機邊界模型。農業與資源經濟,5(1),55-76。  延伸查詢new window
9.Badunenko, O.(2010)。Downsizing in the German Chemical Manufacturing Industry during the 1990s. Why is Small Beautiful?。Small Business Economics,34,413-431。  new window
10.Bain, J. S.(1951)。Relation of Profit Rate to Industry Concentration。Quarterly Journal of Economics,65,293-324。  new window
11.Berger, A. N.(1995)。The Profit-Structure Relationship in Banking-Tests of Market-Power and Efficient-Structure Hypotheses。Journal of Money, Credit and Banking,27(2),404-431。  new window
12.Berger, A. N.、Harman, T. H.(1998)。The Efficiency Cost of Market Power in the Banking Industry: A Test of the 'Quiet Life' and Related Hypotheses。Review of Economics and Statistics,80,454-465。  new window
13.Bhagwat, Y.、DeBmine, M.(2011)。R&D and Advertising Efficiencies in the Pharmaceutical Industry。International Journal of Applied Economics,8,55-65。  new window
14.Chen, M. F.、Hu, J. L.、Ding, C. G.(2005)。Efficiency and Productivity of Taiwan's Biotech Industry。International Journal of Biotechnology,7(4),307-322。  new window
15.De Borger, B.、Kerstens, K.(1996)。Cost Efficiency of Belgian Local Governments: A Comparative Analysis of FDH, DEA and Econometric Approaches。Regional Science and Urban Economics,26,145-170。  new window
16.Demsetz, H.(1973)。Industry Structure, Market Rivalry and Public Policy。Journal of Law and Economics,16,1-9。  new window
17.Erickson, G.、Jacobson, R.(1992)。Gaining Comparative Advantage through Discretionary Expenditures: The Returns to R&D and Advertising。Management Science,38,1264-1279。  new window
18.Jensen, M. C.、Meckling, W. H.(1976)。Theory of the Firm: Management Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure。Journal of Financial Economics,3(4),305-360。  new window
19.Kenney, M.(1986)。Schumpeterian Innovation and Entrepreneurs in Capitalism: A Case Study of the U. S. Biotechnology Industry。Research Policy,15,22-31。  new window
20.Keraniidoiu, I.、Mimis, A.、Pappa, E.(2011)。Efficiency Analysis of Sausage Industry: Evidence from Greece。African Journal of Business Management,5,7142-7149。  new window
21.Lau, L. J.、Yotopoulos, P. A.(1989)。The Meta-Production Function Approach to Technological Change in World Agriculture。Journal of Development Economics,31,241-269。  new window
22.Mazumdar, Mainak、Rajeev, Meenakshi(20090800)。Comparing the Efficiency and Productivity of the Indian Pharmaceutical Firms: A Malmquist-Meta-Frontier Approach。International Journal of Business and Economics,8(2),159-181。new window  new window
23.McConnell, J.、Servaes, H.(1990)。Additional Evidence on Equity Ownership and Corporate Value。Journal of Financial Economics,27(2),595-613。  new window
24.Simar, L.、Wilson, P. W.(2007)。Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes。Journal of Econometrics,136(1),31-64。  new window
25.You, Taewoo、Chen, Xiaoying、Holder, Mark E.(2010)。Efficiency and its Determinants in Pharmaceutical Industries: Ownership, R&D and Scale Economy。Applied Economics,42,2217-2241。  new window
26.Battese, George E.、Coelli, Timothy J.(1995)。A Model for Technical Inefficiency Effects in a Stochastic Frontier Production Function for Panel Data。Empirical Economics,20(2),325-332。  new window
27.O'Donnell, Christopher J.、Rao, D. S. Prasada、Battese, George E.(2008)。Metafrontier Frameworks for the Study of Firm-Level Efficiencies and Technology Ratios。Empirical Economics,34(2),231-255。  new window
28.Morck, Randall、Shleifer, Andrei、Vishny, Robert W.(1988)。Management Ownership and Market Valuation: An Empirical Analysis。Journal of Financial Economics,20(1/2),293-315。  new window
29.楊志海、陳忠榮(20020300)。研究發展,專利與生產力--臺灣製造業的實證研究。經濟論文叢刊,30(1),27-48。new window  延伸查詢new window
30.Shepherd, William G.(1986)。Tobin's Q and the Structure-Performance Relationship: Comment。American Economic Review,76(5),1203-1209。  new window
31.Jensen, Michael C.、Ruback, Richard S.(1983)。The market for corporate control: The scientific evidence。Journal of Financial Economics,11(1-4),5-50。  new window
32.Demsetz, Harold、Lehn, Kenneth(1985)。The Structure of Corporate Ownership: Causes and Consequences。Journal of Political Economy,93(6),1155-1177。  new window
會議論文
1.李東杰、吳嘉尉、李孟純(2011)。應用隨機性統計邊界法與決策樹進行生物科技上市。台灣效率與生產力學會2011年年會。台北。  延伸查詢new window
2.林灼榮、林正祥、張正忠、黃國信(2007)。台灣生技製藥產業效率結構、市場力量與獲利能力之攸關性探討。台灣經濟學會與北美華人經濟學會2007年聯合年會。台北。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.Fuerst, O.、Kang, S.(2000)。Corporate Governance, Expected Operating Performance, and Pricing。New Haven:Yale School of Management。  new window
2.Huang, C. J.、Huang, T. H.、Liu, N. H.(2011)。A New Approach to Estimating the Metafrontier Production Function Based on a Stochastic Frontier Framework。  new window
3.Lee, S.、Ryu, K.(2003)。Management Ownership and Firm's Value: An Empirical Analysis Using Panel Data。The Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University。  new window
4.Ngobo, P. V.、Gatignon, H.(2012)。Explaining Cross-Country Differences in the Effects of R&D Expenditures on Risk and Stock Returns。INSEAD。  new window
學位論文
1.Sheng, T. C.(2008)。An Empirical Investigation of the Cost Efficiency, Factors and Economies/ Diseconomies of Scale Effects in Taiwan's Biotech-Pharmaceutical Industry: A Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA) Approach(碩士論文)。Northwestern Polytechnic University。  new window
圖書
1.湯谷清(2010)。我國明星產業競爭優勢及市場利基研究-委託計畫生技及國際醫療。台北:財團法人生物技術開發中心。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃鏡如、傅祖壇、黃美瑛(2008)。績效評估--效率與生產力之理論與應用。台北:新陸書局。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.台灣經濟研究院(2011)。100年度台灣生技相關產業調查統計摘要,台北:台灣經濟研究院生物科技產業研究中心。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE