:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:香港小學中文科準教師在閱讀課給學生口頭回饋之研究
書刊名:教育研究與發展期刊
作者:廖佩莉
作者(外文):Liu, Pui-lee
出版日期:2015
卷期:11:1
頁次:頁33-55
主題關鍵詞:口頭回饋教師主導的回饋學生為本的回饋促進學習的評估準教師Oral feedbackTeacher-directed feedbackStudent-centered feedbackAssessment for learningPre-service teachers
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:6
  • 點閱點閱:56
「促進學習的評估」是近年世界各國課程改革的重要項目。實踐「促進學習的評估」的理念,Black 和 William 提議一種常用的方法是教師在日常教學上多注意給予學生回饋。研究者常有機會視導準教師的教學,但他們卻未能有效運用回饋促進學生的學習。因此本研究旨在探討香港中國語文準教師在閱讀課是怎樣給予學生口頭回饋和他們給予學生回饋時做得不足的地方。研究對象是二十位修讀香港教育學院小學榮譽教育學士的準教師,研究者在他們實習期間和他們觀課並進行錄像分析,然後邀請六位作訪談。研究發現大多數準教師給予學生教師主導的回饋,較少運用學生為本的回饋。準教師未能善用學生的回應,也欠缺多元化的追問。本文最後提出建議,希望藉此提升準教師給予學生口頭回饋的效能。
“Assessment for learning” is regarded as an important issue in recent educational reform in the world. Black and William have suggested that one of the methods to implement “Assessment for learning” is to give feedback to students in daily lessons. The researcher has many opportunities to supervise the Chinese Language pre-service teachers during the teaching practice. However, they cannot give feedback to students effectively in the reading lessons. This research aims at finding how the pre-service teachers give feedbacks to students and to explore their shortcomings. Twenty pre-service Chinese Language teachers are invited to participate in this research, their lessons are recorded and analyzed. Six teachers are interviewed. Findings indicate that most pre-service Chinese language teachers use the “teacher-directed feedback”, but seldom use “student-centered feedback”. They cannot fully make use of the diversified chasing questions as feedback to facilitate students’ learning. At the end of the paper, some suggestions are made to the pre-service teachers in order to improve the quality of using oral feedback.
期刊論文
1.祝新華(20090300)。閱讀教學提問中的追問系統探討。中國語文通訊,85/86,3-13。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Sadler, Royce(1998)。Formative assessment and improvement of academic learning。Journal of Higher Education,54,60-79。  new window
3.Yorke, Mantz(2003)。Formative assessment in higher education: moves towards theory and the enhancement of pedagogic practice。Higher Education,45,477-501。  new window
4.Burke, D.(2009)。Strategies for using feedback students bring to higher education。Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education,34(1),41-50。  new window
5.Kluger, A. N.、DeNisi, A.(1996)。The effect of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory。Psychological Bulletin,119,254-284。  new window
6.Lee, I.(2008)。Student reactions to teacher feedback: Hong Kong secondary classrooms。Journal of Second Language Writing,17(3),144-164。  new window
7.Mackey, A.(2006)。Noticing and instructed second language learning。Applied Linguistics,27(3),405-430。  new window
8.Poulos, A.、Mathony, M. J.(2008)。Effectiveness of feedback: The students' perspective。Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education,33(2),143-154。  new window
9.Sadler, D. R.(1989)。Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems。Instructional Science,18(2),119-144。  new window
10.廖佩莉(20120300)。從香港中國語文科課程的目標和評估趨勢析論中文科教師給予學生的回饋。教育研究,215,122-133。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.廖佩莉(20130600)。香港中國語文教師對於給予學生「回饋」的認識與實施現況之研究。教育研究與發展期刊,9(2),65-89。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Callingham, R.(2008)。Dialogue and feedback: Assessment in the primary mathematics classroom。Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom,13(3),18-21。  new window
13.Hattie, J. A.(1987)。Identifying the salient facets of a model of student learning: a synthesis of meta-analyses。International Journal of Educational Research,11,187-212。  new window
14.Black, P.、Wiliam, D.(1998)。Assessment and Classroom Learning。Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice,5(1),7-74。  new window
圖書
1.Irons, Alastair(2008)。Enhancing Learning through Formative Assessment and Feedback。New York:Routledge。  new window
2.Wiggins, Grant(1999)。Feedback。Pennington, NJ:CLASS Publisher。  new window
3.Brown, G.、Ngan, M. Y.(2010)。Contemporary Educational Assessment。Hong Kong, China:Pearson。  new window
4.Johnson, P. H.(2004)。Choice words: How our language affects children's learning。Portland, ME:Stenhouse。  new window
5.香港課程發展議會(2002)。基礎教育指引--各盡所能,發展所長。香港:政府印務局。  延伸查詢new window
6.Bandura, A.、繆小春、李凌、井世洁、張小林(2003)。自我效能:控制的實施。上海:華東師範大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.譚愛梅(1990)。讀書教學提問技巧。香港:教育署語文教育學院。  延伸查詢new window
8.Black, P.、Wiliam, D.、教育署課程發展處(2002)。暗箱內探透過課堂評估提高學習水準。香港:香港特別行政區。  延伸查詢new window
9.課程發展議會、香港考試及評核局(2007)。中國語文課程及評估指引(中四至中六)。香港:政府物流服務署。  延伸查詢new window
10.Berry, R.(2008)。Assessment for learning。Hong Kong:Hong Kong University Press。  new window
11.Gallavan, Nancy. P.(2009)。Developing Performance-Based Assessment。Singapore:Thousand Oaks, CA:SAGE Asia-pacific Pvt. Ltd:Crown Press。  new window
12.Koopmans, M.(2009)。Feedback mastering the art of giving and receiving feedback。Zaltbomme, Netherlands:Singapore:Theme:Publisher of Schouten Global。  new window
13.Nightingale, P.、Te Wiata, I.、Toohey, S.、Ryan, G.、Hughes, C.、Magin, D.(1996)。Assessing learning in universities。Sydney, Australia:University of new South Wales。  new window
14.Vygotsky, Lev Semenovich、Cole, Michael、John-Steiner,‎ Vera、Scribner, Sylvia、Souberman, Ellen(1978)。Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes。Harvard University Press。  new window
15.羅耀珍(2008)。促進學習的評估。香港:香港大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.Black, Paul,William, Dylan(1999)。Assessment for Learning: Beyond the Black Box,Cambridge:London, England:University of Cambridge:Assessment Reform Group:GL Assessment。,http://www.assessment-reform-group.org.uk/AssessInsides.pdf,(pamphlet 371.26)。 2004/09/29。  new window
圖書論文
1.張壽洪(2013)。課堂提問的回饋:以語文科閱讀課為基礎的探索。深化語文教育改革的思考與實踐。南京:東南大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.鄺銳強(2010)。優化語文學習的課堂提問策略。優化語文學習的評估:理論與實踐。香港:香港教育學院中文學系。  延伸查詢new window
3.Hyland, K.、Hyland, F.(2006)。Context and issues in feedback on L2 writing: An introduction。Feedback in Second Language writing: context and issues。New York, NY:Cambridge University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關博士論文
 
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE