:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:從協力治理觀點探討國立大學自主治理試辦方案之執行
書刊名:教育研究與發展期刊
作者:陳盈宏
作者(外文):Chen, Ying-hong
出版日期:2015
卷期:11:3
頁次:頁31-54
主題關鍵詞:協力治理國立大學自主治理試辦方案論述聯盟Collaborative governanceNational university governance and autonomy pilot programDiscourse coalition
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:100
  • 點閱點閱:190
當前國際高等教育競爭激烈,為加速我國高等教育轉型及改革,教育部於2014 年 4 月函報行政院同意,正式核定及推出國立大學自主治理試辦方案,但於2014 年 12 月卻邁向政策終結的結果。由於國立大學自主治理試辦方案的核心精神合乎協力治理的多中心治理主體之理念,所以,可從協力治理觀點探討國立大學自主治理試辦方案的執行過程之相關議題。綜言之,本文採用論述取向的研究取徑,蒐集及分析國立大學自主治理試辦方案的相關文件資料,並從協力治理的初始條件、制度設計、領導型態及協力過程等面向,了解及掌握國立大學自主治理試辦方案在執行過程中不同論述聯盟的相關政策論述及互動結果,以釐清政策問題及提出相關建議,作為日後相關政策執行之參考。本研究發現,從協力治理觀點,國立大學自主治理試辦方案的政策執行過程中,由於不同論述聯盟的利害關係人間初始條件的不一致、政策領導型態的認知歧異、制度設計透明性及程序正義的質疑等,導致各利害關係人並未形成協力合作的關係及實踐,進而使國立大學自主治理試辦方案邁向政策終結的結果。
Current competition among international higher education institutions in Taiwan is intensive. In order to accelerate transformation and reformation of higher education, the Ministry of Education in April 2014 submitted to the Executive Yuan for approval a National University Governance and Autonomy Pilot Program. However, the policy came to termination in December 2014. Since the core spirit of National University Governance and Autonomy Pilot Program is consistent with the concept of multi-center collaborative governance, it is able to inspect related issues with regard to the promotion of National University Governance and Autonomy Pilot Program from collaborative governance perspective. In summary, this article adopts discourse-oriented research approach to collect and analyze related data related to National University Governance and Autonomy Pilot Program; furthermore, it also understands and monitors relevant policy discourse and interactive results of various discourse coalitions when promoting National University Governance and Autonomy Pilot Program through four dimensions of collaborative governance which initial conditions are: institutional design, leading type, and the collaborative process. The article aims to clarify policy problems and propose related suggestions, which could be a reference for future planning of related policies.
期刊論文
1.Booher, D. E.(2004)。Collaborative governance practices and democracy。National Civic Review,93(4),32-46。  new window
2.張源泉(20121200)。德國高等教育治理之改革動向。教育研究集刊,58(4),91-138。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Middlehurst, R.(2004)。Changing internal governance: A discussion of leadership roles and management structures in UK universities。Higher Education Quarterly,58(4),258-280。  new window
4.張奕華、劉文章(20120800)。教育正義的實踐觀點與個案分析。教育資料與研究,106,1-22。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.張建威、曾冠球(20131200)。協力治理觀點下影響臺北市長期照顧管理中心組織運作之因素。法政學報,25,119-149。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.葉志傑、謝傳崇(20131200)。國民中學校長關係領導、協力治理與關係績效之研究。新竹教育大學教育學報,30(2),101-137。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.劉秀曦(20131100)。西歐高等教育治理政策之變革:英國與法國經驗之探究。比較教育,75,49-74。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.謝卓君(20131200)。大學治理轉型與政府角色:荷蘭高等教育系統之個案研究。教育研究集刊,59(4),113-145。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Bryer, T. A.(2011)。Linking students with community in collaborative governance: A report on a service-learning class。Journal of Public Affairs Education,17(1),89-114。  new window
10.Morse, R. S.(2011)。The practice of collaborative governance。Public Administration Review,71(6),953-957。  new window
11.Purdy, J. M.、Jones, R. M.(2012)。A framework for assessing power in collaborative governance processes。Public Administration Review,72(3),409-417。  new window
12.曾冠球(20110100)。協力治理觀點下公共管理者的挑戰與能力建立。文官制度季刊,3(1),27-52。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Dill, D. D.(1998)。Evaluating the 'evaluative state': Implications for research in higher education。European Journal of Education,33(3),361-377。  new window
14.李長晏、林煥笙(20090600)。中央與地方協力夥伴關係之分析--以臺中縣潭子段旱溪整治工程為例。公共行政學報,31,49-100。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.Thomson, Ann Marie、Perry, James L.(2006)。Collaboration processes: Inside the black box。Public Administration Review,66(Suppl. 1),20-32。  new window
16.林子倫(20080900)。臺灣氣候變遷政策之論述分析。公共行政學報,28,153-175。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.Ansell, Chris、Gash, Alison(2008)。Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice。Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,18(4),543-571。  new window
學位論文
1.徐昌義(2010)。學校行銷正當性之論述分析(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Hajer, Maarten A.(1995)。The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process。Oxford, NY:Oxford University Press。  new window
2.Gayle D. J.、Tewarie B.、White, A. Q.(2003)。Governance in the twenty-first-century university: Approaches to effective leadership and strategic management: ASHE-ERIC higher education report。San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass。  new window
3.Phillips, Nelson、Hardy, Cynthia(2002)。Discourse Analysis: Investigating Processes of Social Construction。SAGE。  new window
4.Clark, Burton R.(1983)。The Higher Education System: Academic Organization in Cross-National Perspective。Berkeley, CA:University of California Press。  new window
5.Sullivan, Helen、Skelcher, Chris(2002)。Working Across Boundaries: Collaboration in Public Services。Palgrave Macmillan。  new window
6.Agranoff, Robert、McGuire, Michael(2003)。Collaborative Public Management: New Strategies for Local Governments。Georgetown University Press。  new window
7.Dryzek, John S.(2000)。Deliberative democracy and beyond: liberals, critics, contestations。Oxford University Press。  new window
其他
1.教育部(2014)。國立大學自主治理試辦方案,http://nuga.ncku.edu.tw/data/editor-upload/file/1030528s 1.pdf, 。  延伸查詢new window
2.教育部(2013)。教育部公布高等教育制度鬆綁行動方案,共提出46項鬆綁措施,該措施分為人事、經費、經營、人才、教學5大面向,http://www.edu.tw/pages/detail.aspx?Node=1088&Page=21574&wid=c0746986-1231-4472-abce-5c5396450ba9&Index=1。  延伸查詢new window
3.臺灣高等教育產業工會(20120525)。反對教育部執行之「大學自主治理方案」連署聲明,http://2012theunion.blogspot.tw/2012/05/blog-post_25.html。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Wetherell, M.(2001)。Part three: Mind, selves and sense making- editor's introduction。Discourse theory and practice: A reader。London, England:Sage。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE