:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:大學生基本素養測驗的發展及信度效度分析
書刊名:教育科學研究期刊
作者:陳柏熹 引用關係黃馨瑩陳郁欣葉泰廷蘇少祖
作者(外文):Chen, Po-hsiHuang, Hsin-yingChen, Yu-hsinYeh, Tai-tingSu, Shao-tsu
出版日期:2015
卷期:60:3
頁次:頁95-126
主題關鍵詞:信度效度素養評量情境式測驗線上測驗ReliabilityValidityLiteracy assessmentScenario based testOnline test
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(14) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:14
  • 共同引用共同引用:53
  • 點閱點閱:240
本研究目的旨在發展大學生基本素養測驗並進行信度與效度評估。藉由分析國內大專院校的通識教育目標和核心素養,並參考ATC21S提出的21世紀現代學生需具備的10項基本素養,歸納出大學生基本素養測驗的九項素養,分別為:溝通合作、美感素養、科學思辨、資訊素養、終身學習、創新領導、問題解決、公民社會及生涯發展。測驗形式為線上多媒體情境式題型,每個題本均包含九項素養的內容,每項素養皆有二至三個題組。研究對象為全國大專校院一至四年級學生,研究樣本來自20校10,958名大學生。由效度評估結果可知,大學生基本素養測驗的題組效果不大,可以忽略,並採用部分計分模式來估計,幾乎所有試題與模式都能適配,顯示建構效度良好。試題發展過程均歷經嚴謹修審題程序,取得良好專家效度證據。此外,不同性別和年級的學生在各素養的表現上差異不大,和過去的文獻相符合,具有良好的效標關聯效度。信度證據方面,各素養能力估計誤差約在 .20~ .60 logit之間,單一題本的信度高於 .69,顯示本測驗題數雖少,但信度大致良好。整體而言,大學生基本素養測驗具良好的信度與效度
This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the General Literacy Test for University Students. To develop the assessment framework, the educational objectives of general literacy courses of universities in Taiwan as well as the core competencies of Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills were all reviewed and considered. The general literacy test is composed of nine literacy domains: communication and collaboration, esthetics, information, lifelong learning, career, leadership, problem solving, social concerns and citizenship, and scientific thinking. The items of the general literacy test were developed into a multimedia assessment. In addition, booklets including two to three testlets on each of the nine literacy domains were organized. Overall, 10,958 students from 20 universities participated. The results demonstrated that testlet effect could be ignored and the partial credit model could be used to analyze data. In addition, the items fit the partial credit model closely and the test demonstrated favorable construct validity. In addition, small differences existed between gender and grades. The results were consistent with those of previous studies and showed that the test’s criterion-related validity was acceptable. Furthermore, the standard error of ability ranged from .20 to .60 logit and the reliabilities of the booklets were more than .69 in the nine literacy domains. The evidence supports the high degree of reliability and validity of basic literacy assessment
期刊論文
1.王保進(20110900)。以學生學習成效品質保證為核心之第二週期系所評鑑作業規範。評鑑雙月刊,33,7-11。  延伸查詢new window
2.McManus, I. C.、Furnham, A.(2006)。Aesthetic activities and aesthetic attitudes: Influences of education, background and personality on interest and involvement in the arts。British Journal of Psychology,97(4),555-587。  new window
3.Bock, R. D.、Mislevy, R. J.(1982)。Adaptive EAP estimation of ability in a microcomputer environment。Applied Psychological Measurement,6(4),431-444。  new window
4.Rottinghaus, P. J.、Day, S. X.、Borgen, F. H.(2005)。The Career Futures Inventory: A measure of career-related adaptability and optimism。Journal of Career Assessment,13(1),3-24。  new window
5.廖添富、黃景裕(19950600)。我國大學生公民態度之研究--樣本取自北部地區。公民訓育學報,4,109-127。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Liu, T.-T.、Sun, H.-B.(2012)。Gender differences on information literacy of science and engineering undergraduates。International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science,4(2),23-30。  new window
7.Ma, F.-C.、Ding, R.、Li, Z.-Z.(2009)。案例研究:武漢地區高校學生信息素養現狀分析。圖書情報知識,1,24-29。  延伸查詢new window
8.Masters, M. S.、Sanders, B.(1993)。Is the gender difference in mental rotation disappearing?。Behavior Genetics,23(4),337-341。  new window
9.Pope-Davis, D. B.、Twing, J. S.(1991)。The effects of age, gender, and experience on measures of attitude regarding computers。Computers in Human Behavior,7(4),333-339。  new window
10.Raju, N. S.、Price, L. R.、Oshima, T. C.、Nering, M. L.(2007)。Standardized conditional SEM: A case for conditional reliability。Applied Psychological Measurement,31(3),169-180。  new window
11.Rowland, K. D.(2004)。Career decision-making skills of high school students in the Bahamas。Journal of Career Development,31(1),1-13。  new window
12.Scott, B. P.(1998)。Just what in a competency?。Training Minneapolis,35(6),58-64。  new window
13.Yip, D.-Y.、Chiu, M.-M.、Ho, E. S.-C.(2004)。Hong Kong student achievement in OECD-PISA study: Gender differences in science content, literacy skills, and test item formats。International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,2(1),91-106。  new window
14.Wright, B. D.、Linacre, J. M.、Gustafson, J.-E.、Martin-Löf, P.(1994)。Reasonable mean-square fit values。Rasch Measurement Transactions,8(3),370-371。  new window
15.陳儀蓉、黃芳銘(20061200)。組織公民行為量表在男女員工群體上之測驗恆等性檢定。測驗學刊,53(2),297-325。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Wang, Wen-Chung、Wilson, Mark(2005)。The Rasch testlet model。Applied Psychological Measurement,29(2),126-149。  new window
17.Cohen, Jacob(1992)。A power primer。Psychological Bulletin,112(1),155-159。  new window
會議論文
1.Chen, P. H.、Kuo, J. W.、Sung, Y. T.(201107)。Influence of pre-test design on the precision of the parameters estimation in the multidimensional items bank。IMPS 2011, the 76rd Annual Meeting of the Psychometric Society。Hong Kong。  new window
2.Sypher, H. E.、Applegate, J. L.、Church, S. L.(198105)。Cognitive differentiation and verbal intelligence: Clarifying relationships。Annual conference of the International Communication Association。Minneapolis, MN。  new window
研究報告
1.林煥祥、劉聖忠、林素微、李暉(2008)。台灣參加PISA 2006成果報告 (計畫編號:NSC95-2522-S-026-002)。花蓮市:國立花蓮教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development(2007)。PISA 2006: Science Competencies for Tomorrow's World, Volume 2: Data/Données。Paris, France:Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development。  new window
2.陳柏熹(2011)。心理與教育測驗:測驗編製理論與實務。精策教育有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.Aiken, L. R.、Groth-Marnat, G.(2005)。Psychological testing and assessment。Boston, MA:Pearson Education。  new window
4.Schmidt, W. H.、Raizen, S. A.、Britton, E. D.、Bianchi, L. J.、Wolfe, R. G.(1997)。Many visions, many aims: A cross-national investigation of curricular intentions in school science。Dordrecht, the Netherlands:Kluwer Academic。  new window
5.Verderber, R. F.、Verderber, K. S.(1995)。Inter-act: Using interpersonal communication skills/voices: A selection of multicultural readings。Belmont, CA:Wadsworth。  new window
6.Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development(2007)。PISA 2006--Science competencies for tomorrow's world: Volume 1: Analysis。Paris, France:Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development。  new window
7.Rasch, G.(1960)。Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests。Copenhagen:The Danish Institute of Educational Research。  new window
8.Cohen, J.(1988)。Statistical power and analysis for the behavioral sciences。Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
9.Gardner, H.(1983)。Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences。NY:Random House。  new window
10.郭生玉(2012)。心理與教育研究法--量化、質性與混合研究方法。臺北市:精華書局。  延伸查詢new window
11.Holland, J. L.(1973)。Making Vocational Choices: A Theory of Careers。Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall。  new window
其他
1.國立臺灣師範大學雲端測驗中心(2014)。大學生基本素養指導手冊,http://140.122.69.221/ntnucit/index.php/services-mainnav/testing-of-students-literacy-mainnav。  延伸查詢new window
2.國家教育研究院(2014)。教育部提升國民素養專案辦公室,http://literacytw.naer.edu.tw/index.php?REFDOCID=0m8mptc3ioz0a9z8。  延伸查詢new window
3.(2010)。21st century skills white pape,http://atc21s.org/index.php/resources/white-papers/。  new window
4.European Association for Quality Assurance(2009)。The Bologna process 2020--The European higher education area in the new decade,http://www.enqa.eu/files/Leuven_Louvain-la-Neuve_ Communique_ April_2009.pdf。  new window
5.European Association for Quality Assurance(2009)。ENQA position paper on quality assurance in the EHEA--In view of the leuven and louvainla-neuve meeting of ministers responsible for higher education of 28-29 April 2009,http://www.enqa.eu/files/ENQA_position_ paper%20(3).pdf, 。  new window
圖書論文
1.Birnbaum, A. L.(1968)。Some latent trait models and their use in inferring an examinee's ability。Statistical theories of mental test scores。Addison-Wesley Publishing Company。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE