臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：以網路論證系統探究學生批判思考能力與論證歷程檔案之研究
書刊名：全球商業經營管理學報
作者：蔡俊彥／施文玲
出版日期：2012
卷期：4
頁次：頁13-23
主題關鍵詞：網路論證系統；論證；歷程檔案；批判思考能力；Argumentation；Critical thinking skill；Online argumentation system；Portfolio
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:54
  • 點閱點閱:207
本研究旨在使用網路論證系統探討學生論證歷程檔案，研究對象為國小五年級學生60位。依據資料的性質採用量化統計分析的方式，進行學生論證歷程檔案的綜合分析。研究結果顯示：學生在論證活動中使用的提示策略，在論證模式的五個元素中以「論據」使用次數最多；批判思考能力愈低之學生使用提示策略次數愈高；低批判思考能力學生除了在使用提示策略的總數高於高批判思考能力學生之外，亦在元素「主張」及「論據」使用提示策略的次數高於高批判思考能力學生。最後，本研究依據研究結果提出在論證研究及科學教學上的若干建議。
This study investigated students’ argumentation portfolios by using an online argumentation system. Sixty fifth grade students took part in this study. Quantitative analyses were used to evaluate students’ argumentation portfolios. The results showed that students used ‘warrant’ prompt in the argumentation model the most during the argumentation activities. Those students having lower critical thinking skills tended to use more prompts. Those students having lower critical thinking skills used more prompts totally than those having higher critical thinking skills. In addition, those students having lower critical thinking skills used more ‘claim’ and ‘warrant’ prompts than those having higher critical thinking skills. Finally, suggestions for argumentation research and science instruction were also proposed.
期刊論文
1.Simon, S.、Osborne, J.、Erduran, S.(2004)。TAPping into Argumentation: Developments in the Application of Toulmin's Argument Pattern for Studying Science Discourse。Science Education，88(6)，915-933。  new window
2.Clark, D. B.、Sampson, V.(2008)。Assessing dialogic argumentation in online environments to relate structure, grounds, and conceptual quality。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，45(3)，293-321。  new window
3.Zohar, A.、Nemet, F.(2002)。Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，39(1)，35-62。  new window
4.Chang, C. C.、Tseng, K. H.(2009)。Use and performances of web-based portfolio assessment。British Journal of Educational Technology，40(2)，358-370。  new window
5.Joiner, R.、Jones, S.(2003)。The Effects of Communication Medium on Argumentation and the Development of Critical Thinking。International Journal of Educational Research，39，861-871。  new window
6.林宗進、林樹聲、陳映均(20100600)。大學生對基因改造作物議題的認知與論證能力之研究。科學教育學刊，18(3)，229-252。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Clark, D. B.、Sampson, V. D.(2009)。The impact of collaboration on the outcomes of scientific argumentation。Science Education，93(3)，448-484。  new window
8.Glassner, A.、Weinstock, M.、Neuman, Y.(2005)。Pupils€™ evaluation and generation of evidence and explanation in argumentation。British Journal of Educational Psychology，75，105-118。  new window
9.Nussbaum, E. M.(2002)。Scaffolding argumentation in the social studies classroom。Social Studies，93(3)，79-83。  new window
10.Osborne, J.、Erduran, S.、Simon, S.(2004)。Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，41(10)，994-1020。  new window
11.Sanders, J. A.、Wiseman, R. L.、Gass, R. H.(1994)。Does teaching argumentation facilitate critical thinking?。Communication Reports，7(1)，27-35。  new window
12.Yeh, S. S.(2001)。Tests worth teaching to: Constructing state-mandated tests that emphasize critical thinking。Educational Researcher，30(9)，12-17。  new window
13.Bell, P.、Linn, M. C.(2000)。Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: Designing for learning from the web with KIE。International Journal of Science Education，22(8)，797-817。  new window
14.Ennis, R. H.(1985)。A logical basis for measuring critical thinking。Educational Leadership，43(2)，44-48。  new window
15.Erduran, S.、Osborne, J.、Simon, S.(2006)。Learning to Teach Argumentation: Research and Development in the Science Classroom。International Journal of Science Education，28(2/3)，235-260。  new window
16.Zimmerman, C.(2000)。The development of scientific reasoning skills。Developmental Review，20(1)，99-149。  new window
17.洪振方、林志能(20110600)。網路與課室學習環境促進學童論證能力之效益。教育實踐與研究，24(1)，67-106。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.Sandoval, W. A.、Millwood, K. A.(2005)。The quality of students' use of evidence in written scientific explanations。Cognition and Instruction，23(1)，23-55。  new window
19.葉玉珠、葉碧玲、謝佳蓁(20000100)。「中小學批判思考技巧測驗」之發展。測驗年刊，47(1)，27-46。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.Sampson, V. D.、Clark, D. B.(2007)。Personally-seeded Discussions to Scaffold Online Argumentation。International Journal of Science Education，29(3)，253-277。  new window
21.Duschl, R. A.、Osborne, J.(2002)。Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education。Studies in Science Education，38(1)，39-72。  new window
22.Nussbaum, E. M.、Sinatra, G. M.(2003)。Argument and conceptual engagement。Contemporary Educational Psychology，28(3)，384-395。  new window
23.Tytler, R.、Gott, R.、Duggan, S.(2001)。Dimensions of evidence, the public understanding of science and science education。International Journal of Science Education，23(8)，815-832。  new window
會議論文
1.Tsai, C. Y.、Huang, T. C.、Yang, J. T.(2008)。Improving the quality of argument scaffolded by Toulmin Argumentation System。The Conference of Asian Science Education。Koahsiung, Taiwan.。  new window
2.Sampson, V. D.、Clark, D. B.(2005)。Analyzing the Quality of Argumentation Supported by Personally-seeded Discussions。2005 Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Learning 2005: The Next 10 Years!。  new window
學位論文
1.丁信中(2004)。青年學生於理論競爭論證過程中對其支持理論侷限的覺察(博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.張淑女(2004)。從認識論的觀點探究大學生論證思考之能力與模式(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.曾江合(2003)。網路化個人及團體學習歷程檔案系統之建置與評估(碩士論文)。國立交通大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.蔡俊彥(2009)。以認知學徒制網路論證系統促進論證能力、概念學習與批判思考成效之研究(博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.洪振方(1994)。從孔恩異例的認知與論證探討科學知識的重建(博士論文)。國立師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.林朝敏(2004)。網路學習歷程檔案系統中提供自動化工作日誌支援同儕互評之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺南大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Wray, D.、Lewis, M.(1997)。Extending Literacy: Children Reading and Writing Non-fiction。London：Routledge。  new window
2.葉玉珠(2003)。思考測驗--第一級(CTTI)。臺北市：心理。  延伸查詢new window
3.Toulmin, Stephen Edelston(1958)。The Uses of Argument。Cambridge University Press。  new window
4.Osborne, J.、Erduran, S.、Simon, S.(2003)。Ideas, evidence and argument in science: Teacher training pack。Nuffield, UK：Nuffield Foundation。  new window
其他
1.創意群(2010)。傳統Web與AJAX 的比較，http://www.dotweb.com.tw/onweb.jspwebno=3333333335&webitem_no=223， 2010/08/28。  new window
圖書論文
1.Collins, A.、Brown, J. S.、Newman, S. E.(1989)。Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics and science。Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Bobert Glaser。Hillsdale, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：455（臺灣：447，外國：8） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2541260 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68353602
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上