:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:我國酒駕再犯行為具體防制策略之謅議--以美國阿拉斯加州酒駕再犯治療法庭為例
書刊名:交通學報
作者:吳吉裕 引用關係許華孚 引用關係
作者(外文):Wu, Chi-yuHsu, Hua-fu
出版日期:2015
卷期:15:2
頁次:頁165-189
主題關鍵詞:酒駕再犯治療法庭情境預防Drunk driving recidivismTreatment courtsCrime prevention through environmental design
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:359
  • 點閱點閱:13
政府目前對於酒駕防制工作主要以「提高懲罰」、「強化執法」以及「擴大宣導」為其三大政策主軸。鑑於近年來酒駕行為和酒駕肇事死亡案件居高不下,特別是占有極高比重的「酒駕再犯」防制工作,似乎又被執法當局所忽略,讓長久以來的防制工作始終無法獲得具體成效,政策與執行均須面臨重新思考與調整。本文除逐一評估現行「酒駕再犯」防制的問題癥結,更介紹國外對酒駕再犯預防的現行作法,同時針對美國阿拉斯加州「酒駕及毒品施用重罪法院」預防方案作一深入而完整介紹。最後作者以嶄新思維,渠引犯罪學「情境預防」概念及阿拉斯加州「治療法庭」作法,試圖針對「酒駕再犯」行為,提出「情境預防」與「戒治預防」的二元預防策略架構。希冀藉由行為人與環境控制的交互運作,落實酒駕再犯行為的監控與治療,達到標本兼治、有效降低酒駕行為的最終目標。
Current government work on prevention of drunk driving mainly includes “enhanced punishment”, “strengthened law enforcement”, and “extensive education.” Given the fact that the number of drunk driving cases and death caused by drunk driving remains high, and prevention of drunk driving recidivism appears to be deliberately ignored by the law enforcement authorities, thus it is critical to re-examine the current policy and execution. This article first evaluated recent issues on the prevention of drunk driving recidivism in Taiwan and followed by an introduction of the current practices on drunk driving recidivism prevention using the Felony DUI court in the state of Alaska, U.S.A.. Lastly, drawing upon both the notion of “situational prevention” from criminology and the practice of the “Therapeutic Court” in the State of Alaska, U.S.A., this study proposed two-folded prevention strategy framework, including “situational prevention” and “physical strategy prevention.” It is hoped that through a more thorough program with more control over the offenders and environment, we would be able to monitor and treat drunk driving recidivism more effectively.
期刊論文
1.陳四信(2014)。提升機關政策執行力之探討--以政府防制酒後駕車為例。T&D飛訊,199,1-28。  延伸查詢new window
2.張夢麟、王芳美(2012)。世界各國防制酒後駕車作法。警光雜誌,675,1-4。  延伸查詢new window
3.張文菘(2013)。防制酒駕之探討專論。警專論壇,7,2-12。  延伸查詢new window
4.Cams , T. W.(2005)。Therapeutic Justice in Action: An Evaluation of Three Therapeutic Courts。Alaska Justice Forum,22(1),809-822。  new window
學位論文
1.王邦安(2008)。酒醉駕車決意歷程與預防對策之研究--以高雄地區為例(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.黃富源、范國勇、張平吾(2012)。犯罪學概論。台北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.Alaska Judicial Council(2005)。Evaluation of the Outcomes in Three Therapeutic Courts。Anchorage, Alaska。  new window
3.許春金(2010)。犯罪學。臺北市:許春金出版 : 三民書局總經銷。  延伸查詢new window
4.蔡德輝、楊士隆(20190000)。犯罪學。臺北:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.内政部統計通報(2014)。102年警察機關交通執法概況,http://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/news_content.aspx?sn=8078, 2015/01/25。  延伸查詢new window
2.法務部(2013)。102年矯正統計短文專題分析--酒駕案件偵結情形與被告犯次統計分析,http://www.ksa.nkflist.edu.tw/ezfiles/2/1002/img/325/Humanrightslaw_l 02 102.12.pdf, 2015/01/25。  延伸查詢new window
3.Alaska Therapeutic Courts(2010)。Anchorage Wellness Felony DUI Court,http://courts.alaska.gov/forms/pub-110.pdf., 2015/05/02。  new window
4.Kuo X. X.,Mandelis, A.,Liu, Y. J.,Chen, B.,Zhou, Q.,Comeau, F.(2014)。Noninvasive in-vehicle Alcohol Detection with Wavelength-modulated Differential Photothermal Radiometry,http:// http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4102367/, 2014/06/18。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE