:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:稅捐規避行為可罰性之探討
書刊名:國立中正大學法學集刊
作者:林其玄
作者(外文):Lin, Chi-hsuan
出版日期:2016
卷期:50
頁次:頁1-52
主題關鍵詞:稅捐規劃稅捐規避節稅逃漏稅處罰實質課稅Tax planningTax avoidanceTax evasionPenaltySubstance-over-formEconomic substance
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:163
  • 點閱點閱:30
期刊論文
1.葛克昌(20120300)。稅捐罰與憲法解釋。月旦法學,202,114-139。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.柯格鐘(20121000)。稅捐規避行為啟動實質課稅原則判斷之時機--以實務上躉繳保險費為例。當代財政,22,9-22。  延伸查詢new window
3.柯格鐘(20120501)。實質課稅原則與其在稅捐程序法中之運用--兼論稅捐稽徵法第12條之1的增訂。臺灣法學雜誌,199,121-163。  延伸查詢new window
4.李惠宗(20120501)。實質課稅可以作為逃漏稅之證據嗎?--兼論實質課稅適用上的界限。臺灣法學雜誌,199,86-95。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳清秀(20130700)。實質課稅原則之適用界限。東吳公法論叢,6,159-218。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.吳德華(20120900)。美國經濟實質原則成文法化對稅務實務影響之探討。高大法學論叢,8(1),173-177+179-216。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Cantu, Charles E.(2003)。Distinguishing the Concept of Strict Liability in Tort from Strict Products Liability: Medusa Unveiled。U. Mem. L. Rev.,33,823-881。  new window
8.Case, Kevin(2006)。Tanks in the Streets: Suvs, Design Defects, and Ultrahazardous Strict Liability。Chi.-Kent L. Rev.,81,149-197。  new window
9.Christopher, Russell L.、Christopher, Kathryn H.(2012)。The Paradox of Statutory Rape。Ind. L. J.,87,505-549。  new window
10.Fisher, Jasmine M.(2014)。Fairer Shores: Tax Havens, Tax Avoidance, and Corporate Social Responsibility。B. U. L. Rev.,94,337-365。  new window
11.Griffith, J. Leigh(2012)。40 Percent Strict Liability Penalty: What Tax and Transaction Attorneys Need to Know。Tenn. B. J.,48,18-23。  new window
12.Luke, Charlene(2011)。What Would Henry Simons Do?: Using an Ideal to Shape and Explain the Economic Substance Doctrine。Hous. Bus. and Tax L. J.,11,108-172。  new window
13.Palmer, Vernon(1988)。A General Theory of the Inner Structure of Strict Liability: Common Law, Civil Law, and Comparative Law。Length. L. Rev.,62,1303-1355。  new window
14.Rector, Jeff(2004)。A Review of the Economic Substance Doctrine。Stan. J. L. Bus. and Fin.,10,173-189。  new window
15.Sancilio, Philip(2013)。Clarifying (Or Is It Codifying?) The “Notably Abstruse”: Step Transactions, Economic Substance, and the Tax Code。Colum. L. Rev.,113,138-180。  new window
16.Thomas, Kathleen DeLaney(2011)。The Case Against a Strict Liability Economic Substance Penalty。University of Pennsylvania Journal of Business Law,13,445-497。  new window
17.Wells, Bret(2010)。Economic Substance Doctrine: How Codification Changes Decided Cases。Florida Tax Review,10(6),411-457。  new window
18.Likhovski, Assaf(2004)。The Duke and the Lady: Helvering v. Gregory and the History of Tax Avoidance Adjudication。Cardozo Law Review,25,953-1018。  new window
研究報告
1.柯格鐘(2008)。稅捐規避案件中補稅與裁罰問題之研究報告書。司法院。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.黃茂榮(2002)。稅法總論。台北:植根。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.陳清秀(2006)。稅法總論。臺北:元照出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.葛克昌(1999)。所得稅與憲法。翰蘆圖書出版有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.黃俊杰(200609)。稅捐基本權。台北:元照出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳清秀(200110)。稅法總論。台北:翰蘆圖書:陳清秀。  延伸查詢new window
6.黃源浩(2012)。稅法學說與判例研究。翰蘆。  延伸查詢new window
7.葛克昌(199707)。國家學與國家法。月旦。  延伸查詢new window
8.吳庚(2004)。憲法的解釋與適用。臺北:吳庚。  延伸查詢new window
9.葛克昌(2005)。行政程序與納稅人基本權。翰蘆圖書出版有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.陳清秀(2014)。稅法總論。元照。  延伸查詢new window
單篇論文
1.陳清秀(2015)。稅捐規避與處罰,http://www.npf.org.tw/post/2/7773, 2015/04/12。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE